Your response contains serious allegations, but it does not provide any verifiable evidence to support them.
First, my previous disputes with other bookmakers were not related to match-fixing, fraud, or manipulated tennis matches. Those accounts were restricted because I was considered a winning player or because of alleged arbitrage activity. In every previous case, the bookmaker returned at least my original deposit because they had no evidence that the funds themselves were connected to fraud.
EarnBet has acted very differently. You have not only confiscated the disputed winnings, but also my original deposited funds. This is the central issue you continue to avoid.
Regarding the tennis bets, I completely reject the allegation that any match or betting activity involved fraud or manipulation. You are free to publish the full betting history, including the matches, markets, odds, bet times and settlement details. I have nothing to hide. General phrases such as “suspicious betting patterns” are not evidence of cheating.
I also reject the allegation that I operated four active accounts. While I was betting with the account in question, I did not have another active account with a usable balance. A blockchain connection alone does not prove that multiple accounts were controlled by the same person. Funds can pass through exchanges, payment services, shared wallets, intermediaries or third parties. If you claim that all four accounts belonged to me, publish the specific evidence showing common ownership and control—not merely that some transactions were connected on-chain.
You also refer to my edited Bitcointalk post as though editing one sentence somehow proves fraud. I edited it only to prevent the discussion from being misunderstood or diverted toward unrelated disputes with other bookmakers. The original sentence did not admit cheating, multi-accounting or match manipulation. Using a routine edit as a major part of your defence only demonstrates how weak the underlying evidence is.
For transparency, please answer these questions directly:
Which exact bets were allegedly fraudulent?
What specific betting pattern proves fraud rather than simply successful betting?
What evidence proves that I personally owned and controlled all four accounts?
Were the accounts used at the same time, from the same device, IP address or identity documents?
Why was my original deposit confiscated instead of being returned?
Which exact wording in Section 6 authorizes EarnBet to confiscate legitimate deposited funds without publishing evidence of fraud?
Other bookmakers that no longer wished to accept my bets at least returned my deposit and clearly stated that they did not want my future business. EarnBet instead relies on vague accusations, refuses to disclose the evidence and confiscates both winnings and deposited funds.
I am not asking anyone to accept my word blindly. I am asking EarnBet to provide concrete, independently verifiable evidence. Until that evidence is published, the public should distinguish between a proven fraud case and a bookmaker making broad allegations after a customer wins.
Return my winnings or original deposit and publish the complete evidence supporting your accusations.
You've literally contributed nothing to this community and while that is not a prerequisite for help if you are mistreated, your very limited post history is only filled with scam accusations against various casinos and bookmakers. If someone gets treated badly by one casino or bookmaker, maybe the gambling site is the problem. When they seem to run into a problem with every gambling site they used, maybe it is the player that is the problem. Somebody writing out an essay like that suggests that they know they are trying to play (and possibly abuse) the rules. Not sure you're going to find much sympathy here, even though it would be right for earnbet to refund your original deposit - unless there is a deeper story here to explain, like you've ripped them off previously with multi accounts. I'm quoting your post because it looks like you edit stuff when called out on it.
The fact that you think you can pick which terms you want to follow or bend them to fit your narrative is quite telling. The terms state you may not have multiple accounts. It does not refer to "active" or "not having funds" in the account. There are reasons for this, like stopping people from taking the welcome bonuses multiple times which are only intended once per player. The wording you use in responses looks very much like you're trying to weave a path through the terms and conditions that doesn't show you breaking them.
You keep bringing up the fact that I had issues with other bookmakers, but you continue to ignore the actual facts.
First of all, I have never claimed or received a single welcome bonus from any bookmaker. The suggestion that I operated multiple accounts to abuse promotions makes no sense because there was never any bonus to abuse in the first place.
Secondly, the allegation that my tennis bets were somehow fraudulent is completely false. These were simply bets on ATP Challenger tournaments, placed on major matches that were publicly available to every customer. Some people may consider me lucky, while others may simply think I am a successful tennis bettor. Neither of those is evidence of fraud.
What I cannot accept is having all of my money confiscated based on vague accusations without any verifiable evidence. Inventing a justification after the fact and seizing both my winnings and my original deposit only demonstrates bad faith on the part of the bookmaker.
You also continue to use my original statement about having been restricted by other bookmakers as if it somehow proves wrongdoing. That is a misleading argument. I had disputes with several bookmakers because they no longer wanted to accept my action as a winning customer and chose to end the business relationship for various reasons. That does not mean I cheated, manipulated matches, or committed fraud.
Most importantly, none of those bookmakers confiscated my original deposit. They simply decided they no longer wanted my business and returned my funds. EarnBet is the only operator that has gone far beyond that by confiscating not only disputed winnings but also my legitimate deposited funds without presenting concrete evidence.
If a bookmaker genuinely believes a customer has violated its terms, it should communicate that openly, explain the evidence, and handle the matter professionally. Instead, EarnBet chose to confiscate my funds without meaningful explanation. When a company behaves this way, I have every right to challenge its actions publicly and ask for transparency.
I am still asking the same simple question: Where is the evidence? If the accusations are true, publish the evidence. If you cannot produce it, then my original deposit—and any funds that cannot be proven to be connected to wrongdoing—should be returned.
