🔥 EarnBet.io | No KYC Casino | 62.5% Rakeback • Highest Rebate 💎

[Fortify]

If they don't like any winning accounts and you never broke any rules, then the worst-case scenario would be to limit your bets. I don't think they would take your funds just like that.
Something must have triggered this, and I think the best way to know is to take them on with the licensing body or arbitrators.

I remember about another casino, Duelbits, that prohibited some users in their casino tournaments. Likely because these users won many tournaments and the casino no longer wanted to allow them joining, like they felt something wrong, or they wanted to give opportunities to other users. It's not like they banned those users on their casino completely, just restrictions on tournaments.

In life, I read that some casinos prohibit a famous poker player to come to their casinos and play, and there are reasons for that. About @peleasd, likely there are reasons too but if he felt not safe to store money and play in EarnBet, he can move, of course after withdrawing his fund from the platform. It's personal feeling, experience and choice, while other gamblers can stay as Earnbet is a good casino with good reputation.

I read the scam accusation and there does seem to be inconsistencies, or rather.. key information that may look unfavorable on the player seems to be left out. Someone mentioned an edited post where they'd been banned at other bookmakers before and it seems like they are presenting information very selectively. While I agree that the original deposit amount should be returned to the player out of fairness if they don't want to do business with them, I don't think that they should be allowed to take any profits away. Looking at the odds of bets being placed, it looks like arbitrage "matched betting" which is turned away at most sportbooks. This player mentions having "no active multiple accounts" in the scam accusation, which could just be unfortunate wording but could also suggest they skirt around rules to take advantage of bookmakers. Diving straight into the scam accusation with this sketchy story seems like they're trying to extort or blackmail their way out, which I cannot see working.

[Cryptomultiplier]

Hello everyone ! Earnbet is not paying my winnings . i've deposited 3331 TRX and after 3 tennis bets i wanted to withdraw my all funds ( 5977 TRX) . i see my withdraw request marked as error and my funds are not either in my acc or in my wallet.  If you don't want me to bet in your casino you may void my bets i can understand but even stealing my deposit amount it's too much. I didn't do anything wrong my tennis bets were fair. id: Lilayo .

Am not on the technical board of Earnbet, but I can do my best to direct you on the best route to take that may help you get somewhere.

Firstly, check your public address on Tronscan to see the latest inbound transactions, if you see a failed transaction, copy the ID as a proof your transaction failed on the Blockchain. If you didn't see any transaction at all, it was an internal server error.

Next is to contact support via live chat or through email while providing your account ID, the exact amount, the timestamp of the withdrawal, a screenshot of the error status page, while stating clearly what happened and ask for a reset or manual processing of your payout.

You can also check the community channels on telegram or discord to see if such issues were already escalated.

Please also be careful not to give out your password or private keys to anyone on these channels as official admin only need your username to search it up on the database log.

Since they said you already contravene section 6, i wonder what that is, but still try to get a reasonable explanation or do a critical personal research as to what you did wrong to have such issues.

[peleasd]

Your response contains serious allegations, but it does not provide any verifiable evidence to support them.
First, my previous disputes with other bookmakers were not related to match-fixing, fraud, or manipulated tennis matches. Those accounts were restricted because I was considered a winning player or because of alleged arbitrage activity. In every previous case, the bookmaker returned at least my original deposit because they had no evidence that the funds themselves were connected to fraud.
EarnBet has acted very differently. You have not only confiscated the disputed winnings, but also my original deposited funds. This is the central issue you continue to avoid.
Regarding the tennis bets, I completely reject the allegation that any match or betting activity involved fraud or manipulation. You are free to publish the full betting history, including the matches, markets, odds, bet times and settlement details. I have nothing to hide. General phrases such as “suspicious betting patterns” are not evidence of cheating.
I also reject the allegation that I operated four active accounts. While I was betting with the account in question, I did not have another active account with a usable balance. A blockchain connection alone does not prove that multiple accounts were controlled by the same person. Funds can pass through exchanges, payment services, shared wallets, intermediaries or third parties. If you claim that all four accounts belonged to me, publish the specific evidence showing common ownership and control—not merely that some transactions were connected on-chain.
You also refer to my edited Bitcointalk post as though editing one sentence somehow proves fraud. I edited it only to prevent the discussion from being misunderstood or diverted toward unrelated disputes with other bookmakers. The original sentence did not admit cheating, multi-accounting or match manipulation. Using a routine edit as a major part of your defence only demonstrates how weak the underlying evidence is.
For transparency, please answer these questions directly:
Which exact bets were allegedly fraudulent?
What specific betting pattern proves fraud rather than simply successful betting?
What evidence proves that I personally owned and controlled all four accounts?
Were the accounts used at the same time, from the same device, IP address or identity documents?
Why was my original deposit confiscated instead of being returned?
Which exact wording in Section 6 authorizes EarnBet to confiscate legitimate deposited funds without publishing evidence of fraud?
Other bookmakers that no longer wished to accept my bets at least returned my deposit and clearly stated that they did not want my future business. EarnBet instead relies on vague accusations, refuses to disclose the evidence and confiscates both winnings and deposited funds.
I am not asking anyone to accept my word blindly. I am asking EarnBet to provide concrete, independently verifiable evidence. Until that evidence is published, the public should distinguish between a proven fraud case and a bookmaker making broad allegations after a customer wins.
Return my winnings or original deposit and publish the complete evidence supporting your accusations.

[Fortify]

Your response contains serious allegations, but it does not provide any verifiable evidence to support them.
First, my previous disputes with other bookmakers were not related to match-fixing, fraud, or manipulated tennis matches. Those accounts were restricted because I was considered a winning player or because of alleged arbitrage activity. In every previous case, the bookmaker returned at least my original deposit because they had no evidence that the funds themselves were connected to fraud.
EarnBet has acted very differently. You have not only confiscated the disputed winnings, but also my original deposited funds. This is the central issue you continue to avoid.
Regarding the tennis bets, I completely reject the allegation that any match or betting activity involved fraud or manipulation. You are free to publish the full betting history, including the matches, markets, odds, bet times and settlement details. I have nothing to hide. General phrases such as “suspicious betting patterns” are not evidence of cheating.
I also reject the allegation that I operated four active accounts. While I was betting with the account in question, I did not have another active account with a usable balance. A blockchain connection alone does not prove that multiple accounts were controlled by the same person. Funds can pass through exchanges, payment services, shared wallets, intermediaries or third parties. If you claim that all four accounts belonged to me, publish the specific evidence showing common ownership and control—not merely that some transactions were connected on-chain.
You also refer to my edited Bitcointalk post as though editing one sentence somehow proves fraud. I edited it only to prevent the discussion from being misunderstood or diverted toward unrelated disputes with other bookmakers. The original sentence did not admit cheating, multi-accounting or match manipulation. Using a routine edit as a major part of your defence only demonstrates how weak the underlying evidence is.
For transparency, please answer these questions directly:
Which exact bets were allegedly fraudulent?
What specific betting pattern proves fraud rather than simply successful betting?
What evidence proves that I personally owned and controlled all four accounts?
Were the accounts used at the same time, from the same device, IP address or identity documents?
Why was my original deposit confiscated instead of being returned?
Which exact wording in Section 6 authorizes EarnBet to confiscate legitimate deposited funds without publishing evidence of fraud?
Other bookmakers that no longer wished to accept my bets at least returned my deposit and clearly stated that they did not want my future business. EarnBet instead relies on vague accusations, refuses to disclose the evidence and confiscates both winnings and deposited funds.
I am not asking anyone to accept my word blindly. I am asking EarnBet to provide concrete, independently verifiable evidence. Until that evidence is published, the public should distinguish between a proven fraud case and a bookmaker making broad allegations after a customer wins.
Return my winnings or original deposit and publish the complete evidence supporting your accusations.

You've literally contributed nothing to this community and while that is not a prerequisite for help if you are mistreated, your very limited post history is only filled with scam accusations against various casinos and bookmakers. If someone gets treated badly by one casino or bookmaker, maybe the gambling site is the problem. When they seem to run into a problem with every gambling site they used, maybe it is the player that is the problem. Somebody writing out an essay like that suggests that they know they are trying to play (and possibly abuse) the rules. Not sure you're going to find much sympathy here, even though it would be right for earnbet to refund your original deposit - unless there is a deeper story here to explain, like you've ripped them off previously with multi accounts. I'm quoting your post because it looks like you edit stuff when called out on it.

The fact that you think you can pick which terms you want to follow or bend them to fit your narrative is quite telling. The terms state you may not have multiple accounts. It does not refer to "active" or "not having funds" in the account. There are reasons for this, like stopping people from taking the welcome bonuses multiple times which are only intended once per player. The wording you use in responses looks very much like you're trying to weave a path through the terms and conditions that doesn't show you breaking them.

[SquirrelJulietGarden]

I read the scam accusation and there does seem to be inconsistencies, or rather.. key information that may look unfavorable on the player seems to be left out.

At least, with the specific user @peleasd, there is a scam accusation thread and EarnBet team replied there already. With that reply about the case and the user post history, I don't feel good about the user.

@peleasd can continue in that thread rather than here because it's more easily to follow up a case only at one place.

your very limited post history is only filled with scam accusations against various casinos and bookmakers. If someone gets treated badly by one casino or bookmaker, maybe the gambling site is the problem.

It's not a good signal about a gambler but I surely don't conclude anything about the user.

[peleasd]

Your response contains serious allegations, but it does not provide any verifiable evidence to support them.
First, my previous disputes with other bookmakers were not related to match-fixing, fraud, or manipulated tennis matches. Those accounts were restricted because I was considered a winning player or because of alleged arbitrage activity. In every previous case, the bookmaker returned at least my original deposit because they had no evidence that the funds themselves were connected to fraud.
EarnBet has acted very differently. You have not only confiscated the disputed winnings, but also my original deposited funds. This is the central issue you continue to avoid.
Regarding the tennis bets, I completely reject the allegation that any match or betting activity involved fraud or manipulation. You are free to publish the full betting history, including the matches, markets, odds, bet times and settlement details. I have nothing to hide. General phrases such as “suspicious betting patterns” are not evidence of cheating.
I also reject the allegation that I operated four active accounts. While I was betting with the account in question, I did not have another active account with a usable balance. A blockchain connection alone does not prove that multiple accounts were controlled by the same person. Funds can pass through exchanges, payment services, shared wallets, intermediaries or third parties. If you claim that all four accounts belonged to me, publish the specific evidence showing common ownership and control—not merely that some transactions were connected on-chain.
You also refer to my edited Bitcointalk post as though editing one sentence somehow proves fraud. I edited it only to prevent the discussion from being misunderstood or diverted toward unrelated disputes with other bookmakers. The original sentence did not admit cheating, multi-accounting or match manipulation. Using a routine edit as a major part of your defence only demonstrates how weak the underlying evidence is.
For transparency, please answer these questions directly:
Which exact bets were allegedly fraudulent?
What specific betting pattern proves fraud rather than simply successful betting?
What evidence proves that I personally owned and controlled all four accounts?
Were the accounts used at the same time, from the same device, IP address or identity documents?
Why was my original deposit confiscated instead of being returned?
Which exact wording in Section 6 authorizes EarnBet to confiscate legitimate deposited funds without publishing evidence of fraud?
Other bookmakers that no longer wished to accept my bets at least returned my deposit and clearly stated that they did not want my future business. EarnBet instead relies on vague accusations, refuses to disclose the evidence and confiscates both winnings and deposited funds.
I am not asking anyone to accept my word blindly. I am asking EarnBet to provide concrete, independently verifiable evidence. Until that evidence is published, the public should distinguish between a proven fraud case and a bookmaker making broad allegations after a customer wins.
Return my winnings or original deposit and publish the complete evidence supporting your accusations.

You've literally contributed nothing to this community and while that is not a prerequisite for help if you are mistreated, your very limited post history is only filled with scam accusations against various casinos and bookmakers. If someone gets treated badly by one casino or bookmaker, maybe the gambling site is the problem. When they seem to run into a problem with every gambling site they used, maybe it is the player that is the problem. Somebody writing out an essay like that suggests that they know they are trying to play (and possibly abuse) the rules. Not sure you're going to find much sympathy here, even though it would be right for earnbet to refund your original deposit - unless there is a deeper story here to explain, like you've ripped them off previously with multi accounts. I'm quoting your post because it looks like you edit stuff when called out on it.

The fact that you think you can pick which terms you want to follow or bend them to fit your narrative is quite telling. The terms state you may not have multiple accounts. It does not refer to "active" or "not having funds" in the account. There are reasons for this, like stopping people from taking the welcome bonuses multiple times which are only intended once per player. The wording you use in responses looks very much like you're trying to weave a path through the terms and conditions that doesn't show you breaking them.

You keep bringing up the fact that I had issues with other bookmakers, but you continue to ignore the actual facts.
First of all, I have never claimed or received a single welcome bonus from any bookmaker. The suggestion that I operated multiple accounts to abuse promotions makes no sense because there was never any bonus to abuse in the first place.
Secondly, the allegation that my tennis bets were somehow fraudulent is completely false. These were simply bets on ATP Challenger tournaments, placed on major matches that were publicly available to every customer. Some people may consider me lucky, while others may simply think I am a successful tennis bettor. Neither of those is evidence of fraud.
What I cannot accept is having all of my money confiscated based on vague accusations without any verifiable evidence. Inventing a justification after the fact and seizing both my winnings and my original deposit only demonstrates bad faith on the part of the bookmaker.
You also continue to use my original statement about having been restricted by other bookmakers as if it somehow proves wrongdoing. That is a misleading argument. I had disputes with several bookmakers because they no longer wanted to accept my action as a winning customer and chose to end the business relationship for various reasons. That does not mean I cheated, manipulated matches, or committed fraud.
Most importantly, none of those bookmakers confiscated my original deposit. They simply decided they no longer wanted my business and returned my funds. EarnBet is the only operator that has gone far beyond that by confiscating not only disputed winnings but also my legitimate deposited funds without presenting concrete evidence.
If a bookmaker genuinely believes a customer has violated its terms, it should communicate that openly, explain the evidence, and handle the matter professionally. Instead, EarnBet chose to confiscate my funds without meaningful explanation. When a company behaves this way, I have every right to challenge its actions publicly and ask for transparency.
I am still asking the same simple question: Where is the evidence? If the accusations are true, publish the evidence. If you cannot produce it, then my original deposit—and any funds that cannot be proven to be connected to wrongdoing—should be returned.

[EOSBet]

Your response contains serious allegations, but it does not provide any verifiable evidence to support them.
First, my previous disputes with other bookmakers were not related to match-fixing, fraud, or manipulated tennis matches. Those accounts were restricted because I was considered a winning player or because of alleged arbitrage activity. In every previous case, the bookmaker returned at least my original deposit because they had no evidence that the funds themselves were connected to fraud.
EarnBet has acted very differently. You have not only confiscated the disputed winnings, but also my original deposited funds. This is the central issue you continue to avoid.
Regarding the tennis bets, I completely reject the allegation that any match or betting activity involved fraud or manipulation. You are free to publish the full betting history, including the matches, markets, odds, bet times and settlement details. I have nothing to hide. General phrases such as “suspicious betting patterns” are not evidence of cheating.
I also reject the allegation that I operated four active accounts. While I was betting with the account in question, I did not have another active account with a usable balance. A blockchain connection alone does not prove that multiple accounts were controlled by the same person. Funds can pass through exchanges, payment services, shared wallets, intermediaries or third parties. If you claim that all four accounts belonged to me, publish the specific evidence showing common ownership and control—not merely that some transactions were connected on-chain.
You also refer to my edited Bitcointalk post as though editing one sentence somehow proves fraud. I edited it only to prevent the discussion from being misunderstood or diverted toward unrelated disputes with other bookmakers. The original sentence did not admit cheating, multi-accounting or match manipulation. Using a routine edit as a major part of your defence only demonstrates how weak the underlying evidence is.
For transparency, please answer these questions directly:
Which exact bets were allegedly fraudulent?
What specific betting pattern proves fraud rather than simply successful betting?
What evidence proves that I personally owned and controlled all four accounts?
Were the accounts used at the same time, from the same device, IP address or identity documents?
Why was my original deposit confiscated instead of being returned?
Which exact wording in Section 6 authorizes EarnBet to confiscate legitimate deposited funds without publishing evidence of fraud?
Other bookmakers that no longer wished to accept my bets at least returned my deposit and clearly stated that they did not want my future business. EarnBet instead relies on vague accusations, refuses to disclose the evidence and confiscates both winnings and deposited funds.
I am not asking anyone to accept my word blindly. I am asking EarnBet to provide concrete, independently verifiable evidence. Until that evidence is published, the public should distinguish between a proven fraud case and a bookmaker making broad allegations after a customer wins.
Return my winnings or original deposit and publish the complete evidence supporting your accusations.

You've literally contributed nothing to this community and while that is not a prerequisite for help if you are mistreated, your very limited post history is only filled with scam accusations against various casinos and bookmakers. If someone gets treated badly by one casino or bookmaker, maybe the gambling site is the problem. When they seem to run into a problem with every gambling site they used, maybe it is the player that is the problem. Somebody writing out an essay like that suggests that they know they are trying to play (and possibly abuse) the rules. Not sure you're going to find much sympathy here, even though it would be right for earnbet to refund your original deposit - unless there is a deeper story here to explain, like you've ripped them off previously with multi accounts. I'm quoting your post because it looks like you edit stuff when called out on it.

The fact that you think you can pick which terms you want to follow or bend them to fit your narrative is quite telling. The terms state you may not have multiple accounts. It does not refer to "active" or "not having funds" in the account. There are reasons for this, like stopping people from taking the welcome bonuses multiple times which are only intended once per player. The wording you use in responses looks very much like you're trying to weave a path through the terms and conditions that doesn't show you breaking them.

You keep bringing up the fact that I had issues with other bookmakers, but you continue to ignore the actual facts.
First of all, I have never claimed or received a single welcome bonus from any bookmaker. The suggestion that I operated multiple accounts to abuse promotions makes no sense because there was never any bonus to abuse in the first place.
Secondly, the allegation that my tennis bets were somehow fraudulent is completely false. These were simply bets on ATP Challenger tournaments, placed on major matches that were publicly available to every customer. Some people may consider me lucky, while others may simply think I am a successful tennis bettor. Neither of those is evidence of fraud.
What I cannot accept is having all of my money confiscated based on vague accusations without any verifiable evidence. Inventing a justification after the fact and seizing both my winnings and my original deposit only demonstrates bad faith on the part of the bookmaker.
You also continue to use my original statement about having been restricted by other bookmakers as if it somehow proves wrongdoing. That is a misleading argument. I had disputes with several bookmakers because they no longer wanted to accept my action as a winning customer and chose to end the business relationship for various reasons. That does not mean I cheated, manipulated matches, or committed fraud.
Most importantly, none of those bookmakers confiscated my original deposit. They simply decided they no longer wanted my business and returned my funds. EarnBet is the only operator that has gone far beyond that by confiscating not only disputed winnings but also my legitimate deposited funds without presenting concrete evidence.
If a bookmaker genuinely believes a customer has violated its terms, it should communicate that openly, explain the evidence, and handle the matter professionally. Instead, EarnBet chose to confiscate my funds without meaningful explanation. When a company behaves this way, I have every right to challenge its actions publicly and ask for transparency.
I am still asking the same simple question: Where is the evidence? If the accusations are true, publish the evidence. If you cannot produce it, then my original deposit—and any funds that cannot be proven to be connected to wrongdoing—should be returned.

As requested, we have now published the evidence supporting our decision

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5588744.msg66957693#msg66957693

[Pmalek]

While I agree that the original deposit amount should be returned to the player out of fairness if they don't want to do business with them, I don't think that they should be allowed to take any profits away.

Casinos have been known to also confiscate deposits if players have been identified as returning rule & TOS breakers who have been banned and asked to leave because they profited from the casinos previously with their nonallowed gameplay. In such cases, the sites confiscate the entire or part of their deposits to recover what the cheaters took from them in the past.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

As requested, we have now published the evidence supporting our decision

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5588744.msg66957693#msg66957693

It's the first time I have seen a casino respond to an accusation in this forum in detail in a long time. I am confident EarnBet.io has all the information pinning the accuser, and I don't think they are making this up.

Good Job @EarnBet.io

[snipie]

As requested, we have now published the evidence supporting our decision

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5588744.msg66957693#msg66957693

It's the first time I have seen a casino respond to an accusation in this forum in detail in a long time. I am confident EarnBet.io has all the information pinning the accuser, and I don't think they are making this up.

Good Job @EarnBet.io

That's what I call K.O.
The user didn't find anything to explain his wrong attitude and reclaim his fraudulent money back. He shouldn't try to abuse the service he was using in the first place.. Terms are clear and he agreed on it upon registration like in any other site. Worst he admitted abusing other services too..

[julerz12]

Are there any Limbo fans lurking around here? Now's your chance to earn more while trying to hit that juicy multiplier.  
EarnBet just launched a new Limbo Challenge. The first few to hit 500x will win $25.

Requirements:
Minimum bet should be $0.10

Only the first two players to hit the 500x multiplier will win $25 each.

To join, you would need to post proof on EarnBet's Telegram post about this challenge (see source link)
As of this writing, no one has claimed the prize yet.
Source: https://t.me/EarnBetAnnouncements/665

[Mandoy]

While I agree that the original deposit amount should be returned to the player out of fairness if they don't want to do business with them, I don't think that they should be allowed to take any profits away.

Casinos have been known to also confiscate deposits if players have been identified as returning rule & TOS breakers who have been banned and asked to leave because they profited from the casinos previously with their nonallowed gameplay. In such cases, the sites confiscate the entire or part of their deposits to recover what the cheaters took from them in the past.

I feel like there needs to be a difference between a player who just chooses not to play at a casino. And one who does it on purpose and breaks the rules. Returning the original amount of the deposit is a fair result if there is no evidence of fraud or the abuse of bonuses. But when a player has repeatedly violated the terms, used more than one account or taken advantage of promotions, the casino has just cause for action. Key to this is transparency. Casinos need to explain why they confiscated and should have clear evidence – otherwise, they may ruin their reputation and lose the trust of honest players.

[mitchr4]

...

I feel like there needs to be a difference between a player who just chooses not to play at a casino. And one who does it on purpose and breaks the rules. Returning the original amount of the deposit is a fair result if there is no evidence of fraud or the abuse of bonuses. But when a player has repeatedly violated the terms, used more than one account or taken advantage of promotions, the casino has just cause for action. Key to this is transparency. Casinos need to explain why they confiscated and should have clear evidence – otherwise, they may ruin their reputation and lose the trust of honest players.

Looking at this case, the situation clearly falls into the category of a rule violation. Several accounts were funded from the same address and all of them showed a similar betting pattern. This is not just a guess from the casino, but transaction proof that can be checked directly from that address. When the proof is that strong, it makes sense for the casino to take action including on the deposit because this is connected multi accounting, not just a player who just decided to stop playing.

[whiteblue]

...

I feel like there needs to be a difference between a player who just chooses not to play at a casino. And one who does it on purpose and breaks the rules. Returning the original amount of the deposit is a fair result if there is no evidence of fraud or the abuse of bonuses. But when a player has repeatedly violated the terms, used more than one account or taken advantage of promotions, the casino has just cause for action. Key to this is transparency. Casinos need to explain why they confiscated and should have clear evidence – otherwise, they may ruin their reputation and lose the trust of honest players.

Looking at this case, the situation clearly falls into the category of a rule violation. Several accounts were funded from the same address and all of them showed a similar betting pattern. This is not just a guess from the casino, but transaction proof that can be checked directly from that address. When the proof is that strong, it makes sense for the casino to take action including on the deposit because this is connected multi accounting, not just a player who just decided to stop playing.

Gamblers mistakes stem from ignoring the rules. They seek ways to cheat the Casino to gain an advantage. However, Because the team knows their moves, They can quickly deal with this by blocking their Accounts.

I believe that thriving Casinos will continue to maintain their platforms growth by preventing the large number of gamblers who attempt to cheat them.

As gamblers, We should Gamble wisely by following all the rules Implemented by all casinos. No problems will arise if we gamble responsibly.

[maydna]

...

I feel like there needs to be a difference between a player who just chooses not to play at a casino. And one who does it on purpose and breaks the rules. Returning the original amount of the deposit is a fair result if there is no evidence of fraud or the abuse of bonuses. But when a player has repeatedly violated the terms, used more than one account or taken advantage of promotions, the casino has just cause for action. Key to this is transparency. Casinos need to explain why they confiscated and should have clear evidence – otherwise, they may ruin their reputation and lose the trust of honest players.

Looking at this case, the situation clearly falls into the category of a rule violation. Several accounts were funded from the same address and all of them showed a similar betting pattern. This is not just a guess from the casino, but transaction proof that can be checked directly from that address. When the proof is that strong, it makes sense for the casino to take action including on the deposit because this is connected multi accounting, not just a player who just decided to stop playing.

That is greedy gamblers who want to benefit from the casinos and thinks that casinos don't know so that is a wrong idea if they do that because casinos will aware and can check easily of the transaction coming to them and will do something. Taking the deposit money without refund can be done especially if cheat members really do that.

Casinos can shows the evidence to them and perhaps casino can request more identification from the gamblers and investigate it. If members really do that, casinos can block and prohibited those person from their site.

[Pmalek]

Looking at this case, the situation clearly falls into the category of a rule violation. Several accounts were funded from the same address and all of them showed a similar betting pattern. This is not just a guess from the casino, but transaction proof that can be checked directly from that address. When the proof is that strong, it makes sense for the casino to take action including on the deposit because this is connected multi accounting, not just a player who just decided to stop playing.

He tried to paint a bad picture, describing himself as this random innocent player who got their money stolen by the big and bad casino. If you remember, he claimed he broke no rules and and is innocent. He claimed he had only one account. Then the casino shows proof of four connected accounts and he completely abandons old claims of not having multiple accounts and instead focuses on how he never abused bonuses from those connected accounts. My guess is that if EarnBet proved bonus abuse as well, his reply would be that he didn't do it with all accounts or that there was only a little bit of abuse, not much.

Such players believe they are entitled to get their deposits back and therefore they can't lose. Worst case scenario is they get caught, their winnings get confiscated, but they receive the deposits back. He mentioned that's how it was for him in other casinos. That's basically an invitation to try again. Best case scenario is if the casino never figures it out and he keeps going until he finally gets stopped. 

[TopTort777]

It is always funny to read how those people try to look like an innocent white sheep, post wall of text and add screenshots how unfair casino acted, actively post and demand help and justice. But when casinos post their stone proof, all of them suddenly become silent and disappear The individual that has made a claim turns to be experienced in trying to use multiple-accounts in casino and cheat. Usually normal people get smart after failure or getting caught... This individual seems to be on purpose try to find weak spots in casinos...

[impulse709]

...

I feel like there needs to be a difference between a player who just chooses not to play at a casino. And one who does it on purpose and breaks the rules. Returning the original amount of the deposit is a fair result if there is no evidence of fraud or the abuse of bonuses. But when a player has repeatedly violated the terms, used more than one account or taken advantage of promotions, the casino has just cause for action. Key to this is transparency. Casinos need to explain why they confiscated and should have clear evidence – otherwise, they may ruin their reputation and lose the trust of honest players.

Looking at this case, the situation clearly falls into the category of a rule violation. Several accounts were funded from the same address and all of them showed a similar betting pattern. This is not just a guess from the casino, but transaction proof that can be checked directly from that address. When the proof is that strong, it makes sense for the casino to take action including on the deposit because this is connected multi accounting, not just a player who just decided to stop playing.

That is greedy gamblers who want to benefit from the casinos and thinks that casinos don't know so that is a wrong idea if they do that because casinos will aware and can check easily of the transaction coming to them and will do something. Taking the deposit money without refund can be done especially if cheat members really do that.

Casinos can shows the evidence to them and perhaps casino can request more identification from the gamblers and investigate it. If members really do that, casinos can block and prohibited those person from their site.

It is perfectly fair for a casino to defend itself against players who intentionally use their promotions and wager in multiple accounts or with partners. But in player action, there must be a clear evidence and not assumptions. While a common deposit address can be useful, it can be more convincing when. Coupled with identical betting methods, frequent bonus claims. And other questionable activities. It becomes a pattern. If an investigation shows it was intentional abuse, then it's OK to keep the winnings, even the deposit, as per the terms of the casino. The most important factor is transparency. Where the casino clearly explains the reason and provides evidence to support its decision. Maintaining trust with legitimate players.

[ultrloa]

It is always funny to read how those people try to look like an innocent white sheep, post wall of text and add screenshots how unfair casino acted, actively post and demand help and justice. But when casinos post their stone proof, all of them suddenly become silent and disappear The individual that has made a claim turns to be experienced in trying to use multiple-accounts in casino and cheat. Usually normal people get smart after failure or getting caught... This individual seems to be on purpose try to find weak spots in casinos...

Maybe that dude is hoping that he can convince the community and pressure Earnbet to return their deposits. But unfortunately to that accuser the representative bring all those necessary proof to counter his argument and accusations.

Now he's been buried alive and been proved that he's a violator and suffering the consequences of the action done in Earnbet.

This one somehow serve as a warning to those trolls that they won't succeed with their bad intension. Knowing that the casino can identify or bring proof towards those violations they have made.

[julerz12]

This individual seems to be on purpose try to find weak spots in casinos...

My question now is if that dude's account in this forum should get a negative tag. I mean, he did clearly try to manipulate the narrative by presenting himself as the victim when, in fact, he created the problems on his own by using multiple accounts on EarnBet. His intentions were clear: dragging a casino's reputation down so he gets the money. He's even quick to post it on the scam accusations board with that big bold thread title "SCAM ALERT". 
Who knows which casino he'll try to cheat and post a scam accusation against again if he was by any chance successful with this attempt.