blade007
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 01:32:00 AM |
|
Obviously you have a very personal beef with the devs. You should take that and get it resolved privately. Seems like they gave you an option to have some say in the future of the coin and there was a misunderstanding, maybe in the way it was asked. Doesn't make sense holding so much and putting it down. You are ultimately just hurting yourself.
|
|
|
|
anderl
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 02:12:24 AM |
|
Obviously you have a very personal beef with the devs. You should take that and get it resolved privately. Seems like they gave you an option to have some say in the future of the coin and there was a misunderstanding, maybe in the way it was asked. Doesn't make sense holding so much and putting it down. You are ultimately just hurting yourself.
What about transparency? Doesn't it cut both ways?
|
|
|
|
SUNcoinDEVs
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 02:15:50 AM |
|
im biased but id say SUN is on low price now. we had 4k satoshi stabile and 9k at tops.
|
|
|
|
blade007
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 02:16:58 AM |
|
What are they not being transparent about?
|
|
|
|
anderl
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 02:25:40 AM |
|
What are they not being transparent about?
Transpernecy is about presenting the developer's view and the consumer/miner/traders views. blade007 you posted: Obviously you have a very personal beef with the devs. You should take that and get it resolved privately. Seems like they gave you an option to have some say in the future of the coin and there was a misunderstanding, maybe in the way it was asked. Doesn't make sense holding so much and putting it down. You are ultimately just hurting yourself. If you want me to take it offline then you oppose transparency because you do not want me to post publicly what my "beefs" with IFC developers are about. In reality it is what was discussed privately is what caused me to initially loose favor with IFC. I held on for some time thinking it was just my perception of posts and events. But my long term view is justified by threads like this and others that just solicit IFC through giveaways and shameless pumps. Its fine for a new coin but for one that is almost a year old seems incredulous. It should me mature enough to use better tactics.
|
|
|
|
zackclark70
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
ADT developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 02:28:46 AM |
|
I personally supported IFC up until the point I realised that its going to be really hard to keep mining power on the coin when the block reward drops very low right now IFC can be 51% attacked with not to much hash power if the block rewards were dragged out over a longer amount of time it would have made a lot of difference but right now the only way to keep the minors mining it to keep upping the TX fee if would like to have a more secure investment you might want to take a look at POS ( Proof of Stake ) coins as they don't rely on POW hash power to keep things moving
|
|
|
|
blade007
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 02:44:40 AM |
|
What are they not being transparent about?
Transpernecy is about presenting the developer's view and the consumer/miner/traders views. blade007 you posted: Obviously you have a very personal beef with the devs. You should take that and get it resolved privately. Seems like they gave you an option to have some say in the future of the coin and there was a misunderstanding, maybe in the way it was asked. Doesn't make sense holding so much and putting it down. You are ultimately just hurting yourself. If you want me to take it offline then you oppose transparency because you do not want me to post publicly what my "beefs" with IFC developers are about. In reality it is what was discussed privately is what caused me to initially loose favor with IFC. I held on for some time thinking it was just my perception of posts and events. But my long term view is justified by threads like this and others that just solicit IFC through giveaways and shameless pumps. Its fine for a new coin but for one that is almost a year old seems incredulous. It should me mature enough to use better tactics. I don't oppose transparency, it just feels like this is personal for you and the better forum is to talk directly and offline. Just my openion
|
|
|
|
anderl
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 02:57:30 AM |
|
I personally supported IFC up until the point I realised that its going to be really hard to keep mining power on the coin when the block reward drops very low right now IFC can be 51% attacked with not to much hash power if the block rewards were dragged out over a longer amount of time it would have made a lot of difference but right now the only way to keep the minors mining it to keep upping the TX fee if would like to have a more secure investment you might want to take a look at POS ( Proof of Stake ) coins as they don't rely on POW hash power to keep things moving This is what I anticipated would happen. Instead the initial development team walked away and a new team took its place thinking that it was just a mere marketing effort rather than a technical issue. There were several potential changes that should have been made and still could be made. Infinite coins... do what DOGE does, infinite coins, provide random rewards with a high stake. Miners would join the network on the off chance that they hit big. Change to variable-n factor. Transition is easy and you gain the adopt of many GPU farms after the ASIC flood swamps scrypt mining. There are SOOOOOOOOOOO many options but the developers are not smart enough, or aggressive enough to try to redefine the coin network. Unless I see more innovation or better ideas, I don't have high hopes for IFC like I did. I have to find the original developer to see what he is doing today. POS is a good idea and should be included in ever coin bot shouldn't be the end all be all factor of a coin. POS would help IFC but would not be game changer for me.
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 02:58:38 AM |
|
IFC is okay but i have taken most of my ifc and spread them over tix and adt .... i feel best to have all 3 right now. I have gone longer still in ADT now it is on the cgb base and an active dev is back.
Tix i like too ... been very strong from the start. All 3 are good, but at current prices i rank them adt>tix>ifc> in terms of value but keep some of all 3 of course.
|
|
|
|
anderl
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 03:14:36 AM |
|
IFC is okay but i have taken most of my ifc and spread them over tix and adt .... i feel best to have all 3 right now. I have gone longer still in ADT now it is on the cgb base and an active dev is back.
Tix i like too ... been very strong from the start. All 3 are good, but at current prices i rank them adt>tix>ifc> in terms of value but keep some of all 3 of course.
It is a good strategy. Keep some of a coin in hopes that it improves. I'll have to define a number of coins to keep in storage if the coin development team matures or another one takes over. There really is no risk at this point.
|
|
|
|
blade007
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 04:10:05 AM |
|
I personally supported IFC up until the point I realised that its going to be really hard to keep mining power on the coin when the block reward drops very low right now IFC can be 51% attacked with not to much hash power if the block rewards were dragged out over a longer amount of time it would have made a lot of difference but right now the only way to keep the minors mining it to keep upping the TX fee if would like to have a more secure investment you might want to take a look at POS ( Proof of Stake ) coins as they don't rely on POW hash power to keep things moving This is what I anticipated would happen. Instead the initial development team walked away and a new team took its place thinking that it was just a mere marketing effort rather than a technical issue. There were several potential changes that should have been made and still could be made. Infinite coins... do what DOGE does, infinite coins, provide random rewards with a high stake. Miners would join the network on the off chance that they hit big. Change to variable-n factor. Transition is easy and you gain the adopt of many GPU farms after the ASIC flood swamps scrypt mining. There are SOOOOOOOOOOO many options but the developers are not smart enough, or aggressive enough to try to redefine the coin network. Unless I see more innovation or better ideas, I don't have high hopes for IFC like I did. I have to find the original developer to see what he is doing today. POS is a good idea and should be included in ever coin bot shouldn't be the end all be all factor of a coin. POS would help IFC but would not be game changer for me. Well seems to me that from the other thread, you had a chance to give some input on the future of this coin but instead you took offence and took your bags and left. Crying now, whether right or wrong, is not going to help. Looking at your old posts over the last week on IFC you can clearly see you have a real vendetta. You don't like it then leave it be. The old Dev would have left it to you if you were capable. Instead he left if to someone very capable and he is following his vision of the coin based on the concept that it was created after. You know something, I see this all the time. Its not only with IFC but the community behind a lot of these coins are happy when the coins are soaring but the time it sinks they sit back and take a shit on the devs. I wouldn't be suprised if some of these devs just says fuck you and go about their business. This is currently happening with earthcoin, and forget premine, you shit all over the guys doing the work then he has no reason to do anything to get you richer. The difference with IFC is that the community is actually coming together and doing things and assisting the dev. Once again you were asked to be a part of this and you fucked off. You are not happy with it buddy then please yourself. Keep your stash and hope for the best or sell it. Makes no difference. Slinging this shit around just hurts the smaller holders of this coin. And it is shit you are slinging because they clearly invited you onboard to be a part of the direction of this coin, no matter how you spin it. Your choices are to get with the team and share your vision and maybe things will change or keep yammering. The latter is just stupid. It's pissing where you drink from! Hope this is transparent enough for you
|
|
|
|
anderl
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 04:27:57 AM |
|
I personally supported IFC up until the point I realised that its going to be really hard to keep mining power on the coin when the block reward drops very low right now IFC can be 51% attacked with not to much hash power if the block rewards were dragged out over a longer amount of time it would have made a lot of difference but right now the only way to keep the minors mining it to keep upping the TX fee if would like to have a more secure investment you might want to take a look at POS ( Proof of Stake ) coins as they don't rely on POW hash power to keep things moving This is what I anticipated would happen. Instead the initial development team walked away and a new team took its place thinking that it was just a mere marketing effort rather than a technical issue. There were several potential changes that should have been made and still could be made. Infinite coins... do what DOGE does, infinite coins, provide random rewards with a high stake. Miners would join the network on the off chance that they hit big. Change to variable-n factor. Transition is easy and you gain the adopt of many GPU farms after the ASIC flood swamps scrypt mining. There are SOOOOOOOOOOO many options but the developers are not smart enough, or aggressive enough to try to redefine the coin network. Unless I see more innovation or better ideas, I don't have high hopes for IFC like I did. I have to find the original developer to see what he is doing today. POS is a good idea and should be included in ever coin bot shouldn't be the end all be all factor of a coin. POS would help IFC but would not be game changer for me. Well seems to me that from the other thread, you had a chance to give some input on the future of this coin but instead you took offence and took your bags and left. Crying now, whether right or wrong, is not going to help. Looking at your old posts over the last week on IFC you can clearly see you have a real vendetta. You don't like it then leave it be. The old Dev would have left it to you if you were capable. Instead he left if to someone very capable and he is following his vision of the coin based on the concept that it was created after. You know something, I see this all the time. Its not only with IFC but the community behind a lot of these coins are happy when the coins are soaring but the time it sinks they sit back and take a shit on the devs. I wouldn't be suprised if some of these devs just says fuck you and go about their business. This is currently happening with earthcoin, and forget premine, you shit all over the guys doing the work then he has no reason to do anything to get you richer. The difference with IFC is that the community is actually coming together and doing things and assisting the dev. Once again you were asked to be a part of this and you fucked off. You are not happy with it buddy then please yourself. Keep your stash and hope for the best or sell it. Makes no difference. Slinging this shit around just hurts the smaller holders of this coin. And it is shit you are slinging because they clearly invited you onboard to be a part of the direction of this coin, no matter how you spin it. Your choices are to get with the team and share your vision and maybe things will change or keep yammering. The latter is just stupid. It's pissing where you drink from! Hope this is transparent enough for you You only looked back a few weeks?!?! LOL take a Ritalin pill and try going bac' a few months. Yes since IFC was under new management it has failed time and time again. I"m not crying. I still have over $500k in the coin I"m trying to sell off. I'm not going to cry if it is only $100k or $1mill. 2 months of mining at $2000 means PROFIT!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!! Don't get mad bro, if I'm selling off my coins just buy them off me. I'm only ask you buy them at 500 or higher so I can collect my half million plus. After all you care more about the coin than I do. So you seem to fee that the current price is a great value. So buy them M eFer. I"m not happy so I'm selling. Of course you want me to keep them so I don't tank your investment. Usually when people say "if you are not happy then GTFO". Funny you didn't say that. Seems you would be a bagholder if I got out at current prices. You are SOOOO obvious! Thanks for being transparent. This is great for IFC. It reports to the community where everyone's pain points are. Seems your pain points are at current prices. My pain point would be at... oh... about... .00000001. So as long are I get .00000002 I get a 200% profit. So there is that.
|
|
|
|
anderl
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 04:35:28 AM |
|
I personally supported IFC up until the point I realised that its going to be really hard to keep mining power on the coin when the block reward drops very low right now IFC can be 51% attacked with not to much hash power if the block rewards were dragged out over a longer amount of time it would have made a lot of difference but right now the only way to keep the minors mining it to keep upping the TX fee if would like to have a more secure investment you might want to take a look at POS ( Proof of Stake ) coins as they don't rely on POW hash power to keep things moving This is what I anticipated would happen. Instead the initial development team walked away and a new team took its place thinking that it was just a mere marketing effort rather than a technical issue. There were several potential changes that should have been made and still could be made. Infinite coins... do what DOGE does, infinite coins, provide random rewards with a high stake. Miners would join the network on the off chance that they hit big. Change to variable-n factor. Transition is easy and you gain the adopt of many GPU farms after the ASIC flood swamps scrypt mining. There are SOOOOOOOOOOO many options but the developers are not smart enough, or aggressive enough to try to redefine the coin network. Unless I see more innovation or better ideas, I don't have high hopes for IFC like I did. I have to find the original developer to see what he is doing today. POS is a good idea and should be included in ever coin bot shouldn't be the end all be all factor of a coin. POS would help IFC but would not be game changer for me. Well seems to me that from the other thread, you had a chance to give some input on the future of this coin but instead you took offence and took your bags and left. Crying now, whether right or wrong, is not going to help. Looking at your old posts over the last week on IFC you can clearly see you have a real vendetta. You don't like it then leave it be. The old Dev would have left it to you if you were capable. Instead he left if to someone very capable and he is following his vision of the coin based on the concept that it was created after. You know something, I see this all the time. Its not only with IFC but the community behind a lot of these coins are happy when the coins are soaring but the time it sinks they sit back and take a shit on the devs. I wouldn't be suprised if some of these devs just says fuck you and go about their business. This is currently happening with earthcoin, and forget premine, you shit all over the guys doing the work then he has no reason to do anything to get you richer. The difference with IFC is that the community is actually coming together and doing things and assisting the dev. Once again you were asked to be a part of this and you fucked off. You are not happy with it buddy then please yourself. Keep your stash and hope for the best or sell it. Makes no difference. Slinging this shit around just hurts the smaller holders of this coin. And it is shit you are slinging because they clearly invited you onboard to be a part of the direction of this coin, no matter how you spin it. Your choices are to get with the team and share your vision and maybe things will change or keep yammering. The latter is just stupid. It's pissing where you drink from! Hope this is transparent enough for you You only looked back a few weeks?!?! LOL take a Ritalin pill and try going bac' a few months. Yes since IFC was under new management it has failed time and time again. I"m not crying. I still have over $500k in the coin I"m trying to sell off. I'm not going to cry if it is only $100k or $1mill. 2 months of mining at $2000 means PROFIT!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!! Don't get mad bro, if I'm selling off my coins just buy them off me. I'm only ask you buy them at 500 or higher so I can collect my half million plus. After all you care more about the coin than I do. So you seem to fee that the current price is a great value. So buy them M eFer. I"m not happy so I'm selling. Of course you want me to keep them so I don't tank your investment. Usually when people say "if you are not happy then GTFO". Funny you didn't say that. Seems you would be a bagholder if I got out at current prices. You are SOOOO obvious! Thanks for being transparent. This is great for IFC. It reports to the community where everyone's pain points are. Seems your pain points are at current prices. My pain point would be at... oh... about... .00000001. So as long are I get .00000002 I get a 200% profit. So there is that. Doubling my money to me means..... ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fencrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcTeKOQFNd-VToHiXstLcSUEO_YphEGhvywxOmcPRrMzxp9J87DYXg&t=665&c=tWobEjQXLUvoHQ) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fhot92and100.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Ftrain.jpg&t=665&c=J4yPvcuBXH2osQ) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2F0.media.dorkly.cvcdn.com%2F59%2F65%2F96b61f85bd0a1bb646e6d76411bf3bf7.jpg&t=665&c=3YBOd27rXZ_1uQ) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmemecrunch.com%2Fmeme%2F4QOW%2Fsuper-excited%2Fimage.png&t=665&c=kOEV2MxijDxxSg) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fencrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcQYOqdGgst2GDKCB3BfcqC-gm3NTim7yTaqPXPHjQPzOyrjFDbAFQ&t=665&c=56XGnMfHIpeWIw) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-L07gdEpv5cA%2FUK9ki_OAvhI%2FAAAAAAAAAAk%2Ff6PaQ7fiyAY%2Fs1600%2Fhappy_kid.jpg&t=665&c=apY4yrAupryoOQ) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.memegenerator.net%2Finstances%2F500x%2F33229288.jpg&t=665&c=IKy2wBS-CacXIw)
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 05:59:20 AM Last edit: March 12, 2014, 06:21:26 AM by TECSHARE |
|
LOL GJ IFC supporters Keep proving my point. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fitsnews.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2008%2F08%2Fambulance-chasers.jpg&t=665&c=QT_ygkBH7wJIjQ) Your point is we are poorly illustrated lawyers? Only that you imitate poorly illustrated ambulance chasers. Sorry if that was over your head. I'm only making a statement when I should be asking why you would play off of the collapse of another cryptocoin by promoting your cryptocoin. What it means to me is that you are not identifying with the merits of your coins but instead trying to collect people who lost money in DOGE to trust IFC instead. I find that somewhat amoral. And this is why I do not like the new IFC management. First of all DOGE coin users constantly attack other coins, why do they get this pass from your moral high ground? Second, you aren't one to preach of morals considering your active slandering efforts. As far as the previous dev Fisheater goes, if he is so great, why did myself and others have to step in to clean up his mess? I have only been working with IFC for a few months, most of that time was spent fixing his neglect. I just got here and you are already condemning me. You clearly have a grudge here because your points make no sense especially if you review the coin's history.
|
|
|
|
jrretirement (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 09:16:54 PM |
|
Oh wow you guys sure know how to hijack a thread! Seriously dude how can you spout off such shit? "Yes since IFC was under new management it has failed time and time again." The new management structure has been in place for a little over 4 weeks, the lead has only had this coin for a few months and had to repeatedly fix the client as it was so poorly coded! I struggle to see how the new management has failed time and time again, when it's barely had time to get moving. Wow, then you start swinging your dick around about how many coins and how much money you have, narcissistic you think?, well seriously that's a stupid fkn thing to do! With all the people/exchanges etc targeted by hackers/org crime you just put a big bulls eye on your back. Ok your going to sell your IFC, well do it and leave us alone to get on with running our coin! BTW I called this latest DOGE pump! ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) MODS please shut this thread down! Ty
|
|
|
|
wallstreetcoiner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 09:27:39 PM |
|
do you imagine the general public ever using something called "Infinitecoin", especially when the whole point of crypto is to get around the fear that the federal banks are printing endless money into oblivion?
Exactly. This is one of the reasons that Goldcoin (GLD) has attracted the greatest living crypto developer. If you want to invest in something, invest in a coin with the best name and the best dev. This is the coin that will truly stand the test of time, in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
zackclark70
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
ADT developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2014, 10:42:10 PM |
|
Oh wow you guys sure know how to hijack a thread! Seriously dude how can you spout off such shit? "Yes since IFC was under new management it has failed time and time again." The new management structure has been in place for a little over 4 weeks, the lead has only had this coin for a few months and had to repeatedly fix the client as it was so poorly coded! I struggle to see how the new management has failed time and time again, when it's barely had time to get moving. Wow, then you start swinging your dick around about how many coins and how much money you have, narcissistic you think?, well seriously that's a stupid fkn thing to do! With all the people/exchanges etc targeted by hackers/org crime you just put a big bulls eye on your back. Ok your going to sell your IFC, well do it and leave us alone to get on with running our coin! BTW I called this latest DOGE pump! ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) MODS please shut this thread down! Ty according to this IFC has been under new management since December > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=356065.0
|
|
|
|
jrretirement (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 02:49:51 AM |
|
Oh wow you guys sure know how to hijack a thread! Seriously dude how can you spout off such shit? "Yes since IFC was under new management it has failed time and time again." The new management structure has been in place for a little over 4 weeks, the lead has only had this coin for a few months and had to repeatedly fix the client as it was so poorly coded! I struggle to see how the new management has failed time and time again, when it's barely had time to get moving. Wow, then you start swinging your dick around about how many coins and how much money you have, narcissistic you think?, well seriously that's a stupid fkn thing to do! With all the people/exchanges etc targeted by hackers/org crime you just put a big bulls eye on your back. Ok your going to sell your IFC, well do it and leave us alone to get on with running our coin! BTW I called this latest DOGE pump! ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) MODS please shut this thread down! Ty according to this IFC has been under new management since December > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=356065.0Clearly you are incapable of comprehending what is written! I'll walk you through it! Read what is written again and you'll see it clearly states the new lead began a few months ago, December, aka new management. But the new management structure has only been in place for a little over 4 weeks!
|
|
|
|
zackclark70
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
ADT developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 03:09:54 AM |
|
Oh wow you guys sure know how to hijack a thread! Seriously dude how can you spout off such shit? "Yes since IFC was under new management it has failed time and time again." The new management structure has been in place for a little over 4 weeks, the lead has only had this coin for a few months and had to repeatedly fix the client as it was so poorly coded! I struggle to see how the new management has failed time and time again, when it's barely had time to get moving. Wow, then you start swinging your dick around about how many coins and how much money you have, narcissistic you think?, well seriously that's a stupid fkn thing to do! With all the people/exchanges etc targeted by hackers/org crime you just put a big bulls eye on your back. Ok your going to sell your IFC, well do it and leave us alone to get on with running our coin! BTW I called this latest DOGE pump! ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) MODS please shut this thread down! Ty according to this IFC has been under new management since December > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=356065.0Clearly you are incapable of comprehending what is written! I'll walk you through it! Read what is written again and you'll see it clearly states the new lead began a few months ago, December, aka new management. But the new management structure has only been in place for a little over 4 weeks! so it took nearly 3 months to get the new management structure in place and you don't count that as a bad thing
|
|
|
|
blade007
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 03:44:04 AM |
|
according to this IFC has been under new management since December > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=356065.0[/quote] Clearly you are incapable of comprehending what is written! I'll walk you through it! Read what is written again and you'll see it clearly states the new lead began a few months ago, December, aka new management. But the new management structure has only been in place for a little over 4 weeks! [/quote] so it took nearly 3 months to get the new management structure in place and you don't count that as a bad thing [/quote] We from what I read at that post, I see Fisheater giving the reigns to Tecshare and then the first talk about infrastructure at the end of January. I am not a part of the dev team but I am a member of infinitecointalk.org and it was only a few weeks ago they mentioned anything about a full team taking care of this coin. So the end of January to now, 4-6 weeks in not 3 month. You have to remember that with so many moving parts everyone has to be on the same page for things to get moving and they seem to be doing this. I like that they are not trying to win a race or force this coin to rise too rapidly but it has sustained a organic growth over the last few months. When I bought in this coin was 1.1e-07 and only it has risen steadly over the last 5 months. Were there some pumps and dumps? Absolutely, happens to all coins but not the kind of levels seen with other coins and it quickly bounced back. As to anyone looking to add it to their portfolio, this is a good price to still get it at but do your research. Don't rely on what this one said or didn't say. Join the forums there and see for yourself.
|
|
|
|
|