Blackjack.fun |SLOTS|SPORTS|ESPORTS| JACK Token

[milewilda]

Altcoins are the solution here.

At this point you should introduce the possibility to "exchange" coins directly in your site, even at a certain rate it could be an #ideaforblackjack.fun

That's a huge job since they will be an exchanger for that thing but its good addition since the site user will not find any platform to exchange their winnings to various of alts, but I don't think they will implement this since I don't know if there's a site made this by now or maybe I just missed them.

Actually there are already famous gambling sites that do have that integrated exchanger(coinswitch) just like Stake.


It doesnt really a huge job imho and i agree above that this would be a good add up for people to have options on
converting various coins that they do prefer.

[Emitdama]

Altcoins are the solution here.

At this point you should introduce the possibility to "exchange" coins directly in your site, even at a certain rate it could be an #ideaforblackjack.fun

That's a huge job since they will be an exchanger for that thing but its good addition since the site user will not find any platform to exchange their winnings to various of alts, but I don't think they will implement this since I don't know if there's a site made this by now or maybe I just missed them.

Exchange in a casino is never a solution, that is more trouble than needed for anyone involved. I would say have the option to change them all to usdt if you can, but that's it, usdt is simpler since at least one side of the exchange is stable and not moving but even with that in mind it is still very risky to put an exchange on your website. If you really want to, there could be a third party app that is added that could help. All in all I think just having altcoins and that's it is enough for everyone.

Why go with an exchange, people who put up altcoins could withdraw altcoins and people who put up bitcoin would know about everything before hand and withdraw bitcoin as well. The only trouble would be bankroll of the casino since if you add more coins it would cost you more to cover the bets as well.

[Lanatsa]

Altcoins are the solution here.

At this point you should introduce the possibility to "exchange" coins directly in your site, even at a certain rate it could be an #ideaforblackjack.fun

That's a huge job since they will be an exchanger for that thing but its good addition since the site user will not find any platform to exchange their winnings to various of alts, but I don't think they will implement this since I don't know if there's a site made this by now or maybe I just missed them.

Exchange in a casino is never a solution, that is more trouble than needed for anyone involved. I would say have the option to change them all to usdt if you can, but that's it, usdt is simpler since at least one side of the exchange is stable and not moving but even with that in mind it is still very risky to put an exchange on your website. If you really want to, there could be a third party app that is added that could help. All in all I think just having altcoins and that's it is enough for everyone.

Why go with an exchange, people who put up altcoins could withdraw altcoins and people who put up bitcoin would know about everything before hand and withdraw bitcoin as well. The only trouble would be bankroll of the casino since if you add more coins it would cost you more to cover the bets as well.

Its not really bad to have that option and you saw on what milewilda posted above came from Stake? They put out coinswitch and we know that you can able to exchange tons of alts into your desired coin you wanted to without the need of going to another browser or making another transaction since you can directly make it on the site as well. Might a redundant thing but its beneficial for some, yeah you can choose up coins that had been already supported by the house and simply make direct deposit and direct withdrawal but hey there are people want to get a specific coin.

[shield132]

Altcoins are the solution here.

At this point you should introduce the possibility to "exchange" coins directly in your site, even at a certain rate it could be an #ideaforblackjack.fun

That's a huge job since they will be an exchanger for that thing but its good addition since the site user will not find any platform to exchange their winnings to various of alts, but I don't think they will implement this since I don't know if there's a site made this by now or maybe I just missed them.

Oh no, definitely there are casinos that have built-in exchange and it isn't something new. Having an exchanger on your website isn't that difficult and is far different from exchanges like binance. Internal exchanges are much easier in casinos and for example see Bitsler, they have 22 coin and it's possible to exchange any of them without going on another websites.
Also, primedice team has a different variation of exchange that seems very interesting and functional too. There, you can exchange and send/receive funds from different casinos immediately without paying any additional fee, check if interested.
Also, I remember FortuneJack had an exchange on their website but for some reason, they removed it (idk why).

[arallmuus]

Im not sure how this high fee issue has become such a discussion right now but you guys forget few key point here

1. This high fee issue could be temporary issue therefore there is no need to waste resources to build in some sort of exchanger like the other site. Unless there is alot of people that demand it ( Or it is on the site's roadmap )

2. I just checked and it cost me 229.21 μBTC for withdrawal fee. That is 0.00023 BTC which is roughly $2.85 ~ . I dont see how it is an issue, you are not withdrawing ten times a day from this site anyway  

[blackjack.fun]

So here is our Roadmap and focus:


1. BCH
2. ETH (+many of its tokens)
3. Suprise feature
4. Multiplayer tables
5. Monero
6. Live video stream tables.

And of course many small improvements and fixes what got inspired by YOU from feedback campaign.

Thank you all for helping to build the most trusted, most honest, coolest looking, interactive blackjack on the market!

Stay tuned for updates,
Blackjack.fun

[jostorres]

Im not sure how this high fee issue has become such a discussion right now but you guys forget few key point here

1. This high fee issue could be temporary issue therefore there is no need to waste resources to build in some sort of exchanger like the other site. Unless there is alot of people that demand it ( Or it is on the site's roadmap )

2. I just checked and it cost me 229.21 μBTC for withdrawal fee. That is 0.00023 BTC which is roughly $2.85 ~ . I dont see how it is an issue, you are not withdrawing ten times a day from this site anyway  

2.85 dollars could be a lot of money for someone living in a different nation than you. Not every nation has good economy and people actually work on faucets to make 5 bucks per week just to side-income and live a bit better, 5 bucks wouldn't probably change anything in your life. However I do believe that this place is developing already, there is no need to change the development as it is and simply just allow it to grow naturally and meanwhile the fee will drop anyway.

The increased fee prices has always been a temporary thing, I do not care how long it takes but eventually whenever this happens it ends, we will probably see the low ones once again. Like withdraw maxed capped at 1 dollars type of deal will probably happen just this summer, not even that further in the future.

[shield132]

Im not sure how this high fee issue has become such a discussion right now but you guys forget few key point here

1. This high fee issue could be temporary issue therefore there is no need to waste resources to build in some sort of exchanger like the other site. Unless there is alot of people that demand it ( Or it is on the site's roadmap )

2. I just checked and it cost me 229.21 μBTC for withdrawal fee. That is 0.00023 BTC which is roughly $2.85 ~ . I dont see how it is an issue, you are not withdrawing ten times a day from this site anyway  

2.85 dollars could be a lot of money for someone living in a different nation than you. Not every nation has good economy and people actually work on faucets to make 5 bucks per week just to side-income and live a bit better, 5 bucks wouldn't probably change anything in your life. However I do believe that this place is developing already, there is no need to change the development as it is and simply just allow it to grow naturally and meanwhile the fee will drop anyway.

The increased fee prices has always been a temporary thing, I do not care how long it takes but eventually whenever this happens it ends, we will probably see the low ones once again. Like withdraw maxed capped at 1 dollars type of deal will probably happen just this summer, not even that further in the future.

In most cases, casinos don't cover withdraw fee but I think it will be a right deal to have transaction fees divided like this: Low, Normal, High and have different kind of fees on them, calculate estimated hour of confirms and let users choose whether they prefer to pay 2$ or 2.5$.

And if 2.85$ is a lot of money for someone, then I want to remind you that these fees aren't manually set by blackjack.fun but are set in overall on bitcoin network, so if someone wants to even deposit on this website, in any case has to pay that 2.85$ or number near to it and that happens independently from blackjack.fun

There are some cases that don't depend on you. Even xapo was offering people zero-fee transactions but changed this term back in 2017 when fees skyrocketed.

[Quidat]

Im not sure how this high fee issue has become such a discussion right now but you guys forget few key point here

1. This high fee issue could be temporary issue therefore there is no need to waste resources to build in some sort of exchanger like the other site. Unless there is alot of people that demand it ( Or it is on the site's roadmap )

2. I just checked and it cost me 229.21 μBTC for withdrawal fee. That is 0.00023 BTC which is roughly $2.85 ~ . I dont see how it is an issue, you are not withdrawing ten times a day from this site anyway  

2.85 dollars could be a lot of money for someone living in a different nation than you. Not every nation has good economy and people actually work on faucets to make 5 bucks per week just to side-income and live a bit better, 5 bucks wouldn't probably change anything in your life. However I do believe that this place is developing already, there is no need to change the development as it is and simply just allow it to grow naturally and meanwhile the fee will drop anyway.

The increased fee prices has always been a temporary thing, I do not care how long it takes but eventually whenever this happens it ends, we will probably see the low ones once again. Like withdraw maxed capped at 1 dollars type of deal will probably happen just this summer, not even that further in the future.

In most cases, casinos don't cover withdraw fee but I think it will be a right deal to have transaction fees divided like this: Low, Normal, High and have different kind of fees on them, calculate estimated hour of confirms and let users choose whether they prefer to pay 2$ or 2.5$.

And if 2.85$ is a lot of money for someone, then I want to remind you that these fees aren't manually set by blackjack.fun but are set in overall on bitcoin network, so if someone wants to even deposit on this website, in any case has to pay that 2.85$ or number near to it and that happens independently from blackjack.fun

There are some cases that don't depend on you. Even xapo was offering people zero-fee transactions but changed this term back in 2017 when fees skyrocketed.

No business would sustain to give out zero-fee if the entire network is on high volume yet we know that transaction fees would be highly affected.I agree on what you have said which there should be some
slider that people would able to choose up from low-high priority fee so they do have options whatever they like so it will depend if the management will do such request or not but somehow there
are alts deposits in the site which we can temporarily use in times like these where btc tx fee are way too high.I wont say that $2.82 network fee is something that someone easily to neglect on,
not all people are that rich for them not to get affected by that one.

[blackjack.fun]

A new ANN design

[joksim299]

New Ann design is well done

[Bajank]

From all sorts of gambling games I just got lucky at Blackjeck 

[sana54210]

Between all of that roadmap, BCH seems like the only one I would probably argue against but it is personal and I understand there are many people who likes it. BCH is just a very shady looking scammy coin for me because it was done in ill manners by the miners so they could get more profits for their work, which they are already getting the rewards of mining and should only want that since it was only promised thing, fee's weren't really in calculation when it was calculated yet they want more of it and when they couldn't they started BCH hence why I dislike that coin. But that shouldn't stop you, there are tons of people who gamble with it, and adding would probably get you more people. Doge is one that is gambled in many places, maybe that could get more attention from you.

[shield132]

Between all of that roadmap, BCH seems like the only one I would probably argue against but it is personal and I understand there are many people who likes it. BCH is just a very shady looking scammy coin for me because it was done in ill manners by the miners so they could get more profits for their work, which they are already getting the rewards of mining and should only want that since it was only promised thing, fee's weren't really in calculation when it was calculated yet they want more of it and when they couldn't they started BCH hence why I dislike that coin. But that shouldn't stop you, there are tons of people who gamble with it, and adding would probably get you more people. Doge is one that is gambled in many places, maybe that could get more attention from you.

I don't understand at all why they shouldn't add BCH on their website. BCH isn't a coin similar of bitconnect and why do they have to reject this coin? Will users lose money if they deposit BCH or what? A lot of casinos are adding BCH because there is a demand on it from players. There are a lot of people who got free BCH from their Bitcoins and are going to gamble. Also, a lot of people had Bitcoins saved on crypto casinos and when casinos supported BCH, users were able to claim those coins.

There are still a lot of people who like BCH because of its pros and cons. I think users have a right to choose the coin they wish to gamble and the more opportunities here, the better. They don't promote BCH over BTC like Roger Ver does so what's wrong?

Btw, without doubt, it will be nice to see Doge and many altcoins on the website.

[jostorres]

No business would sustain to give out zero-fee if the entire network is on high volume yet we know that transaction fees would be highly affected.I agree on what you have said which there should be some
slider that people would able to choose up from low-high priority fee so they do have options whatever they like so it will depend if the management will do such request or not but somehow there
are alts deposits in the site which we can temporarily use in times like these where btc tx fee are way too high.I wont say that $2.82 network fee is something that someone easily to neglect on,
not all people are that rich for them not to get affected by that one.

There are plenty of methods to make it very low for the people who withdraw and casino to not charge this much. I am not saying its high, its normal during this period and I can understand it right now, of course just for now but it is quite common to have options to gamblers during this period. That idea of options like low-normal-high was created mainly during the 2017 peak.

I remember paying 14 dollars on a transaction at its peak if I am not wrong, there was one guy who paid me with 37 bucks but I think that was a bit of a mistake, he wanted to send right away as soon as possible and the minimum with the highest fee was 37 dollars, wasn't needed, but it did came in like 10 minutes later with 1 confirmation so I guess he did right. So right now we just need to have options, and also you can add batch withdrawals together as well, people would wait a long time but at least it would be very cheap.

[carlfebz2]

Between all of that roadmap, BCH seems like the only one I would probably argue against but it is personal and I understand there are many people who likes it. BCH is just a very shady looking scammy coin for me because it was done in ill manners by the miners so they could get more profits for their work, which they are already getting the rewards of mining and should only want that since it was only promised thing, fee's weren't really in calculation when it was calculated yet they want more of it and when they couldn't they started BCH hence why I dislike that coin. But that shouldn't stop you, there are tons of people who gamble with it, and adding would probably get you more people. Doge is one that is gambled in many places, maybe that could get more attention from you.

It wont really be that needed since theres is already LTC and DASH imho which is already sufficient option to take by most gamblers but the more the merrier eh?
Just like on what we saw on other popular sites like fj and cg but since this one do only have 1 game which is blackjack then those options currently
are enough.

[sana54210]

Honestly I am starting to realize that I do not care about which coin they are putting in, as long as they keep working on the website itself, doesn't matter what they are working on. BCH has a community and a lot of people who has it, maybe BCH itself could be bad, the owners (the miners) could made it for bad reasons, and there could be a lot of bad people who use it for wrong reasons, but at the end of the day we can't blame their fault into the users who are innocent and only use it for maybe profiting, or gambling or any other innocent reason.

Hence from now on when I am judging a coin, I will do it to project creators and not the users, not adding BCH would hurt the users and not the project owners so I should not be against it and even support it to help those people.

[blackjack.fun]

Hello Bitcointalk community.


We launched a new Winning Competition:
Biggest winner will win. No matter of deposit amount.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5253019.msg54553514#msg54553514

Kind regards,
Blackjack.fun

[arwin100]

Between all of that roadmap, BCH seems like the only one I would probably argue against but it is personal and I understand there are many people who likes it. BCH is just a very shady looking scammy coin for me because it was done in ill manners by the miners so they could get more profits for their work, which they are already getting the rewards of mining and should only want that since it was only promised thing, fee's weren't really in calculation when it was calculated yet they want more of it and when they couldn't they started BCH hence why I dislike that coin. But that shouldn't stop you, there are tons of people who gamble with it, and adding would probably get you more people. Doge is one that is gambled in many places, maybe that could get more attention from you.

It wont really be that needed since theres is already LTC and DASH imho which is already sufficient option to take by most gamblers but the more the merrier eh?
Just like on what we saw on other popular sites like fj and cg but since this one do only have 1 game which is blackjack then those options currently
are enough.

Maybe yes, But somehow if you see the current status of BCH right now you can imagine the number of BCH users around and for having a huge transaction fee's for BTC for sure the other holder shifts to BCH whenever they do transaction to minimize the fee's so maybe this will be a good option for this site since it could bring additional supporters in the presence of BCH, But we still be more careful for this coin since as you said it still shady coin even though this is listed at top list so better take extra precaution for holding.

[blackjack.fun]

Between all of that roadmap, BCH seems like the only one I would probably argue against but it is personal and I understand there are many people who likes it. BCH is just a very shady looking scammy coin for me because it was done in ill manners by the miners so they could get more profits for their work, which they are already getting the rewards of mining and should only want that since it was only promised thing, fee's weren't really in calculation when it was calculated yet they want more of it and when they couldn't they started BCH hence why I dislike that coin. But that shouldn't stop you, there are tons of people who gamble with it, and adding would probably get you more people. Doge is one that is gambled in many places, maybe that could get more attention from you.

It wont really be that needed since theres is already LTC and DASH imho which is already sufficient option to take by most gamblers but the more the merrier eh?
Just like on what we saw on other popular sites like fj and cg but since this one do only have 1 game which is blackjack then those options currently
are enough.

Maybe yes, But somehow if you see the current status of BCH right now you can imagine the number of BCH users around and for having a huge transaction fee's for BTC for sure the other holder shifts to BCH whenever they do transaction to minimize the fee's so maybe this will be a good option for this site since it could bring additional supporters in the presence of BCH, But we still be more careful for this coin since as you said it still shady coin even though this is listed at top list so better take extra precaution for holding.

Blackjack.fun is getting built by our bitcointalk and blackjack.fun community member suggestions. That is what we are doing. It was suggested many times to add this as a payment option. We would like to add as many coins as possible. Starting from Coinmarketcap list and adding from Up to Down. ETH is next because it is much more complicated to add. Hopefully Bitcoin TX fees will go lower and altcoins are not needed anymore but before it happens, Altcoins have a role here.