Blackjack.fun |SLOTS|SPORTS|ESPORTS| JACK Token

[blackjack.fun]

Thinking about going back to play on this site but my biggest concern is payout ability, i dont wanna come to a situation where the site wont be able to payout (if in some chance i am that lucky lmao) i see that the max bet is 0.6btc, am i right in thinking that there is atleast 1 btc in reserve to payout users?

Hello

Thank you for Your interest. If the Max bet is 0.6 btc then payout ability needs to be much more then just 1 btc. Biggest withdraw has been 8 btc. 2 to 8
Every players who comes to blackjack.fun Deposits and Wins, can withdraw their winnings. Always will!

[1714807269]

1714807269

[1714807269]

1714807269

[1714807269]

1714807269

[1714807269]

1714807269

[Dave1]

Question about multiplayer,

What if in the same household we try to play multiplayer, will it be allowed assuming that it will register as players having one ip address?

[sujonali1819]

Question about multiplayer,

What if in the same household we try to play multiplayer, will it be allowed assuming that it will register as players having one ip address?

Afaik multiple accounts are allowed if you use it in an honest way. But you can not abuse it. For example, you can not claim the bonuses with multiple ids, you can not be your own referral, etc.

*Admin can give a better answer in this case though. (My thought could be totally wrong or right)

[blackjack.fun]

Question about multiplayer,

What if in the same household we try to play multiplayer, will it be allowed assuming that it will register as players having one ip address?

It is fine to take 2 or 3 seats on multiplayer table if you want to with one account. 
Not allowed to do that in tournaments - yet.

[Dave1]

Question about multiplayer,

What if in the same household we try to play multiplayer, will it be allowed assuming that it will register as players having one ip address?

It is fine to take 2 or 3 seats on multiplayer table if you want to with one account. 
Not allowed to do that in tournaments - yet.

Ok, thanks for the quick response. Will definitely try multiplayer with some family members during weekends.

[blackjack.fun]

Hello guys!

Multiplayer tables are ready.
Sit and Go tables are ready
Tournament tables are ready


Single Table & Multi Table Tournaments
The difference between these two formats is both simple and, given their names, fairly obvious. Single table tournaments are played on just a single table, while multi-table tournaments are played over multiple tables.

The tournament ends up when time is up.

Sit and Go & Scheduled Tournaments
These differ purely in the way they start. A sit and go has no fixed start time, and will begin as soon as enough players have entered.

A scheduled tournament will start at a fixed time, with registration opening some time in advance.

[blackjack.fun]

So today is our first real blackjack tournament with 1mbtc entry fee.
First 10 players will get 1mbtc back right away. Risk free.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5299115

[ronaldo40]

Blackjack is an age-old game there are many different variants in a casino but I always wonder which variant is the most beneficial for a player because I have also read that in some cases a bank is allowed to fold and in some cases not that is a world of difference

[blackjack.fun]

Blackjack is an age-old game there are many different variants in a casino but I always wonder which variant is the most beneficial for a player because I have also read that in some cases a bank is allowed to fold and in some cases not that is a world of difference

Yes, these rules makes a huge difference and Blackjack.fun has the best ones for the player.

House edge is 0.85%
Covered with advanced PROVABLY FAIR algorithm which can be analyzed and verified cryptographically for your fairness.

[webtricks]

So blackjack.fun hosted a tournament yesterday. I noticed the special 0.001 BTC Giveaway for the first 10 bitcointalk users who would join the tournament. I liked the concept, deposited 0.00108 BTC quickly and registered for the tournament. Got credit of additional 0.001 BTC instantly in my blackjack.fun account.

Everything was going smoothly, although only 2 users joined the tournament, it was fun playing the tournament. I really enjoyed it and blackjack.fun surely has the best blackjack experience among all crypto casino (not to forget that the site has valid provably fair system).

But what happened after the tournament was horrible experience and made me decide to never play on blackjack.fun again. As soon as tournament ended, I was accused of multi-accounting by the admin:

 

At first I was unable to understand what does 'humb' mean. I thought it's some English word I am unaware of. But after the other guy messaged, I realized the gravity of the situation that I was accused of multi-accounting. And before I could figure out anything, I was banned from the chat. The chat ban effected my ongoing 'sit & go' tournament and I had to logout & login twice to complete that tournament.

Moreover, I think balance reflecting in my account is not correct. The admin said in the chat that he will create free 1 mBTC sit & go for the players who are playing the tournament:



So, as per my calculation:

     Balance Deposited                =  1.08 mBTC
(-) Fees for the Tournament       =  1.00 mBC
                                                 -------------
                                                   0.08 mBTC
(+) Balance from tourney          =  0.43 mBTC (I am not entirely sure but it was close to 430 uBTC)
                                                 -------------
                                                   0.51 mBTC
(+) Prize for winning tourney     =  1.00 mBTC
                                                 -------------
                                                   1.51 mBTC
(+) Reward for Bitcointalk user  =  1.00 mBTC
                                                 -------------
                                                   2.51 mBTC
(-) Fees for Sit & go                  =  1.00 mBTC
                                                 -------------
                                                   1.51 mBTC
(+) Balance from Sit & Go         =  0.06 mBTC
                                                  -------------
                                                   1.57 mBTC
(+) Winning the Sit & Go.         =   1.00 mBTC
                                                  -------------
                                                   2.57 mBTC
(+) Free credit for Sit & Go.      =   1.00 mBTC
                                                   ------------
      Final Balance                     =   3.57 mBTC


But I only see 2.59 mBTC as my balance. Hope admin will provide here the reasonable explanation for everything - why I was suddenly banned, what connection did he see between my and humb's account, why balance in my account is not as per my calculation? Else, I am never going to deposit and play again on blackjack.fun ever and recommend others to not do so as well.

[blackjack.fun]

Thank you for your feedback!


What happened is that I gave free funds to play to everyone who was around. Some giveaway. 
Then Webtricks took part of the game. Everything was very good. He won the tournament.

We have a protection for alternative account. If the system will find the alternative account then it lets me know.

System told me that Webtricks=Hello I am Humb

I can share part of the info of both accounts. I cant share more because we have different ways to protect against alternative accounts and I will not share any personal information.


Hello I am Humb:
"timezone": 5,
  "referrer": "",
  "previousSites": 2,
  "browserName": "Netscape",
  "browserEngine": "Gecko",
  "browserVersion1a": "5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/87.0.4280.88 Safari/537.36",
  "browserVersion1b": "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/87.0.4280.88 Safari/537.36",
  "browserLanguage": "es-US",
  "browserOnline": true,
  "browserPlatform": "Win32",
  "javaEnabled": false,
  "dataCookiesEnabled": true,
  "sizeScreenW": 1536,
  "sizeScreenH": 864,
  "sizeInW": 1536,
  "sizeInH": 754,
  "sizeAvailW": 1536,
  "sizeAvailH": 824,
  "scrColorDepth": 24,
  "scrPixelDepth": 24


Webtricks:
  "timezone": -5.5,
  "referrer": "https://blackjack.fun/table/341edb0e-37a9-421a-9928-1ab9822da26c",
  "previousSites": 13,
  "browserName": "Netscape",
  "browserEngine": "Gecko",
  "browserVersion1a": "5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/87.0.4280.88 Safari/537.36",
  "browserVersion1b": "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/87.0.4280.88 Safari/537.36",
  "browserLanguage": "en-US",
  "browserOnline": true,
  "browserPlatform": "Win32",
  "javaEnabled": false,
  "dataCookiesEnabled": true,
  "sizeScreenW": 1536,
  "sizeScreenH": 864,
  "sizeInW": 1536,
  "sizeInH": 754,
  "sizeAvailW": 1536,
  "sizeAvailH": 824,
  "scrColorDepth": 24,
  "scrPixelDepth": 24


It was very interesting discovery. That one person can have very different reputation in bitcointalk.
Vary sad to see complain that I didnt give extra 1mbtc from good will after this.

We continue with honesty no matter what.

[webtricks]

System told me that Webtricks=Hello I am Humb

I can share part of the info of both accounts. I cant share more because we have different ways to protect against alternative accounts and I will not share any personal information.

Hello I am Humb:
"timezone": 5,
~~snip

Webtricks:
"timezone": -5.5,
~~snip

Seriously! Your system detected alt accounts because two users have same browser and screen size!! LOL! Even a 12-year old can code a better anti-cheating script for you. Okay, I give you one more chance to prove how I am related to that other user. You said you don't wanna share personal information but I am insisting you to go ahead and share whatever you got. It's not like that I shared my passport with you that you are so worried about sharing in the public forum. Also I see my timezone is completely different from the other user so same IP address isn't the case too. Go ahead, share what you got so I can conclude whether you accusing me of multi-accounting is a genuine mistake or ill-intent from you.

Vary sad to see complain that I didnt give extra 1mbtc from good will after this.

Do you think I care about 1 mBTC too? But it's all about integrity. I thought your system had calculation problem, that's why I highlighted my calculation in previous post. But now I noticed that you just didn't credit me 1 mBTC for Sit & Go. But does the amount matter here? It can be 1 satoshi, it can be 1 BTC but when you clearly stated in the chat that you are creating a free tournament and I joined it solely due to your bonus promise, I fell cheated for not being credited, especially when you later come up with a fancy alt account story just because I have same browser and screen size like one of your site's serial scammer.

Fun Fact: 65% internet users use Chrome browser and I assume 30% of them have 1080p screen like me. So according to you, I have 880 million alt accounts using internet.

[LoyceV]

I can share part of the info of both accounts. I cant share more because we have different ways to protect against alternative accounts and I will not share any personal information.

Can you share the full evidence with me? I've "known" Humb for years and I don't believe he's the same person as webtricks.

Hello I am Humb:
"timezone": 5,
  "browserLanguage": "es-US",

Webtricks:
  "timezone": -5.5,
  "browserLanguage": "en-US",

This isn't very convincing.

[webtricks]

I can share part of the info of both accounts. I cant share more because we have different ways to protect against alternative accounts and I will not share any personal information.

Can you share the full evidence with me? I've "known" Humb for years and I don't believe he's the same person as webtricks.

I would rather prefer full transparency. Post all the evidences here in the thread, @admin. I insist.

[Timelord2067]

Take care @blackjack.fun, humbertin's alt is using retaliatory DT distrust in an attempt to silence anyone exposing their alts and scamming.

I cant share more because we have different ways to protect against alternative accounts and I will not share any personal information.

Can you share the full evidence with me? I've "known" Humb for years and I don't believe he's the same person as webtricks.

Would you be prepared to share your further evidence with @LoyceV (who is well trusted on the forum) that you haven't posted because of respecting privacy issues?

[NotATether]

I can share part of the info of both accounts. I cant share more because we have different ways to protect against alternative accounts and I will not share any personal information.

Can you share the full evidence with me? I've "known" Humb for years and I don't believe he's the same person as webtricks.

I would rather prefer full transparency. Post all the evidences here in the thread, @admin. I insist.

Damn, admin didn't even check your IP addresses to see if you two are the same, he just checked your browser version and screen resolution?

Chrome 87 on Windows and 1536x824 screen resolution? Please stand by while I fire up a Windows 10 VM and emulate that screen resolution so I can get banned for being an "alt account" of webtricks /s


Also what happens to all the Chrome for Windows 10 users with 1080p screens do they all get banned for being alt accounts too?  

Seriously I hope you get this settled webtricks, this is some horrible multiaccounting check system they have in place.

Take care @blackjack.fun, humbertin's alt is using retaliatory DT distrust in an attempt to silence anyone exposing their alts and scamming.

This is the silliest thing I've heard all month. You seriously think that humbertin=webtricks?

[suchmoon]

Chrome 87 on Windows and 1536x824 screen resolution? Please stand by while I fire up a Windows 10 VM and emulate that screen resolution so I can get banned for being an "alt account" of webtricks /s

The thing is... the resolution is a lot more common than it seems - it's a 125% scale of 1080p, not an unusual thing to do on e.g. a laptop. The user agent is obviously vanilla latest version of Chrome on Windows 10.

  "browserVersion1b": "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/87.0.4280.88 Safari/537.36",
[...]
  "sizeScreenW": 1536,
  "sizeScreenH": 864,

[Timelord2067]

This is the silliest thing I've heard all month.

You obviously haven't lurked in the "reputation" section anytime this year.

You seriously think that humbertin=webtricks?

Are you asking me, or @blackjack.fun who made the assertion - with proof.

??

[blackjack.fun]

Hello guys.

On 17th when dev team is back from vacation, we can make a deeper investigation then.
If it is just a coincidence or is it an alt account. Truth will come out then.
If it is not then it also definitely will come out and I let you all know.

No hard feelings,I love you all anyway.
Blackjack.fun

[suchmoon]

On 17th when dev team is back from vacation, we can make a deeper investigation then.
If it is just a coincidence or is it an alt account. Truth will come out then.

You do realize that basically every Chrome user on Windows gets automatically updated to that user agent string? Get a PC with 1080p resolution, set scaling to 125% and run latest Chrome, and check your logs. You don't need "dev team" for that. It's quite asinine to make an accusation like that and leave it hanging.