How to distinguish between good and bad projects

[Alucard2425]

For me i just look at their whitepaper and look at their project if it is realistic that it can be used in daily life and i always look deeper in the project aim and goals

[1714670593]

1714670593

[1714670593]

1714670593

[1714670593]

1714670593

[1714670593]

1714670593

[1714670593]

1714670593

[shinratensei_]

For me i just look at their whitepaper and look at their project if it is realistic that it can be used in daily life and i always look deeper in the project aim and goals

Basically, the platform that will see a chance to fix a common problem in our life is much better than a platform that created a non sense idea. We know that a common problem will give them a lot of chance to get a lot of demand by offering an interesting solution.

[NightMar_1St]

It is difficult to distinguish. But I often evaluate a project according to criteria such as: ICO team, trend, future feasibility, strong community

[futuristishe]

strange question. It has been discussed about 100 times)) If the project already has a working product that 100% is a good project and you go. But in General it is worth examining the team, she might then have opened successful project. Study white paper.

[jan.nicolas]

A big difference at first glance you just can not make out. Therefore, I can only say one simple thing. In order to fully analyze between all these things, you must learn to understand the little things that scammers do not pay attention.

[Chomsy]

For now I haven't seen any good analyzes that practically tells which coin is good or which is bad. Most projects after the analysis still ends up disappointing the investors.

[Cosbycoin]

for me the first thing i search their website, their core team member and their advisor, their official social media account, and all info about them must be clear.

This knowledge can determine the possible return that any investor expects to make in cryptocurrency or a project. For this, you need to go through the details on their website and also about the reviews from the people who have been part of the project. This way, you would be able to compare with another standard project that you know about and is profitable. If the risk is lower, the return might be solid.

[bitgolden]

for me the first thing i search their website, their core team member and their advisor, their official social media account, and all info about them must be clear.

This knowledge can determine the possible return that any investor expects to make in cryptocurrency or a project. For this, you need to go through the details on their website and also about the reviews from the people who have been part of the project. This way, you would be able to compare with another standard project that you know about and is profitable. If the risk is lower, the return might be solid.

This suggestion is good too but this can only be applicable to projects that are already existing and where people has participated to give reviews, what about the ones that is just starting up which is the major ICO we are talking about here, we cannot apply review method or use comparison method except we study the project team thoroughly and also see if the project they are trying to engage themselves in viable and will be useful to the community, if the project product is one that will not gain the interest of people, no matter how hard the project team tries to push it, it will end up being a shitcoin.

[raptorez]

I think that today you can really only do an analysis of the project based on the fact that the fundamental analysis of the project today. I think that people understand what I mean. Therefore, I think that now people can not do much.

[Petchant]

ICO rating sites are really not a good parameters to judge if a project is good or not. Those guys are in business and they are ever ready to rate any project high once the team is ready to pay them. I think you might get to know if a project is good or not through their community on Telegram, the content of their Whitepaper and the extent of credibility that the team shows

[bartusv]

I am looking at the team activity on Github and how actively the team communicate to their supporting
community. On the telegram we can find many helpful  insights. for easier decision making.

[Danslip]

There are some reliable projects that worth to invest in but this is not the main concern of big investors. Bad projects can't collect so much money in ICOs and they usually fail in a year.

[Yamifoud]

There are some reliable projects that worth to invest in but this is not the main concern of big investors. Bad projects can't collect so much money in ICOs and they usually fail in a year.

I'll consider that project will be good if it have a huge contribution into crypto space and not just a copy of another project as usually it happen today. Mostly running project have a big chances to attract more investors as they could tried to used it and to know its capabilities unlike of those aid to be launch soon. Cause it sometimes it turns into just a scam.

[reality18]

There is not any fixed strategy to follow to identify good projects from a bad one. The best an investor can do to help himself is to do a personal research into the project. During the research, it is imperative for the investor to study about the team and their expertise level. Also, studying about the idea and product of the project is very important because if the idea is feasible and the product is in high demand, the project is likely to succeed.

[overnight03]

How can you quickly distinguish between good and bad projects and even being invincible in the bear market？

In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.

Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.

Currently, there are now few ICO participants and many are participating in the IEO, which is a new trend of the market, most people who buy IEO successfully, their account balance will increase greatly ,now I don't really care much about ICO

[futile-resistance]

There are some reliable projects that worth to invest in but this is not the main concern of big investors. Bad projects can't collect so much money in ICOs and they usually fail in a year.

Of course they do, prior to now that many ICO find it difficult to reach their softcap because of these issue of scam and bad project scaring investors, most projects that has failed succeeded in actually reaching their hardcap which we are not talking about chicken change here, their hardcap runs to millions of dollars.

Some of them don’t envisage failure too, just that they probably met some challenges along the way that was way beyond their control and not every failed project lasted a year, some lasted far more than a year, and they usually get stock in a value before finally collapsing.

[Cianix]

How can you quickly distinguish between good and bad projects and even being invincible in the bear market？

In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.

Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.

Currently, there are now few ICO participants and many are participating in the IEO, which is a new trend of the market, most people who buy IEO successfully, their account balance will increase greatly ,now I don't really care much about ICO

I agree , now you need to go to io , this is a new trend in 2019 , the more there are great chances to make good money ! especially on binance

[hahahafr]

You are guys have done a great job with that research but i think you could have uploaded it on any cloud website and provided the community with the link so that we can have access to such vital information. Anyway, distinguishing between good projects and bad projects is quite difficult because most of these ICOs that are running don't have any real use case but rather potential use case which may or may not look feasible. Sometimes we look on the surface such as community members, interface of website etc. and assess a project but i think this is not always right.

I invested into a project which even provided a live tour of its office yet as over six months now i have not heard anything about that project. I think we need to look at what the team has build in the first place before investing our hard earned funds into it.

[Galantin]

  Yes, not as there is a project. He either works or you have lost money and time. Unfortunately, there are too many such projects today. I got another couple of such projects on this I am in a rage today.

[qomariah95]

Actually there are so many ways to see the project as good or not. But all people are of course different ways of looking at the project itself. So you decide whether the project is good or not. Because you can analyze yourself how the project can be said to be good or bad.