Account banned - Limx Dev - [closed]

[lobcmt2]

I probably spent hours to find that post, LOL.

I think there should be a better explanation for the ban than this.

I agreed your findings likely the most possible reason of Limx Dev's perma ban.
I just curious why around 5 years after posting this, he got perma banned, not sooner.  
Anyway, I felt deeply regret for Limx Dev, who probably did not read forum rules carefully and unintentionally, carelessly plagiarised.

One more question, for plagiarism, if someone violates only one time, they will get perma banned when plagiarism found or after two, three, four times till a death penalty comes?

[1714840165]

1714840165

[1714840165]

1714840165

[1714840165]

1714840165

[1714840165]

1714840165

[fronti]

One more question, for plagiarism, if someone violates only one time, they will get perma banned when plagiarism found or after two, three, four times till a death penalty comes?

in general, there is no excuse in plagiarism.

[UserU]

One more question, for plagiarism, if someone violates only one time, they will get perma banned when plagiarism found or after two, three, four times till a death penalty comes?

You bet. Satoshi Nakamoto as the Death Reaper.

At least he/ she could finally meet the Bitcoin maker.

[cryptohunter]

This all looks like weak sauce for a perm ban. Just take off his sig for a couple of years.

What kind of place is this? it is turning into a complete sham.

1. perm ban devs and real contributors for a couple of copy and paste which is not even likely financially motivated, likely just got sloppy or forgot to reference original source (does not look like any ground breaking revelations or anything even covered by copyright). I mean he is obviously not a copy and paste bot spammer and creates a lot of original content.

2. we reward, promote and provide financial incentive for

a. proven liars
b. proven and self confessed trust abusers
c. proven sneaky and greedy financially motivated racist trolling sig spamming sock puppets
d. those STRONGLY implicated in extortion attempts who contact and threaten peoples parents
e. those implicated in moving the btc they were intrusted with for escrow purposes to gain personally from any forks
f. those with observable double standards on SERIOUS matters.

3. sneaky snitches like suchmoon who revels in getting real contributors and NON scammers banned whilst enabling/ protecting the most shady and scammy shits on here.

What a fucked up place it's all turning into.

We just sold out free speech here on this board by implementing merit (now DT) to take care of a bunch of  ico spammers/bots  who should have been contained within a noob jail in the first place and not allowed anywhere near the valuable posters who were driven away.

Allowing this copy and paste shit to be weaponized is another huge mistake.  Who seriously gives 1 fuck if someone copies a mining guide, a news posts about a project, any helpful information that was requested. Come on this is fucking pathetic we care about this but not about the A - F of real scum bags whom we want to reward, praise and promote.

Copy and paste perm bans should be for bots, text spinners, frequent copy and pasters for clear financial gain. Those using copy and paste to ruin the board for financial reward. Not those helping others or just a bit lazy. Ban occasional lazy and reward and pay scammers?? yeah okay sounds legit.

I've never encountered such a bunch of sniveling vermin.

There MUST be more behind this kind of account to be banned. Did his projects turn into scams? is there any observable untrustworthy wrongdoing with financial motives here? if so present it.

All this hassle, innocent accounts getting ruined with red paint, real contributors banned on weaponized copy and paste nonsense, the free speech of the entire board now crushed by merit and dt, .... just to deal with some shitty ico spammers.  

Just take off his sig for a few years, I'm sure he will not mind if he is a real enthusiast.

If this is not financially motivated then theymos will surely sig ban him since chitbitcity was allowed back  because of some DT supporters. One of which I think was suchmoon.

[LoyceV]

This all looks like weak sauce for a perm ban. Just take off his sig for a couple of years.

What kind of place is this? it is turning into a complete sham.

1. perm ban devs and real contributors for a couple of copy and paste which is not even likely financially motivated, likely just got sloppy or forgot to reference original source (does not look like any ground breaking revelations or anything even covered by copyright). I mean he is obviously not a copy and paste bot spammer and creates a lot of original content.

This I agree with. If you would have stopped here instead of repeating the same thing you always post anywhere, I would have merited your post as being worth reading. Now I'm quoting just the relevant part.

[fronti]

This all looks like weak sauce for a perm ban. Just take off his sig for a couple of years.

What kind of place is this? it is turning into a complete sham.

1. perm ban devs and real contributors for a couple of copy and paste which is not even likely financially motivated, likely just got sloppy or forgot to reference original source (does not look like any ground breaking revelations or anything even covered by copyright). I mean he is obviously not a copy and paste bot spammer and creates a lot of original content.

agree here

We just sold out free speech here on this board by implementing merit (now DT) to take care of a bunch of  ico spammers/bots  who should have been contained within a noob jail in the first place and not allowed anywhere near the valuable posters who were driven away.

a jail is not the solution, the bots will find ways to go around.
Also it make it hard for real new useres as if there is a newbe jail these are also excluded.

Allowing this copy and paste shit to be weaponized is another huge mistake.  Who seriously gives 1 fuck if someone copies a mining guide, a news posts about a project, any helpful information that was requested. Come on this is fucking pathetic we care about this but not about the A - F of real scum bags whom we want to reward, praise and promote.

Copy and pasting a complete guide without mention the source is for me plagiarism.

but overall I think yeas, there must be somehow a bit more relaxed in plagiarism but be non relaxed on signature spamming (which is the source on plagiarism dabate in my eyes)


but now i also think that this is an mostly off topic reply for this thread..

[cryptohunter]

This all looks like weak sauce for a perm ban. Just take off his sig for a couple of years.

What kind of place is this? it is turning into a complete sham.

1. perm ban devs and real contributors for a couple of copy and paste which is not even likely financially motivated, likely just got sloppy or forgot to reference original source (does not look like any ground breaking revelations or anything even covered by copyright). I mean he is obviously not a copy and paste bot spammer and creates a lot of original content.

agree here

We just sold out free speech here on this board by implementing merit (now DT) to take care of a bunch of  ico spammers/bots  who should have been contained within a noob jail in the first place and not allowed anywhere near the valuable posters who were driven away.

a jail is not the solution, the bots will find ways to go around.
Also it make it hard for real new useres as if there is a newbe jail these are also excluded.

Allowing this copy and paste shit to be weaponized is another huge mistake.  Who seriously gives 1 fuck if someone copies a mining guide, a news posts about a project, any helpful information that was requested. Come on this is fucking pathetic we care about this but not about the A - F of real scum bags whom we want to reward, praise and promote.

Copy and pasting a complete guide without mention the source is for me plagiarism.

but overall I think yeas, there must be somehow a bit more relaxed in plagiarism but be non relaxed on signature spamming (which is the source on plagiarism dabate in my eyes)


but now i also think that this is an mostly off topic reply for this thread..

Okay cool

We can discuss those other points in a new thread I will make shortly. Sometimes 100% perfect solution is not required to be an improvement over totally broken system that is crushing free speech. But for sure this is a discussion for another thread.... try searching for most important thread of the year on this board and we can discuss it there if you like.
If there is any serious side to the copy and paste at all then just take off their sigs for a few years.

[hacker1001101001]

1. perm ban devs and real contributors for a couple of copy and paste which is not even likely financially motivated, likely just got sloppy or forgot to reference original source (does not look like any ground breaking revelations or anything even covered by copyright). I mean he is obviously not a copy and paste bot spammer and creates a lot of original content.

I too agree with this.

After spendings hours and some efforts in finding a copy-paste, I went through most of his post history and none of them seemed spammy to me.

At the end of the day, what matters is if the person we are banning from the community is worth it or not. In this case it is not for sure as Limx Dev never attempted to do anything which would harm the community rather helped in building a better one.


I think this statement of theymos would help here.

Nobody is banned strictly because of "the rules"; it's always handled case-by-case, but almost always, plagiarists deserve to be permabanned.

I would insist theymos to lift up the ban as nothing in this case looks intentional.

[cryptohunter]

1. perm ban devs and real contributors for a couple of copy and paste which is not even likely financially motivated, likely just got sloppy or forgot to reference original source (does not look like any ground breaking revelations or anything even covered by copyright). I mean he is obviously not a copy and paste bot spammer and creates a lot of original content.

I too agree with this.

After spendings hours and some efforts in finding a copy-paste, I went through most of his post history and none of them seemed spammy to me.

At the end of the day, what matters is if the person we are banning from the community is worth it or not. In this case it is not for sure as Limx Dev never attempted to do anything which would harm the community rather helped in building a better one.


I think this statement of theymos would help here.

Nobody is banned strictly because of "the rules"; it's always handled case-by-case, but almost always, plagiarists deserve to be permabanned.

I would insist theymos to lift up the ban as nothing in this case looks intentional.

We need to keep in mind that in prior cases like this suchmoon (who likely snitched him) likes to wait until the end then present something far more damning than we have already noticed.

This all looks far too weak for any mod to act upon.

Hence why I was contrasting a perm ban for copy and pasting against the "rewards" we bestow upon others proven to have conducted far more disgusting and untrustworthy deeds.

You want an environment where everyone is treated as equally as possible and their ENTIRE net contribution for their entire history here on this board is considered where any punishment or "reward" is being decided upon.

[HardFireMiner]

1. perm ban devs and real contributors for a couple of copy and paste which is not even likely financially motivated, likely just got sloppy or forgot to reference original source (does not look like any ground breaking revelations or anything even covered by copyright). I mean he is obviously not a copy and paste bot spammer and creates a lot of original content.

I too agree with this.

After spendings hours and some efforts in finding a copy-paste, I went through most of his post history and none of them seemed spammy to me.

At the end of the day, what matters is if the person we are banning from the community is worth it or not. In this case it is not for sure as Limx Dev never attempted to do anything which would harm the community rather helped in building a better one.


I think this statement of theymos would help here.

Nobody is banned strictly because of "the rules"; it's always handled case-by-case, but almost always, plagiarists deserve to be permabanned.

I would insist theymos to lift up the ban as nothing in this case looks intentional.

We need to keep in mind that in prior cases like this suchmoon (who likely snitched him) likes to wait until the end then present something far more damning than we have already noticed.

This all looks far too weak for any mod to act upon.

Hence why I was contrasting a perm ban for copy and pasting against the "rewards" we bestow upon others proven to have conducted far more disgusting and untrustworthy deeds.

You want an environment where everyone is treated as equally as possible and their ENTIRE net contribution for their entire history here on this board is considered where any punishment or "reward" is being decided upon.

You are only looking at the financial aspect of the users who plagiarize for immediate/fast rewards who participate in signature campaign. Why exclude the plagiarize used to create a legendary account of a developer who will create and promote projects gaining millions of $?
Back in 2015, name me another reliable forum/source of information such as bitcointalk?

[cryptohunter]

1. perm ban devs and real contributors for a couple of copy and paste which is not even likely financially motivated, likely just got sloppy or forgot to reference original source (does not look like any ground breaking revelations or anything even covered by copyright). I mean he is obviously not a copy and paste bot spammer and creates a lot of original content.

I too agree with this.

After spendings hours and some efforts in finding a copy-paste, I went through most of his post history and none of them seemed spammy to me.

At the end of the day, what matters is if the person we are banning from the community is worth it or not. In this case it is not for sure as Limx Dev never attempted to do anything which would harm the community rather helped in building a better one.


I think this statement of theymos would help here.

Nobody is banned strictly because of "the rules"; it's always handled case-by-case, but almost always, plagiarists deserve to be permabanned.

I would insist theymos to lift up the ban as nothing in this case looks intentional.

We need to keep in mind that in prior cases like this suchmoon (who likely snitched him) likes to wait until the end then present something far more damning than we have already noticed.

This all looks far too weak for any mod to act upon.

Hence why I was contrasting a perm ban for copy and pasting against the "rewards" we bestow upon others proven to have conducted far more disgusting and untrustworthy deeds.

You want an environment where everyone is treated as equally as possible and their ENTIRE net contribution for their entire history here on this board is considered where any punishment or "reward" is being decided upon.

You are only looking at the financial aspect of the users who plagiarize for immediate/fast rewards who participate in signature campaign. Why exclude the plagiarize used to create a legendary account of a developer who will create and promote projects gaining millions of $?
Back in 2015, name me another reliable forum/source of information such as bitcointalk?

1. there is no comparable forums to bitcointalk. It is clearly the best.
2. That developer could have made the same millions by launching as a snr or whatever. I really doubt the copy and pasted with any kind of financial motive in mind.
3. You need to look up the net value of a member did he contribute more net positive original content that the damage he apparently caused the board with a couple of copy and pastes that were likely on topic and helpful. Intent is for me the most important factor however even a couple of mistakes that cause minor if any harm compared to creating a ton of original content.

My point is we ban these people whilst rewarding those that are proven untrustworthy, scammers, liars and far more greedy. It is messed up.

[klaaas]

The reason is a one-year-old message for a small Airdrop. This Airdrop was executed in another forum.

A perma ban is over done here. Repeatedly braking the forum rules and misbehaving would be perma ban material.
Looking at Limx Dev his history this wasnt with bad intent in mind.

[HardFireMiner]

1. perm ban devs and real contributors for a couple of copy and paste which is not even likely financially motivated, likely just got sloppy or forgot to reference original source (does not look like any ground breaking revelations or anything even covered by copyright). I mean he is obviously not a copy and paste bot spammer and creates a lot of original content.

I too agree with this.

After spendings hours and some efforts in finding a copy-paste, I went through most of his post history and none of them seemed spammy to me.

At the end of the day, what matters is if the person we are banning from the community is worth it or not. In this case it is not for sure as Limx Dev never attempted to do anything which would harm the community rather helped in building a better one.


I think this statement of theymos would help here.

Nobody is banned strictly because of "the rules"; it's always handled case-by-case, but almost always, plagiarists deserve to be permabanned.

I would insist theymos to lift up the ban as nothing in this case looks intentional.

We need to keep in mind that in prior cases like this suchmoon (who likely snitched him) likes to wait until the end then present something far more damning than we have already noticed.

This all looks far too weak for any mod to act upon.

Hence why I was contrasting a perm ban for copy and pasting against the "rewards" we bestow upon others proven to have conducted far more disgusting and untrustworthy deeds.

You want an environment where everyone is treated as equally as possible and their ENTIRE net contribution for their entire history here on this board is considered where any punishment or "reward" is being decided upon.

You are only looking at the financial aspect of the users who plagiarize for immediate/fast rewards who participate in signature campaign. Why exclude the plagiarize used to create a legendary account of a developer who will create and promote projects gaining millions of $?
Back in 2015, name me another reliable forum/source of information such as bitcointalk?

1. there is no comparable forums to bitcointalk. It is clearly the best.
2. That developer could have made the same millions by launching as a snr or whatever. I really doubt the copy and pasted with any kind of financial motive in mind.
3. You need to look up the net value of a member did he contribute more net positive original content that the damage he apparently caused the board with a couple of copy and pastes that were likely on topic and helpful. Intent is for me the most important factor however even a couple of mistakes that cause minor if any harm compared to creating a ton of original content.

My point is we ban these people whilst rewarding those that are proven untrustworthy, scammers, liars and far more greedy. It is messed up.

To quote from another thread:

Limx Dev plagiarizing here, on forum, like there is no tomorrow in 2015, makes me think of what else did he plagiarize? BitSend? Bitcloud? Bitcore? All?  

He was a promoter first and foremost, I don't think his banning has anything to do with the quality or ongoings of your project. However, he won't be able to do things like update the OP and stuff...

As we can see, and I believe it's true, he was first and foremost a promoter. He promoted for financial gain his project here using plagiarized content. Sounds like a good reason for ban.

[pwpwpw]

What exactly was plagiarized ? It cannot be this for sure, this is a text book legal reply.

The one of the probable reasons why 'Limx Dev' profile was banned.

Should I buy Bitcore?

As the developers of this project, it’s not our role to make price predictions or give investment advice.

Should I buy Bitcoin Gold?

As the developers of the project, it’s not our role to make price predictions or give investment advice.

[r1s2g3]

Theymos some time back give the 1 month sig ban ( I guess redsnow ) for plagariasm as it was very old post and it is only one of occurrence.

Now what changed in Limx Dev case?

[hopenotlate]

Really curious to know the reason of this perma ban: let's see if someone will unveil it.

Don't think this forum is a better place without Limx Dev and hope theymos will consider lifting their ban .

[tbct_mt2]

Really curious to know the reason of this perma ban: let's see if someone will unveil it.

Don't think this forum is a better place without Limx Dev and hope theymos will consider lifting their ban .

Did you actually spend some seconds to read previous posts before posting this one?
Proof shown there:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5121907.msg50222647#msg50222647

[hopenotlate]

Really curious to know the reason of this perma ban: let's see if someone will unveil it.

Don't think this forum is a better place without Limx Dev and hope theymos will consider lifting their ban .

Did you actually spend some seconds to read previous posts before posting this one?
Proof shown there:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5121907.msg50222647#msg50222647

Yes I did.
Did you?
All I can read at the link you posted are some possible reasons ( based on something he posted back in 2015)  for which the ban was raised but that wasn't anything somewhat official or confirmed.
Unless you consider the proof of a permaban that quoted  part

As the developers of this project, it’s not our role to make price predictions or give investment advice.

that would be at least laughable in my opinion.

[hacker1001101001]

Don't think this forum is a better place without Limx Dev and hope theymos will consider lifting their ban .

Best way to react to the ban or uplifting it would be starting a new thread about it as stated by Theymos here.

If you think that a ban should be ended, make your case in a new topic from a "good for the forum as a whole" perspective.

All I can read at the link you posted are some possible reasons ( based on something he posted back in 2015)  for which the ban was raised but that wasn't anything somewhat official or confirmed.

Yes, this is not an official reason, but we don't need an official one for paralyzing and its the most probable reason for ban.

[YOSHIE]

As said by friends, @Limx Dev is banned because the copy / paste is submitted in the initial post.

But other than this, Aidrop posted two languages, German and English, I guessed @Limx Dev, forbidden on the basis of copying / pasting himself, the date with the clock is a little different, translate and have an alt account.

Strong suspicion, logic is simple, every question the aidrop participant @CoinEraser, who answers, he understands about Aidrop this is one suspicious thing about the @CoinEraser account, the same person @Limx Dev.
That might be @Limx Dev, prohibited first of this.

1. Limx Dev
2. CoinEraser

And this account also posts the same thing.

3. LIMX SUPPORT

Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=376487;sa=showPosts;start=20

Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=376487;sa=showPosts

The problem, I think leads to early Airdrop.

Topic: ANN][BSD] BitSend - Xevan - Segwit- Bittrex- Litebit.eu

Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1412235.160

Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1412235.msg50045830#msg50045830

German language.

Wöchentliche Airdrop Übersicht Nr. 151 - 09.03.19

Gesamtmitglieder: 806 | Auszahlung pro Mitglied: 10 | Auszahlung pro Mitglied insgesamt: 5.656
Airdrop insgesamt: 1.588.578 BitSend

Der nächste Aktionstag ist am nächsten Montag und die Aktion geht bis 2019.

Mit freundlichen Crypto Grüßen, Euer Bitsend Team

German language.

Wöchentliche Airdrop Übersicht Nr. 152 - 11.03.19

Gesamtmitglieder: 806 | Auszahlung pro Mitglied: 10 | Auszahlung pro Mitglied insgesamt: 5.666
Airdrop insgesamt: 1.596.618 BitSend

Der nächste Aktionstag ist am nächsten Montag und die Aktion geht bis 2019.

Mit freundlichen Crypto Grüßen, Euer Bitsend Team

English.

No.151 Overview Weekly Airdrop 03/09/19

Total members: 806 |Payout per member Bitsend: 10| Payout per member total Bitsend: 5.656
Airdrop total Bitsend 1.588.578

Payments will be issued on Mondays until 2019.
Best Regards,
Your Bitsend Team

English.

No.152 Overview Weekly Airdrop 03/11/19

Total members: 806 |Payout per member Bitsend: 10| Payout per member total Bitsend: 5.666
Airdrop total Bitsend 1.596.618

Payments will be issued on Mondays until 2019.
Best Regards,
Your Bitsend Team

1. http://archive.is/VIamL

2. http://archive.is/hMiR3

3. http://archive.is/DYVaY

4. http://archive.is/3qeQv