Bitcoin Forum
January 30, 2023, 09:31:52 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 24.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 [147] 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][SHA]SHACoin2 - Dead Revival - Virtual & Physical Coin - Faucet  (Read 198247 times)
nohow82
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 14, 2015, 12:00:41 PM
 #2921

Our SHA Network stopped for 17 hours.
I don't know why. It works well in past 9 months.
here are some clue before it happened.

1. We saw a new top1 address with 15 million SHA Coins.
2. 30+ nodes up and down to normal ~18
3. difficulty up to 6.5+ and down to 1


check this
blocks" : 525599,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 14.03751155,
"proof-of-stake" : 1.10854562,
"search-interval" : 2
},
"blockvalue" : 1,
"netmhashps" : 0.00000000,
"netstakeweight" : 78937033.38195707,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 49914972,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 49914972
},
"stakeinterest" : 100000,
"testnet" : false
}


13:02:06

getstakinginfo


13:02:07

{
"enabled" : true,
"staking" : true,
"errors" : "",
"currentblocksize" : 1196,
"currentblocktx" : 1,
"pooledtx" : 1,
"difficulty" : 1.10854562,
"search-interval" : 2,
"weight" : 49932455,
"netstakeweight" : 78937033,
"expectedtime" : 94
}

1675071112
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1675071112

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1675071112
Reply with quote  #2

1675071112
Report to moderator
1675071112
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1675071112

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1675071112
Reply with quote  #2

1675071112
Report to moderator
1675071112
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1675071112

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1675071112
Reply with quote  #2

1675071112
Report to moderator
BitcoinCleanup.com: Learn why Bitcoin isn't bad for the environment
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1675071112
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1675071112

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1675071112
Reply with quote  #2

1675071112
Report to moderator
nohow82
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 14, 2015, 12:08:36 PM
 #2922

i think there's something wrong with this address SQFH2nW1ox3mfHd8yy5ueFVmuh7A4eMtUX (new N.1)
How it's possible every stakes over 1000 sha?
frank123m
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500

*** NULL ***


View Profile
March 14, 2015, 01:12:27 PM
 #2923

i think there's something wrong with this address SQFH2nW1ox3mfHd8yy5ueFVmuh7A4eMtUX (new N.1)
How it's possible every stakes over 1000 sha?

the address: SQFH2nW1ox3mfHd8yy5ueFVmuh7A4eMtUX is legit till now.
because after checking its balance before 2014.06.06, it had 12 mils SHA coins already.

Received   12,257,309.236315 SHA   in 13 transactions
Sent   140,141.055313 SHA   in 1 transactions
Staked   3,053,209.087199 SHA   in 1076 transactions

first year 25%, seems normal. but something wrong with it.
frank123m
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500

*** NULL ***


View Profile
March 14, 2015, 01:16:06 PM
 #2924

more info:

last processed block: 46196 (april 26, 2014, 14:33 utc)
total coin in the system: 733 536 630.36497605 sha
top 100 richest
#   address   balance
1   Sg2NdZywasiNUADzm5dxt6G1WWKyKkj9Mc   397 874 484.35873902 sha
2   SSa2ejw4V6U4FLkqRherGtzMxFv5BJhGr5   33 123 808.92874100 sha
3   STX9LaJqGCshBvSxfUQjoDsup3eF4Huc5m   30 359 513.28987100 sha
4   SiRRA1exkSp1cf9ngNFmMRnK6qBcxNpMCT   25 000 000.00000000 sha
5   SiJN7eZpKUeemAKWkbF6fyWn9iqXLS4idf   14 934 372.68550400 sha
6   SQFH2nW1ox3mfHd8yy5ueFVmuh7A4eMtUX   12 249 486.14152900 sha
7   SdBXvP84JRxHLZkepQkhuGTYzc31Jr9WpB   10 791 666.05995800 sha
8   SjJk1ypVhY1Xp2VenHCiAEEcMHou9htQjy   8 000 111.00000000 sha
9   SXQJkvd6r5nNei23FSDAu9EULck3GGpafn   7 509 228.11506800 sha
10   SWfo3ptkFWTpMbqdcDZJp6HA6UjhXn49f2   7 286 416.73203700 sha
nohow82
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 14, 2015, 03:11:37 PM
 #2925

So what is the problem ?
frank123m
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500

*** NULL ***


View Profile
March 14, 2015, 03:36:59 PM
 #2926

So what is the problem ?

The problem is we now cannot go to next block and we don't know what caused this.
There seems to have a weakness in our network, then this happened by accident or attack.
too less nodes?
nohow82
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 14, 2015, 05:10:48 PM
 #2927

Any idea?
frank123m
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500

*** NULL ***


View Profile
March 14, 2015, 06:11:07 PM
 #2928

Any idea?

I am still waiting for CRF's reply. It is holiday, I don't know if they have the time or not.
or I will be doing some testing and try to find the way out.
nohow82
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 15, 2015, 08:21:41 AM
 #2929

What happen if we have reached coin limit?
frank123m
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500

*** NULL ***


View Profile
March 15, 2015, 08:27:31 AM
 #2930

What happen if we have reached coin limit?
PoS rate:
    - Year 1: 25%
    - Year 2: 15%
    - Year 3-9: 10%
    - Starting Year 10, it will have an annual PoS interest of 1%

should be ok, now we need to solve the problem and keep moving on.
frank123m
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500

*** NULL ***


View Profile
March 16, 2015, 05:46:29 AM
 #2931

Coin Dead again. So, there will be a revival.
nohow82
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 16, 2015, 07:16:19 AM
 #2932

And why?
frank123m
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500

*** NULL ***


View Profile
March 16, 2015, 08:12:55 AM
 #2933

And why?

I have no idea.
we will see if we can pass the block 525599 in private network or new public network and try to find out why.
it feel like we just had a 51% attack.


frank123m
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500

*** NULL ***


View Profile
March 16, 2015, 09:36:25 AM
 #2934

It is a very strange time.
Because doge blockchain is ready. btc blockchain is ready. but sha blockchain stopped.
so current we have this:


well, maybe someone need us doing something to SHA first, so here we go.
frank123m
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500

*** NULL ***


View Profile
March 16, 2015, 09:45:53 AM
 #2935

and let me show you something.


17:43:41

getstakinginfo


17:43:41

{
"enabled" : true,
"staking" : false,
"errors" : "",
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 1,
"difficulty" : 1.10854562,
"search-interval" : 0,
"weight" : 53134965,
"netstakeweight" : 78937033,
"expectedtime" : -1
}
nohow82
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 16, 2015, 11:04:49 AM
 #2936

51% attack? How is it possible?
How could we pass block in private network?
frank123m
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500

*** NULL ***


View Profile
March 16, 2015, 11:10:49 AM
 #2937

51% attack? How is it possible?
How could we pass block in private network?

actually, I don't know. and we forgot the coin's birthday celebration.
we just passed the coin's birthday and the coin gave us a smile. Smiley
nohow82
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 16, 2015, 11:11:08 AM
 #2938

and let me show you something.


17:43:41

getstakinginfo


17:43:41

{
"enabled" : true,
"staking" : false,
"errors" : "",
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 1,
"difficulty" : 1.10854562,
"search-interval" : 0,
"weight" : 53134965,
"netstakeweight" : 78937033,
"expectedtime" : -1
}



{
"enabled" : true,
"staking" : true,
"errors" : "",
"currentblocksize" : 1196,
"currentblocktx" : 1,
"pooledtx" : 1,
"difficulty" : 1.10854562,
"search-interval" : 2,
"weight" : 69010675,
"netstakeweight" : 78937033,
"expectedtime" : 68
}
frank123m
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500

*** NULL ***


View Profile
March 16, 2015, 01:11:08 PM
 #2939

"weight" : 69010675,
"netstakeweight" : 78937033,
"expectedtime" : 68
}

well, we just wait and see the weight > netstakeweight and see what happened.

because current setting:
Min stake age: 48 hours, no max age.

no max age, maybe a problem.
nohow82
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 16, 2015, 01:52:38 PM
 #2940

I think that the problem is when n1 stacked a lot of coin. Addresses that haven't stacked for long time will cause this. I think
Pages: « 1 ... 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 [147] 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!