Is cryptohunter spamming forum?

[marlboroza]

Some rants about something, it looks like usual cryptohunter's day in forum except she start to create threads about things which are probably mentioned in her posts over and over again:

Natural permitted flow of a thread - 1. The false allegation.
Natural permitted flow of a thread - 2. precedents and prior behaviours
Natural permitted flow of a thread - 3. flawed reasoning on the basis of prior

Is this spam?

[1715106708]

1715106708

[1715106708]

1715106708

[1715106708]

1715106708

[1715106708]

1715106708

[suchmoon]

Is this spam?

Yes. All three threads are rehashing his butthurt about his deleted posts. Just report them.

[cryptohunter]

NO and here is why..... try to present a sensible case in future because you just look more stupid than usual.

Rants = questions and observable events now

This moronbozo tried to red trust me once for "scare quotes"  and supports on dt proven scammers, liars and other unsavoury behaviours all driven by greed and financial self enrichment. This nicely illustrates why the background of persons presenting opinion or making statements with no case need to be investigated on thread to enable the readers to gain a more complete insight.


1. this should be rep matter when you make it about 1 person. So already you are posting in the wrong section.

2. only a fool like moronbozo would try to bring debate on 3 separate  issues on one thread, the replies will get all mixed up and confusion will be rife. I mean look how confused you are moronbozo and that is just one imbecile. Try to imagine asking that all 3 discussions take place on 1 thread. Your grounds are pathetic. That is why I made 3 separate threads.

By that token perhaps locyeV should put all of his merit analysis on one thread LOL  I often see as many as 8 or more running on the first page here. Sorry to have 3. ooohhhh ban him now.

3. How could even the most desperate person pleading for my ban (all hiding away in my fanzine thread discussing their tactics to stop me presenting the truth and get me banned) try to pass off 3 important threads seeking clarity and definition on such important matters to improve the optimal usefulness of the forum for no personal gain.....be termed a spam.

4. Suchmoron pleading for the mods to delete them ON WHAT GROUNDS???  yes I did note down your comment that you have taken me off ignore to specifically get my posts deleted, and that you said that your only hope now is just to keep reporting and reporting him....i guess to try and get me banned.


Bring your case not just your groundless opinions.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Spamming, definitely.  He is also trolling, albeit in an unusual way.

I've reported quite a few of his posts, but not in the threads he's created.  But now he's starting multiple threads which are (I think; I have him on ignore) basically the same anti-DT crusading that he's been doing for months with no results.  I do think it's about time he got banned.  I'm just tired of seeing either his posts or his threads pop up on my unread posts feed. 

He's so annoying, even the ignore function isn't enough.

[cryptohunter]

Spamming, definitely.  He is also trolling, albeit in an unusual way.

I've reported quite a few of his posts, but not in the threads he's created.  But now he's starting multiple threads which are (I think; I have him on ignore) basically the same anti-DT crusading that he's been doing for months with no results.  I do think it's about time he got banned.  I'm just tired of seeing either his posts or his threads pop up on my unread posts feed.  

He's so annoying, even the ignore function isn't enough.

Ah another proven untrustworthy person arrives to bolster their "no case" statement "no collusion btw"

So let me challenge you my sock puppet racist trolling sig spammer Huge black woman.

Present examples of the trolling " in an unusual way " lol like telling the truth.

Let's compare them to your racist trolling from your  sig spamming sock puppet account. Perhaps you are confused on what trolling is?

Present the examples of the spamming. Do you mean presenting on topic observable events that are relevant but that you guys don't like being mentioned?

Let me see what you bring.

What you all really mean is that we want him banned because he keeps bringing up the annoying "truth" that we are observably pushing double standards and promoting untrustworthy persons on to DT and then punishing others for far lesser crimes.

OK so there are the challenges for you bunch of dumbos. Surely you can present some evidence for your claims?? get on to it and present it now.

These are EXACTLY the kinds of false accusations that have resulted in me presenting observable events to defend myself and they have reported as off topic trying to build up some NUMBERS case to enforce a ban they have tried to action by other means and so far failed. This is observable scummy tactics from a bunch of observably untrustworthy scum.

Back to your self moderated threads where you all hide away. haha

The thoughts and words of cryptohunter will never go away. You will only give them more power and bolster his case that free speech and any kind of justice has gone now. Where proven liars, proven sneaky and greedy sock puppet racist trolling sig spammers, scammers, trust abusers, probable extortionists all conspire and collude to try and silence those honest members that simply tell the TRUTH about them.
Sorry getting me banned for that will just inspire lots of others to join i would imagine ...to ensure that the true legend of cryptohunter and his desire for a transparent, fair and equal environment for all is never forgotten.

I actually notice when looking through my deleted posts (normally i give them little consideration) I find NONE that are off topic / irrelevant at all. A sensible case can be presented that all of them are the truth, based on observable events and are very important to the issues being discussed. By deleting any of them you deprive the reader of gaining a deeper understanding of the issues in the OP and the full context of the replies of the posters within them.

[marlboroza]

Yes. All three threads are rehashing his butthurt about his deleted posts. Just report them.

Ok, will do it right away. I will also report her post from this thread as trolling:

only a fool like moronbozo
[...]
I mean look how confused you are and that is just one imbecile. [/b]
[...]
Suchmoron
[...]
Let me destroy you all over again in public.

And I might create thread about this issue as well, I just don't have enough time to go trough her posts and wall of texts.

while typing this post, cryptohunter edited her post, this was original one:



Destroy who?

Spamming, definitely.  He is also trolling, albeit in an unusual way.

So spamming, trolling and this looks like another off topic/spam/trolling reply.

So let me challenge you my sock puppet racist trolling sig spammer Huge black woman.
[...]
Let's compare them to your racist trolling from your  sig spamming sock puppet account.
[...]
OK so there are the challenges for you bunch of dumbos.

[asche]

Besides the fact that these topics are spam, also most of what he posts on a daily basis can easily be considered as trolling.

When will this get him at least a temp ban?

[cryptohunter]

Yes. All three threads are rehashing his butthurt about his deleted posts. Just report them.

Ok, will do it right away. I will also report her post from this thread as trolling:

only a fool like moronbozo
[...]
I mean look how confused you are and that is just one imbecile. [/b]
[...]
Suchmoron
[...]
Let me destroy you all over again in public.

And I might create thread about this issue as well, I just don't have enough time to go trough her posts and wall of texts.

while typing this post, cryptohunter edited her post, this was original one:



Destroy who?

Spamming, definitely.  He is also trolling, albeit in an unusual way.

So spamming, trolling and this looks like another off topic/spam/trolling reply.

So let me challenge you my sock puppet racist trolling sig spammer Huge black woman.
[...]
Let's compare them to your racist trolling from your  sig spamming sock puppet account.
[...]
OK so there are the challenges for you bunch of dumbos.

No those look like truthful statements that I can back up with observable events if want.

Please do not cherry pick and cut out things to present misleading and corrupt information.

Trolling is not telling the truth. Sorry you are again confused.

LOL snitch cry babies. I will snitch him again and hope he gets banned for telling the truth. What a bunch of pathetic losers. Why not present your case.

LOL trolling is presenting a sensible and credible defense against accusations. hahah you are so stupid you are clearly demonstrating there needs to be clarity on the EXACT ISSUES that I made the threads for. hahaha has suchmoon hacked your account? this sounds like her level of dumbness. Thanks for debunking your own thread that was fun.


@asche  - ah noob trash ass kissing sig spammer enters the game. The problem is you can all be seen colluding and crying together about me crushing you all in public over and over again with THE TRUTH.

BRING ME AN EXAMPLES OF THE TROLLING so we can debate it. I challenge you to bring it here now.  What you will find is that is these posts are all factual and based on observable events and highly relevant but just you all want them to go away. That will not happen be it the legend cryptohunter or be it his friends.

SO HURRY UP MORON BRING YOUR EVIDENCE.... not your crying noob tears here for me to scorn.

As always you will see they will not present anything because all i post is the truth, and it is always relevant to the thread. Wait and see.

[TMAN]

EVIDENCE, FACTS.. suchmoon, TMAN.. SCAM, EXTORTIONISTS

Then just chuck in 300 other words of shit, it’s super boring

[suchmoon]

Besides the fact that these topics are spam, also most of what he posts on a daily basis can easily be considered as trolling.

When will this get him at least a temp ban?

Trolling - probably not. I don't even know if an enforceable definition of trolling exists here on this forum, much less anyone getting banned for that.

Off topic posts, multiple threads on the same subject, serial posting - possibly, if we report it.

[cryptohunter]

EVIDENCE, FACTS.. suchmoon, TMAN.. SCAM, EXTORTIONISTS

Then just chuck in 300 other words of shit, it’s super boring

Haha that's your case. Okay we started at the bottom  rung let's move up the ladder in intellect slightly, wait no moronbozo is probably the bottom rung but he had his shot and blew it by debunking his own argument.  Thanks for that. I mean this thread nicely illustrates, false accusation defense, precedents and prior actions by you and fellow scum  bags, and double standards LOL  these dt chumps are like the dumbest people i have met in quite a while.

I mean this is why we need to discuss these EXACT issue and get some clarity on them. cheers moronbozo.

Natural permitted flow of a thread - 1. The false allegation.  = cryptohunter is a spamming troll - no evidence

Natural permitted flow of a thread - 2. precedents and prior behaviours = same group of colluding scum observably guilty of racist trolling sig spamming puppet accounts, lying, pushing scams, all meriting each other, all voting each other on dt and all ganging up on anyone who questions them. The obvious motivation is they don't want people to mention they all have observably scummy deeds in their past or support those that do.

Natural permitted flow of a thread - 3. flawed reasoning on the basis of prior = observable broken minds all demonstrating clear double standards and failing even to bring a sensible case with examples of their false claims. Whilst being guilty of the exact things they falsely accuse others of doing?? and worse lol



Where are the other proven liars, scammers, trust abusers and general scum bags. I want them to present a proper case for my ban. Let's just go for it guys bring every troll and spam that I have made here and we will debate them in their full context and examine this.

Perhaps I should be banned for telling the truth that is relevant clearly to the topics I post them on. Please let's put this on my headstone when I am banned. Please put cryptohunter - banned by scammers for telling the truth regarding their wrongdoing and pushing for a fair and equal system. That will be useful.

@suchmoron surely you can provide some examples then here for examination??  what's that you are only good at snitching to your pal mods but run from any debate after I destroyed you in public many times.  Stop being scared and present the examples of which you (falsely) claim exist.

Looks like more false accusations. I want you to present these examples now.

[marlboroza]

EVIDENCE, FACTS.. suchmoon, TMAN.. SCAM, EXTORTIONISTS

Then just chuck in 300 other words of shit, it’s super boring

She is doing this in every post. I had her on ignore, but now she started with back-to-back spam threads, and only in this thread she repeated 3-4 times what she said probably hundred times already. It seems that she has few keywords and she spins her posts around them.

As topic is question, I don't understand what she is trying to say:

Haha that's your case. Okay we started at the bottom  rung let's move up the ladder in intellect slightly, wait no moronbozo is probably the bottom rung but he had his shot and blew it by debunking his own argument. [...]

[cryptohunter]

EVIDENCE, FACTS.. suchmoon, TMAN.. SCAM, EXTORTIONISTS

Then just chuck in 300 other words of shit, it’s super boring

She is doing this in every post. I had her on ignore, but now she started with back-to-back spam threads, and only in this thread she repeated 3-4 times what she said probably hundred times already. It seems that she has few keywords and she spins her posts around them.

As topic is question, I don't understand what she is trying to say:

Haha that's your case. Okay we started at the bottom  rung let's move up the ladder in intellect slightly, wait no moronbozo is probably the bottom rung but he had his shot and blew it by debunking his own argument. [...]

Let me break it down for you you dumb shit

1. you start with a false accusation then apparently me requesting some evidence and then countering with your back ground and the background of your pals who are guilty of doing exactly what you falsely claim i am doing arrive to demonstrate.... trolling, spamming, things to report??...

2. double standards and broken logic - needs no explanation it is tied to 3 anyway

3. their rewards on to dt and merit sources for being proven sneaky greedy racist trolling sig spammers that use sock puppets demonstrates the precedents and consequences to measure against.

where is your evidence? where are your examples?  i keep ordering you to bring them here. Get on with it. Hurry up.
looks like a total failure in that it bolsters my statement that we need clarity on what is natural flow and is it in the best interest of the reader?  on all of the thread points I raised in 3 separate threads because it would be way too confusing to attempt 3 separate discussions on 1 thread.

Well done moronbozo. Next time just say I am too retarded to understand the actions of my intellectual superiors can someone break it down for me. Not rush in with false accusations that attract other morons who are proven guilty of the things  you are accusing me of and worse ... haha

Whilst you're at it can you bring your original thought inspiring posts that made a huge difference here??  I mean obviously your posts must be amazing to criticise others. Or are they just piles of shit like all of your posts i have read?

[Foxpup]

Is this spam?

I'm going to go with yes, since these particular threads mark the official point where even I've given up all hope of making sense of his deranged rants. (I think he's mad about his posts in some other thread being deleted? Who knows.) He's on his own now. Hopefully someone will let me know if he starts almost making sense again; he was kinda fun when he was almost making sense.

[cryptohunter]

Is this spam?

I'm going to go with yes, since these particular threads mark the official point where even I've given up all hope of making sense of his deranged rants. (I think he's mad about his posts in some other thread being deleted? Who knows.) He's on his own now. Hopefully someone will let me know if he starts almost making sense again; he was kinda fun when he was almost making sense.

Yep read the 3 threads moronbozo quotes in the OP to witness "deranged rants" hahaha

[LoyceV]

When will this get him at least a temp ban?

Soon, I hope:

We see you doing this over and over again. There are 61 good reports against you in the last 60 days. You're going to get banned if you keep this up.

I like your typo in the title

[Veleor]

Trolling - probably not. I don't even know if an enforceable definition of trolling exists here on this forum, much less anyone getting banned for that.

There is a definition of trolling on the Bitcointalk rules page.

Q: Do you moderate/delete (possible) FUD, accusations and untrue information?
A: No. We don't have enough time to check every single piece of information and verify the validity of the sources. Also, just like scams - too much room for bias and abuse.

However, trolling isn't allowed. If a user is habitually posting obviously false nonsense ("obviously false nonsense" to an outsider, NOT to someone who follows or is involved in the discussion) just to stir up trouble, then it's considered trolling, which is prohibited. Such cases should be thoroughly documented in the report though (There are tons of reports that just say "trolling", but moderators don't have time to look through each user's post).

Trolling (тpoллинг, п. 3) is indicated as one of the ban reasons for some members in the Russian locale: gagik, tor676, Uvajaemy_Kit.

[cryptohunter]

When will this get him at least a temp ban?

Soon, I hope:

We see you doing this over and over again. There are 61 good reports against you in the last 60 days. You're going to get banned if you keep this up.

I like your typo in the title

ah robovac  Absolute Imbecile is here.

I will seek to have most of those 61 undone. I see nothing off topic or untrue in MOST that I am investigating so far.
Most are just examples of my defence against false allegations and attacks by those untrustworthy scumbags.... who then report only my posts as off topic.

This is another loophole I will be closing down. This seems to be used as a tool to try and get people banned when their other tactics to prevent you telling the truth about them fail.

Actually for a legend to be banned a number is nothing, each post should be investigated to see if it was a legit delete in the full context of the thread and the other members behaviours within it.

The difference is this bunch of snitching scum report my posts and I hardly ever report their groundless and false accusation attacks on me first.  Since snitching is only for the lowest of the low as we can observe.

@Veleor

thank god you show up... .

1. to demonstrate the collusion and the same gang appear each time

2. to give some clarity on trolling..... yes the promulgation of obviously false information. Present the examples of my posts that meet this criteria.


haha I love this bunch all wanting to help each other get me banned and all fucking it up .......oh dear


NO EVIDENCE OR ANY EXAMPLES PROVIDE SO FAR haha   just a bunch of observable scum bags and morons fumbling around to try and get banned a superior member who only tells the truth about them when it is relevant.  haha

I am laughing at you all. Thanks for making my day .....yet again.

[r1s2g3]

NO  (rest snipped)

So long post by you, when simply writing one word "No" might solved your purpose.

[cryptohunter]

NO  (rest snipped)

So long post by you, when simply writing one word "No" might solved your purpose.

Thanks this is a good example of another thing I am talking about.

NO on its own in this context means nothing. If you are to express and opinion you must validate it. This is why my posts are always longer than most other peoples because I choose to give the reader my full reasoning behind my opinion. Therefore this gives them a chance to attack my reasoning and break it down if they have an opposing view.

Most people here just give an opinion and will not give it any grounding or substance.

Well most people in this thread have no grounding or substance to their false claims so of course in their case they don't bother to furnish the reader with their reasoning because it would just be like.....errr i want to stop cryptohunter telling the TRUTH about us and our foul deeds.

EVIDENCE, AND EXAMPLES.... that's what you need.

That is why I win every single debate with these dummies because my claims are based on observable events not just a bunch of lies that they usually rely on to force through their agendas.