Is cryptohunter spamming forum?

[marlboroza]

Some rants about something, it looks like usual cryptohunter's day in forum except she start to create threads about things which are probably mentioned in her posts over and over again:

Natural permitted flow of a thread - 1. The false allegation.
Natural permitted flow of a thread - 2. precedents and prior behaviours
Natural permitted flow of a thread - 3. flawed reasoning on the basis of prior

Is this spam?

[1715578936]

1715578936

[1715578936]

1715578936

[1715578936]

1715578936

[1715578936]

1715578936

[1715578936]

1715578936

[suchmoon]

Is this spam?

Yes. All three threads are rehashing his butthurt about his deleted posts. Just report them.

[cryptohunter]

NO and here is why..... try to present a sensible case in future because you just look more stupid than usual.

Rants = questions and observable events now

This moronbozo tried to red trust me once for "scare quotes"  and supports on dt proven scammers, liars and other unsavoury behaviours all driven by greed and financial self enrichment. This nicely illustrates why the background of persons presenting opinion or making statements with no case need to be investigated on thread to enable the readers to gain a more complete insight.


1. this should be rep matter when you make it about 1 person. So already you are posting in the wrong section.

2. only a fool like moronbozo would try to bring debate on 3 separate  issues on one thread, the replies will get all mixed up and confusion will be rife. I mean look how confused you are moronbozo and that is just one imbecile. Try to imagine asking that all 3 discussions take place on 1 thread. Your grounds are pathetic. That is why I made 3 separate threads.

By that token perhaps locyeV should put all of his merit analysis on one thread LOL  I often see as many as 8 or more running on the first page here. Sorry to have 3. ooohhhh ban him now.

3. How could even the most desperate person pleading for my ban (all hiding away in my fanzine thread discussing their tactics to stop me presenting the truth and get me banned) try to pass off 3 important threads seeking clarity and definition on such important matters to improve the optimal usefulness of the forum for no personal gain.....be termed a spam.

4. Suchmoron pleading for the mods to delete them ON WHAT GROUNDS???  yes I did note down your comment that you have taken me off ignore to specifically get my posts deleted, and that you said that your only hope now is just to keep reporting and reporting him....i guess to try and get me banned.


Bring your case not just your groundless opinions.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Spamming, definitely.  He is also trolling, albeit in an unusual way.

I've reported quite a few of his posts, but not in the threads he's created.  But now he's starting multiple threads which are (I think; I have him on ignore) basically the same anti-DT crusading that he's been doing for months with no results.  I do think it's about time he got banned.  I'm just tired of seeing either his posts or his threads pop up on my unread posts feed. 

He's so annoying, even the ignore function isn't enough.

[cryptohunter]

Spamming, definitely.  He is also trolling, albeit in an unusual way.

I've reported quite a few of his posts, but not in the threads he's created.  But now he's starting multiple threads which are (I think; I have him on ignore) basically the same anti-DT crusading that he's been doing for months with no results.  I do think it's about time he got banned.  I'm just tired of seeing either his posts or his threads pop up on my unread posts feed.  

He's so annoying, even the ignore function isn't enough.

Ah another proven untrustworthy person arrives to bolster their "no case" statement "no collusion btw"

So let me challenge you my sock puppet racist trolling sig spammer Huge black woman.

Present examples of the trolling " in an unusual way " lol like telling the truth.

Let's compare them to your racist trolling from your  sig spamming sock puppet account. Perhaps you are confused on what trolling is?

Present the examples of the spamming. Do you mean presenting on topic observable events that are relevant but that you guys don't like being mentioned?

Let me see what you bring.

What you all really mean is that we want him banned because he keeps bringing up the annoying "truth" that we are observably pushing double standards and promoting untrustworthy persons on to DT and then punishing others for far lesser crimes.

OK so there are the challenges for you bunch of dumbos. Surely you can present some evidence for your claims?? get on to it and present it now.

These are EXACTLY the kinds of false accusations that have resulted in me presenting observable events to defend myself and they have reported as off topic trying to build up some NUMBERS case to enforce a ban they have tried to action by other means and so far failed. This is observable scummy tactics from a bunch of observably untrustworthy scum.

Back to your self moderated threads where you all hide away. haha

The thoughts and words of cryptohunter will never go away. You will only give them more power and bolster his case that free speech and any kind of justice has gone now. Where proven liars, proven sneaky and greedy sock puppet racist trolling sig spammers, scammers, trust abusers, probable extortionists all conspire and collude to try and silence those honest members that simply tell the TRUTH about them.
Sorry getting me banned for that will just inspire lots of others to join i would imagine ...to ensure that the true legend of cryptohunter and his desire for a transparent, fair and equal environment for all is never forgotten.

I actually notice when looking through my deleted posts (normally i give them little consideration) I find NONE that are off topic / irrelevant at all. A sensible case can be presented that all of them are the truth, based on observable events and are very important to the issues being discussed. By deleting any of them you deprive the reader of gaining a deeper understanding of the issues in the OP and the full context of the replies of the posters within them.

[marlboroza]

Yes. All three threads are rehashing his butthurt about his deleted posts. Just report them.

Ok, will do it right away. I will also report her post from this thread as trolling:

only a fool like moronbozo
[...]
I mean look how confused you are and that is just one imbecile. [/b]
[...]
Suchmoron
[...]
Let me destroy you all over again in public.

And I might create thread about this issue as well, I just don't have enough time to go trough her posts and wall of texts.

while typing this post, cryptohunter edited her post, this was original one:



Destroy who?

Spamming, definitely.  He is also trolling, albeit in an unusual way.

So spamming, trolling and this looks like another off topic/spam/trolling reply.

So let me challenge you my sock puppet racist trolling sig spammer Huge black woman.
[...]
Let's compare them to your racist trolling from your  sig spamming sock puppet account.
[...]
OK so there are the challenges for you bunch of dumbos.

[asche]

Besides the fact that these topics are spam, also most of what he posts on a daily basis can easily be considered as trolling.

When will this get him at least a temp ban?

[cryptohunter]

Yes. All three threads are rehashing his butthurt about his deleted posts. Just report them.

Ok, will do it right away. I will also report her post from this thread as trolling:

only a fool like moronbozo
[...]
I mean look how confused you are and that is just one imbecile. [/b]
[...]
Suchmoron
[...]
Let me destroy you all over again in public.

And I might create thread about this issue as well, I just don't have enough time to go trough her posts and wall of texts.

while typing this post, cryptohunter edited her post, this was original one:



Destroy who?

Spamming, definitely.  He is also trolling, albeit in an unusual way.

So spamming, trolling and this looks like another off topic/spam/trolling reply.

So let me challenge you my sock puppet racist trolling sig spammer Huge black woman.
[...]
Let's compare them to your racist trolling from your  sig spamming sock puppet account.
[...]
OK so there are the challenges for you bunch of dumbos.

No those look like truthful statements that I can back up with observable events if want.

Please do not cherry pick and cut out things to present misleading and corrupt information.

Trolling is not telling the truth. Sorry you are again confused.

LOL snitch cry babies. I will snitch him again and hope he gets banned for telling the truth. What a bunch of pathetic losers. Why not present your case.

LOL trolling is presenting a sensible and credible defense against accusations. hahah you are so stupid you are clearly demonstrating there needs to be clarity on the EXACT ISSUES that I made the threads for. hahaha has suchmoon hacked your account? this sounds like her level of dumbness. Thanks for debunking your own thread that was fun.


@asche  - ah noob trash ass kissing sig spammer enters the game. The problem is you can all be seen colluding and crying together about me crushing you all in public over and over again with THE TRUTH.

BRING ME AN EXAMPLES OF THE TROLLING so we can debate it. I challenge you to bring it here now.  What you will find is that is these posts are all factual and based on observable events and highly relevant but just you all want them to go away. That will not happen be it the legend cryptohunter or be it his friends.

SO HURRY UP MORON BRING YOUR EVIDENCE.... not your crying noob tears here for me to scorn.

As always you will see they will not present anything because all i post is the truth, and it is always relevant to the thread. Wait and see.

[TMAN]

EVIDENCE, FACTS.. suchmoon, TMAN.. SCAM, EXTORTIONISTS

Then just chuck in 300 other words of shit, it’s super boring

[suchmoon]

Besides the fact that these topics are spam, also most of what he posts on a daily basis can easily be considered as trolling.

When will this get him at least a temp ban?

Trolling - probably not. I don't even know if an enforceable definition of trolling exists here on this forum, much less anyone getting banned for that.

Off topic posts, multiple threads on the same subject, serial posting - possibly, if we report it.

[cryptohunter]

EVIDENCE, FACTS.. suchmoon, TMAN.. SCAM, EXTORTIONISTS

Then just chuck in 300 other words of shit, it’s super boring

Haha that's your case. Okay we started at the bottom  rung let's move up the ladder in intellect slightly, wait no moronbozo is probably the bottom rung but he had his shot and blew it by debunking his own argument.  Thanks for that. I mean this thread nicely illustrates, false accusation defense, precedents and prior actions by you and fellow scum  bags, and double standards LOL  these dt chumps are like the dumbest people i have met in quite a while.

I mean this is why we need to discuss these EXACT issue and get some clarity on them. cheers moronbozo.

Natural permitted flow of a thread - 1. The false allegation.  = cryptohunter is a spamming troll - no evidence

Natural permitted flow of a thread - 2. precedents and prior behaviours = same group of colluding scum observably guilty of racist trolling sig spamming puppet accounts, lying, pushing scams, all meriting each other, all voting each other on dt and all ganging up on anyone who questions them. The obvious motivation is they don't want people to mention they all have observably scummy deeds in their past or support those that do.

Natural permitted flow of a thread - 3. flawed reasoning on the basis of prior = observable broken minds all demonstrating clear double standards and failing even to bring a sensible case with examples of their false claims. Whilst being guilty of the exact things they falsely accuse others of doing?? and worse lol



Where are the other proven liars, scammers, trust abusers and general scum bags. I want them to present a proper case for my ban. Let's just go for it guys bring every troll and spam that I have made here and we will debate them in their full context and examine this.

Perhaps I should be banned for telling the truth that is relevant clearly to the topics I post them on. Please let's put this on my headstone when I am banned. Please put cryptohunter - banned by scammers for telling the truth regarding their wrongdoing and pushing for a fair and equal system. That will be useful.

@suchmoron surely you can provide some examples then here for examination??  what's that you are only good at snitching to your pal mods but run from any debate after I destroyed you in public many times.  Stop being scared and present the examples of which you (falsely) claim exist.

Looks like more false accusations. I want you to present these examples now.

[marlboroza]

EVIDENCE, FACTS.. suchmoon, TMAN.. SCAM, EXTORTIONISTS

Then just chuck in 300 other words of shit, it’s super boring

She is doing this in every post. I had her on ignore, but now she started with back-to-back spam threads, and only in this thread she repeated 3-4 times what she said probably hundred times already. It seems that she has few keywords and she spins her posts around them.

As topic is question, I don't understand what she is trying to say:

Haha that's your case. Okay we started at the bottom  rung let's move up the ladder in intellect slightly, wait no moronbozo is probably the bottom rung but he had his shot and blew it by debunking his own argument. [...]

[cryptohunter]

EVIDENCE, FACTS.. suchmoon, TMAN.. SCAM, EXTORTIONISTS

Then just chuck in 300 other words of shit, it’s super boring

She is doing this in every post. I had her on ignore, but now she started with back-to-back spam threads, and only in this thread she repeated 3-4 times what she said probably hundred times already. It seems that she has few keywords and she spins her posts around them.

As topic is question, I don't understand what she is trying to say:

Haha that's your case. Okay we started at the bottom  rung let's move up the ladder in intellect slightly, wait no moronbozo is probably the bottom rung but he had his shot and blew it by debunking his own argument. [...]

Let me break it down for you you dumb shit

1. you start with a false accusation then apparently me requesting some evidence and then countering with your back ground and the background of your pals who are guilty of doing exactly what you falsely claim i am doing arrive to demonstrate.... trolling, spamming, things to report??...

2. double standards and broken logic - needs no explanation it is tied to 3 anyway

3. their rewards on to dt and merit sources for being proven sneaky greedy racist trolling sig spammers that use sock puppets demonstrates the precedents and consequences to measure against.

where is your evidence? where are your examples?  i keep ordering you to bring them here. Get on with it. Hurry up.
looks like a total failure in that it bolsters my statement that we need clarity on what is natural flow and is it in the best interest of the reader?  on all of the thread points I raised in 3 separate threads because it would be way too confusing to attempt 3 separate discussions on 1 thread.

Well done moronbozo. Next time just say I am too retarded to understand the actions of my intellectual superiors can someone break it down for me. Not rush in with false accusations that attract other morons who are proven guilty of the things  you are accusing me of and worse ... haha

Whilst you're at it can you bring your original thought inspiring posts that made a huge difference here??  I mean obviously your posts must be amazing to criticise others. Or are they just piles of shit like all of your posts i have read?

[Foxpup]

Is this spam?

I'm going to go with yes, since these particular threads mark the official point where even I've given up all hope of making sense of his deranged rants. (I think he's mad about his posts in some other thread being deleted? Who knows.) He's on his own now. Hopefully someone will let me know if he starts almost making sense again; he was kinda fun when he was almost making sense.

[cryptohunter]

Is this spam?

I'm going to go with yes, since these particular threads mark the official point where even I've given up all hope of making sense of his deranged rants. (I think he's mad about his posts in some other thread being deleted? Who knows.) He's on his own now. Hopefully someone will let me know if he starts almost making sense again; he was kinda fun when he was almost making sense.

Yep read the 3 threads moronbozo quotes in the OP to witness "deranged rants" hahaha

[LoyceV]

When will this get him at least a temp ban?

Soon, I hope:

We see you doing this over and over again. There are 61 good reports against you in the last 60 days. You're going to get banned if you keep this up.

I like your typo in the title

[Veleor]

Trolling - probably not. I don't even know if an enforceable definition of trolling exists here on this forum, much less anyone getting banned for that.

There is a definition of trolling on the Bitcointalk rules page.

Q: Do you moderate/delete (possible) FUD, accusations and untrue information?
A: No. We don't have enough time to check every single piece of information and verify the validity of the sources. Also, just like scams - too much room for bias and abuse.

However, trolling isn't allowed. If a user is habitually posting obviously false nonsense ("obviously false nonsense" to an outsider, NOT to someone who follows or is involved in the discussion) just to stir up trouble, then it's considered trolling, which is prohibited. Such cases should be thoroughly documented in the report though (There are tons of reports that just say "trolling", but moderators don't have time to look through each user's post).

Trolling (тpoллинг, п. 3) is indicated as one of the ban reasons for some members in the Russian locale: gagik, tor676, Uvajaemy_Kit.

[cryptohunter]

When will this get him at least a temp ban?

Soon, I hope:

We see you doing this over and over again. There are 61 good reports against you in the last 60 days. You're going to get banned if you keep this up.

I like your typo in the title

ah robovac  Absolute Imbecile is here.

I will seek to have most of those 61 undone. I see nothing off topic or untrue in MOST that I am investigating so far.
Most are just examples of my defence against false allegations and attacks by those untrustworthy scumbags.... who then report only my posts as off topic.

This is another loophole I will be closing down. This seems to be used as a tool to try and get people banned when their other tactics to prevent you telling the truth about them fail.

Actually for a legend to be banned a number is nothing, each post should be investigated to see if it was a legit delete in the full context of the thread and the other members behaviours within it.

The difference is this bunch of snitching scum report my posts and I hardly ever report their groundless and false accusation attacks on me first.  Since snitching is only for the lowest of the low as we can observe.

@Veleor

thank god you show up... .

1. to demonstrate the collusion and the same gang appear each time

2. to give some clarity on trolling..... yes the promulgation of obviously false information. Present the examples of my posts that meet this criteria.


haha I love this bunch all wanting to help each other get me banned and all fucking it up .......oh dear


NO EVIDENCE OR ANY EXAMPLES PROVIDE SO FAR haha   just a bunch of observable scum bags and morons fumbling around to try and get banned a superior member who only tells the truth about them when it is relevant.  haha

I am laughing at you all. Thanks for making my day .....yet again.

[r1s2g3]

NO  (rest snipped)

So long post by you, when simply writing one word "No" might solved your purpose.

[cryptohunter]

NO  (rest snipped)

So long post by you, when simply writing one word "No" might solved your purpose.

Thanks this is a good example of another thing I am talking about.

NO on its own in this context means nothing. If you are to express and opinion you must validate it. This is why my posts are always longer than most other peoples because I choose to give the reader my full reasoning behind my opinion. Therefore this gives them a chance to attack my reasoning and break it down if they have an opposing view.

Most people here just give an opinion and will not give it any grounding or substance.

Well most people in this thread have no grounding or substance to their false claims so of course in their case they don't bother to furnish the reader with their reasoning because it would just be like.....errr i want to stop cryptohunter telling the TRUTH about us and our foul deeds.

EVIDENCE, AND EXAMPLES.... that's what you need.

That is why I win every single debate with these dummies because my claims are based on observable events not just a bunch of lies that they usually rely on to force through their agendas.

[marlboroza]

I like your typo in the title

It was unintentional typo. Fixed now.

Yep read the 3 threads moronbozo quotes in the OP to witness "deranged rants" hahaha

Foxpup is not blind and they can read topic, and as I can see they already responded in one of your threads.

NO EVIDENCE OR ANY EXAMPLES PROVIDE SO FAR

Do you think other users are blind?

Would you please stop spamming this thread?

[stompix]

Is this spam?

No, opening 40 topics in Meta in 3 months with a slightly different title where you discuss the same thing over and over again it's perfectly normal for anyone that has just been released from rehab for a test period under controlled medication.

And now that I've wasted my time counting those...40? 40 topics???

[Joseph R. Cord]

NO  (rest snipped)

So long post by you, when simply writing one word "No" might solved your purpose.

Thanks this is a good example of another thing I am talking about.

NO on its own in this context means nothing. If you are to express and opinion you must validate it. This is why my posts are always longer than most other peoples because I choose to give the reader my full reasoning behind my opinion. Therefore this gives them a chance to attack my reasoning and break it down if they have an opposing view.

Most people here just give an opinion and will not give it any grounding or substance.

Well most people in this thread have no grounding or substance to their false claims so of course in their case they don't bother to furnish the reader with their reasoning because it would just be like.....errr i want to stop cryptohunter telling the TRUTH about us and our foul deeds.

EVIDENCE, AND EXAMPLES.... that's what you need.

That is why I win every single debate with these dummies because my claims are based on observable events not just a bunch of lies that they usually rely on to force through their agendas.

Cryptohunter you are "TRULY" an inspiration for people here!

Most of your "Opinion" on different topics are great and mostly I agree with them. Don't stop.

[o_e_l_e_o]

I made this post almost 3 months ago (when he had already been spamming for 2 months), and it is just as true today as it was then:

At a time with huge changes to DT, when we should be discussing what is best for the forum and how to go forward from here, every thread is being turned in to his rambling nonsense and abuse.

I've had him on ignore for some time, but I'm willing to bet his posts are all the same as they were a week ago. Given that they break the first three rules (low value, off topic and trolling), can a moderator let us know how long we have to put up with this shitfest before he gets banned? I'd like to be able to have a sensible discussion amongst adults again.

Every time I make the mistake of clicking the show/hide button on one of his posts, I might as well be reading the same post every time. Since I made the post above, he's averaged 100 posts/week, all saying the same thing in amongst screeds of rambling nonsense and abuse. We have now put up with this derailing and off topic trash for 5 months. Given that pretty much every one of his posts breaks the 3 rules above, and he has posted almost 1500 times in the last 5 months, he has been given more leeway than any user in any online forum or discussion board I have ever seen.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

I personally think he’s spamming, at the very least he should have his ability to create new threads in Meta removed. It’s the same old shit all the time.

[suchmoon]

Trolling - probably not. I don't even know if an enforceable definition of trolling exists here on this forum, much less anyone getting banned for that.

There is a definition of trolling on the Bitcointalk rules page.

LOL, busted. Yes, there is a definition. Let me rephrase my statement. I don't see it being consistently enforced so I don't bother reporting under that rule.

For example flat earth is obvious false nonsense, and notbatman and a few others are "habitually" posting that shit however I can't imagine them getting banned any time soon. Cryptohunter is firmly in that same category but as long as he veils it in some sort of "fight for freedom of speech" BS - he's probably immune too.

Trolling (тpoллинг, п. 3) is indicated as one of the ban reasons for some members in the Russian locale

Now if we could get CH to start posting on the Russian board...

[Quickseller]

The second two threads can probably be merged into one, and or the last two be locked.

If you don’t want to read what he says, then you can use the ignore button, or simply ignore his posts.

Edit: if anyone has any questions as to what constitutes a low value post, see below:

1. Free speech - you can say anything as long as it is relevant and presented in a calm and polite manner. Swearing, SHOUTING etc. make your post more likely to be removed.
2. No zero value posts or threads, like "SELL SELL SELL"

The “value” of a post is less about your opinion of the content or your opinion of the person writing, and is more about if there can be a discussion, or a response to what is being said (ignoring the reputation of the author).

[TheNewAnon135246]

I always imagine him wheezing like a pug while typing those long rants.

[cryptohunter]

sorry guys gang just been beating some one 3-0  with far less skill at tennis.... kind of like meta board. But they don't cry and snitch and try to get your tennis racket taken away because ............. well false allegations and lies.

Let's answer each person that has replied since I've been away. You know I like to treat you all equally and fairly. Even though you do not deserve it.

Take your time and digest all of the information that I kindly provide.

If it is too much for you to cope with then don't attempt to read such long posts without your mommies and daddies to help you with it all. Sorry that somethings require more than 10 words to answer ,especially to multiple people.
Just read the little bit with your name next to it if you like. It is more manageable that way.




Moronbozo - sorry.. I meant clear examples of spamming or trolling. I mean even you ask "is" crypto hunter spamming. Since I see that even you are in clear doubt over the matter I hardly thought those would be the strongest examples you could find to demonstrate clearly that ............you are a full retard.

 I have just told you WHY they required separate threads because of how easily confused you all are, and  having 3 different conversations with you all at the same time would be distressing and confusing for you guys. Even when I try and make things easy for you then I am the bad guy

Why should loyceV not be asked to merge all of his stats raw data puke on to one thread. I have seen 8 or 9 or more of his stats sharts taking up the nearly entire frontpage of meta? Is he not spamming?? Is this off topic to draw a comparison with someone who opens tons more threads on his fav stats topics? I am interested to know genuinely.


Please bring some examples of the "obviously incorrect information" that I am promulgating all over the place after it has been clearly debunked, and my "trolling" we can then compare it to the financially motivated sneaky greedy racist trolling sig spam of your sock puppeting pal the pharmacist aka huge black woman. Who you must want banned right away...right? who himself is calling for a ban on the same grounds? double standards or is that off topic and not allowed??


As  I have said this thread serves as a perfect example of the why we need a sensible debate on what is permitted natural flow in all the scenarios that I kindly provided in 3 separate topics for open debate. It seems you all start crying whenever I try to bring discussion forth to establish some transparent and objective solid rules we can ALL follow. Not subjective chasms from which you all derive your own sets of rules that you all get to flout and then snitch on others for lesser evils and try to get them banned. LOL this is toooo easy.


@Joseph R. Cord

Thanks for the support. I am certain all persons that would like a transparent, fair and equal system for all would also view my posts in the same light. I mean who would not support this kind of system for which I am fighting for.

@oeioeio - "amongst screeds of rambling nonsense and abuse. "

present evidence of the nonsense OR the unwarranted abuse (I will demonstrate clearly it is called the truth in the face of an attack) .  Hurry up I lose patience with dregs like you. Ass kissers are more sickening than the untrustworthy scum they fluff in public view.

Present some examples of this incorrect nonsense... I mean obviously if you are full retard as you clearly are, then things above your own comprehension may appear to make no sense to you. Sorry that's your parents merging their dna. You will be one of the orcs I'm afraid.

@suchmoron "obvious false nonsense, and notbatman and a few others are "habitually" posting that shit however I can't imagine them getting banned any time soon. Cryptohunter is firmly in that same category"

false accusation again from the dumbo as usual. Bring the evidence of the "obviously false nonsense" NOW or I want you banned for continuous false accusations. This is now promulgating lies over and over and then complaining about me presenting the truth lol . This is surely far more of a crime than presenting the truth ??

I crushed your feeble mind in front of the entire board several times. The more I read over my initial merit cycling threads the more I notice you are forced into making more and more stupid statements that now make you a laughing stock. The best one of the lot is after all your advocating merit as some useful reliable and fair non cycled metric  you go and debunk  your entire own argument by saying "good post" and "bad post" are meaningless terms without clear definition and criteria.... haha that is what I was pushing for in the merit system all along. Thanks suchmoron. What about "most" premerit legends are spammers, or the another hilarious one......nope I can't do it to you all over again your poor wretch.
 

You are respected only by greater fools.  What about your other stupid statements .... I could post them here but I feel like a bully keep bitch slapping you around with them in public. I crushed you too many times already and your mind imploded like a rotten pumpkin and now you are bitter and your pride is damaged. Get over it.. You are simply inferior to me and once you know your place in the pecking order you can be content and show me my rightful respect.

Sorry but never dig your heels in against a superior opponent especially when they are armed with observable events and factual information and all you have is the company of a bunch of fellow scumbags whom are mostly even more stupid than yourself.

 Lauda knows to hide away from me because once I drag that scum bag into an open debate about his past he will be crushed like an ant. You are no better, I feel you are just the front man for that gang.  You are like grima worm tongue in this play. Actually from now on I will refer to you as snitchmoon or grima worm tongue. You will answer only to those from now on until further notice. I let the others fight it out for saruman and sauron, lauda clearly needs to be melkor so I can not leave that open to the lower level dregs.

This is how I feel when I (gandalf) enter this god forsaken place sometimes....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQExgALv9wI

As for destroying gandalf it is apparently impossibly by any means known to man. He is simply reborn until his task is completed. I found that an interesting fact.

Feel free to break that post down and prove me wrong and bring the examples of your false accusations else I will open a thread here asking for you to refrain from lying and making these false allegations or face the ban you snitching scum bags are trying to set me up with.

I noticed the vast vast majority of my deleted posts are actually legit and truthful defences with the observable evidence to substantiate my claims... posted usually in defence of attacks from scumbags like you OR presenting valuable background material in discussions regarding TRUST. Hence why we need to debate is it optimal or even irresponsible to hide relevant facts when discussing TRUST. This is especially important when people make false allegations or even statements that they offer no grounding for when discussing trust or the actions to be taken for people considered "by them" to be untrustworthy or deserving of punishment. Surely we can not allow people to tell lies and make false allegations without being able to challenge them. I don't want to have turn into a snitch yuck.

You guys then report my posts and because I never bother reporting your attacks and lies, I stack up a ton of deleted posts and you guys then think those "numbers" illustrate I an honest member presenting only the truth and observable events should be banned whilst a bunch of proven untrustworthy scum with observable dirty deeds get to red trust me and try 2x now to get me banned.

 You are only fueling my desire to crush you all with each disgusting tactic you pull to shut me up. A ban will simply allow my very good friends to join and they will rightfully talk about the true legend cryptohunter and all of his PROVEN and observable great and illustrious deeds, his constant fight for fairness and equality even for new people and those with little crypto worth even at his own cost, and his constant helping of those that are getting bullied. Actually this is how it all started when you were bullying some other noob around trying to get him banned on FALSE allegations. They will obviously keep telling the truth whenever it is on topic and relevant. They can not be banned for that until they are. Then their friends may choose to  join. Who can say what friends I have already on this board ready to start defending my good name and telling the truth about you guys. I have been here years and made many great friends.

I will gladly sacrifice my account to present the truth, fight for a fair and equal environment for all and the right to free speech. If this board seeks to shut down cryptohunter under false pretense then that is there in history for people to examine and that is fine. Many great people have to sacrifice things for the greater good that is bigger than themselves. Once again demonstrating how selfless and fair and good cryptohunter was.  The only person ever banned for telling the truth and fighting for a transparent fair environment for all and for those being bullied by power hungry, greedy and untrustworthy scum.

@Quickseller

Yes there could be some debate that 2 and 3 could be merged. I had considered this. However I want to draw a distinction between double standards (people who are knowingly advocating different actions for the same "crimes") and those that are not knowingly doing so because they are not privy to prior instances that have set a precedent.   If they must be merged then that is fine but I feel that there could be lots of discussion to drill down on both scenarios and the appropriate natural flow. There needs to be clear definition and guidelines. Where clarity is of paramount importance then eliminating any elements that could cause confusion is important. If someone feels the need to merge them then I will not fight it since there is a slight crossover.

It should be noted that my hostility or politeness depends on if I am being attacked or sworn at/ disrespected myself or people are supporting those attacking me and egging them on and meriting their groundless false accusations. I would not believe you would find me being super hostile to anyone that had not first been super hostile to me or had tried to join in with others that are falsely accusing me of being in the wrong when their arguments will not stand up to scrutiny and they know this.

TheNewAnon135246

Your fantasies are you own to enjoy. However, they are off topic and irrelevant and serve no real purpose. What you happens in your bedroom stays in your bedroom. Please remember that in future.


TLDR??

I see no evidence/examples of any of these false allegations or trolling or spamming??

 I see 3 very interesting and polite threads that were not personal that sought clarity,  and to see people claiming these are "deranged rants" or some threads jammed full of spamming and trolling is nothing short of laughable. These  are the actions of desperate and untrustworthy scum bags who start to realise they just fucked with the wrong account.  

Get my scam tags removed and anyone else that is not a proven scammer or STRONGLY intending to scam because until you do then I will insist on presenting on topic and relevant facts regarding YOUR PROVEN and clearly OBSERVABLE untrustworthy deeds..

It will NEVER stop until the abuse stops and free speech in no longer under threat here. Sorry if that is blackmail to you but ALICE will keep insisting the police do something about this crime until her phone is returned and she will insist that the police act like the police not just have the power of the police but act like criminals and support their criminal pals whilst making the victims pay and receive punishment.

Actually I am going to  approach this with from an angle with far more leverage soon, totally within the board rules and you're not going to like that one bit. Don't believe me? well you soon will. I really have nothing better to do than fight for fairness and equality. Satoshi would want that, so no more centralised colluding control systems abusing their powers. Since satoshis work has enriched me to levels I never dreamed about it is only fair that I fight to keep his forum as he would intend it to be.

I await the examples I have requested. If you fail to present them ( i mean there are about 20+ scum bags making these false allegations) surely you guys will together be able to find LOTS of examples right?

1. examples of obviously false information that has been debunked.
2. any examples of me fighting for anything else other than a transparent and fair system for all.

Like you say it's only 1500 posts or so since  I found meta you can't have that much issue finding me some examples if ALL of my posts are trolling, proliferating false information, lies, nonsense, ??  

PRESENT IT YOU Dirty Turds. Or quit your crying and snitching and hide away in your self moderated rep section. I own meta now, this my board. You have no power here any longer to lecture others and call them out for lesser foul deeds than your own, you gave it all away by being observably untrustworthy or by openly supporting those that are openly untrustworthy.  The rest of the DT's are snivelling cowards that will not even DARE look at evidence I present to them. In debate the great qwk (one more capable than most dummies here) even says

" the truth does not interest me"

" it is good when innocent people get red trust because it makes others more wary of scams"

NO, that is not how it is going to work.

The truth is of paramount importance and very interesting.  The innocent will not be punished.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[suchmoon]

5 months

If CH gets banned and continues to troll using his friends alts we're gonna need a dedicated moderator just to nuke them 24/7.

[darklus123]

At first I really thought that he is giving good points to discuss but when i saw that his been posting a lot for me having the same context is sometimes really annoying.

Rants = questions and observable events now

Sorry I still can't find this definition from my dictionary. I've done it before ranting about something and I swear it is really not working dude unless you do it in a more appropriate approach.

[Joseph R. Cord]

CryptoHunter, I am "AMAZED" and "THRILLED" after reading your views, it's sad that people like "YOU" are "DISRESPECTED" who are genuinely trying to give this forum "SUPER" ideas and making it better.

But like I said, these are "JEALOUS" people, so they can "NEVER". Or in fairness, they do "UNDERSTAND" but they will "NOT" accept because they are "JEALOUS".

Please continue with your ideas, If I have time, I will create E-Books out of your views and send it as a "GIFT" to the Admin.

[cryptohunter]

5 months

If CH gets banned and continues to troll using his friends alts we're gonna need a dedicated moderator just to nuke them 24/7.

2 more false accusations.... getting a bit light on the evidence I asked you to present suchmoron. Like you have not presented any you toothless hag. All bark and snitch with no bite yourself   wassup can't find ANYTHING to bolster your lies? keep begging more to get me banned snitchy you look more pathetic daily.

I guess you learned better than to debate with me in public...

I know you don't probably have real friends who would be willing to come and join to continue your net negative work. I do however have many great and real friends who will gladly do follow on from me and continue to post observable events to aid the person of this board to regain freedom of speech.

I want you to present evidence of these consistent false accusations ....admit you can not?

@darklus123

Good points do not become less valid because they are repeated.

Sometimes one must repeat things until the issue is resolved.

that last part was me being sarcastic - that is NOT the definition it is what they are claiming is the definition.

[marlboroza]

Good points do not become less valid because they are repeated.

You need good points for that.

[Flying Hellfish]

TLDR??

When your TLDR is still TOO FUCKING LONG...

[cryptohunter]

TLDR??

When your TLDR is still TOO FUCKING LONG...

some dumb meme

Can you demonstrate the crazy things that I am saying so I don't just view you as a bias mod trying to silence free speech here?

I mean I have seen you accused of trying to silence open discussion before by other people. I hope there is no truth to it because already this board looks like it is sliding into biased moderation that are on the make.

I also notice you are a fellow fortune jack sig  spammer? I wonder if you are pals with the others like lauda, TMAN and the other PROVEN untrustworthy scum that spam that everywhere?

Sorry if that seems off topic but since you find it on topic to accuse me of being crazy with no EVIDENCE then I think It is only fair that I point out possible reasons for your sudden appearance and more false allegations. The same allegations TMAN seems to try and rely on when all other allegations fail.

I notice you did not object to the politically delivered 20 merits you got for sniping at me in my other thread where you basically admitted you wished I would leave the forum?  from your pal TMAN...... hmmmmm?? 20 merits for a post that was just a biased and invalid piece of net negative dirt 1 line trash.

Or perhaps all just coincidence? I wonder.

long posts = crazy ....haah okay.


@moron bozo  - you have failed to present any evidence of myself presenting false information so we must conclude that I am presenting the TRUTH and observable events. Thanks for creating a thread that demonstrates that my 3 sensible polite and important threads are very useful and demonstrate the need for such a debate on all 3 scenarios.
Same for all the other false accusers here.....NOTHING being presented.

flyinghellfish -  Please present the statements in my post that demonstrate I am crazy. I am waiting. Or recant your false allegations.

Mods here are openly biased it would seem? That is like admitting you are the wrong person for the job. Don't worry I will take your position for free and won't need to spam gambling sigs everywhere. The more mods that openly come out in support of proven scammers, trust abusers, liars, probable extortionists, proven sock puppet racist sig spammers..... most sharing the same sigs. The more you  just look corrupt and self serving. Keep it up.

[AdolfinWolf]

-snip-

Jesus christ you pathetic little shit... Can't you just articulate your points in a couple sentences instead of entire essays.

You've really mastered the argumentum ad nauseam, rambling about non-existing crap. Jesus man, atleast get yourself a signature so you'll get some moola for your time here.

Cryptohunter you are "TRULY" an inspiration for people here!

Most of your "Opinion" on different topics are great and mostly I agree with them. Don't stop.

HAHHAHA.

Of course Cryptohunter is worshipped by scammers, plagiarists, and outright liars.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Cryptohunter you are "TRULY" an inspiration for people here!

Most of your "Opinion" on different topics are great and mostly I agree with them. Don't stop.

Judging by your trust ratings you are an inspiration too.



For plagiarists & scammers

[suchmoon]

TLDR

Talking Drunk?
Truly Deranged?
Totally Drab?
Typically Dreck?
Tattle Dork?

Running out of ideas here.

[cryptohunter]

-snip-

Jesus christ you pathetic little shit... Can't you just articulate your points in a couple sentences instead of entire essays.

You've really mastered the argumentum ad nauseam, rambling about non-existing crap. Jesus man, atleast get a signature so you'll get some moola for your time here.

Cryptohunter you are "TRULY" an inspiration for people here!

Most of your "Opinion" on different topics are great and mostly I agree with them. Don't stop.

HAHHAHA.

Of course Cryptohunter is worshipped by scammers, plagiarists, and outright liars.

Wait lauda worships me now?.... well that would not surprise me at all.

can't you stop spamming sigs you broke ass bum loser whilst promulgating per drivel. Yes I can provide in depth examples of several observable instances and their implications into a sentence or two. ahah  I don't know why I just dont do that?? thanks for the tip though.

You guys can put your posts into one or two words because they contain nothing but false accusations lol

Sorry but the only scammers here that I see are the ones you are felching pal.

NOW present some evidence for all of your claims please if that is not too much trouble.

Can't you see how NONE of your can present ONE shred of evidence to substantiate your claims. Do you not feel pathetic?  while one person just crushes you over and over.

The thread has already been debunked by the OP ..... why continue looking more stupid.

Imagine you dumbos trying to read a book if you struggle with a tiny page of text. haha

I see this thread just crashed into a pile of false allegations and my own legitimate, truthful, list of observable events that demonstrate what a bunch of losers in all conceivable ways you all are. haha

Let me have another sip of this very expensive wine and sit back and wait for more of the toothless hags here with no substance behind their shrill shrieks to  start crying to the mods to delete ONLY my posts. Oh wait the mods are here already all squeaking and spamming false accusations.

This thread could not have worked out more nicely to demonstrate the need for the debate of my 3 threads in the OP.

I sometimes wonder if it is one big troll where you all pretend to hate me and set up these threads pretending to oppose me but then gradually all debunk and contradict each other and yourselves until you just end up being on my side. hah its great though...you had me going for a while but it is getting too obvious now.

You guys...

[DeathAngel]

TLDR

Talking Drunk?
Truly Deranged?
Totally Drab?
Typically Dreck?
Tattle Dork?

Running out of ideas here.

Too Lame , Definitely Retarded

[sirazimuth]

TLDR

Talking Drunk?
Truly Deranged?
Totally Drab?
Typically Dreck?
Tattle Dork?

Running out of ideas here.

How about this....?

[suchmoon]

How about this....?

Lovely...

Thou lumpish dread-bolted ruffian

[Quickseller]

I am no expert, but I don’t think it is best to be bullying a forum member in a meta thread complaining about rules allegedly being broken. It is probably not appropriate at all for a moderator to be doing the same at all all in any public thread.

If you don’t want to deal with his rants, your choice are to ignore him (including not publicly talking about him), or put up with the rants. If you want to chastise him, you should expect a response.

[suchmoon]

I am no expert, but I don’t think it is best to be bullying a forum member in a meta thread complaining about rules allegedly being broken. It is probably not appropriate at all for a moderator to be doing the same at all all in any public thread.

If you don’t want to deal with his rants, your choice are to ignore him (including not publicly talking about him), or put up with the rants. If you want to chastise him, you should expect a response.

You're right, making fun of someone's incoherent rants is such inappropriate bullying. We should instead accuse them of having a pill addiction or being a pedophile.

[Flying Hellfish]

I am no expert, but I don’t think it is best to be bullying a forum member in a meta thread complaining about rules allegedly being broken. It is probably not appropriate at all for a moderator to be doing the same at all all in any public thread.

If you don’t want to deal with his rants, your choice are to ignore him (including not publicly talking about him), or put up with the rants. If you want to chastise him, you should expect a response.

Read your own post and feel free to ignore me asshole!

I am also a user of this forum and to my knowledge being staff does not preclude me from participating in any discussion I feel like commenting on.  If it is I missed that memo.

It isn't my "job" to hold anyones hand and make them feel all warm and fuzzy, if I see a stund cunt I am likely to call them a stund cunt!  It is my "job" to clean up shit in the P&S sub, that's it.  Perhaps if people would use their own fucking brains instead of looking at title or trust or merit things would start to get a little less wild west scummy around here, I know I know I'm a dreamer at heart!

[cryptohunter]

I am no expert, but I don’t think it is best to be bullying a forum member in a meta thread complaining about rules allegedly being broken. It is probably not appropriate at all for a moderator to be doing the same at all all in any public thread.

If you don’t want to deal with his rants, your choice are to ignore him (including not publicly talking about him), or put up with the rants. If you want to chastise him, you should expect a response.

Read your own post and feel free to ignore me asshole!

I am also a user of this forum and to my knowledge being staff does not preclude me from participating in any discussion I feel like commenting on.  If it is I missed that memo.

It isn't my "job" to hold anyones hand and make them feel all warm and fuzzy, if I see a stund cunt I am likely to call them a stund cunt!  It is my "job" to clean up shit in the P&S sub, that's it.  Perhaps if people would use their own fucking brains instead of looking at title or trust or merit things would start to get a little less wild west scummy around here, I know I know I'm a dreamer at heart!

If mods are not impartial then why should anyone trust them at all.

You are not participating in a discussion at all. I see you presenting no evidence or examples of my trolling, no presentation of any evidence of any false information that I am proliferating, and no attempt at all at discussing the reasons to open 3 different threads on 3 separate discussions or anything at all about those 3 important threads that only seek to establish some fair and transparent guidelines that everyone can follow.

All I said to you is that I have noted you are spamming the same sigs as the observable liars, scammers, probable extortionists and other observable scoundrels here and gladly accepting 20 merits for saying I should leave the board. You are not impartial at all and I never even really talked to you before.

You are just trying to join in with your pals on their witch hunt based soley on the fact that I will NOT stop mentioning when it is relevant and on topic that they have observable double standards and seek to punish persons for deeds less damaging and less serious than they or their friends have observably committed.

Also I feel that people of admin level should not have been here years and still need to spam gambling sigs to get some btc dust. That tells me after 2 huge bull runs they are very likely to be poor in their judgement in this community here and could be jealous of successful members. Also being of low net worth certainly makes you more vulnerable to corruption and back handers. This is speculation but the other option is that you are  just greedy so that is no better really.

You like ALL of these people including lauda came after ME, and started attacking me first. Trace back the threads I was not attacking anyone until they turned up calling me a liar and all kinds of false accusations with ZERO grounding over and over even when I asked them to present their evidence. Then I told them if you keep doing this over and over to me I will encourage others to look at your past history. They then red trusted me and next their OBSERVABLE colluding pals all from the same extortion scheme and many other instances they can be observed ganging up all gave me more red trust. I say it is not fair and I don't accept this scam tag.

You as a moderator side with these peoples actions. Then you should be removed from your position. I mean not only do you side with  them in private you openly start attacking me when I never spoke to you before?

Stop crying when I simply note in public some observable events about you. At least it is not a false accusation with zero reasoning or grounding behind it.

How about out of the blue I come on your threads and say its  better if you leave, and start calling you crazy and will not present any evidence at all?? 

Anyway I don't want you to agree with me, just mind your own business and stay out of it.

You will never find me attacking anyone first here. I present observable events and people come and attack me fair enough, but I keep presenting those events anyway.

Anyway I have plenty of opponents here so one more makes zero difference to me. However, don't expect me to react any different to you that I do to them just because you are admin, you really should be able to explain clearly your actions and be held accountable more than a normal member.

So it is up to you. I never heard of you before much and I have no personal experience with you, so just don't come sniping and jabbing at me and then no need for me to reply to you at all, and if you don't like my long posts then you can simply never read one again. I have never read any of yours until you came looking for me AFAIK.

Things are not going to get LESS scummy if mods are supporting observable scum. Try to understand that.

[Flying Hellfish]

Blah blah blah

Thank you for the compliments, I am glad you have come to your senses and agree with everything I have ever said!

[cryptohunter]

I am no expert, but I don’t think it is best to be bullying a forum member in a meta thread complaining about rules allegedly being broken. It is probably not appropriate at all for a moderator to be doing the same at all all in any public thread.

If you don’t want to deal with his rants, your choice are to ignore him (including not publicly talking about him), or put up with the rants. If you want to chastise him, you should expect a response.

You're right, making fun of someone's incoherent rants is such inappropriate bullying. We should instead accuse them of having a pill addiction or being a pedophile.

Says the snitchy scum that moans about others minor infractions whilst enabling and ensuring those that have observably lied, supported scams, trust abused, observably tried to extort people by harassing their parents (haha what scum), sneakily and greedily used sock puppets to racist troll sig spam for btc dust ....GET ON DT1. You are a disgusting fool who I have crushed so many times in debate you must have zero shame to even keep posting here. You must love being crushed in public.

I am likely going to dedicate a thread to all of your most stupid statements and self defeating blunders.

@cryingdumbfish

great reply.... I would have to be reckless to face you in open debate in public again. lol

I see nothing in this thread other than groundless false accusations regarding all kinds of trumped up shit with ZERO evidence supplied even after I called them to present it many times. Bunch of toothless rancid hags all shrieking around flailing their arms crashing into one another as I bitch slap them about with observable events and facts.

[Quickseller]

I am no expert, but I don’t think it is best to be bullying a forum member in a meta thread complaining about rules allegedly being broken. It is probably not appropriate at all for a moderator to be doing the same at all all in any public thread.

If you don’t want to deal with his rants, your choice are to ignore him (including not publicly talking about him), or put up with the rants. If you want to chastise him, you should expect a response.

Read your own post and feel free to ignore me asshole!

I am also a user of this forum and to my knowledge being staff does not preclude me from participating in any discussion I feel like commenting on.  If it is I missed that memo.

It isn't my "job" to hold anyones hand and make them feel all warm and fuzzy, if I see a stund cunt I am likely to call them a stund cunt!  It is my "job" to clean up shit in the P&S sub, that's it.  Perhaps if people would use their own fucking brains instead of looking at title or trust or merit things would start to get a little less wild west scummy around here, I know I know I'm a dreamer at heart!

You are absolutely allowed to participate in the forum as a moderator but that doesn’t give you the right to do whatever you want — you are held to a certain set of standards as a moderator.

I have no problem dealing with your outbursts and it doesn’t trigger me when someone disagrees with me or says something I don’t like.

When you are posting anywhere in the forum you are wearing a ‘staff’ tag and as such it should not be unreasonable to expect you to be professional. 

[Flying Hellfish]

You are absolutely allowed to participate in the forum as a moderator but that doesn’t give you the right to do whatever you want — you are held to a certain set of standards as a moderator.

When you are posting anywhere in the forum you are wearing a ‘staff’ tag and as such it should not be unreasonable to expect you to be professional.  

When I step over the line I assume theymos is a big boy and will let me know.  BTW what does my "attitude" have to do with my ability to clean up shit in P&S LOL.

When Cryptohunter stops posting like a mouth breathing goldfish people will stop making fun of them.

[Quickseller]

You are absolutely allowed to participate in the forum as a moderator but that doesn’t give you the right to do whatever you want — you are held to a certain set of standards as a moderator.

When you are posting anywhere in the forum you are wearing a ‘staff’ tag and as such it should not be unreasonable to expect you to be professional. 

When I step over the line I assume theymos is a big boy and will let me know.  BTW what does my "attitude" have to do with my ability to clean up shit in P&S LOL.

I am voicing my opinion on the matter.

I am not referencing your "attitude" I am referencing your professionalism, or lack thereof towards other forum members you are supposed to have authority over when they post in your section, and that you have influence over everywhere.

The above does not directly affect your ability to "clean up shit" in your section, it reflects on the forum itself via your 'staff' tag, and calls into question your ability to handle issues in a mature/impartial way, including issues within your section.

[marlboroza]

If you don’t want to deal with his rants, your choice are to ignore him (including not publicly talking about him), or put up with the rants.

Why should we ignore spam?

If you want to chastise him, you should expect a response.

Excuse me, but why these rants started? Isn't it because she went full off topic in another thread which has nothing to do with her and things she mentioned in that post, admin deleted her post and she start ranting around and spamming forum with some crap?
Why should we ignore this?
Theymos explained her why post was removed and then she start to create threads one after another like there is some issue going on but there isn't any issue except her spamming and trolling.

Reports are unhandled, should I create thread in meta to ask why? 

When your TLDR is still TOO FUCKING LONG...

I actually read it and she said something about "Alice" whoever that is and whatever that means and some things that she is repeating again. Some off topic crap again, nothing new, really.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I am no expert, but I don’t think it is best to be bullying a forum member in a meta thread complaining about rules allegedly being broken.

This isn't bullying.  Bullying would be picking on a member who hadn't started a complete, forum-wide shitfest first.  And if cryptohunter can't take a thread like this, then he shouldn't be attacking DT members, Theymos, the trust and merit systems, and everything else he's been on a crusade against for the past few months. 

I also don't see why a staff member can't have a strong opinion about this, either.  It's not like they have to be completely impartial--and this isn't even the section Flying Hellfish moderates.

The bottom line is that cryptohunter's posts, threads, and all of his arguments have become stale.  They're repetitive and annoying and the only thing left to do after rebutting all of his points is to laugh at him, since he won't go away.  That's the only thing you can do aside from putting him on ignore, which I've done, but I still can't help reading the replies of others to his posts--so what else can one do?  I've no sympathy for him and see no reason to defend him against other members who just want to take the piss out of him.

[cryptohunter]

This is exactly what I mean and exactly why I created the 3 threads, thanks for demonstrating again the clear need for them once again.

1. they still reference things like my spamming and trolling but are unable to provide any examples.
They still use these false accusations in light of

a/ they can't demonstrate any examples when called on to produce many many times
b/ they have been caught red handed sneakily using puppet accounts to racist troll sig spam for btc dust themselves haha but advocate others be banned whilst they enjoy DT positions

2/ they just speculate on why the 3 threads were started as if they know.
a/ it is not because theymos deleted my post
b/ it is rather because of ALL of reasons I am discussing in the 3 threads I started. It is to establish some transparent guidance for all members.

3/ pharmacist aka Huge Black Woman states that all of my points (including those on merit and trust)

a/ are old and stale (well these are ongoing very important points, shall we just keep talking about cycled merits on ALL threads here and forget improving the forum for REAL in a transparent and fair way for all members) and never mention the observable untrustworthy deeds you have all committed again? haha old and stale

b/states there has been successful rebuttals/ refutations made (NONE EXIST and he does not present them obviously)

c/claims that "taking the piss" is the only thing that remains to be done, when the only thing they do do is present false accusations then refuse to back them up with any evidence or examples. You are merely through force of numbers trying to collude and make it appear that there is strong consensus that your points are true when any person can see that none of you can produce any evidence... .where as I can

4/ again all I say I see these people doing is trying to dole out punishment to those guilty of lesser crimes than they have committed  and those they support are observably guilty of whilst cycling merits and all including each other on DT when they are observably untrustworthy themselves. Their double standards are sickening and they are spamming their "highly paid sigs" whilst they get to exercise their self awarded powers to punish others often merely on a " hunch".

5/ every single point I have made since coming to meta STANDS there has been no successful refutations to ANY of my central points. They are simply trying to defend the systems that allow the most observably untrustworthy and dangerous people here to grasp power and punish others for lesser offences....whilst ensuring they cream off the best sig campaigns via their pals campaign managers projects and mods seem to be joined to the same projects are backing them and their foul deeds against honest members.

So dummies - present the trolling, the incorrect information I am spreading, the points I have made where there has been a successful refutation conclusively presented, and also if you like your most original thought inspiring posts that got you your big bags or merit that would be good for a laugh too. How about your largest achievements since joining this board?

We will get NOTHING presented again. Really you are just demonstrating how stupid and foolish you are.  I have no idea why you have any merits, or a DT position at all. I can see clearly why you are a bunch of broke ass fools though haha.

[marlboroza]

1. they still reference things like my spamming and trolling but are unable to provide any examples.

examples --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110, to be more specific https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110;sa=showPosts

2/ they just speculate on why the 3 threads were started as if they know.
a/ it is not because theymos deleted my post

Yes it is. You spammed threads because theymos removed your off topic reply.

sock puppet racist trolling sig spammer Huge black woman.
racist trolling from your  sig spamming sock puppet account
sock puppet racist trolling sig spammers

racist trolling sig spamming puppet accounts, lying, pushing scams, all meriting each other, all voting each other on dt and all ganging up

The more mods that openly come out in support of proven scammers, trust abusers, liars, probable extortionists, proven sock puppet racist sig spammers

sock puppets to racist troll sig spam for btc dust
DT1

Huge Black Woman
racist troll sig spam
cycling merits
btc dust
DT
highly paid sigs
best sig campaigns
their pals

Do you use text spinner or something?

Can you please stop spamming "keywords" (and some other words) over and over again?

[cryptohunter]

1. they still reference things like my spamming and trolling but are unable to provide any examples.

examples --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110, to be more specific https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110;sa=showPosts

2/ they just speculate on why the 3 threads were started as if they know.
a/ it is not because theymos deleted my post

Yes it is. You spammed threads because theymos removed your off topic reply.

sock puppet racist trolling sig spammer Huge black woman.
racist trolling from your  sig spamming sock puppet account
sock puppet racist trolling sig spammers

racist trolling sig spamming puppet accounts, lying, pushing scams, all meriting each other, all voting each other on dt and all ganging up

The more mods that openly come out in support of proven scammers, trust abusers, liars, probable extortionists, proven sock puppet racist sig spammers

sock puppets to racist troll sig spam for btc dust
DT1

Huge Black Woman
racist troll sig spam
cycling merits
btc dust
DT
highly paid sigs
best sig campaigns
their pals

Do you use text spinner or something?

Can you please stop spamming "keywords" (and some other words) over and over again?

spamming "key words"  ah i see...haha

1/ I did not start these 3 threads for that reason. They encompass many more scenarios than that single example which is possibly just part of the prior precedents set one. Please try to stop demonstrating you are completely stupid.

2/ spamming does not essentially mean using the same TRUTHFUL descriptions describing valid and on topic observable  events over different time periods. Yes you must find different words to describe our observable foul deeds and double standards or you must be banned for spamming....hahahaha

You seem to be moving the goal posts initially it was am I spamming because of the 3 threads. Now it is because I have use some of the same terms to describe observable events. haha fool.

3/ so this is the best you can bring??? where are the examples of

a/ the incorrect and false information I am presenting over and over
b/ the trolling examples
c/ the examples of your original thought provoking posts worthy of all this merit you have
d/ my pushing for any other agenda that introducing a fair and equal system for all.

haha I used some of the same words to describe some of the same observably untrustworthy actions of you and your pals. lolololo

shut up moronbozo ... you just get more stupid daily.

[marlboroza]

Huge Black Woman
racist troll sig spam
cycling merits
btc dust
DT
highly paid sigs
best sig campaigns
their pals

"keywords"

spamming "key words"  ah i see...haha

1/ I did not start these 3 threads for that reason. They encompass many more scenarios than that single example which is possibly just part of the prior precedents set one. Please try to stop demonstrating you are completely stupid.

2/ spamming does not essentially mean using the same TRUTHFUL descriptions describing valid and on topic observable  events over different time periods. Yes you must find different words to describe our observable foul deeds and double standards or you must be banned for spamming....hahahaha

You seem to be moving the goal posts initially it was am I spamming because of the 3 threads. Now it is because I have use some of the same terms to describe observable events. haha fool.

3/ so this is the best you can bring??? where are the examples of

a/ the incorrect and false information I am presenting over and over
b/ the trolling examples
c/ the examples of your original thought provoking posts worthy of all this merit you have
d/ my pushing for any other agenda that introducing a fair and equal system for all.

haha I used some of the same words to describe some of the same observably untrustworthy actions of you and your pals. lolololo

shut up moronbozo ... you just get more stupid daily.

Don't worry, I will make a list of all keywords when I will have enough time to go trough your shitposts.

At the moment, I am adding to that list:

observable events ^[1]
fool (fool deeds)
truth (speak the truth)

where are the examples of

I thought you have read quoted post, anyway, here you go again:

examples --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110, to be more specific https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110;sa=showPosts

[1]Oh...

[cryptohunter]

Huge Black Woman
racist troll sig spam
cycling merits
btc dust
DT
highly paid sigs
best sig campaigns
their pals

"keywords"

spamming "key words"  ah i see...haha

1/ I did not start these 3 threads for that reason. They encompass many more scenarios than that single example which is possibly just part of the prior precedents set one. Please try to stop demonstrating you are completely stupid.

2/ spamming does not essentially mean using the same TRUTHFUL descriptions describing valid and on topic observable  events over different time periods. Yes you must find different words to describe our observable foul deeds and double standards or you must be banned for spamming....hahahaha

You seem to be moving the goal posts initially it was am I spamming because of the 3 threads. Now it is because I have use some of the same terms to describe observable events. haha fool.

3/ so this is the best you can bring??? where are the examples of

a/ the incorrect and false information I am presenting over and over
b/ the trolling examples
c/ the examples of your original thought provoking posts worthy of all this merit you have
d/ my pushing for any other agenda that introducing a fair and equal system for all.

haha I used some of the same words to describe some of the same observably untrustworthy actions of you and your pals. lolololo

shut up moronbozo ... you just get more stupid daily.

Don't worry, I will make a list of all keywords when I will have enough time to go trough your shitposts.

At the moment, I am adding to that list:

observable events ^[1]
fool (fool deeds)
truth (speak the truth)

where are the examples of

I thought you have read quoted post, anyway, here you go again:

examples --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110, to be more specific https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110;sa=showPosts

[1]Oh...

This is excellent work moronbozo....

Keep looking, I have used "observable events" 100's of more times than that. You are just seeing merely the tip of an "observable events " iceberg. hehe. I'm actually starting to see a convincing set of evidence building up that I do use the same words often when I wish to describe the same or similar instances. hmmm perhaps you're on to something I mean after you have spent several weeks counting how many times I have used different words.

Then move on to something a little more damning like

a/ the incorrect and false information I am presenting over and over
b/ the trolling examples
c/ my shit posts (best define that first)
d/ my pushing for any other agenda that introducing a fair and equal system for all.

then the rarest of all.

e/the examples of your original thought provoking posts worthy of all this merit you have

I think you will find it is you that is the net negative shit poster and supporter of "observable" scammers, liars, and other dirt bags. Now get back to counting my words before A-E.  This thread that you created is a shit post. It serves to prevent the board debating and establishing a set of sensible guidelines for dealing with the scenarios that are described within and subsequently how we can view and react to those that operate inside and outside of the guidelines that are determined to be optimal.

They are open debates... nothing more. That is what forums are for. I see you as grossly net negative by trying to prevent it and turn it into another witch hunt. You likely do not have the capacity to realise my true intentions here but just try not to worry about that and accept that a force for good in terms of fairness and equality to all members.

[marlboroza]

a/ the incorrect and false information I am presenting over and over
b/ the trolling examples
c/ the examples of your original thought provoking posts worthy of all this merit you have
d/ my pushing for any other agenda that introducing a fair and equal system for all.

shut up moronbozo ... you just get more stupid daily.

[...]
a/ the incorrect and false information I am presenting over and over
b/ the trolling examples
c/ my shit posts (best define that first)
d/ my pushing for any other agenda that introducing a fair and equal system for all.
[...]
e/the examples of your original thought provoking posts worthy of all this merit you have

What the...? You probably missed this and this again.
You can't really expect anyone to quote your Artamène post history and post all examples of your spamming trolling rant.

[cryptohunter]

some suspicious looking  links he wants me to click

[...]
a/ the incorrect and false information I am presenting over and over
b/ the trolling examples
c/ my shit posts (best define that first)
d/ my pushing for any other agenda that introducing a fair and equal system for all.
[...]
e/the examples of your original thought provoking posts worthy of all this merit you have

What the...? You probably missed this and this again.
You can't really expect anyone to quote your Artamène post history and post all examples of your spamming trolling rant.
[/quote]

Sorry I am not clicking any of your offsite links since you are untrustworthy and I'm a high net worth individual. However if you are trying to point me to an example of one of your original thought inspiring posts you can just give me an on site link to laugh at. examine.

Take it one at a time. Just post one example then if it is proving too hard for your tiny brain of me posting incorrect information. Surely just one example of me presenting something untrue can not be too hard can it?

Obviously finish counting up how many times I use the same words first ...lol

[marlboroza]

some suspicious looking  links he wants me to click

It seems that I said that you want me to click on some suspicious links, but strangely enough I can't find where I said that. Hm, where did you post link which looks suspicious?

Also, I don't remember giving you permission to use my words if you don't mind put them under quotation marks and insert back your copy/paste spam which you probably accidentally removed. Keep spamming this thread with nonsense and c/p, this only proves that you are nothing but a blatant spammer. Post archived 

[cryptohunter]

some suspicious looking  links he wants me to click

It seems that I said that you want me to click on some suspicious links, but strangely enough I can't find where I said that. Hm, where did you post link which looks suspicious?

Also, I don't remember giving you permission to use my words if you don't mind put them under quotation marks and insert back your copy/paste spam which you probably accidentally removed. Keep spamming this thread with nonsense and c/p, this only proves that you are nothing but a blatant spammer. Post archived 

what are you talking about you creepy little worm? are these scare links that don't really exist, ?. Stop wasting my time and provide the evidence I am telling you to present.

I am not clicking on your off site links. I am asking you to present instances which are on this forum. Why should I need to click offsite links?

Now just focus carefully on what I am instructing you to present. You are making the accusations. You need to provide the evidence.

I was enjoying your cryptohunter is spamming "words" case you were crafting.. haha... I want to see more totals of how many times I have apparently spammed words. How many times have I "spammed" moronbozo? that's one of your favourites, do that one first and bring all the evidence. I think i am almost ready to confess but just not yet.

What about all that incorrect information I have presented? where is that moronbozo?

Also how many times have I "spammed" lauda is a liar, scammer and other truthful things about him? can you present the evidence for that and also prove that is a false claim.

Now between counting my words and reporting my entire history of single word posts. How about popping over to shine my shoes and wash my expensive automobile? clean the pool? I pay more than chimpmuncher or whatever it is your are sig spamming.

Actually it just made me realise you earn btc dust from sig spamming and I earn nothing from spamming different words? did you realise that?

I should really have a cut of all your chimpmixers income because I allow you to generate most of your content? I mean if you bunch were not spamming sigs on my threads or making threads  dedicated to me where I am not allowed to post, your wages would be cut dramatically.

You are calling me a spammer. but you are the one getting paid to sig spam about me, to me and i get nothing not even a cut of it all?

This latest thread though is brilliant, you get to spam your sig at my expense, whilst accusing me of spamming not a sig but rather I am spamming words. That is excellent moronbozo.

Next thread... you can spam your sig whilst posting about how I am claiming that you are spamming your sig whilst you are claiming I am spamming words, when actually you are not doing that at all.

It will be a crypto hunter false allegation thread. I like it. Endless revenue from Cryptohunter.