sockpuppets in meta lately

[Lafu]

Why it now looks to me they all are the alt of a single person whose rants are lengthy post are missing now from Meta.
Surprisingly that poster did not posted in past couple of days.

Exactly thats what i thought yesterday mayself too.

4 New Accounts registered only a few days and 4 diffrent complains that all have done by the one User who havnt posted the last days !

Where is Cryptohunter ?  that should be some Users he can discuss his opinions !!!   

[1714133182]

1714133182

[1714133182]

1714133182

[The-One-Above-All]

Eleareon
The-One-Above-All
Big Boobies talkinDoubleD
Hudson-Odoi

Why it now looks to me they all are the alt of a single person whose rants are lengthy post are missing now from Meta.
Surprisingly that poster did not posted in past couple of days.

Why it now looks to you all alt presented single rant person who missing meta now?
Surprisingly I look you didn't understanded your requires proof to insist on makes allegations?
If you must damaged my eye with your broken Englisher accusations please stop spamming your signature and getting paid to do it.
Unless you have some proofs that any of this accounts have alt account then stop claims that they are alts.

Which member did not posted in couple past days?

[Lauda]

I've tagged all of them. This reeks of cryptohunter && quickscammer tactics. Obviously untrustworthy. I will not censor myself because some rando-first world pajeets think they can win using these pathetic methods.

[Foxpup]

Which member did not posted in couple past days?

The one whom you knew was banned even though his ban isn't public and therefore there's no way you could have known he was banned unless you are him. That member.

[r1s2g3]

Using of sockpuppet simply signifies 2 points.

1. They think that broken part of trust system might be used against them.
2. Their main account has no credibility left and even a "Brand New" accounts look more credible then their main account.

I think it's

3. Trolling.

All those sockpuppets provided exactly zero (0) facts or other tangible details as to what the actual problems are, if any. Just some generic rants.

4. When you are evading the ban and main account cannot post due to ban .(One of the possible reason)

[nutildah]

Definitely CH, uses too many words/terms that nobody (rarely anybody) else does.

This will be the first of many threads started to examine the possible actions of campaign managers and their projects and their sponsorship of perhaps some of the most shady people on this entire board whilst refusing honest members merely on some red marks actual scammers and liars wish to put on their accounts.

Theymos can you explain your reasoning on honest meriting of merit worthy posts by those that clearly announce their intentions vs those that are sneaky about it and report others whilst clearly doing it themselves?

(dozens of usages of whilst, if not hundreds)

whilst they cream off the best deals for them selves and their friends?  Perhaps anyone that has been banned for simply whistle blowing or under some false pretense should be reinstated immediately?

....whilst ensuring they cream off the best sig campaigns via their pals campaign managers projects and mods seem to be joined to the same projects are backing them and their foul deeds against honest members.

(both posts are about sig campaigns using the term cream off)

Does Hhampuz  knowingly chose to employ and sponsor people that are Liars, Scam pushers, trust abusers and those implicated in extortion schemes and other shady escrow deals ?

mention facts that there are thread accusing lauda of shady escrow practices and that senior senior members agree that he is shady and the fact that lauda is also implicated in an extortion scheme.

(shadiest of escrows)

This was also a giveaway:

Posts will be deleted if not accompanied by evidence, off topic or deemed irrelevant by myself.

It was funny to see CH try their hardest to keep their words to a minimum but ultimately fail in their last post.

In addition, the new name is entirely fitting for how they see themselves.

Edit:

Holy crap CH is banned!(?)!

Which member did not posted in couple past days?

The one whom you knew was banned even though his ban isn't public and therefore there's no way you could have known he was banned unless you are him. That member.

Quoted for future posterity:

I believe cryptohunter already detailed this in full here. He correctly stated [editors note: said no one ever] that the subjective and practically meaningless merit scores and sources should be far removed from the other control system trust. It is quite terrible how they had him banned for posting the truth [ed: among other things] in response generally to their own viscous attacks upon him, that consisted of nothing other than lies and fabrications, then traced through his post history to find some 1 word posts, to provide excuse to finally get rid of him.

[The-One-Above-All]

Definitely CH, uses too many words/terms that nobody (rarely anybody) else does.

This will be the first of many threads started to examine the possible actions of campaign managers and their projects and their sponsorship of perhaps some of the most shady people on this entire board whilst refusing honest members merely on some red marks actual scammers and liars wish to put on their accounts.

Theymos can you explain your reasoning on honest meriting of merit worthy posts by those that clearly announce their intentions vs those that are sneaky about it and report others whilst clearly doing it themselves?

(dozens of usages of whilst, if not hundreds)

whilst they cream off the best deals for them selves and their friends?  Perhaps anyone that has been banned for simply whistle blowing or under some false pretense should be reinstated immediately?

....whilst ensuring they cream off the best sig campaigns via their pals campaign managers projects and mods seem to be joined to the same projects are backing them and their foul deeds against honest members.

(both posts are about sig campaigns using the term cream off)

Does Hhampuz  knowingly chose to employ and sponsor people that are Liars, Scam pushers, trust abusers and those implicated in extortion schemes and other shady escrow deals ?

mention facts that there are thread accusing lauda of shady escrow practices and that senior senior members agree that he is shady and the fact that lauda is also implicated in an extortion scheme.

(shadiest of escrows)

This was also a giveaway:

Posts will be deleted if not accompanied by evidence, off topic or deemed irrelevant by myself.

It was funny to see CH try their hardest to keep their words to a minimum but ultimately fail in their last post.

In addition, the new name is entirely fitting for how they see themselves.

That's a very compelling case for a sub 80 iq.

It is a shame that cryptohunter was banned. I want to confirm that  he was a great inspiration to myself, that said I am not crytohunter. Let's
keep to the things we can prove.

You are not notildah as cryptohunter would say. You bought his account. This is likely since you are begging for 0.02 btc loans very recently. You are notildah as cryptohunter correctly mentioned. He was a fantastic member and a sad loss to this community. A true legend.

I would like video proof that I am an alt of someone as moronbozo claims in required.

[nutildah]

It is a shame that cryptohunter was banned. I want to confirm that  he was a great inspiration to myself, that said I am not crytohunter. Let's
keep to the things we can prove.

I just choked laughing.

You are not notildah as cryptohunter would say. You bought his account. This is likely since you are begging for 0.02 btc loans very recently. You are notildah as cryptohunter correctly mentioned. He was a fantastic member and a sad loss to this community. A true legend.

Well uh, thanks?  

Don't worry, I'm done here. If I see Nutildah I'll tell him Not Cryptohunter said "Hi".

[Foxpup]

I would like video proof that I am an alt of someone as moronbozo claims in required.

Come now, if you're going to pretend not to be an alt of someone, the least you could do is invent new insults:

This latest thread though is brilliant, you get to spam your sig at my expense, whilst accusing me of spamming not a sig but rather I am spamming words. That is excellent moronbozo.

[hilariousandco]

Teamsters Internet SEctor, Big Boobies talkinDoubleD and Nigerian CocoPalm Farmer are probably the same user.

People need to stop feeding trolls. Maybe any Newbie account spouting the same old nonsense should just be given the silent treatment. I'm sure we could get the merit mafia regulars to agree to it but there's too many sig spamming shitposters who are more than happy to chime in for it to be truly effective. Shadowbanning works wonders for trolls though. When their bait doesn't catch they soon realise they're wasting their time.

I would like video proof that I am an alt of someone as moronbozo claims in required.

Come now, if you're going to pretend not to be an alt of someone, the least you could do is invent new insults:

This latest thread though is brilliant, you get to spam your sig at my expense, whilst accusing me of spamming not a sig but rather I am spamming words. That is excellent moronbozo.

I laughed out loud at moronbozo. Was cryptohunter actually banned? He's not currently so must have been given a short one if so.

[Quickseller]

I will just leave this here...

I do find the multiple newbie accounts posting here to be annoying. I suspect there is one person behind the multiple newbie accounts trying to create an illusion that a single person is complaining about what the OP is saying, and to create an illusion that the problem described in the OP is exaggerated. Sort of a false flag type thing. Or an attempt to prevent anyone from using an anon newbie account from being taken seriously so anyone who wants to criticize must do so openly, risking their reputation.

[The-One-Above-All]

I would like video proof that I am an alt of someone as moronbozo claims in required.

Come now, if you're going to pretend not to be an alt of someone, the least you could do is invent new insults:

This latest thread though is brilliant, you get to spam your sig at my expense, whilst accusing me of spamming not a sig but rather I am spamming words. That is excellent moronbozo.

This is fun. I wonder if anyone else noticed that snippet, after I indicated it was the words of my inspiration cryptohunter?
Agent foxpoop.

You missed notildah? Also there is one that starts out with a f  in this very post.

This is not a proofen fact, you need video evidence of cryptohunter typing on this very keyboard. Ask moronbozo.

I have no alt account, so stop making false accusations. I will not ask you again before I make another reputation thread asking why persons are permitted to continue accusing persons, casting them in a negative light with no proof at all. I hope persons realize this is unfair and ridiculous.

[bones261]

I have no alt account, so stop making false accusations. I will not ask you again before I make another reputation thread asking why persons are permitted to continue accusing persons, casting them in a negative light with no proof at all. I hope persons realize this is unfair and ridiculous.

So you have been lurking around Bitcointalk for quite sometime, becoming quite familiar with the current forum politics and just a couple of days ago decided to create an account? I suppose that is possible, but doesn't pass the occam's razor test. Perhaps you are not a CH alt; especially since a moderator already confirmed that if CH was banned, it's already over. However, it's quite likely you are someone's alt here.

[Foxpup]

Also there is one that starts out with a f  in this very post.

I still maintain that the one that starts with v was better.

I have no alt account, so stop making false accusations. I will not ask you again

In that case, I will not ask you again how you knew cryptohunter was banned when nobody other than himself could know that.

[The-One-Above-All]

Also there is one that starts out with a f  in this very post.

I still maintain that the one that starts with v was better.

I have no alt account, so stop making false accusations. I will not ask you again

In that case, I will not ask you again how you knew cryptohunter was banned when nobody other than himself could know that.

occam's razor informed me

[Pmalek]

He did not explain why he decided to give his pal merits just because he asked for them.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4661300.msg49692389#msg49692389


I see merits given to this initial post. I see no PROOF than any of these accounts that are being accused of being sock puppets are sock puppets. May I see the proof.

It is the double standards of you and your friends here which there is clear proof of.

I don't know why you are quoting my post and asking me to post proof of something, I am not the OP of this thread.

The post you linked is not the post we were talking about, it was this one:

Hello Everyone

I have been mining for almost 6 months but I didn’t build it nor did it program it. I had a friend who helped me out but since then I have been interested in building my own and programming it myself. I have learnt to build it but just need to learn the programmingt, maintaining and upgrading part of the miner.

I have been looking but things seem very confusing with most people giving their opinions rather than actual knowledge. Can anyone please help me by providing me certain links as a newbie in this and other areas once I am able to increase my knowledge I can move up and keep learning.

Thank you

This is the post you had problems with because it received 10 merits and JetCash explained how that happened.
My initial reply is based on you accusing JetCash for whatever it is you think he is guilty of for the post I quoted.
 

[Jet Cash]

I'm a gnat's wedding-tackle away from giving the guy another 20 merits for the post just to piss off the whingers. Would that count as merit abuse, or would it be frock puppet abuse?

[marlboroza]

I see no PROOF than any of these accounts that are being accused of being sock puppets are sock puppets. May I see the proof.

Sure, no problem: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2580400;sa=showPosts.

[stompix]

Was cryptohunter actually banned? He's not currently so must have been given a short one if so.

Is it possible that a direct ban from the theymos won't show in whatever dashboard you moderators have?
Or he is just playing with us to have our hopes destroyed tomorrow morning?

I'm a gnat's wedding-tackle away from giving the guy another 20 merits for the post just to piss off the whingers. Would that count as merit abuse, or would it be frock puppet abuse?

 Seeing how his attitude has changed in the past few weeks I'm not sure if he will be pissed off about this.
In his twisted mind, he might see it as a victory where he has made you do something through his well-planned schemes ....
The only way to deal with a nut is to use a hammer, nothing else works...

[The-One-Above-All]

I see no PROOF than any of these accounts that are being accused of being sock puppets are sock puppets. May I see the proof.

Sure, no problem: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2580400;sa=showPosts.

Is this proof of your sig spamming? 

I see no proof that any accounts here accused are alts?

Video evidence as required by yourself when operating your alt account zorroback.?