KYC Requirement for Bounty Managers before they require KYC to bounty hunters.

[Bessta]

Do you really think that bounty participants can force that issue in the bounty managers? And I don't think that the bounty managers are the one who implements that. It's the project itself. You really can't protest over it. The best move you can make is just to avoid the bounties that implements KYC.

[1714658060]

1714658060

[smyslov]

You have not stated your reasons why you think BM's should be required to submit KYC. Who do you think they should submit them to? The ICO team?

I think he wants bounty managers to submit KYC to the ICO team, because no bounty hunters can ask that, that's actually none of our business although it is recommended submitting KYC should not be done in public and should only submitted internally between the two parties, in this case, bounty managers and the ICO,

[pushups44]

I'd go a step further - there should be an industry third-party association to KYC not just bounty managers, but also ICO companies. Companies with founders who fail the KYC should not be allowed to demand KYC documents, IMO.

[joeperry]

1. The project didn't encourage you or force you to submit a KYC document, there's a lot of bounties out there that doesn't required KYC documents.
2. The managers didn't need to provide KYC... what for? and to whom they're gonna pass it? to all bounty hunters (come to think of it)
3. The KYC verification didn't come from the manager rules, it came from the project represntative/team itself.
4. To make this clear, the managers didn't get your KYC for verification but to avoid bounty abusers and bounty farmers.

Note:Some managers just really want your KYC documents please be careful and protect your privacy.

If you're not comfortable to it, it's simple... They didn't force you... DON'T JOIN.

[Vaculin]

I'd go a step further - there should be an industry third-party association to KYC not just bounty managers, but also ICO companies. Companies with founders who fail the KYC should not be allowed to demand KYC documents, IMO.

I like your idea but i think it would be too hard to make this a possible one. Maybe if we feel too hesitant to submit KYC then we can still search for another campaigns that don't require KYC yet. But most of the legit ICOs today are already asking KYC so we don't have choices but to comply with them. After all as long as we get paid in the end then it would be fine.

[stefany101]

I feel like it's not fair for bounty hunters to submit KYC when joining bounty campaigns because we are not an investor. We will never be involved with any anti money laundering because we don't invest with money but with TIME and Effort instead. Personally I'm NOT very comfortable submitting my ID's for the simple reason that these are startup companies and we don't even know if they can be trusted.

I think it is a good idea to requires KYC for bounty managers but I think they gonna agree with it. Bounty managers are also bounty hunters but there job is more complicate than to us bounty hunters, for the reason that they whole bounty while we are just doing our weekly tasks. If you don't like bounties which requires KYC then don't join with those bounties. Always remember that the bounty rewards still depends on the outcome of the ICO, so we don't have to blame the bounty managers if we don't get any rewards.

[Pamadar]

You have not stated your reasons why you think BM's should be required to submit KYC. Who do you think they should submit them to? The ICO team?

I think he wants bounty managers to submit KYC to the ICO team, because no bounty hunters can ask that, that's actually none of our business although it is recommended submitting KYC should not be done in public and should only submitted internally between the two parties, in this case, bounty managers and the ICO,

Which is right it's between the team and the manager, they have agreement in between so its not the hunters business to know about that and
if they needed to process the KYC, the job should be done and there's no other obligations from the part of the managers, it's really the hunters
job to find and select good project to participate.

[Reid]

First of all what they offer is not that large so KYC's should not really be mandatory.

You are correct. If they really want their bounty hunters to submit KYC then maybe the team needs to do it first.
Or, you could all just participate in their telegram group where they will submit their KYC or in pinned post and then you will just follow before the payment is done.
We should all be fair here, for they could use your personal information with evil intentions.

[dncdog]

Most of KYC requirements come from companies that run promotions for their projects, not come from bounty managers. When bounty managers solely decide asking for KYCs, it is not a good thing, and personally I don't join such campaigns managed by such 'curious' managers. Even KYCs require by projects, I most likely ignore them due to my privacy protection.

[Snaic]

We have to agree that the ICO teams continue to abuse their rights and require bounty hunters to undergo a KYC check. We should not undergo such testing, because we do not invest in ICO projects and therefore cannot be the targets of combating dirty money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism. This situation will continue as long as the ICO remains unregulated.
I do not consider it necessary to require an ICO bounty manager to undergo a KYC check. This figure solves almost nothing. To pass the test more serious than KYC, should the team ICO. Moreover, such verification should be carried out by a third party and include personal verification of the members of the ICO team.

[Mahanton]

I feel like it's not fair for bounty hunters to submit KYC when joining bounty campaigns because we are not an investor. We will never be involved with any anti money laundering because we don't invest with money but with TIME and Effort instead. Personally I'm NOT very comfortable submitting my ID's for the simple reason that these are startup companies and we don't even know if they can be trusted.

KYC for Bounty manager? Why? They arent tied up with the project most of the time and most of them are just being hired so i dont get the point
why would they needed to sent up some documentations too.Even the manager of said bounty is part of their time, we cant still assure that they would able to comply.

[Google+]

I'd go a step further - there should be an industry third-party association to KYC not just bounty managers, but also ICO companies. Companies with founders who fail the KYC should not be allowed to demand KYC documents, IMO.

I think some ico rating givers have given a KYC column for ICO founders to be seen as in the icobench there to be able to get a rating at least the ICO founder must do KYC.

[nikola22]

I think that not bounty managers require KYC from bounty hunters but the developers of the ICO projects. bounty managers just do what they have to do.

[Saugani]

often beginning many complain his times to ask discussing about KYC for the hunters.

So, it's actual that logically statement from the manager bounty because him also in demand a spreading this information to the mention group. Its kind annoying that to kick off is not said the kyc required and then last time it needed pass-kyc when completed or will to complete, once again this’s a disappoint.

It can’t be help!! So it’s be true such a procedure, don’t want to receive well please just “it is a statement that really sick what we have done”

I think, if a campaign where do KYC required it should be was representing or write words in thread and then it will be better.

[mrdeposit]

I feel like it's not fair for bounty hunters to submit KYC when joining bounty campaigns because we are not an investor. We will never be involved with any anti money laundering because we don't invest with money but with TIME and Effort instead. Personally I'm NOT very comfortable submitting my ID's for the simple reason that these are startup companies and we don't even know if they can be trusted.

They also do not want scammers and citizens from restricted countries to be in their projects. KYC is the best way to solve this problem. If it is already mentioned in bounty, do not join.

[Chikitita2004]

Bounty managers should first submit their KYC before they require bounty hunters. There is no chance a bounty hunter can acquire a big amount of their tokens that can be used in illegal activities while bounty managers do. There was a bounty campaign I joined before that the bounty manager ran away with all the token allotment for bounty hunters and it was so disgusting that a lot of bounty hunters who worked hard to get paid were not paid.

[Cocoincos]

I think it very actual question, because a lot of scam on bitcointalk and bounty hunters need some protect from scamers and scam projects

[burky156]

When you work as a bounty hunter in a project, it would means that you are working for the project not invest to project. You are becoming team member right? So they can ask for the KYC procedure for the investors but not from their team. Also many bounty campaign asks KYC after the campaign ends, just before they send the payments! This is not something ethic..

[anggle]

Yes, KYC is actually not used for bounty hunters. This is done only for investors. But now many ICO projects also provide KYC for Bounty participants. I have no problem with KYC, but after I did KYC. Many projects fail and are no longer developed.

[seggardinggins]

It can be interpreted that KYC is not always good and not everyone likes it even though in my opinion it is good to avoid multi-purpose on a project. I honestly like it, but now almost all projects need KYC and fortunately it's not fraud. I hope KYC can provide a guarantee or imbalance that is in accordance with what we provide.