Vod is a liar & extortionist. Get him out of DT!

[OgNasty]

You didn't ask me a question, you left DT feedback based on a lie you made up... 

Where is this DT feedback, liar?

I removed it and apologized.   Learn from my example. 

I noticed you edited post:

He edits posts usually after the conversation has moved onto the next page.  :/

That post is on this same page.  Another lie?

Hey look, you added another lie to my feedback claiming that I'm now trying to extort you.  I'm not trying to extort you Vod.  I don't care what you do as it is only digging your hole deeper.  I'm shining light on your lies, and I will not make any arrangement of any kind with you.  That doesn't sound like extortion to me.  You want to apologize for that lie too?

[Vod]

That post is on this same page.  Another lie?

Where is this feedback, liar?

As long as you are going to abuse the trust system, stop wasting everyone's time pointing out where you think others are abusing it as well.

Clean up your own stink before you complain about others.

[OgNasty]

Where is this feedback, liar?

As long as you are going to abuse the trust system, stop wasting everyone's time pointing out where you think others are abusing it as well.

Clean up your own stink before you complain about others.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136576.msg54066657#msg54066657

I posted the screenshot of your feedback multiple times now Vod.  I have responded to all of your lies multiple times.  I have left very clear references to justify my feedback to you.  It is you who stinks, likely of alcohol (did you remove the post where you talk about getting drunk and making stupid posts/feedback?  I can't seem to find it.).  You don't belong in the DT network and it should be clear now why I posted the list of users who are supporting your lies in the trust network.  

Remember this gem?    (full quote in the original post of this thread)

I'm going to lay off the negative trust from now on.  I will continue to leave negative trust on those accounts who are clearly doing wrong, but I will do my best to cut back on the controversial reports.  If I am unsuccessful, I understand I will be removed.

The last thing I want to see is my three+ years of reporting scams and scammers to disappear into untrusted feedback.  I would rather abandon my account and walk away than see all that work go to waste.

Finally, no matter what your individual choices, I respect everyone's right to manage their list as they see fit.  You will never see any outcry from this account.

Thank you for your time,

Vod/(removed)

[marlboroza]

He edits posts usually after the conversation has moved onto the next page.  :/

Yeah, well, I don't have time to go back to his edited posts over and over again. Actually, now I have 2 questions, seems OG is trying to say that he claimed airdrop on behalf of the forum but I am not sure because he doesn't make much sense in his replies. I'll bold questions:

Just like you entered an airdrop with the 500btc you were holding for the forum.

Is this a lie?

I claimed lots of alts on behalf of the forum as it was my fiduciary duty as treasurer.

Did you claim byteball airdrop on behalf of the forum?

Just like you entered an airdrop with the 500btc you were holding for the forum.

All lies. Every one.

Is this a lie?

[Vod]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136576.msg54066657#msg54066657

I posted the screenshot of your feedback multiple times now Vod.

Feedback that no longer exists?

Stop being dishonest, idiot.

[OgNasty]

I am ignoring marlboroza for repeating the same question over and over again while not reading my responses, but I'm guessing whatever they are on about is answered in this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136576.msg54066313#msg54066313

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136576.msg54066657#msg54066657

I posted the screenshot of your feedback multiple times now Vod.

Feedback that no longer exists?

Stop being dishonest, idiot.

You think you can lie and then delete it and all will be fine again?  Is that your hope for this thread as well, that it will be removed and everyone will pretend you aren't a liar?  Does my question for ibminer still exist?  I noticed your feedback does, and even worse you lie and claim I called him a thief.

[Vod]

You think you can lie and then delete it and all will be fine again?

ibminer didn't steal from you.  Why did you lie and say he did, hypocrite?  :/

Did you apologize, like I did?   Nope - that's impossible for a sociopath.

[OgNasty]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136576.msg54066657#msg54066657

I posted the screenshot of your feedback multiple times now Vod.

Feedback that no longer exists?

Stop being dishonest, idiot.

You think you can lie and then delete it and all will be fine again?  Is that your hope for this thread as well, that it will be removed and everyone will pretend you aren't a liar?  Does my question for ibminer still exist?  I noticed your feedback does, and even worse you lie and claim I called him a thief.

ibminer didn't steal from you.  Why did you lie and say he did, hypocrite?  :/

Did you apologize, like I did?   Nope - that's impossible for a sociopath.

I didn't say he stole from me.  That is a lie.  I also addressed the issue several times publicly on other threads and this one after users like yourself tried to paint it as though I called him a thief when I very clearly did not.

[Vod]

I didn't say he stole from me.  That is a lie.

And I didn't say you stole 500 BCH from the community.  That's a lie too then.

Now you come back at me with more semantics...

[OgNasty]

And I didn't say you stole 500 BCH from the community.  That's a lie too then.

Now you come back at me with more semantics...

Who is the one trying to use semantics?

"When acting as escrow, he stole 500 bitcoin cash from the community."

[Vod]

Who is the one trying to use semantics?

"When acting as escrow, he stole 500 bitcoin cash from the community."

You are.  I deleted that feedback and apologized.

[dragonvslinux]

Now it looks like retaliation indeed.

Utilized as feedback reference. Thank you thick-skinned gang leader, it's always good to know someone has a back-bone here 

Gave retaliatory negative feedback for criticizing his cult-based trust list (see previous feedback) in a predictable manner. I no longer trust this user.

Now the real test: will OG give me more negative feedback and go the way of mosprognoz? Or stick to the original lauda style?

I couldn't give a fuck.

Disclaimer: I am handing you another spade, to dig your hole even deeper.

[bones261]

I think this captures the sentiment of most users when they read this thread. 

[suchmoon]

I don’t typically go looking for scammers, but when they get my attention I don’t mind adding them to my network as such. I reviewed a great deal of that thread and other references as I advised others to do as well. Being a long thread isn’t an excuse for a thread being invalid, although I guess with that logic I can see why people are convoluting this thread. I hadn’t seen the thread or noticed this user before now, or I would have tagged them already. I get that I’ve been vocal recently about constantly making threads with statistical analysis on this forum being merit whorish and not a contribution to Bitcoin, but I won’t go as far as saying your involvement in this thread is retaliation for it. Perhaps you should do the same. Sad to see you join in to derail this thread which exists to discuss Vod’s constant lies. I honesty expected more from you.

Wait, LoyceV is retaliating against OgNasty?

Or perhaps OgNasty is just being his petty narcissistic self and can't handle even the mildest criticism.

By my count, seven most recent neg ratings sent by OgNasty (including multiple ratings for Vod) are bullshit/retaliatory/personal squabbles.

[marlboroza]

I am ignoring marlboroza for repeating the same question over and over again while not reading my responses, but I'm guessing whatever they are on about is answered in this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136576.msg54066313#msg54066313

It is funny to see that OgNasty had to repeat that he ignored me after he edited his post on previous page and placed me on ignore, it is even more fun to see that he posted that after I said that I don't have time go back over and over again to read his posts

I am pretty sure he has no clue what I posted therefore there is no need to repeat that I am on ignore    

Actually, what is more funny is that he said he ignored me because I am repeating questions over and over again which he doesn't want to answer, yes, I repeated question he doesn't want to answer with simple "yes or no", but I did ask him new question https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136576.msg54066669#msg54066669:

Did you claim byteball airdrop on behalf of the forum?

And this came after:



Edited: 09:02:05PM

My post is created on 08:59:15 PM.  OgNasty placed me on ignore after I asked him new question  

I am 100% sure he will read this and won't respond  

Who is the one trying to use semantics?

"When acting as escrow, he stole 500 bitcoin cash from the community."

You are.  I deleted that feedback and apologized.

That was correct thing to do  

I think this captures the sentiment of most users when they read this thread.  

Don't be so sure about this  

[eddie13]

Now the real test: will OG give me more negative feedback and go the way of mosprognoz? Or stick to the original lauda style?

How much do you know about OG and the history of these situations?
Are you really sure you know what you are doing here?

I would say the vast majority of the animosity towards OG stems back to Laudas extortion scandal where OG stood up against Lauda, and it seems a lot of Lauda's buddies at the time are still mad at OG over it, even some of those that don't much like or trust Lauda anymore...

[Vod]

By my count, seven most recent neg ratings sent by OgNasty (including multiple ratings for Vod) are bullshit/retaliatory/personal squabbles.

Everyone has the same count.   Each time I see another desperate trust rating from OG, I see it for what it is - his inability to convince anyone else of his demons.   :/

[TECSHARE]

By my count, seven most recent neg ratings sent by OgNasty (including multiple ratings for Vod) are bullshit/retaliatory/personal squabbles.

Everyone has the same count.   Each time I see another desperate trust rating from OG, I see it for what it is - his inability to convince anyone else of his demons.   :/

I wonder how many retaliatory ratings left by you we could count Vod.

[Vod]

I wonder how many retaliatory ratings left by you we could count Vod.

I wonder why we haven't heard from alien civilizations.  But I can't solve that. 

Why ponder?  It's quicker to simply count then ask others to.  :/

[suchmoon]

I would say the vast majority of the animosity towards OG stems back to Laudas extortion scandal where OG stood up against Lauda, and it seems a lot of Lauda's buddies at the time are still mad at OG over it, even some of those that don't much like or trust Lauda anymore...

I can't speak for others but that's not really true for me... Og's been at this for years (frivolous trust ratings I mean) while he was still invincible in the old DT1. Lauda's "scandal" was a good excuse for him to pretend like he wasn't using the trust system for personal squabbles.