6 Reasons why IEO is better than ICO

[profitgenerator212]

I was very much interested in investing to such IEO. Thus, made me the urged to browse the internet and found some compelling informations. I found it very informative for some members here like me who are disoriented between IEO and ICO.

Here is the infographic that is worth to share.



Here is the SOURCE

It's better if you read the whole article to enlighten your confusions about Initial Exchange Offering (IEO).

This post I guess summarises the merits of IEO over ICO. I believe we have now solved the problem of legitimately raising funds for a startup crypto project. Now we all should seek for solutions to investors loosing money 2 - 4weeks after IEO sales

[bartusv]

The biggest  benefit of IEOs over ICOs is  that exchanges are supervising the funding process.
Reputable exchanges won`t allow the project team to scam their customers.

[jcarlo]

The biggest  benefit of IEOs over ICOs is  that exchanges are supervising the funding process.
Reputable exchanges won`t allow the project team to scam their customers.

We dont have to do our own research when invest in IEO because all done by exchanger. Its more comfortable join in IEO because we dont wait too long get listed in exchanger, mostly after exchanger close sales, exchanger start listing the project

[karagun125]

This is what we should try something new in crypto investments. Many already disappointed for the ico projects and continue to inveat hoping that this IEO would be better than ICO. As i read some of the information about IEO, it is great that it wont allow scam and fraud projects and also has the reputable exchanges for their projects.

[bitsurfer2014]

IEOs carry the same risk as ICOs its just exchanges are involved from the start.  We all know how shady most of these exchanges are so I would be extremely hesitant about investing into any of these "projects".

Then again, I guess its a case to case basis since both ICO and IEO has its own share of pros and cons. And investing in an IEO is never really a guarantee for having good profits since the exchange niche is now very saturated and everybody wants a share of the pie with it. Researching a good project with an ICO and also a good exchange with IEO if often the best thing to do in order to protect our investments. Imho.

[jvper]

Let's explore the question first. Let's wait for the first results. What would definitely understand that of the 2 types of project is better. I think if the project is not well-off, then nothing will save it.

Only time will tell if IEOs are really more secure or are subject to the same problems are ordinary ICOs. The due diligence exchanges perform may not be enough, just like pool due diliegence. An investor must always do their own due diigence.

[Lakai01]

yes, i agree with you and IEO just an upgraded from ICO
the main advantages if a project do an IEO is the project will automaically listed on exchange after IEO ended
but ICO still have a good respond if the project look promissing with great team inside
because i still believe if not all ICO bad  

I wouldnt say the concept of ICOs is bad, its more or less nothing else than crowd funding. Bad is what happened to ICOs at a whole:
- Exit scams and frauds
- Broken promises
- Stopped projects after listings
- ...
Since there are no regulations projects can do what they want and dont have to fear any consequences. Thats one of the reasons why ICOs are pretty dead in my opinion, investors fear that they may lose all their money.

[etherclassic]

totally aggree with all of them. now days very hard to find which ico that have good and not scamming
but for reminder not all IEO success, not all of them give you profit. just choose carefully which ico that worth to invest

I like this thread talking about the reasons IEO is better than ICO it will gives good information about the IEO but i more agree with your statement not all of IEO be successfull, because the projects depends on the developer of team it is not about method (IEO or ICO) for example the first of IEO exit with scam https://news.8btc.com/worlds-first-ieo-exit-scam-yescoin it is sad to head that, my point is no free risk of losing money in cryptocurrencies.

[Gemliting]

for this moment, I think IEO is much better than ICO,
more secure and flexible for everyone

[doycku]

yes, i agree with you and IEO just an upgraded from ICO
the main advantages if a project do an IEO is the project will automaically listed on exchange after IEO ended
but ICO still have a good respond if the project look promissing with great team inside
because i still believe if not all ICO bad  

I wouldnt say the concept of ICOs is bad, its more or less nothing else than crowd funding. Bad is what happened to ICOs at a whole:
- Exit scams and frauds
- Broken promises
- Stopped projects after listings
- ...
Since there are no regulations projects can do what they want and dont have to fear any consequences. Thats one of the reasons why ICOs are pretty dead in my opinion, investors fear that they may lose all their money.

If I understand correctly, then the problem of fraud will be regardless of which concept the new project will carry out.  In some cases, the company's ico looks quite productive, as confirmed by 2016 and 2017.  It seems to me that first of all you need to deal with fraud, and not with the way to implement new projects.

[Prompyboo]

for this moment, I think IEO is much better than ICO,
more secure and flexible for everyone

flexible for everyone? how can you say that this way of raising money is flexible if 90 percent of people cannot take part in it?

[Script3d]

totally aggree with all of them. now days very hard to find which ico that have good and not scamming
but for reminder not all IEO success, not all of them give you profit. just choose carefully which ico that worth to invest

I like this thread talking about the reasons IEO is better than ICO it will gives good information about the IEO but i more agree with your statement not all of IEO be successfull, because the projects depends on the developer of team it is not about method (IEO or ICO) for example the first of IEO exit with scam https://news.8btc.com/worlds-first-ieo-exit-scam-yescoin it is sad to head that, my point is no free risk of losing money in cryptocurrencies.

this is why you should always do research when investing so you would be able to avoid scams like this, it was said they can buy bitcoin and ether at far below market price, if i see that i would immediately fuck off, sadly the investors didn't see that, and who would sell their crypto at much lower price.

[semobo]

For me both are equal it is just a strategy to make more profits from one another so both have its advantages and disadvantages currently IEOs are doing great because it is just now in practice so we will get what is actually better once people get enough knowledge about it

[BigBos]

it is true that IEO is better than ICO, because it is safer, and of course there are many benefits that can be obtained from the IEO. however, people's interest in ICO has not faded. well, maybe a good IEO project will start making people leave the ICO.

[ParabellumLite]

I agree, because IEOs help us avoid scam projects, but that is only true for large exchanges. The fact that the fomo IEO has made many people lose money when investing in IEOs in small, unproductive exchanges when they are listed exchange

[timmmers]

But still listing an token on exchange doesn´t mean that exchange is responsible for further development or? They will just say sorry, you should know that you are investing into high-risk asset and good bye.  

[funnec]

in making our conclusion about IEO and ICO, we should remember that ICO also started on a good note just like IEO but was later to scam, we should note also forget that many exchanges without solid reputation are now conducting IEO now. I just hope the fall of IEO will not be greater than ICO.

[enhu]

in making our conclusion about IEO and ICO, we should remember that ICO also started on a good note just like IEO but was later to scam, we should note also forget that many exchanges without solid reputation are now conducting IEO now. I just hope the fall of IEO will not be greater than ICO.

It would appear that way if IEO fails, an exchange maybe even more of the exchange turning out to be scam is going to be a big set back. This would mean that even when we set up a technology that is suppose to work "trustless" we will need to have trust to each other. These exchange scams is never new, there is always a scam when they  think of the sudden death of the 30 year old CEO of QuadrigaCX.

[kindbtc]

Yeah and i agree on all these points specifically i like the point that all these IEOs significantly reduce the chance of scam as scam or low quality projects are not going to make on exchanges unless the exchange gets greedy so yes considering the market scenario ieo is a new hope for investors.

[endogan]

Yeah and i agree on all these points specifically i like the point that all these IEOs significantly reduce the chance of scam as scam or low quality projects are not going to make on exchanges unless the exchange gets greedy so yes considering the market scenario ieo is a new hope for investors.

The IEO is indeed very good and launched at the right time at the time the ICO was very bad because there were many ICO frauds.
IEO is a new breakthrough for investors to invest and get profits because it has many advantages over ICO.