6 Reasons why IEO is better than ICO

[mrdeposit]

The IEO is new for everyone but it surely doesn't let the scammers take the other people's money. ICOs lost its meaning a while ago and we need better solutions to the scam token sales. IEO will let investors buy with confidence.

[axel2078]

In the crypto space today, IEOs are trending because before launching or accepting any project for IEO due diligence and adequate research is always done, thus reducing the rate of scams. To be frank, more than 90% of ICOs are scams, thus I think IEO will reduce this scam rate.

[Leah38]

More projects are into IEO lately and investors have more trust investing on a project with IEOs compared to ICO. Besides the fact that its already on exchange, you can assure that you can get your tokens. Some ICOs even failed in token distribution after a ICO.

[bitsurfer2014]

Let's explore the question first. Let's wait for the first results. What would definitely understand that of the 2 types of project is better. I think if the project is not well-off, then nothing will save it.

Only time will tell if IEOs are really more secure or are subject to the same problems are ordinary ICOs. The due diligence exchanges perform may not be enough, just like pool due diliegence. An investor must always do their own due diigence.

I think both IEO's and ICO's are almost identical when its comes to the probability of them conveying investment risks just like traditional companies. What matters most is the kind and quality of projects we chose to become part regardless whether they are implementing an ICO or an IEO and most importantly, we should always be vigilant for any activity from the team that shows signs of mismanagement because most of the time, projects failed because of that reason.

[bestpikka]

if it is true that this IEO will be able to provide many benefits and security for investors, of course, in the future, many people will switch from ICO to the IEO. I hope that in the future we will develop more security and security, so that people will not hesitate in investing in cryptocurrency.

[alonelyorange]

The best reason why IEO more better than ICO is only take short time for selling their coins than ICO have waiting more than two or three months for sold out their coin, by IEO only take a week their coins was sold out and will be listed soon.

[icalical]

I totally agree with those statements, IEO is absolutely better than ICO. But let me tell you something, the main mission why the cryptocurrencies occur is to eliminate the third party involvement in any kind of financial activity, including fundraising. The phenomenon of IEO is both good and bad for cryptocurrency, it is very good and reliable for investors, but it also proof that even cryptocurrency and blockchain can't revolutionize how the traditional economic and financial works. Because the parties can not trust each other, and the thing that we call smart-contract which was supposed to give both parties the trust can't provide that. We still need the Third party involvement (the exchange), it shows how the cryptocurrency failed to fulfil its main mission.

[vasrasus]

It's much better, at least it is already listed in an exchange and it assures to have some value. It adds confidence for investors to really invest in it. I prefer joining in IEO campaigns and investment now, especially if the project shows really some progress.

[Malamok101]

Ieo is very important for token sale for ico right now because they can buy for there tokens in different exchanges and they hopping they will list on that exchanges.

[ansarose1]

I think this IEO could be way better than ico. Beacause several of ico's reputation are lost now for scam accusations. And IEO is better now since it has some good features better than ico, like only one kyc process for all projects handled to IEO, and also a good thing here for IEO is free gas fee for buying tokens. Such a great opportunity.

[patz22]

IEO is good in terms of security that investors can get when they participate on these sales however having a requirement of exchange coin like BNB will give us a headache since after the sale if you didnt get in, that coin will be dumped. There are advantages and disadvantages of ICO and IEO it is up to us on how we assess it.

[SeW900]

For me the only reason that the IEO is better than ICO is that you don't need to worry about what you hold because at the end of the day it will ended in exchange and you can sell your coin unlike in ICO there's no assurance that the coin/project you invested will be on exchange and most of the coin/project ended up as a scam or a failed project.

[adterna]

Indeed, now many ICOs are scam, and that is very detrimental to investors, perhaps better not funding the ICO, preferring the IEO because there are many advantages over ICO, and that is very profitable, but that is my opinion, there may be colleagues in the forum who experience different from mine.

[moynul2050]

it may be true that the IEO looks better than ICO. because there are many ICOs that end in scam, but if there is no ICO and no one does a campaign like the ICO, then what about the community?
maybe there will be a community with IEO?

[Distinctin]

it may be true that the IEO looks better than ICO. because there are many ICOs that end in scam, but if there is no ICO and no one does a campaign like the ICO, then what about the community?
maybe there will be a community with IEO?

There will still be campaigns like bounty campaign because IEO is still crowd funding, but it uses a certain exchange to facilitate it.
In short, they are still selling their coins and they need advertisers for their marketing to be effective.

[quality.crypto]

The IEO is new for everyone but it surely doesn't let the scammers take the other people's money. ICOs lost its meaning a while ago and we need better solutions to the scam token sales. IEO will let investors buy with confidence.

Exchange is conducting IEO based on some requirements and everything will be under their control of the exchanges, which they list the for IEO on the basis of some requirements. The exchange like Binance will hold some part of the fund until they start developing the product which they mentioned in roadmap. Whereas ICO's will raise the money from the investors and they left the investors without any further developments.

[etherclassic]

totally aggree with all of them. now days very hard to find which ico that have good and not scamming
but for reminder not all IEO success, not all of them give you profit. just choose carefully which ico that worth to invest

I like this thread talking about the reasons IEO is better than ICO it will gives good information about the IEO but i more agree with your statement not all of IEO be successfull, because the projects depends on the developer of team it is not about method (IEO or ICO) for example the first of IEO exit with scam https://news.8btc.com/worlds-first-ieo-exit-scam-yescoin it is sad to head that, my point is no free risk of losing money in cryptocurrencies.

this is why you should always do research when investing so you would be able to avoid scams like this, it was said they can buy bitcoin and ether at far below market price, if i see that i would immediately fuck off, sadly the investors didn't see that, and who would sell their crypto at much lower price.

I agree with you we must always make investment our time first in the ICOs or IEOs projects, before we make investment our money in cryptocurrencies. Unfortunatelly there are no many people who invested their time than the money, so if we don't know anything about the projects of ICOs or IEOs we will be lost the money or we will be lost the chance to getting alot of money in cryptocurrencies as you said that the investors did not see good chance on cryptocurrencies.

[BlueStackz]

Let's explore the question first. Let's wait for the first results. What would definitely understand that of the 2 types of project is better. I think if the project is not well-off, then nothing will save it.

Only time will tell if IEOs are really more secure or are subject to the same problems are ordinary ICOs. The due diligence exchanges perform may not be enough, just like pool due diliegence. An investor must always do their own due diigence.

The due diligence by exchanges can never be perfect as they are not God to know the heart of every investor and their game plans completely. IEO in the interim, can only assure the investors of a safe environment i.e. not falling into the hand of a scammer that is not known, so if an IEO developers scam an investors, at least, they will get the chance to be prosecuted if found guilty.

The issue now us that of failing projects which I still do not see IEO completely scraping this out, no matter the due diligence they perform in these projects, some of the will still fail in the long run, so I agree with you that we should not completely rely on the exchanges alone is making our choice.

[crzy]

Before ICO is great and now IEO is better, I believe this kind of development will end soon as we continue to grow and look for a better improvements. Manipulation with the exchanges can still happen, there's still no safe investment whether its on the top exchange or not. I will just invest on the top coins, and not on any shitcoins anymore.

[bitgolden]

The reasons listed here are quite valid except for the aspect of it being cheaper which I don’t see any correlation, because you don’t also spend much time on ICO to purchase as much as one even does for IEO, Before an IEO is launched, do you we know how many people will stay on queue burning gas to participate?

One thing IEO fails to tell people is that it is very difficult to participate in it, you have to be on queue for too long and hoping to participate which you might not get a chance to do so before the token gets sold out, which majority are being bought internally. If IEO can solve this challenge, then it will become perfect.