6 Reasons why IEO is better than ICO

[Nellayar]

IEO is already starting to get less attraction from the community. Everyone see that it doesn't works as it should be from the start. Even some projects are moving away from approach. I like ICO more that IEO, this way project has control of all the token amount without sharing it with exchanges.

The major problem with IEO is that it seems like few big whales can get in during that period.
Small-time investors don't have the chance to participate because they are sold out in few minutes especially in top exchanges.
So we don't know what is really going on, if there is manipulation within their system or what?
In this case, some investors are going away because of the disappointment they got from those experiences.

Despite the popularity of IEO right now, many small investors are quiting them. The problem of IEO is that the token sale is too much low compared to the tokens held by dev and management. In short, there is only limited time frame to buy the tokens from exchange. And since whales want to manipulate the project, they buy big bucks of coin so that they can sell when it listed already. Another thing is that, there are ICO projects that turned into IEO which have slower price than public sale. I have been disappointed also on what happening with IEO right now.

[1715245635]

1715245635

[1715245635]

1715245635

[1715245635]

1715245635

[1715245635]

1715245635

[OneCoinMan]

I do not think that these phenomena are very different from each other. These are just different names for one thing: collecting money. 
What matters is not how projects collect money. It is important what projects it is. A successful team will always come to success, and the scammers will always find a way to cheat 

[setialovers]

I do not think that these phenomena are very different from each other. These are just different names for one thing: collecting money. 
What matters is not how projects collect money. It is important what projects it is. A successful team will always come to success, and the scammers will always find a way to cheat 

I think there are fundamental differences between ICO and IEO. Exchangers holding an IEO must filter out the projects being sold because this involves the reputation of the exchanger. And also listing on the market is faster for new projects when using the IEO method

[andika2018]

IEO is already starting to get less attraction from the community. Everyone see that it doesn't works as it should be from the start. Even some projects are moving away from approach. I like ICO more that IEO, this way project has control of all the token amount without sharing it with exchanges.

The major problem with IEO is that it seems like few big whales can get in during that period.
Small-time investors don't have the chance to participate because they are sold out in few minutes especially in top exchanges.
So we don't know what is really going on, if there is manipulation within their system or what?
In this case, some investors are going away because of the disappointment they got from those experiences.

Despite the popularity of IEO right now, many small investors are quiting them. The problem of IEO is that the token sale is too much low compared to the tokens held by dev and management. In short, there is only limited time frame to buy the tokens from exchange. And since whales want to manipulate the project, they buy big bucks of coin so that they can sell when it listed already. Another thing is that, there are ICO projects that turned into IEO which have slower price than public sale. I have been disappointed also on what happening with IEO right now.

It seems like every IEO on an exchanger must be limited to purchases. There is a maximum limit for every person to buy it and also on some exchangers, giving several conditions so that members can buy tokens sold by the IEO.

[Zidan Bst]

That is true IEO is better than ICO.
ICO has a lot of weakness , while IEO is more secure and trusted by investors.

[Anonylz]

That is true IEO is better than ICO.
ICO has a lot of weakness , while IEO is more secure and trusted by investors.

They both have their weakness, IEO base on it's structure supposed to be more secure because they are conducted by exchanges, but i heard Idax have been accuse of scaming and manipulating the CMA IEO carried out on their exchange,
in the cma medium post, it appears other project also experience same treatment, the victims are planning to take legal action against idax exchange, so now am beginning to wonder how secure are IEO's?
Are there hidden agenda people don't know about yet?

[andrearz]

That is true IEO is better than ICO.
ICO has a lot of weakness , while IEO is more secure and trusted by investors.

but only a few large markets are trusted to invest in the IEO because in a small market there are only a few investors who want to invest there and do not provide guarantees for profit.

[galestorm]

Both are beneficial, but let's just face it that IEO is much more secure and reliable. Basically, anyone can launch an ICO, as long as you have a whitepaper to convince the potential investors to put funds into your project. Whereas IEO requires the project team to meet and comply with the exchange’s requirements in order to launch the token sale. Contributors are, therefore, protected by the exchange. This decreases the number of scam projects and raises the probability of legitimate projects to introduce their promised technology to the public.

[Zemomtum]

The comparison is not the way it was painted, the difference is just slightly. Some unqualified exchanges are just accepting any project to list on their platform as IEO to gain membership and have average volume in order to appear on coinmarket cap. Don't be tricked that exchanges do any due diligent before listing, they are more interested in increasing user's base and volume than looking at the integrity of the project. There are lot of IEO that are even worst than ICO, you buy on exchange and the project roadmap will not be followed, explorer will not be managed and the exchange itself will be force to delist such projects. The project owner's has dump on exchange, catch out the capital and ran away,. Infact, IEO is the simplest form to scam now because users will put their trust on exchange and FOMO in. All in all, do your own diligent by looking at the team competency as relates to their background, the essence of the project itself, what problem is it solving that has not been solved in crypto space or what is it doing better? Is the roadmap realistic or too good to believe?

[LiquorBan]

One of the reasons I pick IEOs ahead of ICO is because fake projects is eliminated, many people unfortunately have lost thousands to millions of dollars in ICO frauds and there is no way to recover those funds but with IEO, one will be certain his funds for sure.

[ilovealtcoins]

The IEO offers greater, safer returns but also means that it will be more difficult to join the IEO than the ICO.
In the recent market-wide uptrend, the IEO has contributed greatly to bringing big profits to investors.  That brought cash flow back to the market.  That great merit must include Binance and Houbi.  In the near future, it is certain that IEO is the main trend in capital mobilization of projects.

[Impaler]

Yeah the ICO market was almost dead. Most of them are not performing well. But after ieo came the whole fundraising market was changed again. Cause ieos are far more trusted than ICOs. Many bigbnames are with it. So people who thinks that ICO means scams and failed project they also started to invest. I know there in ieonmarket had some scam. At this point bof timeb OST of them are good for investment.But still do your own research band then invest.

[Menawi12]

The IEO offers greater, safer returns but also means that it will be more difficult to join the IEO than the ICO.
In the recent market-wide uptrend, the IEO has contributed greatly to bringing big profits to investors.  That brought cash flow back to the market.  That great merit must include Binance and Houbi.  In the near future, it is certain that IEO is the main trend in capital mobilization of projects.

Not all IEOs provide big profits but I agree that IEO is safer than ICO and sooner get listing on market. I think, the difficulty when joining the IEO is only in the KYC process but the rest is very easy and safe.

[Barracuda]

Right now the IEO is better than the ICO. And everyone is happy with the IEO now. Plus, if the IEO is carried out in large markets. Of course investor enthusiasm is very high. But ICO is actually still feasible, if you find a good project to invest.

[Malamok101]

As i see lot of ICO turn to IEO the good thing is IEO is worth it and so many investors attract to IEO and willing to invest. So many projects for now are good because of IEO plans, as the past ICO not profitable anymore because many of them are totaly scam at all.

[Crypt0BHunter]

Nice infographic, it's very interesting to post from medium here, and take merits, well done!

[farraddy]

The very ideas of projects that are carried out by IEO are not better and not worse than ICO projects. Just the mechanism of the IEO causes investors more confidence because ICO has recently lost popularity due to scams.

[uniquark]

This kind of information is not eligible for every trader in my opinion, the understanding level is not same for everyone as we know. IEOs can be better than ICOs in terms of return on the investment but it overqualified by everyone for the same reason.

IEO does not need to learn much before investing, just choose big exchange to invest in projects that sell tokens on it. It's simple, but the current situation of overcrowding is also the part that many people cannot afford to buy

[baigreen]

This kind of information is not eligible for every trader in my opinion, the understanding level is not same for everyone as we know. IEOs can be better than ICOs in terms of return on the investment but it overqualified by everyone for the same reason.

IEO does not need to learn much before investing, just choose big exchange to invest in projects that sell tokens on it. It's simple, but the current situation of overcrowding is also the part that many people cannot afford to buy

Yes, and here IEO if the project is bad and in the future it will not be used by the community. Investing in IEO is also difficult as in ICO. No matter what the name and the way to invest money is to look for promising projects.

[tansaneehongkao]

ICO is a failure thats why they come up with solution and that was IEO, many projects have been successful because of IEO.