No knowledge is lost.

[Samboo]

It depends upon goals, team, technology of a project. If a project has a strong team, good goals and unique technology, it will do well in the market irrespective of it is public or individual funded. There are many projects funded publicly through ICO, IEO or STO which are doing well in the market. There are also such projects individual funded doing bad as well.

[pragna]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

Are you saying direct sell tokens into market!! if so i think you are in wrong position. From ICO investors can know projects roadmap and portfolio. So that they can agree to invest here. But if you don't create ICO no body will know your tokens and scammers will do frued here. So i think you are in wrong concepts.

[SistaFista]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

Actually not quite right. A legit funded project ICO will have quick rate to developing because the funds.
Self funded project will running slowly because limited funds they can use.
But the problem is, there were many scam funded projects, and resulting other legit project difficult to raising funds.

[andika2018]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

Are you saying direct sell tokens into market!! if so i think you are in wrong position. From ICO investors can know projects roadmap and portfolio. So that they can agree to invest here. But if you don't create ICO no body will know your tokens and scammers will do frued here. So i think you are in wrong concepts.

If you are looking on RavenCoin project, you will understand community project concept. Its no premine and no fund raising, because drive by community like bitcoin. I think there is a lot non premine coin and many are success and many dont have solid community

[nur rochid]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

Actually not quite right. A legit funded project ICO will have quick rate to developing because the funds.
Self funded project will running slowly because limited funds they can use.
But the problem is, there were many scam funded projects, and resulting other legit project difficult to raising funds.

and this is what makes investors confused. with the existence of fraudulent projects funded, making investors look positively towards the project and eventually they are caught in a fraud

[KryptoKai]

The original bitcoin did not go through an ico and is the most successful project. However, looking at record breaking fundraisers like eos and tezos they are doing very well

[davinchi]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

Projects with no ICO are usually premined coins, and they have their fund already to do so, so they are not after the money completely, but after the use of blockchain technology to make their project successful. Most companies you see conducting ICO has never in their life touch such amount of money.

Many of them just fell like trying it which they get successful and really doesn’t know how to handle the fund or how to continue with the project, so they end up preferring to go with the money and the ones that have little conscience will join and exchange for few people to still benefit before going away. I think the money is the main issue here why some of these ICO projects don’t perform well.

[GabbieBoy12]

Exactly. No knowledge is really a lost becauae for example, if you really dont have a knowledge and you were entering a crypto worls its really a lost for you like you are just wasting your time here without any good basis into what project you might in. So for me, if you dont have enougj knowledge basically you will fall into a bad projects and get nothing from it. But if you have knowledge it will definitely leads you into projects that is good like the dencoin tokens which can give you a really good future investment.

[Makuow]

Yes bro I think knowledge is power. But knowledge is rellay lost. Because there are many projects are not success. So ICO price looking very poor now. So market condition is not good. Project management system very difficult.

[santouao]

Without knowledge in cryptocurrency will always lead to failure and disappointment,so before you start investing and doing cryptocurrency project promoting you must study first the pros and cons so you will have idea in what way you will handle the risk in the cryptocurrency.Be wise as always dont be afraid to make mistakes here ,all of us in the first time here made mistakes also and this will lead us to successful journey in cryptocurrency.

[10c]

Yes bro I think knowledge is power. But knowledge is rellay lost. Because there are many projects are not success. So ICO price looking very poor now. So market condition is not good. Project management system very difficult.

knowledge is not power. Strength is the knowledge that is combined with practice. because if knowledge does not apply - they are useless

[Andrey13101991]

Without knowledge in cryptocurrency will always lead to failure and disappointment,so before you start investing and doing cryptocurrency project promoting you must study first the pros and cons so you will have idea in what way you will handle the risk in the cryptocurrency.Be wise as always dont be afraid to make mistakes here ,all of us in the first time here made mistakes also and this will lead us to successful journey in cryptocurrency.

MIstakes is normal. without making mistakes, people do not advance in any business. People who make no mistakes just do nothing

[goaldigger]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

I guess it would be this way. A company who has a capital or funds in the first place is more likely to succeed aince they dont want to waste their own money doing nothing. On the other hand, if a company does need ICO, then it has a possibility to close if they doesnt meet the required amount of investment.

[BayAngelo]

What exactly do you mean by No-ICO projects? Give an example so that people understand what you are asking. Projects have more control if they hold funding through ICO. So in that way it gives scammer chance to set a trap since there is no third party to look over it.

i know about hydro tokens with no ico and no fund raising. the project had only airdrops. it was worth a coin now. a good project with a good market currently.

[danielchris]

I can't understand this & confused about this issue. Think no any project stands in the market without their investment. There is no possibilty of success any project who depended on icons.l think so.

[Seeker#9]

The first step in ICO funding is called seed funding or private sale.  Sometimes the ICO generates large amount of funds on its initial token sale so there is no need to conduct a public ICO. Sometime they only conduct airdrops and other marketing strategies that doesn't need to invite more investors. What it need is an effective marketing campaign for launching a new product or token and an active developer to develop the coin further.

[Gabmot]

What exactly do you mean by No-ICO projects? Give an example so that people understand what you are asking. Projects have more control if they hold funding through ICO. So in that way it gives scammer chance to set a trap since there is no third party to look over it.

Exactly where the dilemma is coming from actually. I really don't get the angle is coming from really. Cos i don't know how a project will survive without generating initial funds to finance the growth thereof.. Although i have heard about some actually I.e lottery and gaming projects which only wanted the publicity of their respective platforms to the general public

[bitgolden]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

To be honest, I haven't heard any project that didn't go through ICO. And if there is any, what you're saying is surely not always the case. It would still depend on how the team will perform and also how their product will perform. I would recommend you try to join IEO projects.

We have lots of projects in the market that never conducted ICO mate, we only got used to these ones because they use bounty hunting to lure lots of people and to get attentions. Most of these projects that didn’t conduct ICO have their own money already to establish the project and the only thing they usually do to get attention for people to use their product is to create a little airdrop.

I really prefer these ones because they don’t look hungry to me, and it shows that they are genuine company for them not to ask a dime in making their project successful and still creating chances for people to make little profit through the purchase of their coin.

[pinoy.bolanon]

Dear friend, i understand your point, its just that maybe they have already funds for running those projects, so lets take an example, i joined a bounty program for non ico program that is BTC2, a bitcoin hardfork, by this time of posting, their price went up, and its a good thing, what i like is that they keep of improving the project, BUT, i cannot anymore that non ico is better than ico projects, it depends on the developers and the team members in it.

[Best Dreams]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

Actually not quite right. A legit funded project ICO will have quick rate to developing because the funds.
Self funded project will running slowly because limited funds they can use.
But the problem is, there were many scam funded projects, and resulting other legit project difficult to raising funds.

and this is what makes investors confused. with the existence of fraudulent projects funded, making investors look positively towards the project and eventually they are caught in a fraud

To avoid this kind of fraud investors should make investigation before investing , it is not good to invest in unknown projects, there are so many famous and well trusted projects so everyone should if new in market can invest in these projects only, most of scammers will show you green garden but without research not good to trust blindly.