How does a perfect ICO Team looks like for you?

[masterrex]

For me no such thing as perfect ICO team, The most important of any ICO,IEO.ITO is the transparency and the competitive team. It doesnt matter if its not perfect or whatsoever as long as they are capable to deliver the whole concept written in their whitepaper and be sure that the Whitepaper is authentic and not copycats or else its a shady one.

[Prompyboo]

I think that the success of the project does not depend on the number of people in the team. need to consider what kind of scale of the project. If the project is global, then of course only 4 people will not enough for creating a huge project

[aioc]

Hello Bitcointalk Community,


I would like to know from your point of view as an investor how a Team needs to look to get convinced.

Apart from the idear of the project I would be glad to get to know your opinion how a perfect Team looks like.

The reason behind this question is, that some teams have 3-4 members and others show off with 20.

I am looking forward to a good discussion.


Cheers

Your Stag3 Team

They should know each other not only coming from different countries and being hired on Fiverr or on linked I have seen some project where the team members do not know each other, every one of them is just hired by an anonymous developer, I encounter one guy who is part of a project that does not know who is the real owner because they only communicate through email.

[Stage3]

Hello Bitcointalk Community,


I would like to know from your point of view as an investor how a Team needs to look to get convinced.

Apart from the idear of the project I would be glad to get to know your opinion how a perfect Team looks like.

The reason behind this question is, that some teams have 3-4 members and others show off with 20.

I am looking forward to a good discussion.


Cheers

Your Stag3 Team

They should know each other not only coming from different countries and being hired on Fiverr or on linked I have seen some project where the team members do not know each other, every one of them is just hired by an anonymous developer, I encounter one guy who is part of a project that does not know who is the real owner because they only communicate through email.

hey mate, thank you very much for your response. It sounds like a "joke" what you just said, nevertheless i can imagine a few projects work like that and thats pretty shocking. 
Anyways that will and wont be the way at the ICO i work on. We prefer transparency and have a core team that knows each other for a very long time; )

[Stage3]

I think that the success of the project does not depend on the number of people in the team. need to consider what kind of scale of the project. If the project is global, then of course only 4 people will not enough for creating a huge project

I do agree, and of course you can still add new members to the team once you expand. At the end of the day you neet a core team but you want to reach profit and success before you add to many members that cost to much.

[Stage3]

For me no such thing as perfect ICO team, The most important of any ICO,IEO.ITO is the transparency and the competitive team. It doesnt matter if its not perfect or whatsoever as long as they are capable to deliver the whole concept written in their whitepaper and be sure that the Whitepaper is authentic and not copycats or else its a shady one.

I do support your position 100%. It is much better to have people that stand 100% behind the project and can deliver what they promissed in the whitepaper.

[irixo10]

There is a saying " don't judge a book by its cover". Therefore, do not judge a team by their number, rather dig within and know what they are capable of doing.
Actually, the number doesn't really matter, what matters is their skills, experience and achievements; this is what will tell if the team will develop a good project or not, as one can only offer what he has.
Therefore to your question, do not look at their number or facial expressions, go for what lies within (knowledge and experience).

[jessyj48]

Every project teams must be experts in their fields ,I'm talking about professional teams either in engineering and software based or others ,this is the way for any project to have a successful outcome

[Stage3]

There is a saying " don't judge a book by its cover". Therefore, do not judge a team by their number, rather dig within and know what they are capable of doing.
Actually, the number doesn't really matter, what matters is their skills, experience and achievements; this is what will tell if the team will develop a good project or not, as one can only offer what he has.
Therefore to your question, do not look at their number or facial expressions, go for what lies within (knowledge and experience).

Thank you for your detailed response it is really appreciated.

I do agree with you that quality goes over quantitiy and the team should be able to deliver on its promisses.

[The Cryptovator]

Unfortunately it's become very difficult to determine which team is real. Especially those are newbie on crypto-currency they don't know even how to use Google search to identify fake team. For me, if there is well know team member with existing history they are perfect. Team should active and well experienced on crypto-currency world. New face with no experience is worthless. We can't trust them with fund. So it's very important to know their real background.

[Stage3]

Unfortunately it's become very difficult to determine which team is real. Especially those are newbie on crypto-currency they don't know even how to use Google search to identify fake team. For me, if there is well know team member with existing history they are perfect. Team should active and well experienced on crypto-currency world. New face with no experience is worthless. We can't trust them with fund. So it's very important to know their real background.

Hey thank you for your response. I agree that their are lot of people out there without so much knowledge about the market. The people tat invested early dont let themselve fool again. Nevertheless the adaption of bitcoin will bring newbies to the market that can be "scammed" again and thats said.

[MadeinCoin]

I am looking for a few criteria when assessing the team.
First, I want to know they are real people with experience and connection. LinkedIn is mandatory for me.
Second, the team balance is important. I want to see a team comprised of both tech and business people.

LinkedIn might help to track their team's footsteps, but sometimes they manipulate data on LinkedIn. So I don't really believe in LinkedIn unless they really are real people that many people already know. I'm the one who clearly prefers projects that have a strong team, at least one of them is a famous person in the blockchain business.

[Stage3]

I am looking for a few criteria when assessing the team.
First, I want to know they are real people with experience and connection. LinkedIn is mandatory for me.
Second, the team balance is important. I want to see a team comprised of both tech and business people.

LinkedIn might help to track their team's footsteps, but sometimes they manipulate data on LinkedIn. So I don't really believe in LinkedIn unless they really are real people that many people already know. I'm the one who clearly prefers projects that have a strong team, at least one of them is a famous person in the blockchain business.

I their. Can you define me what for you a "famous person" is exactly ?

Cheers

[Shenzou]

Hello Bitcointalk Community,


I would like to know from your point of view as an investor how a Team needs to look to get convinced.

Apart from the idear of the project I would be glad to get to know your opinion how a perfect Team looks like.

The reason behind this question is, that some teams have 3-4 members and others show off with 20.

I am looking forward to a good discussion.


Cheers

Your Stag3 Team

Bigger is not always better, quality is always over quantity, a good team of developers should just consist of real profiles and not some random photos and random names of people from the internet, so you should check them before you give them trust, and also they should know what they are doing meaning you can put a trust in some amateur who knows nothing about crypto or finance or the project that he is going into creating at least one of the developers should have some knowledge.

[Stage3]

Hello Bitcointalk Community,


I would like to know from your point of view as an investor how a Team needs to look to get convinced.

Apart from the idear of the project I would be glad to get to know your opinion how a perfect Team looks like.

The reason behind this question is, that some teams have 3-4 members and others show off with 20.

I am looking forward to a good discussion.


Cheers

Your Stag3 Team

Bigger is not always better, quality is always over quantity, a good team of developers should just consist of real profiles and not some random photos and random names of people from the internet, so you should check them before you give them trust, and also they should know what they are doing meaning you can put a trust in some amateur who knows nothing about crypto or finance or the project that he is going into creating at least one of the developers should have some knowledge.

Thank you for your response it helps to support my view that it might be better to have a core team that is productive and can achieve it sets goals compared to a big team with fake profiles.

[romanij]

The most important thing is that the team must perform all its duties. But how many people in the team do not care about anyone if each member of the community is given enough attention.  The most important thing is to have high-quality information and technical support of the community.

[bitc0000]

In as much as there are no perfect humans in the same way there are no perfect team. But to us, a user if a platform we can only decide is a team is perfect when they are working according to what the promised OR we can decide if a team is perfect when they have what it takes to deliver on the long run.
Many team jumps into building a platform but while studying them, you will only find out they have little or no knowledge thereby having many advisors who will direct them. Am not saying having advisors is wrong, rather the team need to be experienced first while their advisors will only direct them when appropriate.
So in all ramifications, what defines a perfect team is the experiences gathered over the years with accomplishments justifying their experiences.

[djkyno]

I usually visit the Linkedin profiles, and spend some time there to make sure if the team is real or fake, and to see the experience of each member, before considering that their ICO is really promising or just another scam.

[Emmy92]

Although there is no perfect humans in the world, but let's assume there is; in my own view the perfect team in any project should be able to listen to the community members to hear their views about platform activities. Also, most importantly they should have relevant experience in what they are trying to achieve. Furthermore, they should have a working product as this will show how serious they are thus paving way for them during ICO, in addition to an extent showing investors that they mean business.

[Emilyp]

A perfect team can be a number from 5 upwards, I think 3 is lean. A project that's solid will require a good number of hands to be able to pull off, so the more the better.