Bitcoin Forum
March 30, 2020, 07:53:45 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: feedback  (Read 164 times)
dragonvslinux
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 335



View Profile WWW
July 13, 2019, 03:43:31 PM
Last edit: October 19, 2019, 10:12:30 AM by dragonvslinux
 #1

1. All 40 rounds of airdrops were fairly distributed as promised, as can be seen from the following references:

2. The Development and Bounty Funds are accountable through VoteCentral and block experts for full transparency:

3. DeepOnion continues to be an active community-orientated privacy coin with regular updates and maintenance to core software:

Any outdated and unfounded alleged risks of trading with this project, or it's representatives, should now be considered null and void.

1585554825
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1585554825

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1585554825
Reply with quote  #2

1585554825
Report to moderator
1585554825
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1585554825

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1585554825
Reply with quote  #2

1585554825
Report to moderator
1585554825
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1585554825

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1585554825
Reply with quote  #2

1585554825
Report to moderator
Best ratesfor crypto
EXCHANGE
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
dragonvslinux
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 335



View Profile WWW
October 15, 2019, 05:43:29 PM
Last edit: October 16, 2019, 09:09:40 AM by dragonvslinux
 #2

Edit: Negative trust was removed by choice of the user (not requested)

mosprognoz, why the negative trust huh?

Quote from: mosprognoz
Deep-onion shill, untrustworthy liar.

Please be more specific next time, where am I shilling or lying?  Are you trying to say the linked proof provided are lies??
PS - Yes I have supported the development in the past, similar to other altcoins, but that's far from shilling...

dragonvslinux
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 335



View Profile WWW
October 21, 2019, 05:29:04 PM
Last edit: October 21, 2019, 07:55:43 PM by dragonvslinux
 #3

I tagged you for that before, but removed the tag [...] I am sorry, but you left me no more option, but to tag you again.

For reference sake, the original tag referenced the above feedback: ie a referenced statement of facts from predominantly third-party sources.
Unfortunately I didn't manage to screenshot this feedback with the given reference, so can't prove this without the reference (that acts as evidence).
Good lesson in archiving and screenshotting your references folks! Just make sure to use them in the first place at least  Wink

In a related matter, this user now received negative feedback:

Therefore, as I previously explained, I would be leaving you negative feedback for your lack of willingness to be accountable for your claims:

Quote from: Feedback
Made serious accusations about a project without a single reference (msg52799029). The user was given a total of 72 hours to provide sources as evidence but was not capable of doing so, despite repeated requests (refs: msg52808483, msg52810914, msg52816768), as well as contradictory evidence. Clearly believes they can make unfounded accusations and use deflection tactics to avoid accountability.
(Continued) Neutral feedback left as this user is not at risk of trading with, but likely to make allegations without references that would be damaging to current or future scam accusations. Doesn't appear to understand that you can't make false accusations, even if a project is scam, or accused of such.


[Page Archived]

dragonvslinux
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 335



View Profile WWW
November 10, 2019, 11:30:13 AM
Last edit: November 10, 2019, 11:41:19 AM by dragonvslinux
 #4

Edit: Negative trust was removed by choice of the user (not requested)

Negative trust again removed by mosprognoz, this time I managed to grab a screenshot (Oct 21st):



I tagged you for that before, but removed the tag [...blah blah...] you left me no more option, but to tag you again.

More feedback left:

Quote from: feedback
Continues to be unreliable and inconsistent with feedback. This user has now twice given and retracted similar feedback against me within 1 month. As a reminder, this user is not at high-risk of trading with, but it's therefore recommended to wait 30 days to see if trust left by this user is kept or removed.

Talk about being indecisive  Roll Eyes

[Archived]

dragonvslinux
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 335



View Profile WWW
January 10, 2020, 12:07:53 PM
Last edit: January 11, 2020, 10:32:42 AM by dragonvslinux
 #5

Cross-quoting for reference sake, as is relevant to the negative trust received by the user in question.

Ever feel like your digging yourself a hole?

Cross-referencing the following for relevance sake: mosprognoz "voted out" of DefaultTrust group for poor judgement, attempted blackmail and extortion.



You think you can scare me or blackmail me by threatening to "investigate" me?
Don't make me laugh punk..

He's not perfect. Neither are you.

Multiple instances of attempted blackmail and extortion is more than just being "not perfect". mosprognoz is not fit for DT for that reason alone.

OK, I have reviewed everything and am no longer including mosprognoz. That puts him at -1 now.

References: mosprognoz - Needs To Learn | Blackmail | Extortion
Related: Lauda DT1/trust statistics | Is Lauda still on DT?
Archived | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
IsMosprognozStillOnDT.tk

[Archived]

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!