I tagged you for that before, but removed the tag [...] I am sorry, but you left me no more option, but to tag you again.
For reference sake, the original tag referenced the above feedback: ie a referenced statement of facts from predominantly third-party sources.
Unfortunately I didn't manage to screenshot this feedback with the given reference, so can't prove this without the reference (that acts as evidence).
Good lesson in archiving and screenshotting your references folks! Just make sure to use them in the first place at least
In a related matter, this user now received negative feedback:
Therefore, as I
previously explained, I would be leaving you negative feedback for your lack of willingness to be accountable for your claims:
Made serious accusations about a project without a single reference (msg52799029). The user was given a total of 72 hours to provide sources as evidence but was not capable of doing so, despite repeated requests (refs: msg52808483, msg52810914, msg52816768), as well as contradictory evidence. Clearly believes they can make unfounded accusations and use deflection tactics to avoid accountability.
(Continued) Neutral feedback left as this user is not at risk of trading with, but likely to make allegations without references that would be damaging to current or future scam accusations. Doesn't appear to understand that you can't make false accusations, even if a project is scam, or accused of such. 
