🐺 WOLFBET.COM - 🎲 Advanced Dice Game 🎰 Slots ⚽ Sportsbook

[serjent05]

You really have a very interesting and easy to manage resource.  Even a novice becomes very understandable, but apparently this is not enough to attract more users.  Almost a month ago, on the site I watched about 25 users online, and today up to 60. This is not very much and, given the greater competition, you need to attract more attention to your site.  Maybe you should carry out an even more extensive advertising campaign, or maybe you have another strategy for this?

60 users online for now campared only 25 in a month before aren't too much for you? It's increased 140% higher than a month ago, how can it's still not much? When wolf.bet just launced, i even seen there were only less than 15 people online on there, then they improved their site, running 1st signature campaign to promote them, improved the betting speed, and now they are back with 2nd signature campaign

I have been playing on Wolf.bet for a week now, the highest online I saw was today around 77 people. Chat is quite active every now and then, and users are friendly. Rain occasionally occur within an hour window, I love browsing those bet link wherein they show their winning in a 80x wager or more or those who missed the wager by a mere decimal point.  At the same time my fj account is playing the same game, comparing their speed, wolf bet rolls and gives result almost twice than FJ.

[jostorres]

In today's top 10, we can see a few new players who made it to the top 10 and some others who kept their previous positions, good job everyone! Speaking in contests, have you joined our contest here on bitcointalk? Click here!

Normally, when someone wins a big wager I usually think "how many times did they played to win this" because sometimes we see like 10x wagers won but maybe that guy played more than 10 times and lost more than he played. However, when we are talking about such a huge odds to win and he still got it, I doubt he played like 10k times, this guy must be in profit by a big margin.

Weird thing is, he is not on the top 10 list, which means dude didn't wagered much enough to go to top 10 and still won or maybe he is one of the hidden ones but if he was hidden than we wouldn't see his big win, which means its unlikely that he became hidden later on, he probably didn't wagered much neither before nor after the big win, that is a huge profit in any calculation ever.

[WolfBet]

This Saturday was more calm, good job everyone!

[ahmadakbari]

Weird thing is, he is not on the top 10 list, which means dude didn't wagered much enough to go to top 10 and still won or maybe he is one of the hidden ones but if he was hidden than we wouldn't see his big win, which means its unlikely that he became hidden later on, he probably didn't wagered much neither before nor after the big win, that is a huge profit in any calculation ever.

Usually, winners of the contests are those gamblers who wager on small odds with high probabilities. As the total wagring amount determine the winners, in this way they can play for a long time and increase their wagring volume. They try to play with low risk and lose as little as possible.

[ralle14]

Weird thing is, he is not on the top 10 list, which means dude didn't wagered much enough to go to top 10 and still won or maybe he is one of the hidden ones but if he was hidden than we wouldn't see his big win, which means its unlikely that he became hidden later on, he probably didn't wagered much neither before nor after the big win, that is a huge profit in any calculation ever.

That's normal, anyone could win big while not making in the leaderboards since the odds are up to 9900.

Usually, winners of the contests are those gamblers who wager on small odds with high probabilities. As the total wagring amount determine the winners, in this way they can play for a long time and increase their wagring volume. They try to play with low risk and lose as little as possible.

I also use the same strategy for any wagering contest, at 98% win chance you can wager your deposit 100x or more if you're going with the lowest bet amount. I usually stick to 500-1k satoshi if the bet speed is slow and the contest looks +EV i'm tempted to join.

[Lanatsa]

Weird thing is, he is not on the top 10 list, which means dude didn't wagered much enough to go to top 10 and still won or maybe he is one of the hidden ones but if he was hidden than we wouldn't see his big win, which means its unlikely that he became hidden later on, he probably didn't wagered much neither before nor after the big win, that is a huge profit in any calculation ever.

Usually, winners of the contests are those gamblers who wager on small odds with high probabilities. As the total wagring amount determine the winners, in this way they can play for a long time and increase their wagring volume. They try to play with low risk and lose as little as possible.

Common technique I shall say when it comes to wagering contest but this would only fit out for those who do had tend to deposit small balances
but if a certain big bettor or whale would tend to join up then those wagered amount you had reached will just be sweep out on few bet of theirs.
Lucky thing if they didn't have any interest to join in.

[el kaka22]

Some people have bigger expectations and some people have lower. From 25 to 60 in a month is not bad at all to me, I would even say it is great, not many people can manage to make that type of leap in any place. However if you are a whale and you have a ton of money and you lose it here, you may expect to see that go to signature campaigns and promotions and all that which would mean more users.

Signature campaign is great and all but could be expanded if they spent more money, they could have ads in many other places (maybe they do) basically all the marketing stuff I am not really knowledgeable about, they might be doing what I already talked about so maybe other marketing stuff. I think they are already good as it is, maybe they should just keep it up, but not all people would like the growth like me.

[veleten]

Weird thing is, he is not on the top 10 list, which means dude didn't wagered much enough to go to top 10 and still won or maybe he is one of the hidden ones but if he was hidden than we wouldn't see his big win, which means its unlikely that he became hidden later on, he probably didn't wagered much neither before nor after the big win, that is a huge profit in any calculation ever.

Usually, winners of the contests are those gamblers who wager on small odds with high probabilities. As the total wagring amount determine the winners, in this way they can play for a long time and increase their wagring volume. They try to play with low risk and lose as little as possible.

Common technique I shall say when it comes to wagering contest but this would only fit out for those who do had tend to deposit small balances
but if a certain big bettor or whale would tend to join up then those wagered amount you had reached will just be sweep out on few bet of theirs.
Lucky thing if they didn't have any interest to join in.

high probabilities bets i.e. 98% winchance and such are terrible , they only work as a means to increase your wager
it is incredibly hard to make profit betting 1.01x since if you win you only get 1/100 of what you bet , but you lose every 50 bets on average
because of the house edge , this kind of bets is when the casino is making money , usually
but if you have a big bank you certainly have higher chances to win a wagering contest

[lupandina]

What I like in Wolf.bet, is good betting speed and continuously improvements. I like, when new site is simply focusing at what they are doing and working, fixing/implementing new things regularly, instead of just talking "we will have *** soon!" without real actions, like some does.

[ahmadakbari]

high probabilities bets i.e. 98% winchance and such are terrible , they only work as a means to increase your wager
it is incredibly hard to make profit betting 1.01x since if you win you only get 1/100 of what you bet , but you lose every 50 bets on average

In the long term, there is no difference between betting on 1.01x and betting on 2000x.
As long as the house edge is 1%, you lose 1% of the total amount you wager. The odds doesn't matter in the long term.

[ChrisPop]

Got to say that Wolf.Bet user interface is one of the best I have seen in the industry so far. If you have watched other posts of mine you know that I am a big fan of the theme/user interface of the gambling websites and this website did a great job. Congratulations to the developers! I particularly love the darker gradient colors and that shiny "Roll" button is just too much fun. haha Now I sound I got paid to say this, but I assure you these are exactly my thoughts.

[suzanne5223]

What I like in Wolf.bet, is good betting speed and continuously improvements. I like, when new site is simply focusing at what they are doing and working, fixing/implementing new things regularly, instead of just talking "we will have *** soon!" without real actions, like some does.

What you just said caught my attention because the simultaneous improvement aspect of a project team plays a huge role in making the project flourish above its competitors but I would like to know how good their withdraw activities is cause windice withdraw are done auto/instant? Maybe I could try it out someday.

[lupandina]

What I like in Wolf.bet, is good betting speed and continuously improvements. I like, when new site is simply focusing at what they are doing and working, fixing/implementing new things regularly, instead of just talking "we will have *** soon!" without real actions, like some does.

What you just said caught my attention because the simultaneous improvement aspect of a project team plays a huge role in making the project flourish above its competitors but I would like to know how good their withdraw activities is cause windice withdraw are done auto/instant? Maybe I could try it out someday.

I've made 7 withdrawals till now. Honestly, I didn't check how fast it was sent, as I wasn't in rush at all But as I've sent it to my main account in another site, which balance I'm checking pretty often, and I found funds there on next check all these times, I can ensure you, it wasn't longer then 1 hour. Or maybe even instant.

[WolfBet]

Sunday's Wolf Race has awarded another 30 players, congratulations everyone.

[finity]

Is this site really having a 1000 usd race every single day? Anyone here can confirm withdrawing larger amounts from here?

[rexxarofmoknathal]

Is this site really having a 1000 usd race every single day? Anyone here can confirm withdrawing larger amounts from here?

It does seem so, races of $1,000 normalised to BTC with the prize split among the top 10 players. From what I can see, the race re-sets every 24h, a timeframe quite dramatic from the rest of the casinos. Is anyone else able to confirm this?

[Zicadis]

Is this site really having a 1000 usd race every single day? Anyone here can confirm withdrawing larger amounts from here?

The site appears to completely legit, I haven't seen any convincing scam accusations against them.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0

Check this section and keep up to date. So far the platforms looks to be safe.

[Bitinity]

Is this site really having a 1000 usd race every single day? Anyone here can confirm withdrawing larger amounts from here?

How much is larger amount for you? It can be vary from different perspectives. Lets say 0.1BTC is a large amount already for some people but it can be something small for some other people. If you are asking about the daily race, yes they have it and there is no one complaining about it so far. It means that the races are real and paying the winners. You may try try yourself with few hundreds/thousands doge to test the race and wager as much as you can to be eligible for the prize.

[deisik]

In the long term, there is no difference between betting on 1.01x and betting on 2000x.
As long as the house edge is 1%, you lose 1% of the total amount you wager. The odds doesn't matter in the long term

This is the kind of question which has been bothering me lately

I even wanted to create a separate topic dedicated to it but didn't dare. While it definitely looks like the odds don't matter on their own (as far as the house edge is concerned), can the same be said in respect to variance? I mean would variance remain the same for both 1.01x and 9900x if you used these payouts in a hypothetic martingale setup?

In more mundane terms, are outliers going to happen equally frequently (infrequently) in both of these cases? This is important. Statistically, variance should also be the same as long as the bets are truly random, but practically, it may be different due to various physical factors involved which make the outcomes not so random

You may try try yourself with few hundreds/thousands doge to test the race and wager as much as you can to be eligible for the prize

With so little amount it's not going to pan out. I've been doing that for a few months already (since July, to be exact). And guess what? I'm in the second hundred (and never made it to the top ten)

[davinchi]

Actually playing on higher chances of winning could be even riskier, because you usually win but when you lose you lose a lot.

So, when you gamble 1 btc on 99% chance to win, you will win most of the time but you may end up losing a whole 1 btc. Whereas if you gamble just 1k satoshi on 50% and martingale your way into winning, unless you go too many losses in a row you would probably make up what you lost, worst case scenario if you go like 4-5 losses in a row you can restart and wouldn't lose too much (compared to one bitcoin loss all at once).

That is why I think it depends on how much bankroll you have but in the end the higher odd method is usually is not really great all the time unless you gamble a whole ton of money all at once just few times in a row without gambling tens of times.