🐺WOLF.BET - Advanced Dice Game 🎲 Sportsbook 🏟️ Slots 🎰

[codegnome]

Transaction discussion was going to be off-topic in wolf.bet's thread but I only want to say that for two months it wasn't confirmed? wow, you had the patience to wait for that long.

I don't think transaction discussion is "that" much off-topic because people are here talking about both
A) the fee for withdraw at wolf.bet
B) minimum withdrawal limit

I do agree that fee of withdrawal is something that is high everywhere, because eth fee's are insanely high these days and I can understand that, however that is only applied for the fee and if you want to allow people to pay their own fee that should be fine as well, after all if they want to wait they could wait, if they want fast they could do fast.

But what I do not agree with is the minimum requirement, if the person wants to send 1 dollar back to himself and pay 99 cent fee, receive only 1 cent in return for all this, let them do that if they want to. It is not wolf.bet's decision to have a minimum requirement at all.

Most users who cash out will cash out a reasonable amount anyway. I cannot imagine that someone wants to have, for example, 5 EUR paid.
 I think bookmakers should cover fees with payouts, after all, we're not talking hundreds of dollars per transaction. Isn't that only between 2 and 15 euros maximum?
That is part of a piece of customer service to the customer. I also prefer it to not set a minimum withdrawal limit.

[yahoo62278]

I would prefer they added an option for users to pay fees and set amounts users can choose to pay for faster confirms. They're being nice and paying wd fees for users currently, but some users cash out hundreds or thousands of dollars and would like faster confirms.

[Stedsm]

Did anyone experienced ever what I did?
I tried to set my email in my profile to verify and it showed "malicious behavior". I don't know why that happened but has any of you experienced it before? What's the solution to this?

@wolfbet, can you please add SMS and email "code" verifications as a part of your 2fa process? I'm afraid Google Authenticator is not something I'd like to use, because if my phone software crashes and I lose everything, I believe I'll lose my access to to the site as well as withdrawals.

[Furious 7]

I would prefer they added an option for users to pay fees and set amounts users can choose to pay for faster confirms. They're being nice and paying wd fees for users currently, but some users cash out hundreds or thousands of dollars and would like faster confirms.

It is clear for those whose money is big up to thousands of dollars in gambling games when they want to withdraw then this option can be done because the minimum amount of fees is applied and it is with a faster speed.

I don't know what about the users below are they able? or indeed choose the option that has been set because there are no options except those that have been set, but what I know is that if normal bitcoin is $ 15k then the cost will also decrease according to speed mempool.

[michellee]

Did anyone experienced ever what I did?
I tried to set my email in my profile to verify and it showed "malicious behavior". I don't know why that happened but has any of you experienced it before? What's the solution to this?

@wolfbet, can you please add SMS and email "code" verifications as a part of your 2fa process? I'm afraid Google Authenticator is not something I'd like to use, because if my phone software crashes and I lose everything, I believe I'll lose my access to to the site as well as withdrawals.

Maybe you can save the key in notepad and store it in your pc/laptop, so when your phone software crashes, you can add it back to your mobile phone. That is what I did with all keys in Google Authenticator, and I also suggest the same thing to my friends. It helps us to have the 2fa keys and we can install Google Authenticator on other devices.

[deisik]

I would prefer they added an option for users to pay fees and set amounts users can choose to pay for faster confirms. They're being nice and paying wd fees for users currently, but some users cash out hundreds or thousands of dollars and would like faster confirms

It's okay when you want to pay higher fees

But what if someone sets too small a fee and the transaction doesn't get confirmed? When you are sending from your own wallet (i.e. the wallet for which you have the keys), you can try to cancel the TX or add more fees to it (something like CPFP). In this case you are the one totally responsible for your actions. But in case of a casino, someone would undoubtedly start to blame it for allowing such a fee in the first place despite setting it himself. And then you will see this thread or any other such thread filled with complaints and baseless accusations

[Pmalek]

Did anyone experienced ever what I did?
I tried to set my email in my profile to verify and it showed "malicious behavior". I don't know why that happened but has any of you experienced it before? What's the solution to this?

I have never had such an experience before. Were you maybe using a VPN/proxy with an IP address far away from the location from where you originally created the account from? In that case you can try without the VPN or by using a location closer to your place.

If a site recognizes a new device, it might trigger a verification request where you have to confirm that you are the original owner of the account with a click on a link in an email they send.

[tbterryboy]

When you make a "freely put any fee you want" type of situation that could be a problem, some person who is not focused or just having a bad day (or whatever else reason) could just put in the amount he wants to withdraw into the field he should put the fee and vice versa, in that case someone who wants to withdraw 1 bitcoin and pay 0.001 fee so it can be quick, could instead get 0.001 withdraw for a 1 bitcoin fee.

Not that it is common but we have seen this type of thing happen before in bitcoin world, there are unfortunately people who lost hundreds of bitcoins this way and there is no way to reverse it back. Which is why I highly suggest a wallet like three option deal where you have slow, medium and fast where you can choice and the amount will be decided based on the situation of the fee situation at that moment.

[deisik]

When you make a "freely put any fee you want" type of situation that could be a problem, some person who is not focused or just having a bad day (or whatever else reason) could just put in the amount he wants to withdraw into the field he should put the fee and vice versa, in that case someone who wants to withdraw 1 bitcoin and pay 0.001 fee so it can be quick, could instead get 0.001 withdraw for a 1 bitcoin fee

That's probably another reason why the casino should never allow gamblers to play with withdrawal fees. Wanna play? No problem, here's dice, roulette, blackjack... oh, wait

Not that it is common but we have seen this type of thing happen before in bitcoin world, there are unfortunately people who lost hundreds of bitcoins this way and there is no way to reverse it back. Which is why I highly suggest a wallet like three option deal where you have slow, medium and fast where you can choice and the amount will be decided based on the situation of the fee situation at that moment

Don't know about bitcoins but one dude recently sent a couple dollars in Ether for a network fee of a few million. Real story, and I'm curious who has confirmed the transaction. I mean, a mining pool or a single miner. This is truly off-topic in this thread, but you raised an interesting and important issue

[panjul07]

I would prefer they added an option for users to pay fees and set amounts users can choose to pay for faster confirms. They're being nice and paying wd fees for users currently, but some users cash out hundreds or thousands of dollars and would like faster confirms

It's okay when you want to pay higher fees

But what if someone sets too small a fee and the transaction doesn't get confirmed? When you are sending from your own wallet (i.e. the wallet for which you have the keys), you can try to cancel the TX or add more fees to it (something like CPFP). In this case you are the one totally responsible for your actions. But in case of a casino, someone would undoubtedly start to blame it for allowing such a fee in the first place despite setting it himself. And then you will see this thread or any other such thread filled with complaints and baseless accusations

If someone set too small fee that makes his transaction get confirmed in a very long time then it is user's fault why he set too small amount.
Someone who do it then start complaining the site will just embarrass himself as he is the one who made the mistake.
If wolfbet add the option to pay fees as what user wish, better if wolfbet add a notification message of the latest recommended fee to get the transaction confirmed asap.

[STT]

Sure there's a question of personal responsibility but also there's always the usability issue especially when its the entertainment industry, people are going to be taking a drink relaxing and mistakes will happen because that's life.   I don't see crypto really able to take off overall until its available in some shape or form so incredibly easy its like the remote control of online payments, it really does have to be a no hassle no worries type affair.
   I say that from experience of dealing with doctors or lawyers phoning up unfamiliar with windows or their computers in general, it is there fault to an extent if they make a simple mistake sure but also it has to be good working system with rounded edges at some point or growth is not going to divert elsewhere.   I'm pretty sure efficiency is a big thing but also ease of use for mass adoption will be vital for all these aspirations people have in price projections etc.

[deisik]

I would prefer they added an option for users to pay fees and set amounts users can choose to pay for faster confirms. They're being nice and paying wd fees for users currently, but some users cash out hundreds or thousands of dollars and would like faster confirms

It's okay when you want to pay higher fees

But what if someone sets too small a fee and the transaction doesn't get confirmed? When you are sending from your own wallet (i.e. the wallet for which you have the keys), you can try to cancel the TX or add more fees to it (something like CPFP). In this case you are the one totally responsible for your actions. But in case of a casino, someone would undoubtedly start to blame it for allowing such a fee in the first place despite setting it himself. And then you will see this thread or any other such thread filled with complaints and baseless accusations

If someone set too small fee that makes his transaction get confirmed in a very long time then it is user's fault why he set too small amount

Technically, you are right

However, this is not how things are going to unfold in real life. People complaining here and elsewhere would still hurt the public image of the casino. You are not allowed to set your own network fees on most exchanges (in fact, I don't know about any where you can do that), and this is considered normal and standard behavior. In other words, doing it differently would be too risky, while benefits minuscule provided there are any at all

[serjent05]

I would prefer they added an option for users to pay fees and set amounts users can choose to pay for faster confirms. They're being nice and paying wd fees for users currently, but some users cash out hundreds or thousands of dollars and would like faster confirms

It's okay when you want to pay higher fees

But what if someone sets too small a fee and the transaction doesn't get confirmed? When you are sending from your own wallet (i.e. the wallet for which you have the keys), you can try to cancel the TX or add more fees to it (something like CPFP). In this case you are the one totally responsible for your actions. But in case of a casino, someone would undoubtedly start to blame it for allowing such a fee in the first place despite setting it himself. And then you will see this thread or any other such thread filled with complaints and baseless accusations

If someone set too small fee that makes his transaction get confirmed in a very long time then it is user's fault why he set too small amount

Technically, you are right

However, this is not how things are going to unfold in real life. People complaining here and elsewhere would still hurt the public image of the casino. You are not allowed to set your own network fees on most exchanges (in fact, I don't know about any where you can do that), and this is considered normal and standard behavior. In other words, doing it differently would be too risky, while benefits minuscule provided there are any at all

I agree!  Even though it is the client's fault, many people are so narrow-minded looking for someone to blame.  We have seen many situations where clients blame the company for the problem that they (client) themselves create.  Letting people to setup their own transaction fee will create more problems, and that what I think.

[panjul07]

If someone set too small fee that makes his transaction get confirmed in a very long time then it is user's fault why he set too small amount

Technically, you are right

However, this is not how things are going to unfold in real life. People complaining here and elsewhere would still hurt the public image of the casino. You are not allowed to set your own network fees on most exchanges (in fact, I don't know about any where you can do that), and this is considered normal and standard behavior. In other words, doing it differently would be too risky, while benefits minuscule provided there are any at all

It wont hurt the public image of the casino, at least there are some casinos has this option where players can set the fee based on its priority (Low, Med, High).
With this option, I do believe gamblers prefer to use Med and High priority because they want to get the transaction confirmed fast.
I havent seen any complains on those site with this option, crypto gamblers are getting smart time to time so I doubt that gambler will choose low fee as they are aware about the consequence.
Of course it is just a suggestion from yahoo, the idea is to let players set higher fee than the default one set by the casino.
Sometime fixed fee which is being paid by casino is smaller than the recommended fee, this makes players wait longer time for their own money.
If there is an option to pay higher fee, then players wont need to wait for longer time for their money.

[deisik]

However, this is not how things are going to unfold in real life. People complaining here and elsewhere would still hurt the public image of the casino. You are not allowed to set your own network fees on most exchanges (in fact, I don't know about any where you can do that), and this is considered normal and standard behavior. In other words, doing it differently would be too risky, while benefits minuscule provided there are any at all

I agree!  Even though it is the client's fault, many people are so narrow-minded looking for someone to blame.  We have seen many situations where clients blame the company for the problem that they (client) themselves create.  Letting people to setup their own transaction fee will create more problems, and that what I think

If only it were just about that

As this thread clearly shows, people are ready to blame and accuse not for actual wrongdoings, no matter whose fault it really is, but for misdeeds that didn't happen and could only happen in imagined or outright conjured-up and contrived circumstances, for example, Wolf.bet running dummy accounts with hidden names to promote the daily race. Is this still a "legit" call or are we already past that point?

[ultrloa]

I would prefer they added an option for users to pay fees and set amounts users can choose to pay for faster confirms. They're being nice and paying wd fees for users currently, but some users cash out hundreds or thousands of dollars and would like faster confirms

It's okay when you want to pay higher fees

But what if someone sets too small a fee and the transaction doesn't get confirmed? When you are sending from your own wallet (i.e. the wallet for which you have the keys), you can try to cancel the TX or add more fees to it (something like CPFP). In this case you are the one totally responsible for your actions. But in case of a casino, someone would undoubtedly start to blame it for allowing such a fee in the first place despite setting it himself. And then you will see this thread or any other such thread filled with complaints and baseless accusations

If someone set too small fee that makes his transaction get confirmed in a very long time then it is user's fault why he set too small amount

Technically, you are right

However, this is not how things are going to unfold in real life. People complaining here and elsewhere would still hurt the public image of the casino. You are not allowed to set your own network fees on most exchanges (in fact, I don't know about any where you can do that), and this is considered normal and standard behavior. In other words, doing it differently would be too risky, while benefits minuscule provided there are any at all

I agree!  Even though it is the client's fault, many people are so narrow-minded looking for someone to blame.  We have seen many situations where clients blame the company for the problem that they (client) themselves create.  Letting people to setup their own transaction fee will create more problems, and that what I think.

If there's narrow minded users here for sure they will be educated with those users who knows well about the traction fees and others and it cannot ruin the reputation of the casino since the casino have proof that the user use some certain fee's that's why they encounter the error. And the suggestion about having that setting amount option since it could make the life of whales to set the amount to make their transaction faster.

We should not look for the little problem since it can be solve but we should look the convenient what can bring with that suggestion.

[justdimin]

I have seen literally hundreds of people who lost money while gambling on dice game complain about "10 losses in a row!!" like that is something impossible. They calculated what are the odds and realized that even though it is small, there is a chance that happens and they still went with "how could something so rare could happen to me!! this casino must be rigged!!" and started scam accusations.

This didn't happened just one place neither, it happened all around crypto gambling world as well. Now think of people who can't comprehend that ever bet is individual and you have a chance to not only lose 10 in a row at %50 win chance, but you can lose even 20 or 30 as well, to suddenly realize that when you pay small fee, you are not getting your money any time soon. They will blame the website for not sending it quick enough even though they are the ones who picked low fee.

[arwin100]

I have seen literally hundreds of people who lost money while gambling on dice game complain about "10 losses in a row!!" like that is something impossible. They calculated what are the odds and realized that even though it is small, there is a chance that happens and they still went with "how could something so rare could happen to me!! this casino must be rigged!!" and started scam accusations.

This didn't happened just one place neither, it happened all around crypto gambling world as well. Now think of people who can't comprehend that ever bet is individual and you have a chance to not only lose 10 in a row at %50 win chance, but you can lose even 20 or 30 as well, to suddenly realize that when you pay small fee, you are not getting your money any time soon. They will blame the website for not sending it quick enough even though they are the ones who picked low fee.

Those people are crazy looking to be blame for the action they made maybe this people are not fit to gamble since they cannot accept the consequences on the actions they made or the certain scenarios that's not favor unto them and if we see this guy's posting a blame on a site then better to correct them so that they will learn some lesson about how those things occur and to prove that they are wrong if they spit a bad word on the casino.

[janggernaut]

I have seen literally hundreds of people who lost money while gambling on dice game complain about "10 losses in a row!!" like that is something impossible. They calculated what are the odds and realized that even though it is small, there is a chance that happens and they still went with "how could something so rare could happen to me!! this casino must be rigged!!" and started scam accusations.

This didn't happened just one place neither, it happened all around crypto gambling world as well. Now think of people who can't comprehend that ever bet is individual and you have a chance to not only lose 10 in a row at %50 win chance, but you can lose even 20 or 30 as well, to suddenly realize that when you pay small fee, you are not getting your money any time soon. They will blame the website for not sending it quick enough even though they are the ones who picked low fee.

Yeah it's just like you said. Lot of people complaining how can they get many losses in a row while the chance is very very low to happens. They didn't thought if streak losses never happens, all dice sites will go bankrupt as long as we have much money to cover all losses would be happen in a dice game. Don't forget about House edge too, in the long run, you will likely lose. Just hit and run when you have made some profit

[dre1982]

I have seen literally hundreds of people who lost money while gambling on dice game complain about "10 losses in a row!!" like that is something impossible. They calculated what are the odds and realized that even though it is small, there is a chance that happens and they still went with "how could something so rare could happen to me!! this casino must be rigged!!" and started scam accusations.

This didn't happened just one place neither, it happened all around crypto gambling world as well. Now think of people who can't comprehend that ever bet is individual and you have a chance to not only lose 10 in a row at %50 win chance, but you can lose even 20 or 30 as well, to suddenly realize that when you pay small fee, you are not getting your money any time soon. They will blame the website for not sending it quick enough even though they are the ones who picked low fee.

Those users who complaines also get the 10 wins in a row but they don't notice that because they don't bust when this happens. With autobet you roll so many rolls within a few minutes so they chance on a big red streak is there. The best way to gamble on dice sites is just make a few big bets and then just quite. But that's just too boring.