Multiple Round ICOs?

[mr-coin]

Multi round should be short time, if it as you said i never participate.
If i intend to participate in any project every point and steps should be clear and according road map and is it?
So be careful many ICOs this days scam, sure not all.

[1714540356]

1714540356

[1714540356]

1714540356

[ruski]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.

There are so many projects extended their ICO durations especially in the previous year, and even this year. You can check the ANN section and you will see a lot of them. And I think it is normal, because the market is still down, and many projects failed to reach even their softcaps.

[danggoron]

If the project shows good progress and development and is in accordance with what the developer explains and plans, then that is not a problem. But usually, the ICO and IEO plans are already planned in the roadmap. If there is something outside the roadmap, the responsible developer will provide clarification. The thing to worry about is if the developer doesn't make a clear announcement regarding Ico and IEO additions, and there is absolutely no progress in the development of the project, they may just want to cheat more people, so be careful.

[Twinkledoe]

If the project shows good progress and development and is in accordance with what the developer explains and plans, then that is not a problem. But usually, the ICO and IEO plans are already planned in the roadmap. If there is something outside the roadmap, the responsible developer will provide clarification. The thing to worry about is if the developer doesn't make a clear announcement regarding Ico and IEO additions, and there is absolutely no progress in the development of the project, they may just want to cheat more people, so be careful.

The major reason why they are doing those multiple round ICOs is to rip money as much as possible from naive users. This is true to most projects. They are active during these rounds but don't expect to get answers from your questions when the ICO is over. To OP, just browse the ANN section and you will see a lot of projects doing this strategy and now it is more on multiple IEOs. I hope small or big time investors should really be very cautious before sending money to these projects.

[X-ray]

There was a lot of multiple rounds of ICO this time, you can see that how the majority of IEOs in exmarket was doing even a few phase of IEO. they are doing it due to the lack of demand and very strict competition.
I heard so many IEOs have been doing multiple rounds in various major sites too just like bitforex and coineal. (but a lot of multiple round of icos were launching at the medium or low platform)
You just need to visit that exchange site directly and you will find a lot of the IEOs were running multiple rounds.

[pinoy.bolanon]

Based on my understanding from all the IEO's nowadays they have sequence or rounds for their token sale, i think thats normal nowadays, as they need to execute the project with or without full funds from their token sale, and i think its a good way for the team itself to attract more investors, as they only offer good amounts during the initial round.

[charlop24]

I know of a project that carried out several ICO's and its over a year since the project was launched and its yet to commence the project development. I personally find the idea of multiple ICO discouraging. Several investors are waiting for the project to list, but they are busy with ICO's for over a year and nothing to show for the funds which has been entrusted to the team.

[Prolifik]

That could be really a good idea for honest ICOs. Why they need to raise all money at once? Then they are not motivated to do something, they grab money and leave the market, but if they see that they have to do something for money, they will work.  

[Hans Groober]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.

I have not heard about new projects that conduct similar ICOs. This is of course an interesting idea, but I think that if the developers raised the money necessary for the implementation of the project, they will be able to realize it without additional investments.
Unless they need money to advertise a finished project. However, if the project is good, then finding additional funding for them will not be a problem.

[asyakashi]

it was a sign that the project was not in great demand so the Team extended the sales period in several rounds.
there are several projects that use this method to achieve their sales.
some succeed but many also fail, if it involves a bounty hunter this is a big gamble.

Extending the required time and increasing the minimum amount are the signs of bad promotions by the team. Using different methods dor achieving the soft cap is usually thought by the slowly developing projects, there are not concrete mechanisms for detecting the most legit project. Several projects with uniques market ideas can be an exception but the market never gives lifetime access to the tokens of these projects. Extended token sales also help the team to analyze the previous round of token sales with the right management tools. That is the reason why investors never like to take pre-sale bonuses as an early bird on the projects.

I also think that there are other ways to get investors. adding campaign time isn't bad either, but looking for other options should also be considered.

[Lanatsa]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.

Never ever heard such thing because usually or a typical ICO does normally have pre-sale,main sale and I didn't head out about another round of funding after some several months or a year after.If there were projects like that then usually they cant get much funding on 2nd phase unless if they able to convince the previous investors to put up money and see some development on the works rather than having no updates or just an imaginary project hanging.We know that majority of projects nowadays are frauds or doesn't deliver something new and keeps on copying already existed project ideas and repeat the same process over and over again as long they would able to extract out some money from the community and since you've ask this,have you seen one project do have this multiple round ico? if yes then I'm pretty sure they would failed up or even on the first or initial phase.

[Kemarit]

That could be really a good idea for honest ICOs. Why they need to raise all money at once? Then they are not motivated to do something, they grab money and leave the market, but if they see that they have to do something for money, they will work.  

I think that is their main goal here, to raise as much money as they can in the first round so that they can continue with the development of their project. There are expenses that needs to be settled behind that is why it is very important to reach soft cap or even hard cap in the early stage. Assuming that they didn't they another round is needed. My only concern is that if they didn't raise money for the first time, then what are the chances of the project to survived if people are not going to be interested anymore?

[Daffadile]

I think a multiple round ICO is a good thing so long as they pay between rounds. It will mean there will be less initial dumping and more time to hold for later profits. It gives bounty hunters some time to think about their next move. Maybe some will even hold and decide the bounty treated them well so they will be loyal. A loyal bounty program will increase the chances for a successful project and good value token.

[joybella]

Yes it's possible some projects don't wait for long before another round of ICOs. Mot times they do this in order to give room for development to have an MVP in between a set time frame other just to raise enough funds for their project development.

[sjbi]

There are many projects that have held ICOs many times and on many dates. One of them is moozicore, https://medium.com/@moozicore/the-1st-round-of-the-moozicore-ieo-on-exmarkets-exchange-has-been-successfully-completed-2e71d8e7b984.
Launching ICOs many times is a means to raise as much as budget to fund project goals and ideas. It is also a means of increasing price of token.

[Aldrinx00]

I think this has been common to ICOS that reached only their softcap, they need to collect more funds so another rounds of ICOS has been implemented well now in a form of IEO. The main reason i think is because they didn't collect enough funds to develop their project so they conduct a succeeding ICO or IEO to reach their goal.

[bakasabo]

Launching ICOs many times is a means to raise as much as budget to fund project goals and ideas. It is also a means of increasing price of token.

That doesnt make any sense. Why project make new ICO rounds, when the best scenario is "sell everything in the first round and reach soft/hard caps". "Launching ICOs many times" means there is no interest in the project. No one wants to buy it.

How can lots if ICO rounds increase token price? If the project didnt sell all tokens on the first round at the price X (so it makes another ICO round), why would someone wants to buy it with the price X+2 ?

[fullhdpixel]

I think this has been common to ICOS that reached only their softcap, they need to collect more funds so another rounds of ICOS has been implemented well now in a form of IEO. The main reason i think is because they didn't collect enough funds to develop their project so they conduct a succeeding ICO or IEO to reach their goal.

They have been doing that even before IEO was established, to just recently that harmony did it first, I think harmony started their project through ICO first and then later took it to binance IEO after they could not meet up with their funds request on time in the ICO market, but prior to now, we have had so many projects that usually give space for their fund raising deliberately.

I guess those are the one that usually have real use case, they raise little money first to prepare fully for the project and then put some things in place ahead of the major development while they come back to raise more money for the bigger development, at the early development, they must settled anything that has o do with exchanges, and once they are through with second stage, you see them entering exchange immediately.

[Ben Shedly]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.

Typically, each new project has two rounds of fundraising. The first round is called pre-sales or pre ICO. In this round, the development team usually attracts large investors by offering them the greatest discounts.
This is followed by a round of the main ICO, when everyone can invest.

[BITpashaCOIN]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.

This is not good, if the project has a good idea, there is a finished product or mvp, good marketing, then the entire amount is collected at the pre-sale stage. All this tedious stretching of time for rounds, all this is a sign of the scam, I immediately remember the Orbis project, which raises funds for the second year and continues to do so, deceiving the participants of the bounty and leaving without payment.