IEOs is a game for top exchanges.

[Red-Apple]

if you think about it, everything is a game for top exchanges simply because they have more power in the market.  the most common thing we always see is their control over the pump and dumps of different altcoins just because they own the majority of the market share (volume). for example a couple of years ago when they forked ETH and the foundation was dumping ETC to kill it, poloniex which was the biggest exchange of the time blocked their accounts and prevented ETC's death because they had the power to do it.

[1715486537]

1715486537

[BillGoldberg]

It's somehow true and it's correct for projects who did their IEO on smaller exchanges very rarely succeed with their fundraising activities. The top ones are still Binance, they pretty much have the biggest volume out of everyone and you can find projects there that has an actual product and real partnerships, something that can bring you ROI in the long run. But I would say that projects who are making efforts will always make it's way, though it's gonna be a difficult road for them especially if they don't have the budget to enter big exchanges.

[d_fitrie]

The top exchange already has the trust of investors and a lot of data that refer to recommend IEO from the top exchange, I have seen IEO in Binance with a very high ROI, while IEO in small exchanges suffered a lot of losses and even dropped dramatically to disappear.

[fzatni]

I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.

indeed a large volume of trade is more favored in IEO because they have the ability to increase the liquidity of new tokens.  but a large exchange does not guarantee that a successful project might even increase in price for a short time.  better analyze first before investing IEO don't overly trust exchanges I am personally more interested in seeing real products and innovations even though they are on a small exchange

[ridhobagus2308]

They all have benefits, the project who offer the IEO and the exchange. as an investor perspective, of course, I would rather join IEO on a big exchange, but it's not true if the small exchange will stop me to invest. Again its more about the project itself.

[saba1256]

After failure of ICO's, most of the exchanges launching IEO's and big exchanges are getting good success rate but small exchanges have not good rate of success, I think small exchanges adding all projects that do not have worth and people are buying for good investment and want to get good profit, as you can see LATOKEN, Exmarket and some other exchanges not properly checking IEO and launching every project. so we don't invest in small exchanges.

[Peterdav]

That's true, many IEO project successful on top exchange, because top exchange like Binance, Huobi and Okex have liquidity and can pump the coin after listing. I am never invest IEO on small exchange because their have more risk and can't be trusted.

[imstillthebest]

That's true, many IEO project successful on top exchange, because top exchange like Binance, Huobi and Okex have liquidity and can pump the coin after listing.

Not only because of liquidity but because of the credibility because top exchange sites like the ones that you list above are known be legit and running for year's . Smaller exchange can still do thier best to improve their platform and they can offer something that is new and unique so that they can attract fellow traders and hopefully they don't make any dissapointment when building a reputation

[Kasabus]

I am never invest IEO on small exchange because their have more risk and can't be trusted.

I'm not disclosing any chances that those Low volume exchange will exceed in the future nor to think that they can't be trusted anymore. The competition may strong and  traders will give there way into the most reputed exchanges than to risk their money to the others.  
But not just to rely with them because they have a good market reviews, we should also be taking care of our investment and to have better result.

[jumiapaul]

I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.

I agree with you, most of the IEO held in global exchange like binance and bittrex tend to be highly successful and some of them sold out in less than two minutes, but the IEO conducted on small exchanges takes very long time without the team meeting their soft cap, some project even complain of not making any sales.

[Jenkins33]

I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.

The secret to the success of IEO is that the exchange itself artificially inflates the price of a new coin after the listing starts. This gives investors the opportunity to profit and the desire to participate in the next IEO on the same exchange.
Small exchanges do not have such a large amount of money for artificially inflating prices, so not all projects bring profit to their investors.

[wywoc]

I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.

A basic principle is that investors will choose IEO on top exchanges, because these exchanges are almost certain that participants will be profitable if they can participate, while projects at smaller exchanges are more like gambling.
If smaller exchanges can improve liquidity and price after IEO, new traders will be attracted and The IEO game will welcome these exchanges.

[Free1bitco.in]

it is true that the top exchangers have traders who are ready to collect coins from the IEO project carried out on the top exchangers. that is because they believe in the potential of the project. in addition, the exchanger team also helps to review a project whether it is feasible to trade on the exchanger or not. so, when it's feasible, of course traders will think that it's a worthy project.
 
but, it all depends on the quality of a project, sometimes there are some IEO that are also worth trading on exchangers that are not so popular.

[Nivia1st]

I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.

yes you're right, because many people trust more with large exchanges. it's hard to convince investors if the IEO is in a small exchange. they think that projects that are in small exchanges will not succeed.

in fact the most important thing is not where IEO is located, but the quality of the project itself should be prioritized. projects that have good concepts and have a team that is focused on development will survive in the market. than projects that have a lot of speculation.

[auntyjmary]

Most of the failed IEOs were not conducted with due diligence. Looking  at most of the successful IEOs in recent times, I think the top exchanges are really doing well with the IEOs as they are really careful with the number of IEOs they conduct. The smaller exchanges mostly conduct a number of IEOs at the same time and this goes a long way to affect sales.

[Miklight88]

Well big exchange and even the small ones are using ieo to hit customers with big hope of getting profit from the ieo with a quick return .

So the hope of returning and having a good project is lies on the capacity of the exchange and it makes the investors believe in investing on them which is more secure than ICO of then.

[pelumi20]

The main reason why IEOs were able to succeed ICOs was because it offers solution to the scam problems encountered in ICOs. And the fact that it started on the biggest exchange (Binance) in the crypto space is another major boast.
And the reason why IEO is bigger exchanges succeed better than smaller ones is because they have better volume and liquidity than them.

[Denongels]

agree because based on what i see rarely ieo from small exchanges that can pump prices up to 2x or more small exchanges always fail, for example from idax, probit, pb2pb, shortex, vindax most of the list of exchanges like that do not succeed in raising but some projects exist that It might work because it was driven by the project community itself

[Aveatrex]

Most of the failed IEOs were not conducted with due diligence. Looking  at most of the successful IEOs in recent times, I think the top exchanges are really doing well with the IEOs as they are really careful with the number of IEOs they conduct. The smaller exchanges mostly conduct a number of IEOs at the same time and this goes a long way to affect sales.

Moreover,small exchanges rarely take time to review projects,find ones that are legit and predisposed to succeed,most of them are just lured with money and accept any project offering money.On the other hand,big exchanges are aware that failed IEOs stains their reputation therefore they cherry pick projects that are ought to succeed.

[PuertoLibre]

I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.

The game has a beginning and end, the Binance exchange started this race but the development is not going as planned. Small exchanges compete with the big exchanges and they try to show their strong sides in order to gain more liquidity by the IEO investors. The success rate depends on the raised funds on each token sale, the exchanges which have not been recognized by IEO whales are not going to replace the Binance Launchpad.
In my opinion, the liquidity issues are common for all exchanges, even Binance applied the BNB holders case in order to prevent the FUD. The ordinarily known case is not interesting for the big exchanges, only other exchanges look for the all possible selections for pulling more investors to their next IEO launch. Same impression is also substantive in the projects.