Please make your vote for the flag created against game-protect

[AB de Royse777]

b) Donate 5% of your claim (minimum 100 Euro) in advance or

Donate! LOL
I must say that I am not really updated with the information. It seems we have a beggar here :-D


or

c) Register with any Qualify free operator and accumulate affiliate commission worth 5% of your claim.

We have these poor online affiliates who can do anything just to get a sign up LOL

GP, get a real job bud. I hope you do not have a family to feed.

[1714172789]

1714172789

[1714172789]

1714172789

[1714172789]

1714172789

[1714172789]

1714172789

[game-protect]

@ 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, asphyxiate, asu, Astargath, Avirunes, babo, BayAreaCoins, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, blurryeyed, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death,  squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei

Your partner in crime xtraelv investigated that a legally binding agreement, let alone a written contract, does not exist!

1) UK law is similar to the law in most commonwealth countries.

For contracts to be legally binding, five essential elements must be present. There must be:

1) An offer;
2) Acceptance of the offer;
3) Consideration (i.e., some form of payment);
4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract; and
5) Certainty as to what the parties have agreed.

https://businessadvice.co.uk/business-development/business-planning/are-emails-legally-binding/

3) Consideration (i.e., some form of payment);

Does not exist!

Game Protect only takes donations without any legally binding agreement.

https://game-protect.com/donate/

If you appreciate our worldwide only real and unbiased online gaming consumer protection service, your donation is welcome!

Real world legal aspects: Donations are given without return consideration.

4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract

Does not exist!

Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such.

[actmyname]

The Parmasist

@The Pharmacist is this your cousin?

This makes me think that game-protect types the names out one-by-one (prior to their copy-pasting) which makes me think they're even more insane than I originally thought. TwitchySeal's theory might make some sense here.

Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such.

Nice. Outside of the law, huh?

[suchmoon]

This makes me think that game-protect types the names out one-by-one (prior to their copy-pasting) which makes me think they're even more insane than I originally thought.

Well, his list is sorted alphabetically instead of by activity or whatever the default sort order is on a flag, so he's clearly putting some effort into reformatting it.

I wonder what McDonald's is paying in his country. I bet he would have been able to earn a lot more than 210 euro if he spent this time flipping burgers instead of trolling. Unless he's too crazy to the point of unemployable.

[DireWolfM14]

I wonder what McDonald's is paying in his country. I bet he whould have been able to earn a lot more than 210 euro if he spent this time flipping burgers instead of trolling. Unless he's too crazy to the point of unemployable.

Yes, even McDonald's has burger-flipper standards, and bat-shit-crazy is an automatic disqualifier.

[efialtis]

@ 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, asphyxiate, Astargath, Avirunes, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death,  squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei

Your partner in crime xtraelv investigated that a legally binding agreement, let alone a written contract, does not exist!

1) UK law is similar to the law in most commonwealth countries.

For contracts to be legally binding, five essential elements must be present. There must be:

1) An offer;
2) Acceptance of the offer;
3) Consideration (i.e., some form of payment);
4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract; and
5) Certainty as to what the parties have agreed.

https://businessadvice.co.uk/business-development/business-planning/are-emails-legally-binding/

3) Consideration (i.e., some form of payment);

Does not exist!

Game Protect only takes donations without any legally binding agreement.

https://game-protect.com/donate/

If you appreciate our worldwide only real and unbiased online gaming consumer protection service, your donation is welcome!

Real world legal aspects: Donations are given without return consideration.

4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract

Does not exist!

Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such.

I am so glad I finally made it to your list man - seriously! About time...! Online Gaming Consumer Protection... LOL

[AB de Royse777]

~snip~

I am so glad I finally made it to your list man - seriously! About time...! Online Gaming Consumer Protection... LOL

Welcome to the elite group :-P

[game-protect]

xtraelx deliberately misleads the public with claiming that this email



is a WRITTEN CONTRACT!

UK law is similar to the law in most commonwealth countries.

For contracts to be legally binding, five essential elements must be present. There must be:

1) An offer;
2) Acceptance of the offer;
3) Consideration (i.e., some form of payment);
4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract; and
5) Certainty as to what the parties have agreed.

https://businessadvice.co.uk/business-development/business-planning/are-emails-legally-binding/[/quote]

3) Consideration (i.e., some form of payment);

Does not exist!

Game Protect only takes donations without any legally binding agreement.

https://game-protect.com/donate/

If you appreciate our worldwide only real and unbiased online gaming consumer protection service, your donation is welcome!

Real world legal aspects: Donations are given without return consideration.

4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract

Does not exist!

Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such!

[xtraelv]

After your brain substantiated that Game Protect is a scam / show, would not you withdraw your 7 pending enforcement cases?

(September 3rd) My suspicion substantiated when he asked me to borrow him €10. For the second time.

Or would you want Game Protect continue to enforce your 7 claims towards sportsbooks?

Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such!

According to you game protect makes no contracts.

Show me the contract that continues his claim.  Show your capacity to represent him in a real life court !

You can claim either that you don't make contracts or that you have a contract with him to enforce his claim. You can't claim both without exposing the other as a lie.

[game-protect]

After your brain substantiated that Game Protect is a scam / show, would not you withdraw your 7 pending enforcement cases?

(September 3rd) My suspicion substantiated when he asked me to borrow him €10. For the second time.

Or would you want Game Protect continue to enforce your 7 claims towards sportsbooks?

Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such!

According to you game protect makes no contracts.

Correct.

Show me the contract that continues his claim.

Game Protect does not make contracts!

Show your capacity to represent him in a real life court !

Game Protect does not represent claimants at courts!

[xtraelv]

After your brain substantiated that Game Protect is a scam / show, would not you withdraw your 7 pending enforcement cases?

(September 3rd) My suspicion substantiated when he asked me to borrow him €10. For the second time.

Or would you want Game Protect continue to enforce your 7 claims towards sportsbooks?

Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such!

According to you game protect makes no contracts.

Correct.

Show me the contract that continues his claim.

Game Protect does not make contracts!

Show your capacity to represent him in a real life court !

Game Protect does not represent claimants at courts!

How can you enforce his claim if you do not have a contract to represent him ?

[game-protect]

Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed.

The below extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts persist to abuse the trust system with knowingly supporting the incorrect fact-statement that Game Protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, around July 2019, but are not able to show the alleged written contract!

h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Support: 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, Alveus, asphyxiate, asu, Astargath, Avirunes, babo, BayAreaCoins, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, blurryeyed, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Game-Protects, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death,  squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei

[marlboroza]

@The Pharmacist is this your cousin?

This makes me think that game-protect types the names out one-by-one (prior to their copy-pasting) which makes me think they're even more insane than I originally thought. TwitchySeal's theory might make some sense here.

Lol!
It is not so bad after all, more time game-protect spend typing user names, less time to scam he has.

@gp report us to administration, make everyone aware of your behaviour 

[LoyceV]

Around 2 days ago, h4ns (the creator of the Flag) withdrew it:

2019-11-12 Tue 03.18h
source: loyce.club

741 Active. (Withdrawn!) h4ns flagged game-protect (type 3, see why). Supported by Foxpup, alexrossi, suchmoon, babo, yahoo62278, LFC_Bitcoin, RHavar, mocacinno, SyGambler, DaveF, bones261, The Pharmacist, yogg, examplens, mindrust, Avirunes, nutildah, actmyname, Lutpin, Slow death, marlboroza, bL4nkcode, TMAN, Pamoldar, subSTRATA, stompix, LeGaulois, TheUltraElite, Kalemder, AdolfinWolf, Hhampuz, squatz1, HCP, crwth, DiamondCardz, bob123, asu, TwitchySeal, xtraelv, Royse777, o_e_l_e_o, iasenko, mosprognoz, witcher_sense, pandukelana2712, mu_enrico, ChiBitCTy, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DireWolfM14, morvillz7z, TECSHARE, BayAreaCoins, hopenotlate, NeuroticFish, iluvbitcoins, eckmar, robelneo, BigBoy89, passwordnow, Astargath, 1982dre, Initscri, Rodeo02, sheenshane, Alveus, cabalism13, blurryeyed, CASlO, yazher, Captain Corporate, JSRAW, lighpulsar07, rhomelmabini, Harkorede, PassThePopcorn, Mirae, Zwei, efialtis, kruglikov, DreamerBT, WinRateCasino, ScamViruS, Kevinn22, jimmyhate, addarmstrong, LeonGhibli, asphyxiate, Game-Protects. Opposed by nobody.

The Flag system requires Flag-creators to withdraw their support once they've been made whole. Did that happen?

[game-protect]

The Flag system requires Flag-creators to withdraw their support once they've been made whole. Did that happen?

Game Protect never scammed h4ns and the scam accusation is false and misleading!

theymos announced to remove DT members who knowingly support a flag containing incorrect fact-statements. Did that happen?

Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed.

Game Protect does not make any contracts and never made any written contract with h4ns!

The supporters know that a written contract does not exist, because I asked them multiple times to show the alleged written contract, but they are not able to show it!

h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Support: 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, Alveus, asphyxiate, asu, Astargath, Avirunes, babo, BayAreaCoins, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, blurryeyed, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Game-Protects, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death,  squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei

[mocacinno]

I have mixed feelings about this post... But here I go:

I will drop my support for h4ns's flag and exchange my negative tag on GP's trust page by a different negative tag because h4ns withdrew his claim. I feel that when a flag has been dropped by the flag creator, i no longer have the right to keep supporting the flag or tag, since withdrawing a flag more or less means that h4ns was reimbursed or forgave GP (unless he tells us otherwise).

However, i still believe my initial support for this flag was correct. I read h4ns's topic and to the best of my knowledge, i tought it was valid.
I am not a lawyer, and i'm not interested in discussing wether or not an e-mail is to be considered to be a written contract (or not), or that mixing the word "donation" into the conversation results in making every payment a donation (or not).
As I said: i'm not a lawyer,  it's perfectly possible that in a court of law GP's statement would hold, however, my gut feeling tells me these are all semantics, and i believed there was some kind of agreement between GP and h4ns, and GP did not honour said agreement thus deserved a flag and a tag, no matter how hard he tried to focus on the semantics to find a loophole that would prove his "innocence".

But, like i said, the withdrawal of h4ns more or less forces me to withdraw my support... I still wouldn't trust GP with a single penny, the way he handles all criticism tells me i never want to be a client of his company, and leads me to believe he'll be able to weasel his way out of any commitment he makes.

[AB de Royse777]

~snip~

~snip~

What about blackmailing.
GP could be blackmailing h4ns and as a result possibly h4ns is going silent? Don't forget that GP has h4ns's identifications.

And if this is true then how we as a community response here against GP?

PS: I am sure yogg, actmyname, marlboroza are aware of what I am trying to point out.

[mocacinno]

--snip--
What about blackmailing.
GP could be blackmailing h4ns and as a result possibly h4ns is going silent? Don't forget that GP has h4ns's identifications.

And if this is true then how we as a community response here against GP?

This would change everything offcourse, but it would be really hard to proof blackmailing unless h4ns could confirm this.
If h4ns is being blackmailed, i'd encourage him to go to his local law enforcement agency and open a case against GP, then come to the forum with this case. Theymos has ip logs, there are payment traces, GP has an active website and claims to have defended cases. I'm pretty sure a serious law enforcement agence would be able to trace him in case somebody opened a police report against him.

I will continue to support all flags i'm confronted with that are based on valid claims, this includes any future flags on GP (for example, a flag for blackmailing, eventough i don't know which type of flag you'd have to create if you were being blackmailed). At this moment, I'm just confronted with the fact that the flag creator withdrew his flag, and i'm not presented with evidence that he was being forced to do so... So i feel i have no other choice but to drop my support for this particular flag.

[AB de Royse777]

This would change everything offcourse, but it would be really hard to proof blackmailing unless h4ns could confirm this.

There are some other users I have mentioned in my last post can confirm such thing. May be a fear from h4ns has forced him (h4ns) to drop the claim.

If h4ns is being blackmailed, i'd encourage him to go to his local law enforcement agency and open a case against GP, then come to the forum with this case. Theymos has ip logs, there are payment traces, GP has an active website and claims to have defended cases. I'm pretty sure a serious law enforcement agence would be able to trace him in case somebody opened a police report against him.

The idea is good and off course theymos has the IP logs but question is if he will share it or not. If he does not then things will go worse for h4ns. And from practical experience I never seen theymos to step in to this sorts of case.

[mocacinno]

--snip--
And from practical experience I never seen theymos to step in to this sorts of case.

I have, my memory fails me so i cannot find the topic in question.

--snip--
I am willing to cooperate with police on real scams. Whenever someone asks me to release a scammer's IP, I tell them to have police email me from an official police address. I have received police requests a handful of times. Mostly the cases were real scams and I gave the police the requested info. In some cases I've rejected their requests. For example, I refused to give information to some foreign version of the SEC because securities laws are unjust. Of course, you should not trust that I will act in your best interest. If you want to be anonymous, then you must use Tor (or whatever).