tabnk
|
|
March 23, 2014, 02:59:35 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
badman74
|
|
March 23, 2014, 03:19:39 AM |
|
Hi, I'm trying to build the AMD sgminer for Windows to share with the community, and am following the instructions to the letter, but come up with the errors below that I don't know how to get past. Does anybody with more experience than I have any tips of how to get it to compile? Here is my output:
$ autoreconf -fvi autoreconf: Entering directory `.' autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Gettext autoreconf: running: aclocal --force -I m4 autoreconf: configure.ac: tracing autoreconf: configure.ac: adding subdirectory compat/jansson-2.5 to autoreconf autoreconf: Entering directory `compat/jansson-2.5' autoreconf: running: libtoolize --copy --force libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in `.'. libtoolize: copying file `./ltmain.sh' libtoolize: putting macros in AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR, `m4'. libtoolize: copying file `m4/libtool.m4' libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltoptions.m4' libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltsugar.m4' libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltversion.m4' libtoolize: copying file `m4/lt~obsolete.m4' autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf-2.68 --force autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoheader-2.68 --force autoreconf: running: automake --add-missing --copy --force-missing autoreconf: Leaving directory `compat/jansson-2.5' libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in `.'. libtoolize: copying file `./ltmain.sh' libtoolize: putting macros in AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR, `m4'. libtoolize: copying file `m4/libtool.m4' libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltoptions.m4' libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltsugar.m4' libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltversion.m4' libtoolize: copying file `m4/lt~obsolete.m4' configure.ac:95: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_DEFINE If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. configure.ac:171: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_ERROR autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf-2.68 failed with exit status: 1
Michael@DrMavis ~/sph-sgminer-master
you can get the windows binaries from https://github.com/badman74/Binaries/tree/master/sgminer
|
|
|
|
B2BigAl
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
March 23, 2014, 03:23:23 AM |
|
-I 25 -g 4 -w 64 -k fuguecoin --no-submit-stale
I have the same for my Sapphire 280x. Still 55Mhs. No idea why. Anyway thanks. Try -I 25 -g1 thread-concurrency 45000. I get 115-120 mh with my 280x's.
|
|
|
|
hashnine
|
|
March 23, 2014, 03:28:34 AM |
|
Thank you!!
|
Careful XC anonymous coin is a scam
|
|
|
smart15
|
|
March 23, 2014, 03:29:45 AM |
|
so is there a AMD miner yet to work on dwarf?
|
|
|
|
badman74
|
|
March 23, 2014, 03:39:49 AM |
|
so is there a AMD miner yet to work on dwarf?
yes my build works (see above)
|
|
|
|
smart15
|
|
March 23, 2014, 03:43:49 AM |
|
so is there a AMD miner yet to work on dwarf?
yes my build works (see above) yes it does, thanks
|
|
|
|
uswapme
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
March 23, 2014, 04:17:00 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
uswapme
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
March 23, 2014, 06:20:35 AM |
|
lol. this dev's plan
|
|
|
|
kostepanych
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
March 23, 2014, 08:02:31 AM |
|
Please suggest settings for 7950.
|
|
|
|
samanuel2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
March 23, 2014, 09:01:48 AM |
|
This is first coin for nvidia gpu gtx 750ti -90 mh/s gtx 480 100mh/s Amd 7870-82 mh/s Amd r9-280x 121 mh/s
|
|
|
|
SGwar
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:29:35 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
hashnine
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:38:13 PM |
|
This is first coin for nvidia gpu gtx 750ti -90 mh/s gtx 480 100mh/s Amd 7870-82 mh/s Amd r9-280x 121 mh/s GTX690 - 222 MH/s HD6970 - 18 MH/s HD6950 - 14 MH/s
|
Careful XC anonymous coin is a scam
|
|
|
BTCspoon
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:39:30 PM Last edit: March 23, 2014, 12:54:41 PM by BTCspoon |
|
For the technical aspect, the "Plan" is really interesting. I like the idea, very elegant, but i like it only as an idea.
The wallet/p2p aspect used for something else than the coin network itself, i'm not sure i will accept that, i probably will not, too much ethical issues unfortunately. Maybe do it as a side/separate project? or 2 different wallet? not enforcing the use of it?.
|
|
|
|
hashnine
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:45:30 PM |
|
For the technical aspect, the "Plan" is really interesting. I like the idea, very elegant, but i like it only as an idea.
The wallet/p2p aspect used for something else than the coin network itself, i'm not sure i will accept that, i probably will not, too much ethical issues unfortunately.
What ethical issues? Personally i will accept.
|
Careful XC anonymous coin is a scam
|
|
|
filipe3x
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:52:32 PM |
|
Could someone make python hash module, for fugue algo so we can get more pools?
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
March 23, 2014, 01:02:58 PM |
|
For the technical aspect, the "Plan" is really interesting. I like the idea, very elegant, but i like it only as an idea.
The wallet/p2p aspect used for something else than the coin network itself, i'm not sure i will accept that, i probably will not, too much ethical issues unfortunately. Maybe do it as a side/separate project? or 2 different wallet? not enforcing the use of it?.
Assuming this could be done, some PoS feature should be added to the coin otherwise there is no incentive to keep the wallet open... (as well as something to limit the bandwidth used by the wallet)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
atc1
|
|
March 23, 2014, 01:32:10 PM |
|
Any idea why the price is tanking?
|
|
|
|
uswapme
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
March 23, 2014, 01:38:55 PM |
|
HD6970 - 18 MH/s HD6950 - 14 MH/s
bullshit. my 7850 does 55 mh/s. means that my card has more perfomance than 6970?
|
|
|
|
fugue (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
March 23, 2014, 01:49:49 PM |
|
plz donation FC: FLGK6iYciZVG9eKD3GiSNtGSPRYPBUsLjC Because I did not mining, please support me! Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|