List of useful Bitcoin block explorers

[SFR10]

...
I am extremely sowwy for the late reply, but I was very sick recently. I mean I was that sick that in weekend I had an interval of 26h in which I slept almost nonstop, without eating, without doing anything else... I crashed in bed Saturday at 11pm and when I woke up it was Monday 12pm Oo Anyway... I felt sick before this as well, but in the weekend I crashed, lol...
...

Don't be sorry, your health should always be the #1 priority <sup>[I hope you've recovered well]
- Thank you also for your efforts and the merits too</sup>

[DYING_S0UL]

Drafts for translators

.......

Later edit: OP is updated. Also is the Romanian version. At same time, I propose to keep the old table only for reference, without applying other updates... it's too much work (and useless)...
Second edit: all translators have been PMed

Bangla translation has also been updated!

Btw, I am having some problems here! For some reasons, I am not able to see the AOBT logo at the bottom of my translated post! I'm not sure whether it's a forum sided problem, or mine. Will you please take a look, whether it's displaying properly? For me, I saw a buffering logo for a couple of seconds and then there was noting. The Alliance of Bitcointalk Translators doesn't show up..

Topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631891.msg64435655#msg64435655

[GazetaBitcoin]

Don't be sorry, your health should always be the #1 priority ^{[I hope you've recovered well]}

I did, thank you so much, SFR10!

^{- Thank you also for your efforts and the merits too}

You fully deserved them for such herculean work you did!

Bangla translation has also been updated!

Thank you for this, DS!

Btw, I am having some problems here! For some reasons, I am not able to see the AOBT logo at the bottom of my translated post! I'm not sure whether it's a forum sided problem, or mine. Will you please take a look, whether it's displaying properly?

On my side the logo is displayed fine, so don't worry!

[bitcointry]

Hello everyone,

We’d like to briefly introduce a new explorer project we’ve been working on and share it here for feedback.

Gliese is a UTXO-focused explorer and on-chain analysis platform for Bitcoin and Litecoin.
Instead of showing balances only, Gliese aims to provide deeper insight into UTXO structure, fragmentation, and real spendability.

Current features include:

• Address, transaction, and block explorer
• UTXO-level analysis
• Transaction simulation before broadcast
• Full-node based data (no third-party APIs)

The project is actively developed, and feedback from users in this thread would be very valuable for us.

Website: https://gliese.io 
Documentation: https://gliese.io/docs 

Our main ANN thread (development updates & discussion): 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5573042.msg66354311

Thanks for taking the time to check it out.

[GazetaBitcoin]

We’d like to briefly introduce a new explorer project we’ve been working on and share it here for feedback.

Hello and thank you for this. I hope you will receive the feedback needed
In any case, if you want your website being listed to OP, please use the submission form specified in OP.

Cheers!

[bitcointry]

Thanks for the info, much appreciated.

We’d be happy to submit Gliese for listing in the OP.
Could you please point us to the submission form mentioned in the OP, or let us know where exactly we can find it?

Thanks again.

We’d like to briefly introduce a new explorer project we’ve been working on and share it here for feedback.

Hello and thank you for this. I hope you will receive the feedback needed
In any case, if you want your website being listed to OP, please use the submission form specified in OP.

Cheers!

[LoyceV]

Could you please point us to the submission form mentioned in the OP, or let us know where exactly we can find it?

It's literally in the OP:

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?**	Works without JS?	Rated by
________________________	________________________________	_________________________	____________________	________________
xxx	Yes / No (xx/20xx) / Yes / No (xx/20xx)	Yes / No (xx/20xx)	Yes / No	Your name

[bitcointry]

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?**	Works without JS?	Rated by
________________________	________________________________	_________________________	____________________	________________
Gliese.io	Yes (2025) / Yes (2025)	Yes (2025)	No	bitcointry

We’d like to briefly introduce a new explorer project we’ve been working on and share it here for feedback.

Hello and thank you for this. I hope you will receive the feedback needed
In any case, if you want your website being listed to OP, please use the submission form specified in OP.

Cheers!

[GazetaBitcoin]

Thank you for your proposal, bitcointry!

Let's wait a while, for people to check your website and, if there are no objections for a while, we will add the block explorer to OP.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

I don't know how long it has been, but it appears bitcoinexplorer.org is now offline. Cloudflare returns the "Connection timed out" error every time you try to visit the website.

The last snapshot from Wayback Machine, which was on 3 November 2025, shows a similar error code, 522. https://web.archive.org/web/20251103084925/https://bitcoinexplorer.org/

[bitcointry]

Thank you, that sounds good.

We’ll wait and are happy to address any questions or concerns if they come up.
Appreciate you giving the community time to review it.

Thank you for your proposal, bitcointry!

Let's wait a while, for people to check your website and, if there are no objections for a while, we will add the block explorer to OP.

[SFR10]

I don't know how long it has been, but it appears bitcoinexplorer.org is now offline. Cloudflare returns the "Connection timed out" error every time you try to visit the website.

The last snapshot from Wayback Machine, which was on 3 November 2025, shows a similar error code, 522. https://web.archive.org/web/20251103084925/https://bitcoinexplorer.org/

Based on one of my "previous posts", it was also down in mid-September of last year and considering that "IsItDownRightNow" is still showing the more than a week tag that was present back then, it's safe to say it has been down for roughly half a year.

@GazetaBitcoin
I think it'd be better if we renamed the Rated by column into Submitted by instead ^{[not sure how I missed it in the past (my bad )]}.

[GazetaBitcoin]

it's safe to say it has been down for roughly half a year.

So should we remove it?

I think it'd be better if we renamed the Rated by column into Submitted by instead ^{[not sure how I missed it in the past (my bad )]}.

I am afraid of making more changes, as the translators do the updates so slowly... Not even now (2 months later since the previous update) all updates on translations are done... 2 are still pending... sighs... And in all this time I keep PMing after some weeks, for kind reminders...

If not all updates are done and we make new changes, this will make confusion for the ones which did not do previous updates and so on and so forth... It is not easy to coordinate with 15 other people...

[joker_josue]

I am afraid of making more changes, as the translators do the updates so slowly... Not even now (2 months later since the previous update) all updates on translations are done... 2 are still pending... sighs... And in all this time I keep PMing after some weeks, for kind reminders...

If not all updates are done and we make new changes, this will make confusion for the ones which did not do previous updates and so on and so forth... It is not easy to coordinate with 15 other people...

I don't think you have to update based on what the translated threads.

If this is the main topic, you should keep the information as up-to-date as possible. If a translation is only updated several months later, it will be updated based on the latest version of this translation.

It will be indeferent for those who do not follow the topic, to know in detail what happened between one version and the other.
Also, at the end, you will always have this main topic with the history of what has been going on.

[GazetaBitcoin]

If this is the main topic, you should keep the information as up-to-date as possible. If a translation is only updated several months later, it will be updated based on the latest version of this translation.

True, but, at least, let's do all these changes at once. Meaning after we decide if we will add bitcointry's website to change the title of "Rated" column to "Submitted" and also to remove bitcoinexplorer.org.

It will be indeferent for those who do not follow the topic, to know in detail what happened between one version and the other.

Well, I would like to know all translations are up to date as well and the users from the respective local boards also see accurate information...

[joker_josue]

Well, I would like to know all translations are up to date as well and the users from the respective local boards also see accurate information...

I understand. But don't let this interfere with your work.

If you happen to notice that a translation is taking longer than expected, you can go to the topic and say that there is information in the official/main topic. I don't think anyone will be offended by that.

[bitcointry]

Hello,

Just wanted to kindly follow up regarding our previous proposal about adding the Gliese block explorer.

We also wanted to share a small update: we recently made our Basic plan completely free for registered users, so the community can access more on-chain analysis tools without any subscription.

Basic plan now includes:

• UTXO details & history 
• Address scanning 
• On-chain insights 
• Explorer tools 
• Unlimited scans 
• Full spendability analysis 
• API access (10K/mo) 
• TX simulation

You can check the explorer here:
https://gliese.io

Please let us know if you need anything from our side to proceed with adding the explorer to the OP.

Thank you!

Thank you for your proposal, bitcointry!

Let's wait a while, for people to check your website and, if there are no objections for a while, we will add the block explorer to OP.

[GazetaBitcoin]

Just wanted to kindly follow up regarding our previous proposal about adding the Gliese block explorer.

Thank you for the reminder. The website will be added, since nobody objected.

Meanwhile, let me double-check with SFR10 that I am not forgetting any update which should be done, so I will add all at once:

- adding bitcointry's proposal
- rename "Rated" to "Submitted"
- eliminate https://bitcoinexplorer.org

SFR10, can you confirm these are all changes needed, please?

[Ving8]

I've collected some of the most famous Bitcoin block explorers including a column for supported features like displaying native SegWit bech32-addresses.

This is an incredible resource, thanks for keeping it updated after all these years. It is rare to see such a detailed comparison, especially regarding JS-free support and SegWit identification.

Personally, I've been using mempool.space for daily tracking because of its visualization, but for privacy and deeper analysis, Blockstream or Blockchair are still the gold standard. The addition of Bech32m (Taproot) support column is also very helpful now that adoption is growing. Bookmarking this for sure.