⚖️ Crypto Gambling Foundation ⚖️ - Fair Gambling For All

[TwitchySeal]

5 months after the 8048/JAZ license holder Antillephone N.V. forwarded my compensation demand to the Stake alleged "Legal Department" and the Stake managing director Xecutive Corporate Management B.V., they still have not answered!

How on earth can you run a provably rigged in-house Black Jack system and ignore the request by your license issuer?

Is it because Stake is managed by two RuneScape players and a chat moderator?  

Well your claim is complete nonsense, so if they ever do respond you won't like what they say.

[BlackyJacky]

Since 18 months!!! I demand compensation for the unjustifiably lost 30,000 USD at Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system and all responsible parties like the alleged Stake "Legal Department", managing director Xecutive Corporate Management B.V., the 8048/JAZ license holder Antillephone N.V. and the Curacao Gaming Control Board ignore me!

Below is proof that the Stake in-house Black Jack system is rigged!

Info 1)

If you take a look at my statistics here https://ibb.co/Hxf8NpR you can see the following total numbers:

Bets: 180,904

Wins: 78,285

Losses: 86,612

If we reduce the number of wins from the number of losses, we can see that I lost 8,327 bets (86,612 minus 78,285 = 8,327)

Losing 8,327 bets out of 180,904 bets placed = 4,6% of the bets lost.


Info 2)

The advertised house edge for the Stake in-house Black Jack is 0,5%, which means longterm I will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.

Losing 0,5% out of 180,900 bets placed = 900 bets lost.

If you compare Info 1) with Info 2), you can see that I lost 8,327 bets instead of the 900 bets I should lose = 9 times more!

While there is a deviation from the expected outcome, it can not be 9 times more after 180,900 bets!


Info 3)

When the house edge is 0,5% and you placed 180,900 bets, you will lose 900 bets and the remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips.

The remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips, because they are neutral and you will win 50% = 90,000 bets and lose 50% = 90,000 bets.

4,6% of the bets lost while I should lose only 0,5% means my experienced deviation of the 180,000 coin flips is 4,1%!


Now let's take a look at the standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips:

A) Standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 212 coin flips = 0,12% (In 68% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0,12%)
 
My experienced deviation of 4,1% is 34 times higher than the standard deviation (4,1% : 0,12% = 34)

B) 3 times standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 0,36% (In 99,7% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0.36%)
 
My experienced deviation of 4,1% is 11 times higher than the 3 times standard deviation (4,1% : 0,36% = 11)

 
Info 4)

The Stake bet transaction history only states 180,900 single bet events and no overview of my experienced house edge.

To get my experienced house edge from the bet transaction history, I would need to take a look at all 180,900 bets and calculate it manually!

If the cards were dealt fair and I lost only 0,5% of all bets placed while the statistics states that I lost 4,6%, then the Stake statistics is rigged!

In either case, the Stake in-house Black Jack system is provably rigged and Stake has to compensate at least the 30,000 USD I lost from my pocket.

[Onyeeze]

Since 18 months!!! I demand compensation for the unjustifiably lost 30,000 USD at Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system and all responsible parties like the alleged Stake "Legal Department", managing director Xecutive Corporate Management B.V., the 8048/JAZ license holder Antillephone N.V. and the Curacao Gaming Control Board ignore me!

I think that if you have anything in any platform as you said a stake, that you need a compensation and you have been telling stake to compensate you, I think that the best thing to do is to make sure that you have contact the live support and tell them your challenges and if your case is a genuine one I think support will help you to iron it out amicable, and if they continue to ignore you or block you, you can as well file them in scam accusations, or you take them to twitter or Instagram, so if they see your curiosity I think that the management will make sure they have sort out your issues with them.

[TwitchySeal]

Wrong.  
A hand of black jack and a coinflip are not the same.

In blackjack, the dealer wins more hands than the player - but the player is able to win more than even money as well as increase their wager after knowing what their hand and the dealers up card is.  It's not possible to calculate the rtp in blackjack knowing only how many hands a player won and lost.  

You can't just pretend like blackjacks don't payout 2-1, and doubles and splits don't exist and expect anyone to take you're "proof" seriously.  

Since 18 months!!!

As soon as you provide actual proof that you were cheated you will be taken seriously.  Or you can keep posting nonsense.

[oraclecrea]

Discussion in this thread got derailed...  Going back to the topic - is this 'Foundation' still operational?

[BlackyJacky]

No

[TwitchySeal]

The advertised house edge for the Stake in-house Black Jack is 0,5%, which means longterm I will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.

Losing 0,5% out of 180,900 bets placed = 900 bets lost.

This would be true if instead of playing blackjack you were playing a game that paid double your bet 49.5% of the time.

But you were playing black jack, where sometimes the payout is more than double your bet, sometimes less, and sometimes you have the option to increase your bet after the initial deal, so...

no.

With perfect strategy playing blackjack, something I think it's highly unlikely you're capable of since basic math fundamentals are required, you have a ~42% chance of winning each deal and a ~49% chance of losing and pushing the rest. (give or take a bit depending on the rules). 

[BlackyJacky]

Stake celebrates the 7th anniversary of its provably rigged in-house Black Jack system and 19 months!!! after discovery and compensation demand I am still not compensated!

Is it because Stake is managed by two RuneScape players and a chat moderator?  

[TwitchySeal]

after discovery and compensation demand I am still not compensated!

That's because you weren't cheated.  You lost and then made up a bunch of nonsense to try and get your money back.

[AmoreJaz]

after discovery and compensation demand I am still not compensated!

That's because you weren't cheated.  You lost and then made up a bunch of nonsense to try and get your money back.

I don't think they will not compensate the players who really deserve it. Also, if the accusations are true, a lot of players will not play anymore on this site. However, it is still one of the top casinos that you can rely on when it comes to crypto gaming. So he should re-visit his demand and see where it went wrong why he was not compensated.

[BlackyJacky]

Since 21 months!!! I demand compensation for the unjustifiably lost 30,000 USD at Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system and all responsible parties like the alleged Stake "Legal Department", managing director Xecutive Corporate Management B.V., the 8048/JAZ license holder Antillephone N.V. and the Curacao Gaming Control Board ignore me!

Below is proof that the Stake in-house Black Jack system is rigged!

Info 1)

If you take a look at my statistics here https://ibb.co/Hxf8NpR you can see the following total numbers:

Bets: 180,904

Wins: 78,285

Losses: 86,612

If we reduce the number of wins from the number of losses, we can see that I lost 8,327 bets (86,612 minus 78,285 = 8,327)

Losing 8,327 bets out of 180,904 bets placed = 4,6% of the bets lost.


Info 2)

The advertised house edge for the Stake in-house Black Jack is 0,5%, which means longterm I will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.

Losing 0,5% out of 180,900 bets placed = 900 bets lost.

If you compare Info 1) with Info 2), you can see that I lost 8,327 bets instead of the 900 bets I should lose = 9 times more!

While there is a deviation from the expected outcome, it can not be 9 times more after 180,900 bets!


Info 3)

When the house edge is 0,5% and you placed 180,900 bets, you will lose 900 bets and the remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips.

The remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips, because they are neutral and you will win 50% = 90,000 bets and lose 50% = 90,000 bets.

4,6% of the bets lost while I should lose only 0,5% means my experienced deviation of the 180,000 coin flips is 4,1%!


Now let's take a look at the standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips:

A) Standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 212 coin flips = 0,12% (In 68% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0,12%)
 
My experienced deviation of 4,1% is 34 times higher than the standard deviation (4,1% : 0,12% = 34)

B) 3 times standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 0,36% (In 99,7% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0.36%)
 
My experienced deviation of 4,1% is 11 times higher than the 3 times standard deviation (4,1% : 0,36% = 11)

 
Info 4)

The Stake bet transaction history only states 180,900 single bet events and no overview of my experienced house edge.

To get my experienced house edge from the bet transaction history, I would need to take a look at all 180,900 bets and calculate it manually!

If the cards were dealt fair and I lost only 0,5% of all bets placed while the statistics states that I lost 4,6%, then the Stake statistics is rigged!

In either case, the Stake in-house Black Jack system is provably rigged and Stake or the 8048/JAZ license holder Antillephone N.V. has to compensate at least the 30,000 USD I lost from my pocket.

[TwitchySeal]

Since 21 months!!! I demand compensation for the unjustifiably lost 30,000 USD at Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system and all responsible parties like the alleged Stake "Legal Department", managing director Xecutive Corporate Management B.V., the 8048/JAZ license holder Antillephone N.V. and the Curacao Gaming Control Board ignore me!

Below is proof that the Stake in-house Black Jack system is rigged!

Info 1)

If you take a look at my statistics here https://ibb.co/Hxf8NpR you can see the following total numbers:

Bets: 180,904

Wins: 78,285

Losses: 86,612

If we reduce the number of wins from the number of losses, we can see that I lost 8,327 bets (86,612 minus 78,285 = 8,327)

Losing 8,327 bets out of 180,904 bets placed = 4,6% of the bets lost.


Info 2)

The advertised house edge for the Stake in-house Black Jack is 0,5%, which means longterm I will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.

Losing 0,5% out of 180,900 bets placed = 900 bets lost.

If you compare Info 1) with Info 2), you can see that I lost 8,327 bets instead of the 900 bets I should lose = 9 times more!

While there is a deviation from the expected outcome, it can not be 9 times more after 180,900 bets!


Info 3)

When the house edge is 0,5% and you placed 180,900 bets, you will lose 900 bets and the remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips.

The remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips, because they are neutral and you will win 50% = 90,000 bets and lose 50% = 90,000 bets.

4,6% of the bets lost while I should lose only 0,5% means my experienced deviation of the 180,000 coin flips is 4,1%!


Now let's take a look at the standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips:

A) Standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 212 coin flips = 0,12% (In 68% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0,12%)
 
My experienced deviation of 4,1% is 34 times higher than the standard deviation (4,1% : 0,12% = 34)

B) 3 times standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 0,36% (In 99,7% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0.36%)
 
My experienced deviation of 4,1% is 11 times higher than the 3 times standard deviation (4,1% : 0,36% = 11)

 
Info 4)

The Stake bet transaction history only states 180,900 single bet events and no overview of my experienced house edge.

To get my experienced house edge from the bet transaction history, I would need to take a look at all 180,900 bets and calculate it manually!

If the cards were dealt fair and I lost only 0,5% of all bets placed while the statistics states that I lost 4,6%, then the Stake statistics is rigged!

In either case, the Stake in-house Black Jack system is provably rigged and Stake or the 8048/JAZ license holder Antillephone N.V. has to compensate at least the 30,000 USD I lost from my pocket.

Your calculations are worthless if you aren't going to consider the different possible payouts in blackjack and their frequency.   Blackjack pays out 2-1, player having the option to double and split, both raising the average amount of a player win.  You acting like every hsingle hand the player either wins 1 unit, loses one unit or pushes.  That's nonsense.

[OwnerSeller]

contact mail is not working i got scammed on Stake by Evolution.I need to contact with you.

[BCH.games]

I noticed that some sites featured on the Crypto Gambling Foundation homepage are no longer active:

• onehash.com
• luckydice.com
• bitkong.com
• simpledice.com
• cyberdice.net

In some cases, they went offline after debatable changes related to their token (KONG), officially due to "ownership transitions".

It might be a good time to update the homepage, and perhaps consider adding BCH.games.
We've maintained a perfect track record over the past four years (though I may be a bit biased!).

[FortuneFollower]

I noticed that some sites featured on the Crypto Gambling Foundation homepage are no longer active:

• onehash.com
• luckydice.com
• bitkong.com
• simpledice.com
• cyberdice.net

In some cases, they went offline after debatable changes related to their token (KONG), officially due to "ownership transitions".

It might be a good time to update the homepage, and perhaps consider adding BCH.games.
We've maintained a perfect track record over the past four years (though I may be a bit biased!).

I don't think it's good to shill your own platform on another project thread regarding its problems, don't you think? 
As I've seen, you've got your own thread, so why you won't do it from the perspective of the user at least?
Not that I am complaining, but it just seems non-organic a bit.

[BCH.games]

I noticed that some sites featured on the Crypto Gambling Foundation homepage are no longer active:

• onehash.com
• luckydice.com
• bitkong.com
• simpledice.com
• cyberdice.net

In some cases, they went offline after debatable changes related to their token (KONG), officially due to "ownership transitions".

It might be a good time to update the homepage, and perhaps consider adding BCH.games.
We've maintained a perfect track record over the past four years (though I may be a bit biased!).

I don't think it's good to shill your own platform on another project thread regarding its problems, don't you think? 
As I've seen, you've got your own thread, so why you won't do it from the perspective of the user at least?
Not that I am complaining, but it just seems non-organic a bit.

You are right.

[BlackyJacky]

I noticed that some sites featured on the Crypto Gambling Foundation homepage are no longer active:

• onehash.com
• luckydice.com
• bitkong.com
• simpledice.com
• cyberdice.net

In some cases, they went offline after debatable changes related to their token (KONG), officially due to "ownership transitions".

It might be a good time to update the homepage, and perhaps consider adding BCH.games.
We've maintained a perfect track record over the past four years (though I may be a bit biased!).

You are really asking that Stake who runs a provably rigged in-house Black Jack system adds you to their fake "fair gambling" for all website?

The meanwhile defunct casinos are not removed, because the fake "fair gambling" website is not monitored since years!!!