More trust system abuse by Lauda

[nutildah]

I was honestly just trying to help, but you obviously don't want it, so I'll butt out.

Have a terrific day!

[1714740616]

1714740616

[1714740616]

1714740616

[TECSHARE]

I was honestly just trying to help, but you obviously don't want it, so I'll butt out.

Have a terrific day!

Sure you were cupcake, sure you were.

[Vod]

You are free to your opinion, but my "opinion" is invalid and is deserving of a negative trust rating is it?

If that was the case, why do you hand out negative feedback for your opinions?   Are you a doctor?

(oops, I did an OG cherry pick quote)

[marlboroza]

You are free to your opinion, but my "opinion" is invalid and is deserving of a negative trust rating is it? Sounds rational to me.

Opinion is:

"Yes, I have read everything important from transcript and I am not sure that pirate is telling the true, I mean, there is no evidence to back up his words"

Or

"Yes, I have read everything important from transcript and I think pirate is telling the true, OG what happened to funds?"


Not opinion:

"Nutildah you are idiot and moron and part of circle or the same gang who has been attacking me therefore you are just attacking others"

Or:

"I didn't read transcript, I don't have to read it to see that the same people are doing this over and over again"

Or:

"yeah, look how he abused me for a years, now he is doing this again"



You are pretty much doing latter.

[TECSHARE]

I fuck goats.

Man, debate is easy when you just make up quotes!

[Vod]

I fuck goats.

Man, debate is easy when you just make up quotes!

It sure is Techy.  Maybe there should be a forum badge for you and Nasty?

[TECSHARE]

I fuck goats.

Man, debate is easy when you just make up quotes!

It sure is Techy.  Maybe there should be a forum badge for you and Nasty?

Cool off topic post bro. What quote did I make up? Oh right none of your accusations have any substantiation, you just make as many accusations as possible and hope people just blindly believe them.

[Vod]

Cool off topic post bro. What quote did I make up? Oh right none of your accusations have any substantiation, you just make as many accusations as possible and hope people just blindly believe them.

What accusation did I make up, pervert?   

Stop with the obvious deflections and stick to the topic.

I suggested a forum badge for you - wouldn't that make you feel more special?

[TECSHARE]

Cool off topic post bro. What quote did I make up? Oh right none of your accusations have any substantiation, you just make as many accusations as possible and hope people just blindly believe them.

What accusation did I make up, pervert?   

Stop with the obvious deflections and stick to the topic.

I suggested a forum badge for you - wouldn't that make you feel more special?

So your response to a question asking you to substantiate your claims against me, is to ask me the same question? Makes sense... if you are an unhinged lunatic desperately struggling to cling to reality. Speaking of the topic, maybe to you can explain the part where any of your batshit jibbering has anything to do with the topic.

[Vod]

Cool off topic post bro. What quote did I make up? Oh right none of your accusations have any substantiation, you just make as many accusations as possible and hope people just blindly believe them.

What accusation did I make up, pervert?   

Stop with the obvious deflections and stick to the topic.

I suggested a forum badge for you - wouldn't that make you feel more special?

So your response to a question asking you to substantiate your claims against me, is to ask me the same question? Makes sense... if you are an unhinged lunatic desperately struggling to cling to reality. Speaking of the topic, maybe to you can explain the part where any of your batshit jibbering has anything to do with the topic.

If you are going to accuse me of something, why not tell me what it is when I ask? 

Now show us the trust abuse from Lauda, pervert.

[hacker1001101001]

Now show us the trust abuse from Lauda, pervert.

Your eyes could be converted to nuts after a long debate with TECSHARE here, but this is the abuse..

Lauda   2019-12-18   Reference   Dishonest. Wouldn't trust. See also: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182530.msg52385837#msg52385837

You are fighting for a purely wrong action, I think most of the people here opposing TECSHARE already know that.

[TECSHARE]

If you are going to accuse me of something, why not tell me what it is when I ask?  

Now show us the trust abuse from Lauda, pervert.

Your abilities to be delusional are boundless and you are never able to substantiate any of your accusations as demonstrated in excruciating detail here.

Now, Vod ask yourself the same question.

"If you are going to accuse me of something, why not tell me what it is when I ask?"

This inherently insane comment does a great job of demonstrating how you have given up on using any kind of logical basis long ago. If I am accusing you of something, isn't that by the nature of an accusation, me telling you what I am accusing you of? It literally hurts to try to break my brain enough to try to analyze this level of retardation.

By the way Vod, your posts here are doing a wonderful job demonstrating that I am in fact being attacked for exposing the fact there is no actual evidence against OGNasty, so I guess I should at least thank you for that much.

[marlboroza]

I fuck goats.

It is ok, I fuck hares. They have small tiny holes and my tiny little penis easily penetrates them.

Scare quotes [...] are quotation marks that a writer places around a word or phrase to signal that they are using it in a non-standard, ironic, or otherwise special sense[...]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scare_quotes

Your reply didn't address anything from my post but replying to it in such way you addressed everything relevant for it and, you proved my point.

[TECSHARE]

I fuck goats.

It is ok, I fuck hares. They have small tiny holes and my tiny little penis easily penetrates them.

Scare quotes [...] are quotation marks that a writer places around a word or phrase to signal that they are using it in a non-standard, ironic, or otherwise special sense[...]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scare_quotes

Your reply didn't address anything from my post but replying to it in such way you addressed everything relevant for it and, you proved my point.

I don't feel the need to defend words you created then presented as my own. There is nothing to address in the figments of your own imagination. Even if they were real quotes, none of this is anywhere near being on topic. Your move goat fucker.

[marlboroza]

I don't feel the need to defend words you created then presented as my own. There is nothing to address in the figments of your own imagination. Even if they were real quotes, none of this is anywhere near being on topic.

Sure scare quotes are on topic, take a look at this post again:

I have no idea who is right or wrong here, neither do I care. Reading up made it evident that you are dishonest, a hypocrite and are intentionally trying to distract away from the users that are actually willing to objectively look into this (and apparently attack those as well)

I couldn't reference this thread as it might be misinterpreted as you being involved in the original ponzi-case, which you are not.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210651.msg53378525#msg53378525

Your move goat fucker.

There are no moves rabbit fucker, it is all in your head. I figured out that topic title is misleading, and you are presenting yourself as a "political victim", but it is your actions and delusions which are causing you trouble in the first place:

Subject: More trust system abuse by Lauda

The usual mob of perpetrators is at it again, this time taking retribution for daring to defend one of their targeted individuals. The referenced event happened some time ago, but the trust rating was only left now. I wonder why that is! Apparently putting people on my trust list Lauda doesn't approve of makes me dishonest.

This is a blatantly obvious pattern of abuse of anyone who dares to question this targeted abusive behavior. These people belong no where near having any kind of influence in a trust system, because to them it is simply a tool to use to punish people they don't agree with. They couldn't give a fuck less about the community, the community is just a tool they use to jerk off their egos.

Lauda   2019-12-18   Reference   "Dishonest. Wouldn't trust."

Your actions:

None of your conclusions are supported by the evidence and are 100% speculation.

And then you said this:

I haven't bothered to actually look in to any of this but I am willing to form an opinion and share it publicly anyway.

You are one delusional prick.

You know what, everyone can click on your trust page and follow links, read threads, your posts and make their own conclusion. For me, you are a troll Mr. Tec's hare, a big one. I said what I wanted to say here so I am out. Going to ignore you for few days, until my brain cells recover from your mental gymnastic.

[TECSHARE]

I don't feel the need to defend words you created then presented as my own. There is nothing to address in the figments of your own imagination. Even if they were real quotes, none of this is anywhere near being on topic.

Sure scare quotes are on topic, take a look at this post again:

I have no idea who is right or wrong here, neither do I care. Reading up made it evident that you are dishonest, a hypocrite and are intentionally trying to distract away from the users that are actually willing to objectively look into this (and apparently attack those as well)

I couldn't reference this thread as it might be misinterpreted as you being involved in the original ponzi-case, which you are not.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210651.msg53378525#msg53378525

Your move goat fucker.

There are no moves rabbit fucker, it is all in your head. I figured out that topic title is misleading, and you are presenting yourself as a "political victim", but it is your actions and delusions which are causing you trouble in the first place:

Subject: More trust system abuse by Lauda

The usual mob of perpetrators is at it again, this time taking retribution for daring to defend one of their targeted individuals. The referenced event happened some time ago, but the trust rating was only left now. I wonder why that is! Apparently putting people on my trust list Lauda doesn't approve of makes me dishonest.

This is a blatantly obvious pattern of abuse of anyone who dares to question this targeted abusive behavior. These people belong no where near having any kind of influence in a trust system, because to them it is simply a tool to use to punish people they don't agree with. They couldn't give a fuck less about the community, the community is just a tool they use to jerk off their egos.

Lauda   2019-12-18   Reference   "Dishonest. Wouldn't trust."

Your actions:

None of your conclusions are supported by the evidence and are 100% speculation.

And then you said this:

I haven't bothered to actually look in to any of this but I am willing to form an opinion and share it publicly anyway.

You are one delusional prick.

You know what, everyone can click on your trust page and follow links, read threads, your posts and make their own conclusion. For me, you are a troll Mr. Tec's hare, a big one. I said what I wanted to say here so I am out. Going to ignore you for few days, until my brain cells recover from your mental gymnastic.

This doesn't explain anything or relate to the topic, this is just a string of selectively edited quotes you threw together that you think looks persuasive. None of it explains why Lauda's rating is not abusive. Also I see you are taking a page out of Twitchy Seal's book and editing my quote to serve your narrative. Here is what I actually said:

~

TL;DR

[I haven't bothered to actually look in to any of this but I am willing to form an opinion and share it publicly anyway. Victims might not have known they were robbed. Who needs victims anyway? We can still use this as an opportunity to allow certain people here to pursue personal vendettas. After all what is important is that we pass judgement on people even if there is no harmed party seeking redress.]

As you can see I was creating a summary of another user's posts, but you presented the edited quote in such a way as to make it look as if it were a straight forward statement I made in my own voice. The fact that you need to edit my quotes to try to convince people says volumes.

[suchmoon]

As you can see I was creating a summary of another user's posts

Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image

tl;dr: your opinion about another user's post is not a "summary". To put it another way, it's about as much of a summary as Lauda's feedback (which BTW I think is inappropriate but don't let that stop you from attacking me) is a summary of your behavior here on the forum.

[Lauda]

which BTW I think is inappropriate

Care to elaborate? It has clean text, a proper reference and is based on actual events rather than opinions. Additionally, it seems to be even more in line of how the system should be used ever since the trust guidelines were lessened after the introduction of the flag-system.

but don't let that stop you from attacking me

Can always PM me if you want to elaborate to avoid OP's shenanigans, but I leave that up to you. 

[suchmoon]

which BTW I think is inappropriate

Care to elaborate? It has clean text, a proper reference and is based on actual events rather than opinions. Additionally, it seems to be even more in line of how the system should be used ever since the trust guidelines were lessened after the introduction of the flag-system.

I think it's red trust for opinion, however unpopular, distasteful, or malevolent it might me. I'd say the same about most trolls like TECSHARE, cryptohunter, etc, unless their trolling translates into actual scamming or some other tangible threat like doxing.

Quickseller is roughly where I'd draw the line of troll vs scammer. Quickseller is a scammer and a genuinely dangerous troll. TECSHARE is a pitiful egocentric troll.

That's just my opinion.

[TECSHARE]

As you can see I was creating a summary of another user's posts

tl;dr: your opinion about another user's post is not a "summary". To put it another way, it's about as much of a summary as Lauda's feedback (which BTW I think is inappropriate but don't let that stop you from attacking me) is a summary of your behavior here on the forum.

You call it whatever you like. Your completely semantic distinction doesn't change the fact my quote was edited to make it appear as if it was a straight forward statement in my own voice when it was nothing of the sort.

which BTW I think is inappropriate

Care to elaborate? It has clean text, a proper reference and is based on actual events rather than opinions. Additionally, it seems to be even more in line of how the system should be used ever since the trust guidelines were lessened after the introduction of the flag-system.

I think it's red trust for opinion, however unpopular, distasteful, or malevolent it might me. I'd say the same about most trolls like TECSHARE, cryptohunter, etc, unless their trolling translates into actual scamming or some other tangible threat like doxing.

Quickseller is roughly where I'd draw the line of troll vs scammer. Quickseller is a scammer and a genuinely dangerous troll. TECSHARE is a pitiful egocentric troll.

That's just my opinion.

At least you have enough integrity in this instance to not let your personal opinions of me change your standards for what is and is not acceptable to negative rate people over. You are free to think I am a cunt, I won't even argue with you over that, just don't abuse the systems designed to prevent fraud to fight your petty interpersonal battles. That is where I draw the line.