[BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action]

[LoyceV]

Each one of these instances I've noticed it's the end of the line where (for whatever reason) there is not DT1/DT2 logo.

My guess is they don't have any DT1-inclusions, so they're not on DT2 at all. Something similar to my previous suggestion not to show those, as they're "irrelevant" to DefaultTrust.

[AB de Royse777]

My guess is they don't have any DT1-inclusions, so they're not on DT2 at all. Something similar to my previous suggestion not to show those, as they're "irrelevant" to DefaultTrust.

It's more DT1 exclusion than inclusion as well. I mean DT1 inclusion < DT1 exclusion.
When theymos compiled the DT1 for this month, all of these users had DT1 inclusion > DT1 exclusion but after the compilation some users who trusted/distrusted them has changed their minds and perhaps new DT1 came and excluded also which eventually made more DT1 exclusion then DT1 inclusion they had.

I think it makes sense :-P

[hosseinimr93]

Is this a bug from BPIP or the forum? or I am missing something?


Source: BPIP

This user woke up two times in 24 hours.

[suchmoon]

Is this a bug from BPIP or the forum? or I am missing something?

Interesting. Looks like a BPIP bug but I'm not sure how this could happen. Maybe some issue with the "Today" in the timestamps.

[hosseinimr93]

Is this a bug from BPIP or the forum? or I am missing something?

Interesting. Looks like a BPIP bug but I'm not sure how this could happen. Maybe some issue with the "Today" in the timestamps.

There's a same issue with some other profiles. All of them are not like the one already mentioned.
For example, this profile woke up twice. But both are on one day.

I could find an archived page of seclog.
All information inside the box below has been recorded twice.



Profiles on BPIP:
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1087317
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1171969
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1120712
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=332403
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=512797
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=230052
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=218267
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1446383
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=715168
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=2535561
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=988720

[Timelord2067]

It was actually like this in the past, but it didn't make sense (or match) with the current layout of the main page and how it displays ranks (via the shared rank table). Would need to do some serious reconstruction on the front page if we wanted to do it this way.

I'm sorry to say I don't understand your answer - perhaps you could walk me through it...

Over on this page: https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mosttrusted <--- Assuming you have gotten over your fear of links that I post from third party sites) 

User mstrongbow has a score of 20 which gives his rank as 1,000.



Scrolling up six full pages, user TTBit also has a score of 20 yet his rank is 771.



How have the rankings been determined so that a full 229 users have the exact same scores yet their ranks are skewered so distortedly?  Neither has posted in over a year.

By giving mstrongbow a score of 1,000 his rank is far lower than TTBit *even though* they have the same score.

It then becomes a never ending circle - distorted score is used to calculate a distorted score on this page, then that distorted score is used to calculate a distorted score on another page.  That page's distorted score is then used on the first page to calculate a distorted score (and 'round it goes).


Both have just one shield:

abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

Both have just one score (20) - it makes no sense to say one is 229 ranks better than the other one.

[OmegaStarScream]

Reposting this again, as I wasn't entirely sure whether this was an actual bug or not...

If you check the merit's history of some users (an example from my profile), you can see that in some cases, the "post" cell is blank.

At first, I thought it was because these posts were getting deleted or moved to the trashcan, but after checking other profiles(like this one for instance), I noticed that the "Off-limits/ignored/deleted"  is being displayed properly..so it must be something else?

[Timelord2067]

...

Both have just one score (20) - it makes no sense to say one is 229 ranks better than the other one.

I have a follow-up question about the Most Trusted page namely how often does the page update?

Why I ask is because I believe my score for nearly a week should be 71 not 70 which would give me a rank of 228/229 tieing with mnightwaffle and asche

Then, with my score being 228/9 instead of 230(244)258 <--- about midway through those who have an equal score of "70" my Most Recognised score *should* be a few steps higher at 783 tieing at 34th place with Carlton Banks


However, *if* you are calculating the score as being one point per 36.5 days, then my score would be mid 68.5 to 69.5 at this point.  Either way my score isn't 70.

Thanks again.

[suchmoon]

Reposting this again, as I wasn't entirely sure whether this was an actual bug or not...

If you check the merit's history of some users (an example from my profile), you can see that in some cases, the "post" cell is blank.

At first, I thought it was because these posts were getting deleted or moved to the trashcan, but after checking this profile, I noticed that the "Off-limits/ignored/deleted"  is being displayed properly..so it must be something else?

It's probably because in the past merits were being scraped differently and/or gaps in the data were filled in from other sources, which may have had no titles for deleted posts. Sometime in January (I think) I changed the scraper to use each user's merit history, which goes back 120 days so it's far less likely to have deleted gaps and it would display "Off-limits/ignored/deleted" when applicable as you noticed in gmaxwell's profile. Older data may need some manual intervention. I'll add it to my list of TODOs that keeps growing... no free time during this friggin' pandemic.

[LoyceV]

It's probably because in the past merits were being scraped differently and/or gaps in the data were filled in from other sources, which may have had no titles for deleted posts. Sometime in January (I think) I changed the scraper to use each user's merit history, which goes back 120 days so it's far less likely to have deleted gaps and it would display "Off-limits/ignored/deleted" when applicable as you noticed in gmaxwell's profile. Older data may need some manual intervention. I'll add it to my list of TODOs that keeps growing...

For if it helps: as far as I know http://loyce.club/Merit/merit.all.txt is still complete. Every week, I replace the last 113 days with theymos' new 120 day data dump, so it includes any manual changes theymos did in the last 113 days.

no free time during this friggin' pandemic.

It's amazing how not going out still eats up time

[TheBeardedBaby]

Looking at that banned profile > https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1163424
In the Trust Feedback Information he has 0 negative feedback but it is makred with red color.
On the other hand on the MATR information you have -2 in feedback. Last Parsed: 320 days, but the trust seems updated.
Strange, right?

[Timelord2067]

Have just crashed the site: https://bpip.org/error.aspx?aspxerrorpath=/r/dt1changes.aspx

An exception has occurred.

Please contact someone from the BPIP Team or check the Support page for information on reporting errors.

[Jawhead999]

Hi guys, want to ask

Why this user CryptoboyRamesh has not appeared in BPIP? I have do both search using his ID 2749610 and his username
But, I found no result. Any problem about this case? 

[Csmiami]

---

Checked, and he does show up https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=2749610

[suchmoon]

Checked, and he does show up https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=2749610

That's because I fixed it just recently, and a few other missing profiles. Still not sure why exactly that's happening, will do some research later. Right now all profile IDs above 2000000 should be ok.

[ibminer]

It was actually like this in the past, but it didn't make sense (or match) with the current layout of the main page and how it displays ranks (via the shared rank table). Would need to do some serious reconstruction on the front page if we wanted to do it this way.

I'm sorry to say I don't understand your answer - perhaps you could walk me through it...

It's quite simple... the main page has a 'rank' table that lists a static 1-100 which is shared among the other tables. Originally, each table had its own 'rank' but this was requested by Vod at one point in the design process to get a cleaner look, which I actually liked. Unfortunately, it makes sharing ranks across multiple tables somewhat difficult/impossible with the way it is currently designed. So, as I said, it would need some reconstruction, which I'm not opposed to, but it is not at the top of the priority list at this point.

Over on this page: https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mosttrusted <--- Assuming you have gotten over your fear of links that I post from third party sites)  

You posting a link to BPIP.org is completely different than a google doc, but keep trollin'!





Likely a resource issue that caused a time-out, should have resolved itself.

no free time during this friggin' pandemic.

It's amazing how not going out still eats up time

Ya, I really thought I would have more time... my presence at home seems to indicate I have to do *every* house project I'm behind on in the house, not to mention the majority of my job, which can be done remotely, plus appeasing kids who need attention 24x7. lol, this shit is crazy... nonetheless, I'm doing what I can do protect others, and myself.

Stay safe & healthy everyone!!

edit: I should also mention there was an issue with the flaglog.aspx which I corrected recently, seems my formula for parsing the prior 2 days worth of flags more frequently fails when it stalls for 2 days.. or maybe there was no new flags for 2 days?... and then it returned 'null'. Hopefully this is corrected now.

[OmegaStarScream]

edit: I should also mention there was an issue with the flaglog.aspx which I corrected recently, seems my formula for parsing the prior 2 days worth of flags more frequently fails when it stalls for 2 days.. or maybe there was no new flags for 2 days?... and then it returned 'null'. Hopefully this is corrected now.

I've also noticed that the 'changes' count on the flaglog or the accuser's page (4) is always 1 less compared to the flag changes page (5).

[LoyceV]

or maybe there was no new flags for 2 days?

The last time this happened was on April 22. I've checked my data from slightly less than 3 months:

Code:

2020-05-07 06:04:12: 1790 Flags
2020-05-06 06:01:52: 1783 Flags
2020-05-05 08:07:41: 1780 Flags
2020-05-04 07:07:26: 1776 Flags
2020-05-03 08:32:33: 1775 Flags
2020-05-02 08:48:31: 1770 Flags
2020-05-01 07:11:34: 1769 Flags
2020-04-30 06:01:57: 1763 Flags
2020-04-29 05:56:25: 1704 Flags
2020-04-28 05:56:27: 1700 Flags
2020-04-27 05:55:18: 1697 Flags
2020-04-26 08:43:30: 1694 Flags
2020-04-25 05:54:33: 1690 Flags
2020-04-24 08:26:16: 1688 Flags
2020-04-23 06:05:31: 1682 Flags
2020-04-22 05:56:28: 1681 Flags < no new Flags for a day
2020-04-21 08:52:49: 1681 Flags
2020-04-20 08:39:59: 1678 Flags
2020-04-19 06:12:35: 1674 Flags
2020-04-18 08:28:59: 1672 Flags
2020-04-17 05:54:08: 1670 Flags
2020-04-16 05:52:18: 1666 Flags
2020-04-15 05:51:34: 1664 Flags
2020-04-14 05:49:35: 1655 Flags
2020-04-13 05:50:50: 1651 Flags
2020-04-12 05:49:26: 1646 Flags
2020-04-11 05:49:28: 1638 Flags
2020-04-10 05:47:48: 1622 Flags
2020-04-09 05:48:02: 1618 Flags
2020-04-08 05:43:16: 1564 Flags
2020-04-07 05:42:50: 1547 Flags
2020-04-06 05:40:43: 1540 Flags
2020-04-05 05:40:17: 1533 Flags
2020-04-04 05:39:24: 1520 Flags
2020-04-03 05:43:45: 1515 Flags
2020-04-01 05:39:00: 1513 Flags
2020-03-31 05:39:14: 1508 Flags
2020-03-30 05:37:49: 1504 Flags
2020-03-29 05:36:21: 1501 Flags
2020-03-28 20:13:03: 1500 Flags
2020-03-26 08:05:49: 1495 Flags
2020-03-25 05:36:38: 1490 Flags
2020-03-24 05:36:11: 1483 Flags < no new Flags for a day
2020-03-23 05:35:42: 1483 Flags
2020-03-22 05:36:17: 1481 Flags
2020-03-21 05:35:27: 1478 Flags
2020-03-20 05:34:41: 1473 Flags
2020-03-19 05:34:10: 1471 Flags
2020-03-18 05:33:45: 1468 Flags
2020-03-17 05:33:39: 1463 Flags
2020-03-16 05:33:14: 1459 Flags
2020-03-15 05:32:31: 1457 Flags
2020-03-14 05:31:43: 1455 Flags
2020-03-13 05:31:39: 1452 Flags < no new Flags for a day
2020-03-12 05:32:35: 1452 Flags
2020-03-11 05:31:40: 1449 Flags
2020-03-10 05:31:45: 1443 Flags
2020-03-09 05:31:09: 1438 Flags
2020-03-08 05:30:51: 1435 Flags < no new Flags for a day
2020-03-07 05:31:32: 1435 Flags
2020-03-06 05:30:53: 1433 Flags
2020-03-05 05:29:35: 1431 Flags
2020-03-04 05:29:52: 1429 Flags
2020-03-03 05:29:26: 1426 Flags
2020-03-02 05:28:58: 1421 Flags
2020-03-01 05:28:40: 1420 Flags
2020-02-29 05:28:41: 1415 Flags
2020-02-28 05:28:41: 1411 Flags
2020-02-27 05:28:15: 1407 Flags
2020-02-26 05:26:56: 1400 Flags < no new Flags for a day
2020-02-25 05:28:19: 1400 Flags
2020-02-24 05:27:48: 1398 Flags
2020-02-23 05:37:03: 1397 Flags
2020-02-22 05:27:22: 1396 Flags
2020-02-21 05:26:54: 1392 Flags
2020-02-20 05:26:57: 1390 Flags
2020-02-19 05:26:42: 1386 Flags
2020-02-18 05:27:25: 1383 Flags
2020-02-17 05:26:34: 1379 Flags < no new Flags for two days
2020-02-16 05:26:11: 1379 Flags < no new Flags for a day
2020-02-15 05:25:16: 1379 Flags
2020-02-14 05:25:29: 1376 Flags
2020-02-13 05:25:06: 1372 Flags
2020-02-12 05:25:10: 1371 Flags
2020-02-11 05:24:45: 1369 Flags
2020-02-10 12:48:39: 1366 Flags

I didn't expect this many days without new Flags being created.

I've also noticed that the 'changes' count on the flaglog or the accuser's page (4) is always 1 less compared to the flag changes page (5).

The first entry is not a "change".

[ibminer]

I've also noticed that the 'changes' count on the flaglog or the accuser's page (4) is always 1 less compared to the flag changes page (5).

Yes, as LoyceV mentioned, the 1st entry on each flag is seen as an entry, but isn't technically a change. I'll get that 'change' number adjusted on the flag page in the next update.

The last time this happened was on April 22. I've checked my data from slightly less than 3 months:

This seems to be right around the time the issue happened, but not quite, parser seemed to stop on the 24th for some reason, it was attempting to parse a few days after that but once it was past 2 days, the query wasn't returning anything. I didn't realize it and get it going again until the 29th, which is why there were a bunch of flags "created" on the 29th when the parser finally captured them (flags 1691 - 1763).

Query should be OK now though. It was checking the prior 2 days based on the current date, now it will check the past 2 days based on the last creation date of the most recent flag parsed. Previously, if there are no flags returned, it wouldn't attempt parsing. So now if days go by without any new flags, or the parser stops parsing them for some reason, it should just keep re-parsing based on the most recent flags date.

[Timelord2067]

Amazing that ibminer would Troll his own thread.  It's not a very professional look for the OP of a supposedly serious thread be Trolling it themselves...  

Archive for future reference: [1a], [1b]

While we're waiting for ibminer to change his diaper by turning it inside out...


Yet another reason discounting the initial merit makes no sense.

Previously we've seen that it favours those who have been showered with obscene numbers of merits.  Instead of showing "earned merits" BPIP displys "most meritied" causing confusion as we've seen multiple times in this thread by various users.  I don't frequent META too often so I missed seeing this thread: POLL: Initial merit provided to older established accounts which ibminer shut down when it became clear people favoured the (Most Merited) merits score which is displayed on a person's profile page when they visit BPIP.

My merit score is 1,423 at the moment. (I earned it)

From this page http://loyce.club/Merit/history/131361.html which was last updated on the first of May we can see the general pattern of merits received and merits sent.

Merit sent by Timelord2067 (Trust list) from January 24, 2018 until May 01, 2020 (source)

  397. Wed Apr 29 05:53:19 2020: 1 (399) to 2586 (history) for Re: Start Using mBTC as Standard Denomination?

Merit received by Timelord2067 (Trust list) from January 24, 2018 until May 01, 2020 (source)

  217. Mon Apr 27 18:10:41 2020: 5 (416) from klarki (Trust list) (history) for Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q2)

Subtracting the initial 1,000 merits I have received 423 merits QED.

half of 423 is 211½ - already at the end of April 2020 I had sent close to 400 merits, so at least (give or take) 200 merits were sendable by me when I was gifted 1,000 for already being Legendary.

But what of those initial 200 merits?  Here they are:

  200. Thu May 10 04:51:03 2018: 1 (200) to BTCforJoe (Trust list) (history) for Re: Account with the same user.
  199. Wed May  9 09:51:30 2018: 1 (199) to o_e_l_e_o (Trust list) (history) for Re: Conflict of Interest on DT1
  198. Wed May  9 09:41:05 2018: 1 (198) to Chinese909 (Trust list) (history) for Re: Conflict of Interest on DT1
  197. Wed May  9 08:26:02 2018: 1 (197) to DarkStar_ (Trust list) (history) for Re: URGENT LOAN NEEDED | COLLATERAL IS PRIMECOIN [XPM]
  196. Tue May  8 09:39:38 2018: 1 (196) to zazarb (Trust list) (history) for Re: Need 0.008 BTC loan - WITH COLLATERAL
  195. Tue May  8 03:24:33 2018: 1 (195) to actmyname (Trust list) (history) for Re: I got negative trust for Some Misunderstanding. please check
  194. Tue May  8 02:53:49 2018: 1 (194) to julerz12 (Trust list) (history) for Re: Would you Join an Altcoin Signature Campaign for me if I pay you in BTC?
  193. Sun May  6 08:02:05 2018: 1 (193) to b!z (Trust list) (history) for Re: Need some Follower ! Will pay
  192. Thu May  3 15:00:54 2018: 1 (192) to marlboroza (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q2)
  191. Tue Apr 24 02:08:28 2018: 1 (191) to marlboroza (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q2)
  190. Wed Apr 11 02:47:32 2018: 1 (190) to LoyceV (Trust list) (history) for Re: LoyceV's Legendary 10 Month 10 Person 10 Altcoin Investment Experiment: STARTED
  189. Fri Apr  6 16:15:53 2018: 1 (189) to nullius (Trust list) (history) for Re: Quickseller’s Rumour-Mongering
  188. Fri Apr  6 16:13:55 2018: 1 (188) to suchmoon (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
  187. Fri Apr  6 16:11:48 2018: 1 (187) to The Pharmacist (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
  186. Fri Apr  6 16:10:13 2018: 1 (186) to The Pharmacist (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
  185. Wed Apr  4 09:18:19 2018: 1 (185) to ICHIOCHA (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  184. Wed Apr  4 08:32:26 2018: 1 (184) to Hhampuz (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  183. Wed Apr  4 08:30:59 2018: 1 (183) to Lesbian Cow (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  182. Wed Apr  4 08:30:11 2018: 1 (182) to TMAN (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  181. Wed Apr  4 08:22:26 2018: 1 (181) to Glomerulus22 (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  180. Wed Apr  4 02:42:03 2018: 1 (180) to ranochigo (Trust list) (history) for Re: Vanity Pool - vanity address generator pool
  179. Wed Apr  4 01:49:47 2018: 1 (179) to reagannn (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  178. Fri Mar 30 11:38:37 2018: 1 (178) to AerialGopher (history) for Re: [110+PH] KanoPool kano.is 10 BTC giveaway &#128008;
  177. Fri Mar 30 11:28:54 2018: 1 (177) to hedgy73 (Trust list) (history) for Re: Recommended bitcointalk escrow services
  176. Fri Mar 30 11:14:08 2018: 1 (176) to grtthegreat (Trust list) (history) for Re: The BCT PGP/GPG Public Key Database: Stake Your PGP Key Here
  175. Sun Mar 25 03:16:08 2018: 1 (175) to marlboroza (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  174. Wed Mar 14 01:11:45 2018: 1 (174) to jc12345 (Trust list) (history) for Re: [SXC][NSFW] Sexcoin - v0.10.4.0 Released!! Mandatory Upgrade!
  173. Wed Mar 14 01:11:07 2018: 1 (173) to HEvangelista (history) for Re: [SXC][NSFW] Sexcoin - v0.10.4.0 Released!! Mandatory Upgrade!
  172. Wed Mar 14 01:10:35 2018: 1 (172) to lavajumper (Trust list) (history) for Re: [SXC][NSFW] Sexcoin - v0.10.4.0 Released!! Mandatory Upgrade!
  171. Fri Mar  2 03:13:13 2018: 1 (171) to owlcatz (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  170. Thu Mar  1 17:25:25 2018: 1 (170) to tmfp (Trust list) (history) for Re: I am new to this forum. I don't know what I did wrong?
  169. Thu Mar  1 04:05:59 2018: 1 (169) to Glomerulus22 (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  168. Thu Mar  1 01:31:37 2018: 1 (168) to reagannn (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  167. Sun Feb 25 02:46:40 2018: 1 (167) to lavajumper (Trust list) (history) for Re: [SXC][NSFW] Sexcoin - v0.10.4.0 Released!! Mandatory Upgrade!
  166. Thu Feb 22 14:17:29 2018: 1 (166) to swogerino (Trust list) (history) for Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here
  165. Thu Feb 22 12:07:23 2018: 1 (165) to LoyceV (Trust list) (history) for LoyceV's Legendary 10 Month 10 Person 10 Altcoin Investment Experiment: STARTED
  164. Thu Feb 22 10:17:21 2018: 1 (164) to Joel_Jantsen (Trust list) (history) for Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here
  163. Thu Feb 22 10:08:30 2018: 1 (163) to marlboroza (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  162. Thu Feb 22 01:25:32 2018: 1 (162) to jossiel (history) for Re: Cryptocurrency wallets
  161. Thu Feb 22 01:24:45 2018: 1 (161) to TravelMug (Trust list) (history) for Re: Cryptocurrency wallets
  160. Thu Feb 22 01:23:45 2018: 1 (160) to LuvCyanide (history) for Re: Cryptocurrency wallets
  159. Tue Feb 20 15:45:27 2018: 1 (159) to nullius (Trust list) (history) for Re: Lauda is a WITCH, who cast an evil spell on me! BURN THE WITCH!
  158. Tue Feb 20 15:27:55 2018: 1 (158) to Aveatrex (Trust list) (history) for deleted post
  157. Tue Feb 20 15:10:43 2018: 1 (157) to DarkStar_ (Trust list) (history) for Re: Joel_Jantsen's Merit Distribution Thread (Newbies Welcome)
  156. Tue Feb 20 14:58:25 2018: 1 (156) to marlboroza (Trust list) (history) for Re: Joel_Jantsen's Merit Distribution Thread (Newbies Welcome)
  155. Tue Feb 20 14:48:14 2018: 1 (155) to Joel_Jantsen (Trust list) (history) for Joel_Jantsen's Merit Distribution Thread (Newbies Welcome)
  154. Tue Feb 20 12:43:25 2018: 1 (154) to reagannn (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  153. Tue Feb 20 12:22:03 2018: 1 (153) to nyerok Banned! (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  152. Tue Feb 20 12:04:41 2018: 1 (152) to Sylon (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  151. Tue Feb 20 11:59:46 2018: 1 (151) to BeEvil Banned! (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  150. Tue Feb 20 11:53:06 2018: 1 (150) to BeEvil Banned! (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  149. Tue Feb 20 00:54:02 2018: 1 (149) to marlboroza (Trust list) (history) for Re: I Got hacked?? Someone used my all sMerit
  148. Mon Feb 19 12:25:39 2018: 1 (148) to VenusianLion (history) for Re: Tagcash (TAG)
  147. Mon Feb 19 12:24:10 2018: 1 (147) to tagcash (Trust list) (history) for Re: Tagcash (TAG)
  146. Mon Feb 19 02:54:06 2018: 1 (146) to SebastianJu (Trust list) (history) for Setting up your own trust list
  145. Mon Feb 19 02:51:56 2018: 1 (145) to moneybat (Trust list) (history) for Future Scammer: WouchtSack
  144. Mon Feb 19 02:48:14 2018: 1 (144) to buysellbitcoin (Trust list) (history) for Happy halving day friends
  143. Mon Feb 19 02:43:55 2018: 1 (143) to shorena (Trust list) (history) for Bitcoin Vanity Addresses!
  142. Mon Feb 19 02:42:15 2018: 1 (142) to doof (Trust list) (history) for [ANN] Get Paid In Bitcoin (www.getpaidinbitcoin.com.au)
  141. Mon Feb 19 02:41:59 2018: 1 (141) to Avirunes (Trust list) (history) for Re: Scammer Family Tree Mk II - morocco.man - 27 UID's connected!
  140. Mon Feb 19 02:41:01 2018: 1 (140) to VladK (history) for Re: [ANN] Maples -Update to V1.1-POS/POW- Pools - Explorer - Download Now
  139. Mon Feb 19 02:39:53 2018: 1 (139) to cortexx066 (history) for directbet.eu scam 0.268 btc
  138. Mon Feb 19 02:39:37 2018: 1 (138) to Lauda (Trust list) (history) for Re: User: Timelord Feedback on our profile.
  137. Mon Feb 19 02:36:37 2018: 1 (137) to cryptobullion.io (history) for Crypto Bullion (CBX) &gt;&gt;&gt; rebranding to "bullion" | 2018 Roadmap published
  136. Sun Feb 18 08:22:54 2018: 1 (136) to TMAN (Trust list) (history) for Re: Goose20 outstanding Loan
  135. Sun Feb 18 00:40:35 2018: 1 (135) to lavajumper (Trust list) (history) for Re: [SXC][NSFW] Sexcoin - v0.10.4.0 Released!! Mandatory Upgrade!
  134. Sun Feb 18 00:40:21 2018: 1 (134) to lavajumper (Trust list) (history) for Re: [SXC][NSFW] Sexcoin - v0.10.4.0 Released!! Mandatory Upgrade!
  133. Sun Feb 18 00:39:57 2018: 1 (133) to lavajumper (Trust list) (history) for Re: [SXC][NSFW] Sexcoin - v0.10.4.0 Released!! Mandatory Upgrade!
  132. Fri Feb 16 03:36:19 2018: 1 (132) to nullius (Trust list) (history) for Quickseller, the Bitcoin Forum’s Iago
  131. Fri Feb 16 03:13:30 2018: 1 (131) to TheNewAnon135246 (Trust list) (history) for Re: Preliminary Scam Accusation against Cryptopia for holding customers funds
  130. Fri Feb 16 03:12:36 2018: 1 (130) to StelioKontos (history) for Re: Preliminary Scam Accusation against Cryptopia for holding customers funds
  129. Wed Feb 14 06:08:59 2018: 1 (129) to actmyname (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  128. Wed Feb 14 06:08:41 2018: 1 (128) to actmyname (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  127. Wed Feb 14 04:15:37 2018: 1 (127) to BeEvil Banned! (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  126. Sun Feb 11 06:05:34 2018: 1 (126) to Dabs (Trust list) (history) for Re: Recommended bitcointalk escrow services
  125. Sun Feb 11 06:00:04 2018: 1 (125) to notbatman (Trust list) (history) for Re: Interesting Bitcoin-address 1111111111111111111114oLvT2
  124. Sun Feb 11 05:55:48 2018: 1 (124) to LiteCoinGuy (history) for Re: Interesting Bitcoin-address 1111111111111111111114oLvT2
  123. Sun Feb 11 05:52:08 2018: 1 (123) to jackjack (Trust list) (history) for Re: Interesting Bitcoin-address 1111111111111111111114oLvT2
  122. Sun Feb 11 05:51:53 2018: 1 (122) to suppp (history) for Interesting Bitcoin-address 1111111111111111111114oLvT2
  121. Sun Feb 11 05:28:09 2018: 1 (121) to james.lent (Trust list) (history) for Re: Interesting Bitcoin-address 1111111111111111111114oLvT2
  120. Sun Feb 11 05:25:01 2018: 1 (120) to lavajumper (Trust list) (history) for Re: [SXC][NSFW] Sexcoin - v0.10.4.0 Released!! Mandatory Upgrade!
  119. Fri Feb  9 03:44:58 2018: 1 (119) to The Pharmacist (Trust list) (history) for The balls of a moron: adekpulpen.
  118. Thu Feb  8 09:39:01 2018: 1 (118) to KWH (Trust list) (history) for Re: Goose20 outstanding Loan
  117. Thu Feb  8 09:37:56 2018: 1 (117) to KWH (Trust list) (history) for Re: Goose20 outstanding Loan
  116. Thu Feb  8 09:37:13 2018: 1 (116) to zazarb (Trust list) (history) for Re: Goose20 outstanding Loan
  115. Thu Feb  8 09:35:42 2018: 1 (115) to KWH (Trust list) (history) for Re: Goose20 outstanding Loan
  114. Tue Feb  6 01:06:39 2018: 1 (114) to BeEvil Banned! (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  113. Mon Feb  5 13:33:56 2018: 1 (113) to Coiner_ (history) for Re: [User Generated Mk III] - Known alts of anyone Mk III
  112. Mon Feb  5 08:21:40 2018: 1 (112) to mexxer-2 (Trust list) (history) for Known alts of anyone: User generated
  111. Mon Feb  5 08:21:26 2018: 1 (111) to Lauda (Trust list) (history) for [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone
  110. Mon Feb  5 04:51:16 2018: 1 (110) to Lauda (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  109. Sun Feb  4 04:08:21 2018: 1 (109) to BeEvil Banned! (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  108. Sun Feb  4 04:07:41 2018: 1 (108) to BeEvil Banned! (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  107. Sun Feb  4 04:07:11 2018: 1 (107) to steklomoy (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  106. Sat Feb  3 13:49:40 2018: 1 (106) to Jet Cash (Trust list) (history) for Re: This little change might be better than the current merit system.
  105. Fri Feb  2 12:33:21 2018: 1 (105) to nullius (Trust list) (history) for Re: Who will be the first user to reach 10,010 activity?
  104. Fri Feb  2 00:14:19 2018: 1 (104) to minersday (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  103. Thu Feb  1 11:50:21 2018: 1 (103) to Joel_Jantsen (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  102. Thu Feb  1 11:50:03 2018: 1 (102) to BeEvil Banned! (Trust list) (history) for Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1)
  101. Thu Feb  1 11:49:50 2018: 1 (101) to BeEvil Banned! (Trust list) (history) for Re: [User Generated Mk III] - Known alts of anyone Mk III
  100. Thu Feb  1 11:49:42 2018: 1 (100) to BeEvil Banned! (Trust list) (history) for Re: [User Generated Mk III] - Known alts of anyone Mk III