[BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action]

[ibminer]

It's good now.

[DYING_S0UL]

What's this error I am getting? Trying to access reports.

Stupid Microsoft relying on a dynamic page to display dynamic errors.  :/

Something fundamental has failed - maybe the database connection pool is exhausted (saluting loycev) - but it's still just a single issue despite the error suggesting everything is falling apart.  

And it's so random. Sometime this works, sometime that works.

Previously, if I remember correctly, the search function was effected. Just tested it, and now when I click an user from the ""Favorite profiles to send sMerit to", the runtime error is triggered.

This part is broken now, maybe later something else will. Who knows..

It's good now.

Yeah, maybe for now..

[Vod]

I'm involved in this conversation:

Are you saying one new DT member supporting could make this active?  

I know your trust score is

Code:

(number of positive trust) - 2^(number of negative trust)

as it was based on Theymos' original formula.  We've seen in the last 12 months growing amounts of AI accounts pumping positive trust.

In my opinion, the 2 should be raised to a higher number to indicate the seriousness of multiple DT accusations via hundreds of positive contest giveaways with newbies.  There is precedence already from Theymos with a "!!!" indicating a rapid increase of distrust.

If the community could agree on a better number, it could help with issues like these flags.     My example above would show OPPOSE -176 and it would take DT1/2 member(s) with positive trust of at least 177 to support.  It would make them so much more interesting as your flag can be influenced by your current activities and you are trusted by the most trusted.

[MarryWithBTC]

This is my first time seeing this ANN thread even if I use the project.

Congratulations to the project builders, this is massive.

I don't know if it's only me, but while trying to get the url of this project, I keep typing things like "bbip", "pbip", "pbib" etc . If I had known the acronym as shown below, it wouldn't have been an issue for me remembring the url. I don't know if others face the same problem as me.

Re: [BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action]

[JeromeTash]

This is my first time seeing this ANN thread even if I use the project.

Congratulations to the project builders, this is massive.

I don't know if it's only me, but while trying to get the url of this project, I keep typing things like "bbip", "pbip", "pbib" etc . If I had known the acronym as shown below, it wouldn't have been an issue for me remembring the url. I don't know if others face the same problem as me.

Re: [BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action]

I guess it's just you since you didn't pay attention at first
I never had any issues memorising the URL, and yes, knowing the acronym helps a lot. Also that "BPIP" is almost similar to "BIP" – Bitcoin Improvement Proposal, so there is no way you are misplacing letters around

[MarryWithBTC]

I guess it's just you since you didn't pay attention at first
I never had any issues memorising the URL, and yes, knowing the acronym helps a lot. Also that "BPIP" is almost similar to "BIP" – Bitcoin Improvement Proposal, so there is no way you are misplacing letters around

It is not that I didn't pay attention at first, this is my first time seeing the announcement thread. I didn't know the meaning of the acronym and that was why I had problem memorizing the url.

Now that I know, all i need do is to type "B" and i'll always remember "public information project" - Bpip

[hosemary]

Now that I know, all i need do is to type "B" and i'll always remember "public information project" - Bpip

Do you really type out the full URL every time you want to visit BPIP.org?
My browser always shows BPIP.org as the first suggestion once I type the first P and all I need to do after that is press the Enter key.

[MarryWithBTC]

Now that I know, all i need do is to type "B" and i'll always remember "public information project" - Bpip

Do you really type out the full URL every time you want to visit BPIP.org?
My browser always shows BPIP.org as the first suggestion once I type the first P and all I need to do after that is press the Enter key.

Browser suggestions work for me also, but I think it works well for a site you often visit.
For me, if i type P, bitcointalk, bitcoin price among others appear for me.
Now I have known that it is p that follows after b, i will no longer have issues.

I have just checked my browser and this is the site i usually visit while trying to get Bpip.
"bipp.org" and it takes me to people protesting with yellow flags

[Findingnemo]

What's changed with the BPIP ranking?

I just noticed that my rank dropped from 330 to 907 when I logged in, so I assume there is a change rather more variables included in the way the BPIP ranking calculations are done now.

~
Ranks shouldn't be changing, I'm in the process of updating some things but have run into some unexpected issues... I'll revert back to the prior code if I can't get it functioning soon... sorry for the confusion.

That clears up, Thanks.

[ibminer]

What's changed with the BPIP ranking?
~

Ranks shouldn't be changing, I'm in the process of updating some things but have run into some unexpected issues... I'll revert back to the prior code if I can't get it functioning soon... sorry for the confusion.


Edit:
Actually, I may be wrong here... I didn't anticipate this changing, but it may be accurate. With the inclusion of each ranking now going to 10,000 users, the average used for recognition ends up with more competition.

[DYING_S0UL]

What's changed with the BPIP ranking?
~

Ranks shouldn't be changing, I'm in the process of updating some things but have run into some unexpected issues... I'll revert back to the prior code if I can't get it functioning soon... sorry for the confusion.


Edit:
Actually, I may be wrong here... I didn't anticipate this changing, but it may be accurate. With the inclusion of each ranking now going to 10,000 users, the average used for recognition ends up with more competition.

Mine was somewhere between 1000-1100 rank, but now it's showing 700+-. Moreover I see a bunch of badges under my name, when I visited bpip. I don't quite remember seeing them before.
And lastly, some of the icons under these badges aren't visible, there are descriptions but no images/graphics..

Like this....below

[Findingnemo]

Edit:
Actually, I may be wrong here... I didn't anticipate this changing, but it may be accurate. With the inclusion of each ranking now going to 10,000 users, the average used for recognition ends up with more competition.

Mine was somewhere between 1000-1100 rank, but now it's showing 700+-. Moreover I see a bunch of badges under my name, when I visited bpip. I don't quite remember seeing them before.
And lastly, some of the icons under these badges aren't visible, there are descriptions but no images/graphics..

Like this....below

I am not sure about the accuracy if that is the case. Unless now trust score got too much weight in the calculation, because that is where you beat me while I have more stats in everything else. Anyway, if that's the new ranking, then gladly accepting it.

BTW, the icons are loading fine. Might be the browser is having trouble loading the transparent icons in your end.

[JayJuanGee]

What's changed with the BPIP ranking?
~

Ranks shouldn't be changing, I'm in the process of updating some things but have run into some unexpected issues... I'll revert back to the prior code if I can't get it functioning soon... sorry for the confusion.
Edit:  Actually, I may be wrong here... I didn't anticipate this changing, but it may be accurate. With the inclusion of each ranking now going to 10,000 users, the average used for recognition ends up with more competition.

Based on my seeing this post, I went to BPIP to check my own.

It went from 33 to 6.

I was going to load the image onto Talkimg.com, but Talkimg will not let me load images.

[icopress]

Edit: Actually, I may be wrong here... I didn't anticipate this changing, but it may be accurate. With the inclusion of each ranking now going to 10,000 users, the average used for recognition ends up with more competition.

I'd like to take this opportunity to mention that perhaps we should add two more rating types to help give a clearer picture.

1. DT1/DT2 Strength.
2. The ratio of written posts to merit.

Thus, adding two new criteria will give a more realistic picture of Report?r=mostrecognized.

[LoyceV]

With the inclusion of each ranking now going to 10,000 users, the average used for recognition ends up with more competition.

How is the Most Recognized calculated now?

2. The ratio of written posts to merit.

That will be heavily influenced on when someone registered and how many posts someone made. I expect the top to be filled with users with just a few posts.

[icopress]

That will be heavily influenced on when someone registered and how many posts someone made. I expect the top to be filled with users with just a few posts.

"Activity" should solve this problem.

[examplens]

2. The ratio of written posts to merit.

Thus, adding two new criteria will give a more realistic picture of Report?r=mostrecognized.

The written post - merit ratio certainly shows something, but I'm not sure it conveys a real "recognised" status. A member can have an excellent post/merit ratio and still barely leave the local board. At least I've seen some members who have a significant number of earned merits, and I've only recently noticed (recognised) them.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

2. The ratio of written posts to merit.

This can easily be manipulated by people who like to delete their past posts. For example, I make 1000 posts, I earn 800 merits, and then I decide to delete 500 past posts. Now I have 500 posts vs. 800 merits.

Maybe if they are going to rely on archived post records to ensure the number doesn't change.