I would say an exclusion is more than enough based on how you perceive their judgement, but if you stick solely with Default trust then I can understand not deviating from that.
Nah, I don't do that exclusion/inclusion thingy.
That's what I believe would be best in this situation, as you clearly want to leave the feedback.
Actually, I should have done what TECSHARE suggested:
It's entirely legitimate to give someone a new positive rating just to negate a negative rating. (In this case you should explicitly respond to the negative rating you're negating.) It is not legitimate to keep deleting and reposting negative ratings to put the system back into "this guy just turned scammer!" mode. People who do that shouldn't be trusted.
Great. Now if only Lauda and Vod would follow suit, that would be great. I am not holding my breath though.
It is not really great, I think your trolling is very dangerous. Over and out.
Well just declare some one a "troll" and "dangerous" and you can do whatever you like then eh?
Great. Now if only Lauda and Vod would follow suit, that would be great. I am not holding my breath though.
What would you like me to do Techy? Change my feedback so it isn't based on what you think is just my opinion?
I'll remind you of your trust abuse against me - unless you can show medical evidence I am mentally ill, or produce evidence of my future plans, you are a hypocrite and can fuck off.
Hold your breath.
As usual, more insane jibbering that makes little to no sense from you. Your rating is "based on what you think is just my opinion" What the fuck does that even mean? As I have explained many times before, the rating I left for you was because of your doxing OG Nasty and your claimed reports to government agencies in retribution for his criticisms of you.
As
Theymos said about your behavior:
"I was disgusted by the reckless and vicious doxing in this case, where:
- The evidence was very thin.
- Even if all of the allegations were true, it'd likely result only in civil penalties, not criminal.
- The whole thing was motivated merely by past arguments. OgNasty never caused Vod to even lose anything, as far as I know. An utterly ridiculous & disproportionate escalation.
- It's based on the premise that purely statutory crimes are directly unethical, which I don't agree with at all, though I'm willing to mostly look past this as subjective.
It's good that Vod came to his senses on this after the fact, though doing it at all certainly blemishes his reputation in my mind, and I added to my notes the fact that those users merited such a post. Meriting it is saying basically that we need more posts like this on the forum, and we do not need more posts like this on the forum.
Red-trusting Vod over this is an appropriate usage of red-trust, since his actions here are highly trust-relevant."
Your negative rating for me however:
Vod 2019-09-09
Reference This profile has fundamentally abused the trust system, trading positive trust with as many others as possible to get on Default Trust. See reference and the BPIP DT Change Log for examples. Do not trust this profile's trust of others by adding ~TECSHARE to your personal trust list. You and the usual retribution mob invented a bunch of unsubstantiated speculation and then claim it is abuse of the trust system, some how "justifying" your use of the trust system. Even if it was true, "abuse of the trust system" alone is not a valid reason for leaving a negative rating, this is what exclusions are for.
Clearly this is just retribution because I dared to tag you for your dangerous and insane behavior regarding OG Nasty, as you also tagged others who left you negative ratings for this behavior, and habitually leave frivolous and unsubstantiated retaliatory ratings. This is just the last act in your YEARS long pattern of abusive and stalking behavior against me documented
here. In the past you were forced to remove your abusive and unsubstantiated ratings under threat of exclusion. This is just an extension of your past abuse of the trust system against me.
Would you like me to remove the reference to your obvious mental illness and repost the negative rating without it? Would that make the rating valid in your mind?
