Why We Think Craig Wright is Satoshi and Why That Matters

[Fappanu]

https://unboundedcapital.com/blog/why-we-think-craig-wright-is-satoshi-and-why-that-matters


What are your thoughts?

Who think Craig Wright  is Satoshi Nakamoto? 

Honestly, this guy has yet to prove that he is actually Satoshi Nakamoto.

And even simply putting up a bitcoin sign message he couldn't.

[gabmen]

https://unboundedcapital.com/blog/why-we-think-craig-wright-is-satoshi-and-why-that-matters


What are your thoughts?

Who think Craig Wright  is Satoshi Nakamoto? 

Honestly, this guy has yet to prove that he is actually Satoshi Nakamoto.

And even simply putting up a bitcoin sign message he couldn't.

Funny thing is, people still take the time to discuss whether he's satoshi or not. We don't even have any evidence that satoshi is an actual singular person lol. This claim by craig wright is pretty much the same as john mcaffee's claim that he'll eat his dick if btc doesn't go to 1m this year. Both are utterly rubbish and shouldn't be taken seriously.

[Norway]

If you want to learn about the possibilities of bitcoin, payment channels and future signature schemes like these Cambridge students, spend half an hour on this video that was released today.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=Qal1leB05DQ&feature=emb_logo

Do your own research 

[BitcoinFX]

If you want to learn about the possibilities of bitcoin, payment channels and future signature schemes like these Cambridge students, spend half an hour on this video that was released today.

hxxps://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=Qal1leB05DQ&feature=emb_logo

Do your own research  

We did. CSW is a Snake Oil salesman.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_oil

Actually I understood from his first interview that he was forced to do the front running.

He sounded really pissed

Toddlers get pretty indignant when they're lying to your face because they don't want to get caught being in the wrong.  I see Faketoshi very much as an angry little toddler throwing a tantrum because no one believes his tall tales.

GQ interview with Craig Wright "F##K OFF!"
- https://youtu.be/7YUTq7_vO3A *NSFW*

[Getmon]

https://unboundedcapital.com/blog/why-we-think-craig-wright-is-satoshi-and-why-that-matters


What are your thoughts?

Who think Craig Wright  is Satoshi Nakamoto? 

Honestly, this guy has yet to prove that he is actually Satoshi Nakamoto.

And even simply putting up a bitcoin sign message he couldn't.

Funny thing is, people still take the time to discuss whether he's satoshi or not. We don't even have any evidence that satoshi is an actual singular person lol. This claim by craig wright is pretty much the same as john mcaffee's claim that he'll eat his dick if btc doesn't go to 1m this year. Both are utterly rubbish and shouldn't be taken seriously.

The mystery that shrouds the name Satoshi Nakamoto is enough for people to react every time an individual comes forward claiming himself Satoshi. But this Craig Wright is doing it more stubbornly and persistently. He looks stupid in what he is doing. I will not be wondering if John McAfee ends up more appreciated than Craig Wright. At least John has humor. Lol.

[airdnasxela]

https://unboundedcapital.com/blog/why-we-think-craig-wright-is-satoshi-and-why-that-matters


What are your thoughts?

Who think Craig Wright  is Satoshi Nakamoto? 

Honestly, this guy has yet to prove that he is actually Satoshi Nakamoto.

And even simply putting up a bitcoin sign message he couldn't.

Funny thing is, people still take the time to discuss whether he's satoshi or not. We don't even have any evidence that satoshi is an actual singular person lol. This claim by craig wright is pretty much the same as john mcaffee's claim that he'll eat his dick if btc doesn't go to 1m this year. Both are utterly rubbish and shouldn't be taken seriously.

It's not really a discussion if he's the real Satoshi or not. Discussion about Craig Wright is becoming a discussion of his new lies. We're already aware that he is not Satoshi and it's not worth it to discuss it again and again especially here in the forum. But the thing is, he keeps on talking and saying something about Bitcoin that's why he can still gets the attention of us... I wonder when will he stop talking nonsense

[Norway]

People with strong confirmation bias form echo chambers like this forum. It's a very bad investment strategy.

[bittraffic]

Why did he fork BSV when instead he could just work with BTC if he just own it?

CSW doesn't really look like he can code something extra ordinary like BTC, he can't discuss something that might just keep the interest of the BTC users into believing something or even just made us think he could be Satoshi but all he did is just claim he is satoshi. I bet he can only code a hello world script.

[Norway]

Why did he fork BSV when instead he could just work with BTC if he just own it?

CSW doesn't really look like he can code something extra ordinary like BTC, he can't discuss something that might just keep the interest of the BTC users into believing something or even just made us think he could be Satoshi but all he did is just claim he is satoshi. I bet he can only code a hello world script.

Bitcoin is not a computer program. Lots of CS-people get this wrong. It's an economic game with rules. Software is just a tool.

[hv_]

Why did he fork BSV when instead he could just work with BTC if he just own it?

CSW doesn't really look like he can code something extra ordinary like BTC, he can't discuss something that might just keep the interest of the BTC users into believing something or even just made us think he could be Satoshi but all he did is just claim he is satoshi. I bet he can only code a hello world script.

Bitcoin is not a computer program. Lots of CS-people get this wrong. It's an economic game with rules. Software is just a tool.

Bitcoin is first the idea, written down in the white paper, it has a socio-economical consensus, a protocol design.

True, once that needs to have a real world instance, some lines of code must be put down and computers need a program to run, here the problems are starting, cause bugs and limitations are nature of real word instances. It always helps to keep such as simple as possible, KISS.

Segwit, LN, ... was the opposite

[Norway]

Why did he fork BSV when instead he could just work with BTC if he just own it?

CSW doesn't really look like he can code something extra ordinary like BTC, he can't discuss something that might just keep the interest of the BTC users into believing something or even just made us think he could be Satoshi but all he did is just claim he is satoshi. I bet he can only code a hello world script.

Bitcoin is not a computer program. Lots of CS-people get this wrong. It's an economic game with rules. Software is just a tool.

Bitcoin is first the idea, written down in the white paper, it has a socio-economical consensus, a protocol design.

True, once that needs to have a real world instance, some lines of code must be put down and computers need a program to run, here the problems are starting, cause bugs and limitations are nature of real word instances. It always helps to keep such as simple as possible, KISS.

Segwit, LN, ... was the opposite

Yes, I agree. Bitcoin SV is restoring the original, unbounded protocol. That includes restoring OP-codes that was chucked out by Core and bringing big numbers back. The complete Bitcoin script language is much more powerful and general than Core devs understood. It's like Forth, and most younger devs don't understand that you can unroll loops etc unbounded with Bitcoin script. With BigNum back, you can even do cryptographic math pretty effectively with fewer iterations. Bitcoin script wasn't made to give inexperienced devs a simple job, but to have something that scales to the world. Developers will probably use tools like this online interpreter to write bitcoin script in the years ahead:
http://scrypt.studio/

[gmaxwell]

That includes restoring OP-codes that was chucked out by Core and bringing big numbers back.

So you agree that Satoshi was part of 'Core'?  Because it was Satoshi that deactivated opcodes... no one else.

[Norway]

That includes restoring OP-codes that was chucked out by Core and bringing big numbers back.

So you agree that Satoshi was part of 'Core'?  Because it was Satoshi that deactivated opcodes... no one else.

Lol, you're an idiot. I don't care about you. We are building Bitcoin as it was meant to be, and we are not waiting for laggards like you.

[DaCryptoRaccoon]

That includes restoring OP-codes that was chucked out by Core and bringing big numbers back.

So you agree that Satoshi was part of 'Core'?  Because it was Satoshi that deactivated opcodes... no one else.

Lol, you're an idiot. I don't care about you. We are building Bitcoin as it was meant to be, and we are not waiting for laggards like you.

No your building a community of trolls end of........

Why would someone who say's they understand blockchain post an address of stolen MTGOX coins  in a court paper..
Tulip Trust?  More like IDIOT who didn't know what he was putting in these documents....

Page 9....

https://www.scribd.com/document/372445141/Exhibit-11

1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF

https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

OOPS... So he's a liar and a thief..

Don't waste time on revenge. The people who hurt you will eventually face their own karma.

[Norway]

That includes restoring OP-codes that was chucked out by Core and bringing big numbers back.

So you agree that Satoshi was part of 'Core'?  Because it was Satoshi that deactivated opcodes... no one else.

Lol, you're an idiot. I don't care about you. We are building Bitcoin as it was meant to be, and we are not waiting for laggards like you.

No your building a community of trolls end of........

Why would someone who say's they understand blockchain post an address of stolen MTGOX coins  in a court paper..
Tulip Trust?  More like IDIOT who didn't know what he was putting in these documents....

Page 9....

https://www.scribd.com/document/372445141/Exhibit-11

1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF

https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

OOPS... So he's a liar and a thief..

Don't waste time on revenge. The people who hurt you will eventually face their own karma.

As a BTC bag holder, you should fear the utility of Bitcoin (BSV) more than the Tulip trust

[DooMAD]

restoring the original, unbounded protocol.

Horseshit.  The original protocol did not require an Emergency Difficulty Adjustment.  The original protocol wasn't so weak and feeble that it wouldn't survive without breaking the original consensus rules like that.

Mess about with the formula all you like, you simply can't recreate all the vital parts that make Bitcoin what it is.

If you want to talk about your forkcoin, there's an Altcoins sub for that.  Stop defecating all over Bitcoin Discussion with your altcoin crap.

[Norway]

restoring the original, unbounded protocol.

Horseshit.  The original protocol did not require an Emergency Difficulty Adjustment.  The original protocol wasn't so weak and feeble that it wouldn't survive without breaking the original consensus rules like that.

Mess about with the formula all you like, you simply can't recreate all the vital parts that make Bitcoin what it is.

If you want to talk about your forkcoin, there's an Altcoins sub for that.  Stop defecating all over Bitcoin Discussion with your altcoin crap.

AFAIK, the DAA will be restored later this year, but not at feb 4th. I can think of a good reason for that, but I will not share it.

[fiulpro]

Even if he is Mr. Satoshi I would still see him in the same light as I see him today , because if a man is worthy, it's shown by his actions and so far all he have shown is selfishness and literally no respect , even for the dead person ..
I really don't think why it will matter. ?
You think the market is swayed by him ? Or the people will start running after him for decades ?
The identity doesn't matter , this is what bitcoins teaches us. !

[lixer]

https://unboundedcapital.com/blog/why-we-think-craig-wright-is-satoshi-and-why-that-matters


What are your thoughts?

I couldn’t finish the whole article, it was too much so I read the first few paragraphs and skimmed through the others.
I don’t really have any opinion about this and I don’t know if CSW is the real Satoshi Nakamoto or not, I have seen a lot of people claim to be Satoshi but CSW was the only one I know that took the case seriously, maybe he is or maybe he’s not.

But, is Satoshi the only one that created the cryptocurrency bitcoin or are there others? But whatever, I’m just going stick to the point that has been made by a lot of people about Satoshi being dead.

[Polar91]

https://unboundedcapital.com/blog/why-we-think-craig-wright-is-satoshi-and-why-that-matters


What are your thoughts?

I couldn’t finish the whole article, it was too much so I read the first few paragraphs and skimmed through the others.
I don’t really have any opinion about this and I don’t know if CSW is the real Satoshi Nakamoto or not, I have seen a lot of people claim to be Satoshi but CSW was the only one I know that took the case seriously, maybe he is or maybe he’s not.

But, is Satoshi the only one that created the cryptocurrency bitcoin or are there others? But whatever, I’m just going stick to the point that has been made by a lot of people about Satoshi being dead.

Basically to test and determine if Craig Wright could possibly be the real satoshi, he should know the bitcoin protocol better than others, and escape to his world of marketing and business talks. He should be more technical rather than more skeptical, knows how to accept opinions and how to prove bitcoin is created by him through the very first blocks ever created. In addition, Craig Wright is evidently promoting other cryptocurrency which in fact a direct manifestation of not owning bitcoin.