[CFNP] BestChange Signature Campaign | Sr Member+

[examplens]

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2874486
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 40
BTC Address: bc1qlxhwfantvezu0pdye6lh3xy523938w3m0j0n9u

examplens was a true green family, I tip my hat.

Hold my spot until I join back 

[1714602666]

1714602666

[1714602666]

1714602666

[1714602666]

1714602666

[dansus021]

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=392207
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 35
BTC Address: bc1quxyftm94p36hvhayvg8a9gcp03lqsptn3zqrwu

Re-Apply

Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 35 48

[FatFork]

Just throwing my hat in the ring here...

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2738899
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 260
BTC Address: bc1q9ffqa5hdnxtkfa8s74drh8p0t2laj03d22t4yu

[Unbunplease]

Bitcointalk Profile URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2597241
Post count (Including this one): 2861
Your BTC address (segwit): bc1q28xvl9ahnzwa87wv8tec09fxwsqd8wqvfk8qz7
Earned merit in the last 120 days; 86

[Edwardard]

Bitcointalk profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=710241
Post Count (Including this one): 1785
BTC segwit address: bc1qqsgsm8ahc2v5epc6al5vvstrmsj7yk0vkpa2k3
Merits received in last 120 days: 41
Will update sig. if accepted.

[dbc23]

Bitcointalk profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=944497
Post Count (Including this one): 1134
BTC segwit address: bc1qyg090t0r3r698f8ss6jk8wxx0pj7wjznqwe68t
Merits received in last 120 days: 8

[Asuspawer09]

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1136961
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 30
BTC Address: bc1qmg2pgu8wvjavcds673gp5y87z4elvnu6vq4547

[Don Pedro Dinero]

Delete

[Hamza2424]

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2811340
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: (159)
BTC Address: bc1q28k846x8cx4rhymauatc3pg2jzmzsanmg6zpzt

[ajanwalker]

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2775937
Amount of merits for the last 120 days: 20
BTC Address: bc1qxrw3dh4ujqdz6s4ez6506qzgaxxsza9f67mmmp

[Mr.right85]

examplens was a true green family, I tip my hat.

Hold my spot until I join back 

Your shoes are definitely bigger but, like we do it here in Africa during the 80s and 90s, we pad up our stockings till it fits. Your green family spot would be safe 

[Warkop]

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=894091
Amount of merit for the last 120 days: 2
BTC Address: bc1q6ka60p2yduwxqrf3ed283x2u36g6mj3rhysmex

[_BlackStar]

The payment for week 173 has been sent: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/e63393776b17219f382dbef14cee63b9fbac09d3335e0871d36fc6279b580c6c

I just noticed that the payment for week 173 has been sent since May 10th, but unfortunately it hasn't been confirmed even though it was broadcast 4 days ago.

Mempool.space seems to recommend a 19 sat/vB fee for low priority ^{[it has been lower than in previous days],} but that transaction has a 12 sat/vB fee. Just wondering, apart from being patient waiting for the fee to down lower, can accelerator also help in this case?



Example: FREE/PAY BITCOIN TRANSACTION ACCELERATOR

[Charles-Tim]

Mempool.space seems to recommend a 19 sat/vB fee for low priority ^{[it has been lower than in previous days],} but that transaction has a 12 sat/vB fee. Just wondering, apart from being patient waiting for the fee to down lower, can accelerator also help in this case?

The transaction support RBF, which means the fee rate can be increased to 20 - 25 sat/vbyte. Assuming if the fee rate is around 17 to 20 sat/vbyte, it would have been confirmed.

But just that I remember we use to be patient in time like this when I was in Bestchange campaign. I mean you should be patient.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

The payment for week 173 has been sent: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/e63393776b17219f382dbef14cee63b9fbac09d3335e0871d36fc6279b580c6c

I just noticed that the payment for week 173 has been sent since May 10th, but unfortunately it hasn't been confirmed even though it was broadcast 4 days ago.

Mempool.space seems to recommend a 19 sat/vB fee for low priority ^{[it has been lower than in previous days],} but that transaction has a 12 sat/vB fee. Just wondering, apart from being patient waiting for the fee to down lower, can accelerator also help in this case?



Example: FREE/PAY BITCOIN TRANSACTION ACCELERATOR

It's because the transaction fee is at around 11.8 sats/vbyte. I think we should practice patience as a virtue, especially with brands like BestChange. They have been with us here through thick and thin. The mempool is slowly but surely normalizing. Today I had some of my 15 sats/vB transactions get confirmed, this was only a dream a couple of days back.

Transaction "accelerators" like the one you suggested don't actually work. They just rebroadcast the transactions into the network. Not including them, it in the next block

ViaBTC would work in this case, but the transaction is above the maximum transaction size (0.5KB) required for the free transaction accelerator.

[Charles-Tim]

Why? Because the manager decided to save on transactions and pay 12 sat at a time when the commission was 300-400 sat per 1 byte? Not a single forum campaign puts such commissions on payment to its participants, everyone is trying to find compromises.

The campaign is one of the best and longest on the forum, but the manager cannot afford to pay an extra 20-30 bucks for a transaction? This somehow does not fit with the status of an elite campaign, which is attributed to this campaign.

I will agree because I do not want to be self-centered, nobody will like delay. I noticed that some addresses are still legacy addresses, about 13 of the addresses, while some of the addresses are nested segwit. Only few are native segwit. With native segwit, you can save more than 42% on fee, while up to 50% as the inputs and outputs are increasing like in Bestchange transaction. I mean if native segwit is compared to legacy, while native segwit transaction is also cheaper than nested segwit.

It is just an advice, as Bestchange is accepting native segwit addresses already, native segwit addresses can be requested from all Bestchange campaign participants which will also help because the fee rate used would have been higher if Bestchange is sending to native segwit addresses and the chance of the transaction to get confirmation would have been higher. Also the fee can be increased, but this is left to Bestchange.

[examplens]

Mempool.space seems to recommend a 19 sat/vB fee for low priority ^{[it has been lower than in previous days],} but that transaction has a 12 sat/vB fee. Just wondering, apart from being patient waiting for the fee to down lower, can accelerator also help in this case?

Accelerators cannot help in this case, until the fee is below 12 sat/vB. At the moment I am writing this, it is currently on the ~16 sat/v, so if this trend continues, there is a possibility that it will be realized in the next few hours. Try to accelerate this tx once when the fee is below 12sat/v.
What can be difficult is that Monday is coming, so there will be more new transactions that can raise the fee. At least as far as I have noticed, the cheapest transactions were always Saturday/Sunday.

I will leave this "always updated bitcoin fees image from mempool.space" created by bitmover, to facilitate your check

Why? Because the manager decided to save on transactions and pay 12 sat at a time when the commission was 300-400 sat per 1 byte? Not a single forum campaign puts such commissions on payment to its participants, everyone is trying to find compromises.

The campaign is one of the best and longest on the forum, but the manager cannot afford to pay an extra 20-30 bucks for a transaction? This somehow does not fit with the status of an elite campaign, which is attributed to this campaign.

I wouldn't lightly "accuse" a proven and one of the longest-running campaigns that they wanted to save $20 or $30 here. I am quite sure that it was not their intention to cause a delay in payment to 25 participants due to such an amount.

As far as I know, it is even more complicated for them that they have many inputs for these Bitcoins they send, plus everything goes through the legacy address.

[hugeblack]

No one is blaming anyone, but it is strange for a manager to pretend that nothing happened on the bitcoin network and send the same fees as before. Nevertheless, such moments must be taken into account when forming payments to their participants. Indeed, the campaign lasts 174 weeks and pays weekly $2.5k-$3k to its members, but can't pay the $25 commission instead of $5. It's really weird.

The reason is not necessarily to save fees costs, but rather a use of a bad Software in estimating the fees or there is no option to edit fees. I remember in the past that their wallet did not support bc1 while most wallets was supporting those addresses.
It is not limited to this service, but rather a lot of services and even some exchanges do not update their programs annually and therefore there is no choice to edit fees.

you can read more here ----> Why do some people pay illogically high fees for transactions?


This is also happen here

@Royse777
Can you please bump up the transaction fee? I think it will take ages for this transaction to get confirmed because fees go crazy sometimes.

Just did a CPFP, so hopefully, that would do the job without Royse777 bumping the fee: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/3a5978099ea12d161f7f3b9901010c9ee4959d142ce0842ff8a8b36048661117

I'll update this post when it gets a confirmation...

Update:
It's now confirmed

So it is not really weird.

@Best_Change please use is code^[1] before sending to avoid such discussions in the future.

[1]

Code:

https://bitcoindata.science/api/bitcoinfees.php

[Mpamaegbu]

I remember in the past that their wallet did not support bc1 while most wallets was supporting those addresses.

I think it will be appropriate at a time like this for BestChange to mandate its signature participants to have a wallet change to SegWit. I'm all for anything that will make this Blockchain nightmare go away.

[AB de Royse777]

No one is blaming anyone, but it is strange for a manager to pretend that nothing happened on the bitcoin network and send the same fees as before. Nevertheless, such moments must be taken into account when forming payments to their participants. Indeed, the campaign lasts 174 weeks and pays weekly $2.5k-$3k to its members, but can't pay the $25 commission instead of $5. It's really weird.

The reason is not necessarily to save fees costs, but rather a use of a bad Software in estimating the fees or there is no option to edit fees. I remember in the past that their wallet did not support bc1 while most wallets was supporting those addresses.
It is not limited to this service, but rather a lot of services and even some exchanges do not update their programs annually and therefore there is no choice to edit fees.

you can read more here ----> Why do some people pay illogically high fees for transactions?


This is also happen here

@Royse777
Can you please bump up the transaction fee? I think it will take ages for this transaction to get confirmed because fees go crazy sometimes.

Just did a CPFP, so hopefully, that would do the job without Royse777 bumping the fee: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/3a5978099ea12d161f7f3b9901010c9ee4959d142ce0842ff8a8b36048661117

I'll update this post when it gets a confirmation...

Update:
It's now confirmed

So it is not really weird.

@Best_Change please use is code^[1] before sending to avoid such discussions in the future.

[1]

Code:

https://bitcoindata.science/api/bitcoinfees.php

Sometimes I wonder, you are in bitcoin, you are in a signature campaign for months, for years, for decades but when there is a few days delay to receive your payment or even to get the first confirmation a lot of you start to panic as if you are losing all of your life savings. I get it all the time from some of the members on my telegram group. Other day when SFR10 bumped the fees, I am sure he did that because he saw some of these people were panicking.

If people are really depending on the payments from signature campaigns they are in then I see a good chance for these people to have a huge financial crisis when there will be no way to earn money from this forum.

My suggestion is that, create a business of your own, of you own management, of your own platform while you are bringing food to your mouth from signature campaigns because tomorrow when the forum will disable signature space from users profile then you will become homeless.