Pain of a bounty manager.

[Chainsmokers]

Bounty manager should take the risks and pay with his reputation if something goes wrong. If he is famous and well known, with good reputaion, people are following him and taking part in all his campaigns. If he fails constantly, he is to blame and nobody likes him

A professional bounty manager is willing to stake his reputation and not only expect to get pay big of the bounties he manages. of course if the project he manages continues to fail then no one people wants  to follow the bounty he manages. but now many bounty managers don't care if the project they manage will end up being fraudulent or not because they just expect to be paid with the lure of a big salary.

which became a problem two years ago when many new projects came to the crypto market and not all of them succeeded in making many bounty managers tempted to get more money to promote the project. it is not the responsibility of the bounty manager to make the project a success or not. but some bounty managers who care about their reputation must choose the best project. not just the payment they will receive.

The bounty manager is not responsible for the success or failure of the project and for me personally it might be difficult for a bounty manager to judge whether a project is good or not because we know that the scammer always has a way to find loopholes and can get into it and sometimes the bounty manager only do its work by updating the spreadsheet, determining whether participants are in accordance with the requirements and reporting the results that have been done by all participants.

[1714264506]

1714264506

[1714264506]

1714264506

[1714264506]

1714264506

[Warkop]

Bounty manager should take the risks and pay with his reputation if something goes wrong. If he is famous and well known, with good reputaion, people are following him and taking part in all his campaigns. If he fails constantly, he is to blame and nobody likes him

A professional bounty manager is willing to stake his reputation and not only expect to get pay big of the bounties he manages. of course if the project he manages continues to fail then no one people wants  to follow the bounty he manages. but now many bounty managers don't care if the project they manage will end up being fraudulent or not because they just expect to be paid with the lure of a big salary.

which became a problem two years ago when many new projects came to the crypto market and not all of them succeeded in making many bounty managers tempted to get more money to promote the project. it is not the responsibility of the bounty manager to make the project a success or not. but some bounty managers who care about their reputation must choose the best project. not just the payment they will receive.

The bounty manager is not responsible for the success or failure of the project and for me personally it might be difficult for a bounty manager to judge whether a project is good or not because we know that the scammer always has a way to find loopholes and can get into it and sometimes the bounty manager only do its work by updating the spreadsheet, determining whether participants are in accordance with the requirements and reporting the results that have been done by all participants.

But as a campaign manager who has extensive experience in managing a project, of course, can assess a project that smells of fraud and even very often it happens, and the most serious problem is the rise of Copy links on Spreadsheets, where the campaign manager often misses in terms of assessing and correcting the work of all campaign participants, and that as a drawback of a campaign manager who spelled out too much of their duties as campaign manager, at least there was a change to prevent all of this from happening to be more accurate in terms of assessing and correcting the work of bounty campaign participants. ..

[maxreish]

A couple of times bounty manager is the one who was being blamed for the unsuccess projects. Not realizing that bounty managers are just doing their job whatever the owner wants him to do. And it is true that bounty participants are juat joining any ICO or any signature campaigns without further realizing that it is not worth to join for.

Being a bounty manager isn't an easy job. Reputations, good image, efforts and time are needed and I understand where OP is coming from all of his sentiments.

[qiwoman2]

I think personally from now on unless the coins are already on exchanges, bounty managers and also bounty hunters should be paid part in Eth or BTC and part in the token at the end of the ICO/IEO as a bonus. This would be far less risky for bounty hunters and managers alike because then even if the projects turn to scam, we have already had a part payment in a real digital currency that we can exchange or hodl with less risk. I also managed a bounty once and the most annoying part was sifting through all those fake accounts and even worse still, we had members pretending to be real legitimate BTCTALK members. I have had my profile faked many times and my content was stolen even as a bounty hunter. I am thinking even in bounty hunting there are scammers and thieves? There was a whole Vietnamese ring of scammers faking accounts for the video campaigns, they tried to steal every single video of my Husband's lol from his channel to get stakes in video bounties. It's a huge task to be bounty manager and one cannot run a bounty by oneself, you need at least one assistant minimum to help check and double-check spreadsheets, as well sift through tons of PMS coming in daily from bounty hunters. Don't think it's an easy job, because it isn't.

[julius caesar]

It is hard to become a bounty manager since all of the blame is going to be your burden because you are the one talking to the bounty participants. But, as a bounty hunter, lets understand the situation of the bounty manager. They just relay the information to us and have nothing to do with the scam that will happen sooner or later.

[Edraket31]

It is hard to become a bounty manager since all of the blame is going to be your burden because you are the one talking to the bounty participants. But, as a bounty hunter, lets understand the situation of the bounty manager. They just relay the information to us and have nothing to do with the scam that will happen sooner or later.

Yes, although they have made vigilant on the project, still they can't make excuse and their trust will be vanished here in the forum, people will accused them that they were scammers too, so they should make sure too that they are only dealing with legit project so that their reputation won't be at risk.

[XCANA]

It is hard to become a bounty manager since all of the blame is going to be your burden because you are the one talking to the bounty participants. But, as a bounty hunter, lets understand the situation of the bounty manager. They just relay the information to us and have nothing to do with the scam that will happen sooner or later.

What? I have seen and work with many campaigns managers and haven't seen the difficulties in being a bounty manager. Although, many incompetent managers may found things difficult as a result causing them pays; who cares. Any competent bounty manager will always find things easy to administer over a campaign.

Campaign managers should be held responsible for their inability to double check the campaign they chose to administer to know if they are legit or scams, not the responsibility of the hunters who are just here doing what can earn them few SATs.

[BitDane]

It is hard to become a bounty manager since all of the blame is going to be your burden because you are the one talking to the bounty participants. But, as a bounty hunter, lets understand the situation of the bounty manager. They just relay the information to us and have nothing to do with the scam that will happen sooner or later.

What? I have seen and work with many campaigns managers and haven't seen the difficulties in being a bounty manager. Although, many incompetent managers may found things difficult as a result causing them pays; who cares. Any competent bounty manager will always find things easy to administer over a campaign.

Campaign managers should be held responsible for their inability to double check the campaign they chose to administer to know if they are legit or scams, not the responsibility of the hunters who are just here doing what can earn them few SATs.

I agree, they are the one who brought the project bounty here in the forum because they are paid to do so.  Even a volunteer person should beheld accountable to whatever damage done by his promotion.  Bounty hunters task is easy, anyone can do it as long as you have the tool.  Participants will join whatever these bounty manager posted here without any hard effort.  And the checking and verifying participants is one of the taks they are paid with so they should not whine about it.  Aside from that, it is a personal responsibility of a Bounty manager to verify if his project is a scam or not.

[Beparanf]

It is hard to become a bounty manager since all of the blame is going to be your burden because you are the one talking to the bounty participants. But, as a bounty hunter, lets understand the situation of the bounty manager. They just relay the information to us and have nothing to do with the scam that will happen sooner or later.

Only few bounty managers now whotu  really studied the project it's unfortunate that-those who research it will be involved too when project fails . No bounty manager , professionals will risk their reputation so we must not blame them when projects failed . Only at times they forgot to check or add our stakes in campaigns spreadsheet . The rest depend on the market itself  . 

[cryp24x]

I guess this will give us a life lesson. If we don't really know what we are doing then don't accept the job as Bounty Manager. I think it will just give you a heartache when you accepted the job and whine about it because you have difficulty on delivering the tasks well. I think that is why we need to be good at something we do. Besides, we are paid doing it.  The difference between them and the participants is the upfront payment.

[coin_1122]

It is hard to become a bounty manager since all of the blame is going to be your burden because you are the one talking to the bounty participants. But, as a bounty hunter, lets understand the situation of the bounty manager. They just relay the information to us and have nothing to do with the scam that will happen sooner or later.

What? I have seen and work with many campaigns managers and haven't seen the difficulties in being a bounty manager. Although, many incompetent managers may found things difficult as a result causing them pays; who cares. Any competent bounty manager will always find things easy to administer over a campaign.

Campaign managers should be held responsible for their inability to double check the campaign they chose to administer to know if they are legit or scams, not the responsibility of the hunters who are just here doing what can earn them few SATs.

Of course, it is their duty to cross-check about the company because we have seen many managers failed to deliver from the projects. Bounty hunter's duty is to cross-check the companies whether they are legit or not, we already lost faith in bounties because we worked many months without any payments. We cannot judge the bounty managers or company.

[ubercool]

Bounty hunters think that bounty manager will be a part of the project team but in most of the cases it'll not be true as bounty manager will be hired just to do a job and get paid, he won't be having the power to do any decisions rather just do as the team says. It's really hard to do these days and even the icos are not even getting any investments.

[Driggers95]

A couple of times bounty manager is the one who was being blamed for the unsuccess projects. Not realizing that bounty managers are just doing their job whatever the owner wants him to do. And it is true that bounty participants are juat joining any ICO or any signature campaigns without further realizing that it is not worth to join for.

Being a bounty manager isn't an easy job. Reputations, good image, efforts and time are needed and I understand where OP is coming from all of his sentiments.

Indeed, bounty managers are just hired employees with a pretty good salary because of their management skills and experience, they are not an official member of the project but a lot of people often blame them for the failures of a project, the impatience and agitation are understandable from the participants but maybe they attacked the wrong object. In addition, the bounty manager has only a few contacts with the project, they do not have the right to decide or ask anything but many participants still ask very difficult questions to answer, and asked many times while there was an answer ahead

[desticy]

All your listed difficulties are ordinary work for a good manager. To be honest, a good manager organizes everything in such a way that later he can easily cut off fake accounts from honest ones.
For a good manager, this is not a problem. Moreover, he can specially create a trap for such accounts so that they do not complicate the process of their mimicry.
In the end I will say that good managers are one, and that is why there are so many problems at the distribution and calculation stage.

[Novatech8]

A couple of times bounty manager is the one who was being blamed for the unsuccess projects. Not realizing that bounty managers are just doing their job whatever the owner wants him to do. And it is true that bounty participants are juat joining any ICO or any signature campaigns without further realizing that it is not worth to join for.

Being a bounty manager isn't an easy job. Reputations, good image, efforts and time are needed and I understand where OP is coming from all of his sentiments.

Bounty managers capability is of different types, few bounty managers on this forum cares about their reputations and they do research before approving a bounty project but some bounty managers are know for always introducing bad projects, I'm not going to mention names but this is true

[TWW]

A couple of times bounty manager is the one who was being blamed for the unsuccess projects. Not realizing that bounty managers are just doing their job whatever the owner wants him to do. And it is true that bounty participants are juat joining any ICO or any signature campaigns without further realizing that it is not worth to join for.

Being a bounty manager isn't an easy job. Reputations, good image, efforts and time are needed and I understand where OP is coming from all of his sentiments.

Bounty managers capability is of different types, few bounty managers on this forum cares about their reputations and they do research before approving a bounty project but some bounty managers are know for always introducing bad projects, I'm not going to mention names but this is true

although in good research, sometimes not all projects promoted by bounty managers can be successful. this also depends on market conditions and other factors. we cannot force and know the wishes of the bounty manager. we have to research the projects that we will support. and the decision is whether we want to join the campaign or not.

[masterrex]

I don't know much about what settings and payment arrangement was use between the project team and the bounty manager, But i'm sure the bounty manager was directly paid in BTC or other liquid coins/tokens, in that sense i think the bounty manager has more advantage comparing to the ordinary bounty hunters, But still the burden of bounty campaign performance in terms of results stays on the bounty manager side including on how to run the bounty campaign efficiently.

[leyton11]

Actually, I understand this. I was the one who used to run the bounty campaign and I myself get paid with their tokens. We are like bounty hunters, every action needs to wait for a notice from our superiors and from there we will dare to distribute the tokens or give exact dates. So when a bad project ends, don't swear at us because we're one of the victims. We should better understand each other's problems and create the best quality community.

[samuraijin]

I am still confused about how the bounty manager got the job for the project and why they did not select it either, that they were real and paying projects,

Well, apparently even they want to manage a good one when the team itself is totally scammer then they wouldn't know. Some projects looks legit in the beginning then after a while, things turned out the other away around. Bounty managers are someway victims since some doesn't been paid in fiat or bitcoin or the worse their salary is just a shitcoin.

yes I know they seem to be pursuing reputation in this forum of course so they don't choose which one is the best to be shared here, actually this should also be prevented so that no bounty managers don't get paid because there are many scam projects, they can ask for half a down payment for payment as a bounty manager so as not to be harmed when they scammers leave the project, including bounty hunters, my hope is that in the future, bounty managers must be selective on the projects they hold at least help prevent fraud that often occurs like this, because they are the leaders of bounty hunters in This forum, whatever it is good for everyone, let's fix it now that must be fixed

[makishart]

A couple of times bounty manager is the one who was being blamed for the unsuccess projects. Not realizing that bounty managers are just doing their job whatever the owner wants him to do. And it is true that bounty participants are juat joining any ICO or any signature campaigns without further realizing that it is not worth to join for.

Being a bounty manager isn't an easy job. Reputations, good image, efforts and time are needed and I understand where OP is coming from all of his sentiments.

Bounty managers capability is of different types, few bounty managers on this forum cares about their reputations and they do research before approving a bounty project but some bounty managers are know for always introducing bad projects, I'm not going to mention names but this is true

But the central capability from the managers must be to make sure if the participant was getting safe too. There was a lot of differences between bitcoin campaign and altcoin campaign manager. The majority of managers who are introducing so many scam projects are coming from the altcoin bounty as they wanna look like they are reputable enough to manage the campaign. Still, they don't care about the quality of the campaign. Those altcoin campaign managers should have been putting more responsibility to make sure the quality of their projects.