My negative feedback for BestChange is going to stay because it is very relevant.
If you read thought the tag properly you would know I did not leave negative trust because of the $21,000 scam, I left my negative feedback long before that accusation and my reasons are stated within the trust section:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1073450@JollyGood I really respect what are you doing on this forum, in most cases I agree with you but I'm not sure about this case.
Your negative feedback posted before "$21k accusation" says "
BEWARE - this user has no history on the forum but created a signature bounty without escrow"
I don't think that running a signature campaign without escrow deserve the red tag. especially considering that they already paid out five consecutive weeks without any delay or excuses. I confirm that.
In your
reference post, I find the only discussion about escrow and whether they have the money for such a campaign, and I think is not a proper reference.
Rigid attitude on the campaign/escrow issue leads to the wrong side. But still here is a lot of new campaign without escrow on a daily basis, just check the altcoin section.
Also, you say in feedback: "
Furthermore, this user watched from the sidelines WITHOUT entering the conversation when users discussed bestchange. Instead this user sent PMs to its supporters rather than have an open transparent debate therefore not definitely not trustworthy."
Can you link me to this discussion? I know for BestChange
ANN thread, but I don't see any constructive discuss there initiated by the dissatisfied user.
When BestChange send copy and pasted PMs to those that left negative trust asking it to be removed otherwise there was a threat made against us. I ignored that pathetic PM just like the other users that received it. In your case I am posting a reply here, please do not send me any more PMs - thank you.
OP, I already said in my previous post on this topic about sending PM, it is not the right way. IDK why Bestchange do that, I want to believe they are new in the forum discussion and really wants to improve his trust here.
Now you have to look at this one post, from the beginning I have said about BestChange.
I really don't care anymore about the BestChange campaign whether you want to be paid or not.
So right now, if I associate it with the red trust in
(BestChange), I can't make a decision because there are 11 DT members currently in it.
I respect their decision in this matter.
For now I am just waiting for the results of the 11 DT, against (BestChange). In making a decision to delete or not.
red trustSo now I have explained the point of the problem now.
The red paint I gave for BestChange based on:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219339.msg53670911#msg53670911So, please don't send me PM again, I'm afraid I won't have time to read, thank you.
So, your opinion depends on the other 11 DT members decision? Isn't trust rating a personal opinion based on evidence and experience? You left both, negative and neutral obviously it seems that you are not sure what is appropriate.
When we talking about evidence, what kind of fraud proves your post in
red tag reference? We talking here about BestChange business, not about services listed there.
among other things, their mediation helped to solve the incident with changehero.io. It is a plus, right? Users have someone trusted who will help them to solve "misunderstanding" with exchangers.
It is just my 2 cents in this case, though it can be argued that I'm not rational here because I am paid from Bestchange (even this post will be counted). I just want to be sure whom I promote wearing his signature.