Satoshi Nakamoto never used Bitcointalk - new claim by Craig Wright

[BitcoinFX]

This guy is saying all kinds of ridiculous things...so that he can get free press..he is thinking himself like a celebrity who can feed off media & paparazzi...but he is not an actual celebrity!!

On 26 August 2019, a US Federal Court ruled that Satoshi Nakamoto is the partnership of Dave Kleiman and Craig Wright.

So now, for the first time in history we have confirmation by a US Federal Court of the fact that CSW is at least 50% of Satoshi Nakamoto.

Not so. Incorrect.

Your source ?

Further, I likely already know what you might link here and its already been debunked as well.

...

Now go here @MicroGuy ...

- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/fraud-timeline.html

[BitcoinFX]

In terms of my friendship with Satoshi. It is my belief that I was communicating with Craig Wright.

MicroGuy ....

Date Registered:    April 05, 2013, 03:08:23 PM
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=93373

 

[DooMAD]

On 26 August 2019, a US Federal Court ruled that Satoshi Nakamoto is the partnership of Dave Kleiman and Craig Wright.

So now, for the first time in history we have confirmation by a US Federal Court of the fact that CSW is at least 50% of Satoshi Nakamoto.

Nope.  That was just Calvin Ayre's warped interpretation of proceedings.  And anyone who trusts Calvin Ayre is an idiot. 

[o_e_l_e_o]

On 26 August 2019, a US Federal Court ruled that Satoshi Nakamoto is the partnership of Dave Kleiman and Craig Wright.

I mean, you could at least make up lies that aren't instantly disprovable.

Here's a transcript of what the court actually said:





In other words, the court does not decide who is or was Satoshi, but for the purposes of this ruling only, CSW owes Kleiman 50% of what CSW claims to possess.

[BitcoinFX]

The fact of the matter is, Blockstream cannot allow the truth above to be revealed/accepted.

This is because it would throw a wrench in the works in terms of their hidden agenda for Bitcoin.

The fact of the matter is, you 'MicroGuy' are a manipulating liar and also seemingly complicit ...

Your tweet ...
- https://twitter.com/realmicroguy/status/1255153831555497984

"I don't see any of these @blockstream gas lighters on this list.

http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto "

...

My reply ...
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1255505028481273856

"Funny that you 'MicroGuy' only appear on the ning account page (which is known to of been compromised) long after the real satoshi had left. Herewith, an earlier snapshot with the only 2 'friends' actually accepted by the real satoshi ...

- https://web.archive.org/web/20140307223923/http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto "

 

[MicroGuy]

The fact of the matter is, Blockstream cannot allow the truth above to be revealed/accepted.

This is because it would throw a wrench in the works in terms of their hidden agenda for Bitcoin.

The fact of the matter is, you 'MicroGuy' are a manipulating liar and also seemingly complicit ...

Your tweet ...
- https://twitter.com/realmicroguy/status/1255153831555497984

"I don't see any of these @blockstream gas lighters on this list.

http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto "

...

My reply ...
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1255505028481273856

"Funny that you 'MicroGuy' only appear on the ning account page (which is known to of been compromised) long after the real satoshi had left. Herewith, an earlier snapshot with the only 2 'friends' actually accepted by the real satoshi ...

- https://web.archive.org/web/20140307223923/http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto "

 

I think it's perfectly normal that a Ning account would gain followers over time. This isn't anything out of the ordinary.

What do you mean "known to be" compromised?

https://techcrunch.com/2014/03/06/satoshi-dorian/

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/desperately-seeking-satoshi-bitcoin-creator-hunt-turns-bizarre-n46911

https://www.trustnodes.com/2018/11/30/did-satoshi-nakamoto-just-say-nour-and-who-is-wagner-tamanaha-nakamotos-new-friend

https://breakermag.com/satoshi-nakamoto-resurfaced-on-the-p2p-foundation-with-a-mysterious-message/

[BitcoinFX]

The fact of the matter is, Blockstream cannot allow the truth above to be revealed/accepted.

This is because it would throw a wrench in the works in terms of their hidden agenda for Bitcoin.

The fact of the matter is, you 'MicroGuy' are a manipulating liar and also seemingly complicit ...

Your tweet ...
- https://twitter.com/realmicroguy/status/1255153831555497984

"I don't see any of these @blockstream gas lighters on this list.

http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto "

...

My reply ...
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1255505028481273856

"Funny that you 'MicroGuy' only appear on the ning account page (which is known to of been compromised) long after the real satoshi had left. Herewith, an earlier snapshot with the only 2 'friends' actually accepted by the real satoshi ...

- https://web.archive.org/web/20140307223923/http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto "

 

I think it's perfectly normal that a Ning account would gain followers over time. This isn't anything out of the ordinary.

What do you mean "known to be" compromised?

https://www.trustnodes.com/2018/11/30/did-satoshi-nakamoto-just-say-nour-and-who-is-wagner-tamanaha-nakamotos-new-friend

It is known that the 'satoshi' email account associated with the ning account was compromised. Hence why you only appear after this snapshot ...

- https://web.archive.org/web/20140307223923/http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto


Additional ...

My friendship with Satoshi is clearly documented unlike those here promoting the Blockstream agenda. You can't just friend yourself! An action has to be taken on HIS end!

https://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto



So please go crawl back under your rock until you educate yourself. It's nice to have facts before accusing others of lying.

The fact is Satoshi had been long gone from the public by the time you added him as a "friend" on the P2P Foundation website. His P2P Foundation account was hacked sometime in 2014, so whoever "added" you was the hacker, who incidentally used the website to post as Satoshi and threaten to dox him if he wasn't paid some BTC.

This was the message he left using Satoshi's account on the P2P Foundation on September 9th, 2014:

Dear Satoshi. Your dox, passwords and IP addresses are being sold on the darknet. Apparently you didn't configure Tor properly and your IP leaked when you used your email account sometime in 2010. You are not safe. You need to get out of where you are as soon as possible before these people harm you.

That is who you were "friends" with.

Maybe you just weren't aware of it, but this occurred over 5 years ago you should have brought yourself up to speed on the matter in this time before attempting to pretend Satoshi was your "friend." LOL. He's your friend about as much as Tom from MySpace is my friend.

The hacking incident was even mentioned on the forum while you were a member.

[MicroGuy]

The fact of the matter is, Blockstream cannot allow the truth above to be revealed/accepted.

This is because it would throw a wrench in the works in terms of their hidden agenda for Bitcoin.

The fact of the matter is, you 'MicroGuy' are a manipulating liar and also seemingly complicit ...

Your tweet ...
- https://twitter.com/realmicroguy/status/1255153831555497984

"I don't see any of these @blockstream gas lighters on this list.

http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto "

...

My reply ...
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1255505028481273856

"Funny that you 'MicroGuy' only appear on the ning account page (which is known to of been compromised) long after the real satoshi had left. Herewith, an earlier snapshot with the only 2 'friends' actually accepted by the real satoshi ...

- https://web.archive.org/web/20140307223923/http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto "

 

I think it's perfectly normal that a Ning account would gain followers over time. This isn't anything out of the ordinary.

What do you mean "known to be" compromised?

https://www.trustnodes.com/2018/11/30/did-satoshi-nakamoto-just-say-nour-and-who-is-wagner-tamanaha-nakamotos-new-friend

It is known that the 'satoshi' email account associated with the ning account was compromised. Hence why you only appear after this snapshot ...

- https://web.archive.org/web/20140307223923/http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto

Based on your rantings, I think this bitcointalk account must have been compromised.

I knew the real BitcoinFX.

[BitcoinFX]

...snip...

Based on your rantings, I think this bitcointalk account must have been compromised.

I knew the real BitcoinFX.

You truly are a clown MicroGuy.

This is my long standing account and it has never been compromised.

Unlike CSW I've signed and verified myself (and I certainly know my own Bitcoin history very well indeed!) ...

Again, ...
Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

[MicroGuy]

...snip...

Based on your rantings, I think this bitcointalk account must have been compromised.

I knew the real BitcoinFX.

You truly are a clown MicroGuy.

This is my long standing account and it has never been compromised.

Unlike CSW I've signed and verified myself (and I certainly know my own Bitcoin history very well indeed!) ...

Again, ...
Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

Goodbye.

Interesting that when Satoshi used Nour on P2P Foundation you weren't so confident his account was hacked then.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4575874.msg48472954#msg48472954

[kryptqnick]

The news recently surfaced in my inbox,

https://news.bitcoin.com/craig-wright-claims-satoshi-nakamoto-never-used-bitcointalk-to-communicate/

Don't know how to react! The court case seems to taking unexpected twists and turns!

Like some have already pointed out, it's now very new. I've also encountered it on Bitcointalk weeks ago. I think it's understandable why he'd say that: he probably doesn't know much about what Satoshi wrote on the forum, so it can be a serious risk if someone tries to test his knowledge of, allegedly, himself, and fail. Not to mention that the style of Satoshi from the forum differs a lot from Craig's style (Satoshi wasn't so harsh).

What if we all just stop giving this lunatic what he wants - attention? I don't know if it's right to stop calling him out on his bullshit though, but I feel like crypto enthusiasts are the main thing that still keeps him afloat somehow, in a weird way. Let him destruy himself on his own terms

Well I would agree, but this is bitcointalk where anything vaguely related to bitcoin is posted about numerous times and in numerous configurations and formats. It's pretty slow for news these days so this sort of stuff is going to be talked about. There's also seemingly quite a few people who think he is or may actually be satoshi so that doesn't help either.

I don't think it's right to ignore because silence can be interpreted as a lack of objections. Plus, there are people still sure that Craig is Satoshi as well as many newbies who did not make their minds yet. So it's important not to be silent so that 'team Craig' doesn't win.

[BitcoinFX]

...snip...

Based on your rantings, I think this bitcointalk account must have been compromised.

I knew the real BitcoinFX.

You truly are a clown MicroGuy.

This is my long standing account and it has never been compromised.

Unlike CSW I've signed and verified myself (and I certainly know my own Bitcoin history very well indeed!) ...

Again, ...
Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

Goodbye.

Interesting that when Satoshi used Nour on P2P Foundation you weren't so confident his account was hacked.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4575874.msg48472954#msg48472954

I guess you need to understand when I'm being satirical and/or facetious.

This forum is nothing like it used to be and neither is the 'Bitcoin' space now being presented herein.

You know the facts here MicroGuy or you have been easily duped.

If one calls me a 'troll', expect to be 'trolled'.

The funniest part for everyone (and BTC), is it won't really matter who 'wins' the Wright vs Kleinman case ...

Actually, I'll tell you who wins right now ... the Lawyers! 

[MicroGuy]

...snip...

Based on your rantings, I think this bitcointalk account must have been compromised.

I knew the real BitcoinFX.

You truly are a clown MicroGuy.

This is my long standing account and it has never been compromised.

Unlike CSW I've signed and verified myself (and I certainly know my own Bitcoin history very well indeed!) ...

Again, ...
Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

Goodbye.

Interesting that when Satoshi used Nour on P2P Foundation you weren't so confident his account was hacked.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4575874.msg48472954#msg48472954

I guess you need to understand when I'm being satirical and/or facetious.

This forum is nothing like it used to be and neither is the 'Bitcoin' space being presented herein.

You now know the facts here MicroGuy or you have been easily duped.

Unless you've edited them, I've found at least 3 of your posts supporting Satoshi as being the potential author.

Either way, I don't appreciate being called a liar when I've been nothing but truthful about being friends with Satoshi on Ning.

[BitcoinFX]

...snip...

Unless you've edited them, I've found at least 3 of your posts supporting Satoshi as being the potential author.

Either way, I don't appreciate being called a liar when I've been nothing but truthful about being friends with Satoshi on Ning.

Satoshi was the 'author' of BTC. Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi.

Either way, it's not the real satoshi that 'friended' you on ning. We have clearly established that above.

This misdirection by you is clearly unacceptable and has already been spotted by many ...


- https://twitter.com/realmicroguy/status/1255148327437365251

 

[Youghoor]

Lol, I don't know what Craig really wishes to achieve with this dust he wants to throw in our eyes but I am sure he is several motives than just being accredited as Satoshi Nakamoto. Don't you think he is using this hype and attention to make his shit forked coin of BTC more popular in this industry? I am just asking because there is no point in this law case and how he is going to justify his claims yet we keep on wasting time on it

[odolvlobo]

Either way, I don't appreciate being called a liar when I've been nothing but truthful about being friends with Satoshi on Ning.

I see what you did there.

[ReiMomo]

This is one way for scammers to have more victims trying to lead us into his own site so he can easily gain our trust if we believe him and leave bitcointalk. Surely soon he will become the victim of his own trap and when that time comes obviously it will be like a dead end to him and a no way out. Why are some people keep on claiming that they are someone whom they are not, is it because of fame or probably because of personal interest? For years Craig keeps on claiming he is Santoshi, in fact, he is popular now but for years no one believed him so he can't benefit nor gain on his interest in doing this.

[acdc]

To this day, he still asserts himself as Satoshi Nakamoto, but he does not provide any evidence that can prove it.
I suppose it is time for him to end this joke and we should abandon him. Perhaps at the present time he and his joke are only valid for the media, who are willing to believe in any theories.

[franky1]

CSW new ploy was that the real inventor of bitcoin only sent out the white paper in 2008 and that was it. any communication with other people is false.

this is because CSW wants to create a narrative that the edits/bugfixes done via users on bitcointalk were not the 'original bitcoin' but a copy that was stolen from the real inventor. and the user on bitcointalk using the pseudonym on the forum was not the words of the inventor. but the thief that stole 'the original bitcoin'
thus any quotes of 'satoshi' on this forum do not represent the 'original bitcoin' vision

...
to summarise
CSW is an idiot to the magnitude of deserving of some prison time
he knows he cant prove anything so now he is denying involvement while still trying to pretend he made bitcoin.

here is the funny thing though. CSW asked bitcointalk forum members to visit him and discuss communications they had together to help validate CSW claims.

so CSW just 5 years ago was saying he was using bitcointalk and communicating with members..

i truly hate liars, scammers. but i also hate the ones that are so dumb they have to flip flop and change narrative and unable to keep the story straight

[MicroGuy]

...snip...

Unless you've edited them, I've found at least 3 of your posts supporting Satoshi as being the potential author.

Either way, I don't appreciate being called a liar when I've been nothing but truthful about being friends with Satoshi on Ning.

Satoshi was the 'author' of BTC. Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi.

Either way, it's not the real satoshi that 'friended' you on ning. We have clearly established that above.

This misdirection by you is clearly unacceptable and has already been spotted by many ...


- https://twitter.com/realmicroguy/status/1255148327437365251

 

Alas, the spotters themselves have been spotted.