Satoshi Nakamoto never used Bitcointalk - new claim by Craig Wright

[Ozero]

I can’t understand the sensation of Craig Wright’s statement that he did not use a Satoshi account in this forum. What does it matter for the trial of Kleiman's lawsuit? Wright was unable to provide evidence of the ownership of the wallets that Satoshi Nakamoto was supposed to own, and the deadline for providing evidence for this had long expired. It is recorded that Wright lied in court and presented fake documents. In my opinion, this lawsuit took too long. It is time to officially recognize that Wright is not the creator of Bitcoin and therefore all his statements have no meaning.

[Debonaire217]

He again? I thought his journey about bitcoin destruction is finished. Though, why he is now making a statement about Satoshi Nakamoto never used bitcointalk? Is he done impersonating him? Because judging by his actions, Craig Wright shows more of a business side actions and behavior while the real Satoshi here on our forum showed a more technical technology expert knowing much about algorithms, hashes and security features. Craig Wright just claims and claims but actually has his own team who does the code for him. Who would believe Craig to be Satoshi? None.

[klava1983]

I'm sure that Craig doesn't believe in his own claims. The only reasonable thought is that he makes such claims for self-promotion.

[BitcoinFX]

...snip...

If you really are BitcoinFX. What did I do for you to prevent you from attacking the Goldcoin blockchain?

You didn't 'do' anything.

I most certainly didn't 'attack' anything either.

If I recall correctly you, the self-proclaimed 'chief scientist of goldcoin', did not really understand banscore= 

You also did not comprehend potential XAUUSD trade 'backing' within cypto and/or your Goldcoin's™ (lol), hideous economic model, relative to Bitcoin and/or other altcoins.

[amishmanish]

@microguy guy is fixated with marrying wright despite him going back on its word time and again. He even claims he knows the writing style..Ridiculous..!!Anybody who has heard wright speak will know that he can never be the Man/ Men behind an open-sourced solution to the Byzantine General's problem. He speaks like an MLM, Ponzi scheme head, the kind of people behind frauds like Bitconnect.

What kind of a knucklehead are you claiming to be on the same level as Satoshi, Theymos and others? All i could find in your post history was unabated shilling of one altcoin after another interspersed with occasional pieces of wisdom about how Alts will overtake bitcoin. Delusions of Grandeur, False Promises, Promoting shitcoins and vaporware. Quite evident why you to have a crush on wright.

[nutildah]

...snip...

If you really are BitcoinFX. What did I do for you to prevent you from attacking the Goldcoin blockchain?

You didn't 'do' anything.

I most certainly didn't 'attack' anything either.

He's confusing you with BitcoinEXpress  

[arwin100]

I wonder why people takes his claims seriously will we all know that his lying about things maybe we should forget about him since the more talks about his name the more he will became famous and I think he loves his name always brags in controversy.

So technically speaking on this he already claims that he is not Satoshi right? 

[BitcoinFX]

...snip...

If you really are BitcoinFX. What did I do for you to prevent you from attacking the Goldcoin blockchain?

You didn't 'do' anything.

I most certainly didn't 'attack' anything either.

He's confusing you with BitcoinEXpress  

Quite possibly, that's the account which advocated DDoS against various altcoins, right?

I recall a thread once with myself effectively telling him off and advising to try doing something more productive with his time.

 

...snip...

You added yourself years after Satoshi was no longer active: https://web.archive.org/web/20141022054522/https://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto

It looks like you created your account in March 2014 and the first thing you did was leave a comment promoting a shitty altcoin on a more than five year old post by Satoshi.

If you knew Satoshi in any way there certainly isn't any evidence at the link you provided-- quite the opposite: Most people don't tend to go around writing impersonal "Thank you for the clarification" messages to five year old posts by their friends. They especially don't go sticking tacky ads for their competing offerings on them.

Why do all these satoshi obsessed people need to be incompetently lying pieces of shit?

...snip...

...snip...

...snip...

The fact is Satoshi had been long gone from the public by the time you added him as a "friend" on the P2P Foundation website. His P2P Foundation account was hacked sometime in 2014, so whoever "added" you was the hacker, who incidentally used the website to post as Satoshi and threaten to dox him if he wasn't paid some BTC.

This was the message he left using Satoshi's account on the P2P Foundation on September 9th, 2014:

Dear Satoshi. Your dox, passwords and IP addresses are being sold on the darknet. Apparently you didn't configure Tor properly and your IP leaked when you used your email account sometime in 2010. You are not safe. You need to get out of where you are as soon as possible before these people harm you.

...snip...

 

Studiously trying to help 'fix' Bitcoin OPSEC since <2010

Re: TOR and I2P
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=22.msg191#msg191

Re: TOR and I2P
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=22.msg223#msg223

N.B. Above link is 'satoshi' posting in response to myself in early 2010 on this very forum.

Full circle, thread topic back on track. Satoshi clearly posted in these boards.

An obligatory, I am the real Craig Wright [citation needed]

 

[MicroGuy]

Stop trying to confuse the campaign spammers. As you know this is all explained in the following thread.  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2112829.msg54323794#msg54323794

Furthermore, Craig Wright was the person from the original team responsible for making posts on this forum. Gavin Andresen and Jon Matonis were both 100% correct when they identified Wright as Satoshi.

https://news.bitcoin.com/heavy-hitters-reveal-real-satoshi/

During the London proof sessions, I had the opportunity to review the relevant data along three distinct lines: cryptographic, social, and technical. Based on what I witnessed, it is my firm belief that Craig Steven Wright satisfies all three categories. ~ Gavin Andresen

https://medium.com/@jonmatonis/how-i-met-satoshi-96e85727dc5a

"The reality of an extraordinary event is rarely what you imagine and I am now pleased to know the creator of the Bitcoin protocol and the author of the Bitcoin white paper, Craig Steven Wright." ~ Jon Matonis

[BitcoinFX]

Stop trying to confuse the campaign spammers. As you know this is all explained in the following thread.  

hxxps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2112829.msg54323794#msg54323794

Note: Craig Wright was the person from the original team responisble for making the posts on this forum. He's also the individual that added me as a friend on the P2P foundation website.

Gavin Andresen and Jon Matonis were both 100% correct when they identified Wright as Satoshi.

Wrong. Incorrect.

Empirical sources of evidence and myself as a witness proves otherwise.

Now cease and desist.

MicroGuy - claiming to be a "friend of Satoshi" in order to promote his altcoin
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5244815

[South Park]

What if we all just stop giving this lunatic what he wants - attention? I don't know if it's right to stop calling him out on his bullshit though, but I feel like crypto enthusiasts are the main thing that still keeps him afloat somehow, in a weird way. Let him destruy himself on his own terms

I agree, this person is trying his best to remain relevant and he will do and say whatever he needs to in order to achieve that goal, there was a time in which I liked to read those kind of news just to get a good laugh and see what kind of weird story he could come up with, but then I realized that I was doing exactly what he wanted and since then I have not read a single news related to him and if we want this to eventually disappear I think we need to begin to do the same.

[amishmanish]

Stop trying to confuse the campaign spammers. As you know this is all explained in the following thread.  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2112829.msg54323794#msg54323794

Furthermore, Craig Wright was the person from the original team responsible for making posts on this forum. Gavin Andresen and Jon Matonis were both 100% correct when they identified Wright as Satoshi.

Stop trying to sound like an authority on what people should know. If you are foolish enough to believe a man who has only ever equivocated on this subject then keep it to yourself. Gavin tried to be the dictator with his one-sided support for hard-forks and block increase. The other developers were not of this view and he couldn't take it.
Self-aggrandizing ego-maniacs like CSW, Ver, Even Gavin (With his comments about "A lot of people are pushing me to be a dictator") forgot that this is a decentralized project that needs consensus.

I think CIA or someone else had has his balls since very early days. That explains all his attempts at subverting bitcoin including his stupid comments on CSW which by his own admission, he regrets making. Yet, CSW and shitcoin shills like you fail to understand this.

[finaleshot2016]

I bet CW doesn't know the details about satoshi accessing here in the bitcointalk, and the best way for him is to deny that the true SN doesn't interact here.

https://medium.com/@jonmatonis/how-i-met-satoshi-96e85727dc5a

I don't think the "false impression" of Jon Matonis is definitive evidence that CW is satoshi.

The article was very great to illustrate the nature of bitcoin and blockchain technologies and to understand that blockchain is a bitcoin by-product. Still, the article was written 4 years ago and it's hard to know the authenticity of the article if he himself attempted to jazz up all the content to make CW as SN. While he has excellent credibility, and most likely, people will quickly be able to believe it.

Also, it's kinda rude to call some a campaign spammers, just because they're not on the side of CW. We have different opinions and this is a forum so I guess we should respect each other. I do believe that we still need to undergo due process.

[MicroGuy]

Also, it's kinda rude to call some a campaign spammers, just because they're not on the side of CW. We have different opinions and this is a forum so I guess we should respect each other. I do believe that we still need to undergo due process.

Sorry. It's just annoying to start reading a post and then get 2 sentences in to realize it's just random text to get a banner view.

And I'm no Craig Wright fan.

[gundala]

He again? I thought his journey about bitcoin destruction is finished. Though, why he is now making a statement about Satoshi Nakamoto never used bitcointalk? Is he done impersonating him? ~

He lives with sensation, so he is always looking for ways to get other people's attention, like narcissistic symptoms, maybe. Actually we don't need to spend energy on this insignificant problem. Since the beginning Satoshi kept his identity a secret, leave it like that.

[pakhitheboss]

He again? I thought his journey about bitcoin destruction is finished. Though, why he is now making a statement about Satoshi Nakamoto never used bitcointalk? Is he done impersonating him? ~

He lives with sensation, so he is always looking for ways to get other people's attention, like narcissistic symptoms, maybe. Actually we don't need to spend energy on this insignificant problem. Since the beginning Satoshi kept his identity a secret, leave it like that.

He is a joke who is trying to amuse the world and create a fake identity. Unfortunately that has gone against him and that is why he is known now as Faketoshi. I am amazed by the level of confidence this guy has, I sometimes feel he is suffering from attention seeking syndrome. As he tends to always seek attention by creating fake news.

[Tipstar]

Satoshi Nakamoto is a pseudonym. If he is claiming Satoshi never used Bitcointalk, it would be white lie as satoshi is one of the earliest member of this forum. If he meant the satoshi the founder of bitcoin and satoshi the early user of bitcointalk are different, he might be claiming he is also a one of the satoshi but the one who have no any significance.

[Searing]

so Hal Finney and the other early adopters like Galvin and the rest...who gave feedback on how/what to do to improve and push BTC to the world...was just following

some 'random' guy/gal on bitcointalk on here in public and via PM... who knew the code and white paper enough that the things he talked about via bitcointalk were valuable indeed...

but gee it was just some random

guy/gal ..faking to be Satoshi..that knew enough to be one of the 'founders' on the round table of BTC and development of crypto..but what? The supposed 'fake' bitcointalk satoshi

was too shy? Had to hide his massive skills from all comers at the beginning of BTC? Was just being a 'swell fellow' and doing all the work?

What an idiot if he thinks anyone is gonna believe that mess of hooey.......desperate indeed it seems but not a lot of forethought on this current lie by faketoshi CW.

brad

[Wolfencloud]

The fact that a lot of people claims that they are Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of the most famous cryptocurrency Bitcoin, I don't believe on their claims anymore especially it is obvious that what they really want is "Attention" from us so that they can make their self famous. They don't even have a strong proof that can support their claims.