Never trust an ICO ranking site!

[Divinespark]

Why do you have to rely on ICO review sites? Do your own research and choose the best projects. Also do not care about new projects at the present time, most of them will be falling in the future. If you invest in them, you will definitely not profit

[ningrum]

Why do you have to rely on ICO review sites? Do your own research and choose the best projects. Also do not care about new projects at the present time, most of them will be falling in the future. If you invest in them, you will definitely not profit

If you keep fighting for tokens the same thing will happen to me too, in contrast to Bitcoin investments that will continue to grow if you can play in it.

it's better not to take part in ICO let alone participate in it, I always avoid it,
but for IEO which is held in large exchanges I follow it, because the risk that will be received at IEO is much smaller 

[Romeotom]

Yes people not believe in ico ranking site because there has paying service. If a project will pay some rewards then ranking site will giving big ranking place. I shouldn't like ico ranking site even we have more enough knowledge for investing a project.

[ZincUnrated]

I have lost huge sums to IEOs and ICOs in the past simply because I didn't have the right advice at the time and just kept going or trusting in Whitepapers and ICO rating sites or directories. This simply doesn't work most times and these sites or directories are paid to say or write what they people want to see. They do it so tactfully and people tend to believe them in the earn and thus, part away with their monies for investments. In the end, these projects they hype up don't live up to expectations resulting in people losing money. You always have to do your research about any project before putting in your money. That's the only task you owe yourself. Don't depend on third parties that are actually after their pockets.

[aemma]

These ranking sites used to be good and then they started doing the wrong thing which led many people into losing huge funds in bad projects endorsed by them; sincerely it is a huge mistake to trust those ranking site. It's good ICO are no longer existing else people would have continued using them and thus investing in some scam projects which will have nothing but hype. Nowadays, it is better taking your chances with IEO on top exchanges where there is a good opportunity to make your decisions and make profit.

[princeyeboah]

Why do you have to rely on ICO review sites? Do your own research and choose the best projects. Also do not care about new projects at the present time, most of them will be falling in the future. If you invest in them, you will definitely not profit

Very good point. One cryptocurrency expert once told me, "new projects/new cryptocurrencies are for the crypto experts". What he meant was, since cryptocurrency experts know how to perform adequate research on new projects, it is good to leave it to them. Newbies must always look on already listed coins (large cap and mid-cap) to avoid scam or failure unless the newbie can research well.

[EmpowNetwork]

As for me, I no longer believe any ICO projects

[TheClownSong]

Why do you have to rely on ICO review sites? Do your own research and choose the best projects. Also do not care about new projects at the present time, most of them will be falling in the future. If you invest in them, you will definitely not profit

Very good point. One cryptocurrency expert once told me, "new projects/new cryptocurrencies are for the crypto experts". What he meant was, since cryptocurrency experts know how to perform adequate research on new projects, it is good to leave it to them. Newbies must always look on already listed coins (large cap and mid-cap) to avoid scam or failure unless the newbie can research well.

Agree, more research needs to be done to find out new projects because they are very risky. Unlike the coins or tokens that have been listed on the exchanger because we can see their performance in the market, are actively traded or not or already have a large market cap value

[arjuna BTC]

I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!

What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

always believe with your own research, maybe other people or even ICO/IEO rank site just for comparations with your opinion about the project
but the choice is in your hand buddy

[ene1980]

ICO  ranking websites are only doing what a sensible business manager would do, they get paid to rank the project high and that allows the company to continue being profitable. If someone offered you that much money you would take it too, or at least you should take it to be a profitable website.

You can call them fraud if they are taking money from scam projects and then rank them to be the best project in town. I understand that they are doing business ranking these shitty projects but even for that they need to have a background check whether the project is legit or just made to lure people to invest and then run away with the money and none of these ranking websites are not doing any of these background check.

[SolarWindMiningCompany]

I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!

What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

That's the true. They all charge something to put out a word about your project on their blog and theirs nothing wrong with that. Cointelegragh an charge as high as 2k -5k USD to put and article. The most important thing is giving a honest review

[FrozenBit]

As for me, I no longer believe any ICO projects

But I see you're running a project, and how can you attract investors without using an ICO? Or do you intend to implement IEO at the present time? If you do IEO on small exchanges, it is like an ICO, which will surely fail

[JeotQ]

It's really a shame, just imagine if ICO rating websites are reliable, imagine if coinmarketcap lists only very good coins, maybe many investors would have been safe, maybe millions of money won't be lost today, in crypto space it's all about money now

We are all on our own, do your own research to avoid any fund loss or disappointments

[Free1bitco.in]

I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!

What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

That's the true. They all charge something to put out a word about your project on their blog and theirs nothing wrong with that. Cointelegragh an charge as high as 2k -5k USD to put and article. The most important thing is giving a honest review

some sites sometimes give fairly honest ratings. it's just that the team is sometimes not very good at moving the concept. however, I took a reference from the ICO rate site maybe only around 50%, and the rest I did my own research in accordance with the standards that I made.

[TastyChillySauce00]

As for me, I no longer believe any ICO projects

But I see you're running a project, and how can you attract investors without using an ICO? Or do you intend to implement IEO at the present time? If you do IEO on small exchanges, it is like an ICO, which will surely fail

that doesn't make sense to see that. IEO needs a lot of requirements and audit except if he wanna try to apply for the crap exchange site to do an IEO. ICO is still alive no matter what people said because the fact some latest icos can reach the hardcap easily as long as it's a trusted Rico.

[gabbie2010]

You are just saying the truth. ICO ranking has become a business to get free tokens from the project team. The more you pay, the higher your ranking. It has now become a bazaar and I pitty those who rely on ICO ranking sites to make decision.

I once followed a highly rated ICO by this so called ICO rater I was very disappointed at the end of the sales it was a scam despite the high point the ICO was placed,  I took it on myself to embark on through research before investing in any ICO and not to  rely on any ICO sites, I had read many bad experiences of investors relying on ICO sites which later resulted to scam I am sure some would-be or newbies read through comments here before taking any ICO related investment decision

[SyndicateLabs]

ICODROP is still good for you to refer to, I have used this site for many years and see the projects listed there are the best and worthy ones for us to invest. Btw never invest in ICOs not listed there, otherwise you will lose money

[shoreno]

I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!

What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

That's the true. They all charge something to put out a word about your project on their blog and theirs nothing wrong with that. Cointelegragh an charge as high as 2k -5k USD to put and article. The most important thing is giving a honest review

some sites sometimes give fairly honest ratings. it's just that the team is sometimes not very good at moving the concept. however, I took a reference from the ICO rate site maybe only around 50%, and the rest I did my own research in accordance with the standards that I made.

i believe on you because you said you did a research and not just relying 100 percent on the site  . people here should now also woke up and not just blame the site  . 

better if they only blame one to two bad ico site but looks like most of them said that majority of these sites are not legit   . they didnt knew that this words also affect the reputation of those who are only telling the truth and not going to be biased based on the payment that they receieved

[Golftech]

Why do you have to rely on ICO review sites? Do your own research and choose the best projects. Also do not care about new projects at the present time, most of them will be falling in the future. If you invest in them, you will definitely not profit

If you keep fighting for tokens the same thing will happen to me too, in contrast to Bitcoin investments that will continue to grow if you can play in it.

it's better not to take part in ICO let alone participate in it, I always avoid it,
but for IEO which is held in large exchanges I follow it, because the risk that will be received at IEO is much smaller 

This depends on the choice of each person later, if it's the best choice for you to immediately do and continue to survive to get what you want.

It should always that way, if depends from how people understand each investment that they are planning to participate, if you see that IEO which being held to big exchange and you have money to spare, then go ahead and trust your assessment.

Your Money to use so better to listen with your on research and never to be influenced by anyone, it's good to check every potentials and possibilities
and relied with how you understand the project.

[brrzzz]

In general, you can’t believe anything, it’s all paid, like all the media and social networks. Only personal acquaintance and intuition, and not the eulogies of the stars.