Home Court advantage = Not an advantage now because of no-live audience?

[Crypto22265]

For some teams hoke advantage is very important whule for others it makes no difference. I would say at the big stage, in top championships it shouldn't make much of a difference except if we are talking about small teams that really care about their fans support. Maybe only in second and third leagues the supporters are much more important when talking about home advantage

[Mahanton]

We will see it later after the game ends, and maybe the staff will announce it about the result. If that result is good, that can make the sports game continue with having improvement in all sectors. And maybe they will allow people to come into the stadium to support their team because no matter what it is, the fan still needed to give support.

It would still takes time because  they wont give out statistics basing of on few games and percentage basis will be good to look at or be relevant if it would show same numbers on what being shown in op.I can  say that this isnt really that much of a concern because  if we do base up on their gaps when still is everything in normal then the difference isnt really that much  or only a small margin.Hence,
it wont really be that needed to be concerned about and even I doesnt really see for it be relevant.

If those data can be a good input, I think the staff will consider using for another review, or they can use another protocol that is not too strict as before because they can handle the situation at the stadium. Maybe it's only a small margin, but we still need to have as much data as we can to determine what step we need to take in this pandemic. The staff needs hard work to make sure everything goes well because that is related to people's lives.

I dont know on what you are trying to elaborate when it comes to home winning advantage connected to peoples lives.Of course, management would really matter much on the new protocol that they should need to follow and if it  do involves no crowd thing then they wont have any choice and also it doesnt connect out if the said team does really need crowd on this particular  time of pandemic yet we know the risk.
We are talking about winning chances of teams which are on home.Im little bit confused yet you already go to the topic about peoples lives yet it is already somehow far off on what we are talking.

[ethereumhunter]

I dont know on what you are trying to elaborate when it comes to home winning advantage connected to peoples lives.Of course, management would really matter much on the new protocol that they should need to follow and if it  do involves no crowd thing then they wont have any choice and also it doesnt connect out if the said team does really need crowd on this particular  time of pandemic yet we know the risk.
We are talking about winning chances of teams which are on home.Im little bit confused yet you already go to the topic about peoples lives yet it is already somehow far off on what we are talking.

Okay, here is the thing.

Let say the event is succeeded with their first or second match. The staff already got the statistic, every data that is related to the game, including infection people (if it exists), every player's health (before and after the match), the audience (if the staff invite them to go to the stadium).

So when the staff has got all of the data, they can determine what they should do to the next match because the match will continue, but if the number of infections people's increases, they need to consider rescheduling the games. The audience will be an important thing that can support the player from closely. If the staff succeed in the first and second matches, they will consider inviting more people to the stadium, which will benefit the home. But if the staff worried about the pandemic and still want to use no audience, they can still do that.

I am sorry if you are confused

[boyptc]

For some teams hoke advantage is very important whule for others it makes no difference. I would say at the big stage, in top championships it shouldn't make much of a difference except if we are talking about small teams that really care about their fans support. Maybe only in second and third leagues the supporters are much more important when talking about home advantage

Home advantage.

You can say that as speculating that it doesn't really matter to them. As part of professionalism for athletes, they have to consider and stand firm even the crowd is going to be biased against them.

But for the home team, it's a big deal and it makes difference.

[ultrloa]

For some teams hoke advantage is very important whule for others it makes no difference. I would say at the big stage, in top championships it shouldn't make much of a difference except if we are talking about small teams that really care about their fans support. Maybe only in second and third leagues the supporters are much more important when talking about home advantage

Home advantage.

You can say that as speculating that it doesn't really matter to them. As part of professionalism for athletes, they have to consider and stand firm even the crowd is going to be biased against them.

But for the home team, it's a big deal and it makes difference.

Somehow players will have familiarity especially if they always do their practice in the same venue it's still a confidence booster to play at home even if there's no live audiences but the impact is bit different since there's live fans will cheer at them but somehow it adds more excitement but let see if we will be entertained for that set up or we get bored for not having a real audience actions.

[peter0425]

its still some advantgae

two more factors

1 is travel sucks and traveling too a new city to play always affects players even more usa because its so big

2 hoe players can rest and dont really care about being in same city as awlays they can relax and play more normal

But the intensity to beat the homecourt advantage is always the one thing that triggers the visitors skills.

Imagine now there are no audience and fans that will Shout for the team and booing the visitors?

This is always an advantage and now may become disadvantage at all.

[Assface16678]

One of the popular game into the world is playing basketball which is a good thing because some of the player and team has a representative on their every country and if we are talking about the Basketball we have the NBA which most of the professional teams and players are representing their places. But now let's talk about the match of every game which we can tell for example is the Golden State versus Miami heat and we have the best of three matches which a team must have a two (2) wins either 2-0 or 2-1 so go up for the upper bracket and meet the other teams.

Playing in your home court is a good thing because the crowd is supporting you which is a good thing to do if you want to win the players that are representing your places and go up into the finals like the Golden states they are calling their stadium as the Roaracle Arena which is original as the Oracle Arena. By that they made a comeback on their game which is give them a lot of overwhelming to play more and win to their games.

[FanEagle]

If support of audience in home ground makes any differences then obviously playing behind the locked doors even at home ground cannot be providing any significant advantages. But this is purely game dependent. There are sports where audience are not allowed to shout when the game is on-progress, for example, tennis; but in cricket, you can support your team at any time and home team is mostly finding the advantage while playing at their home soil. So, for cricket kind of soil/pitch dependent sport events where audience are not having any restriction to cheer up their team then definitely no-live audience events will have impacts.

But in modern day high skilled sport events, home ground advantages are being broken slowly still not in every sport, I agree. In near future, we are going to have only no-live audience game lone until vaccine for covid19 to be invented. So, how home ground advantage along with no-live audience will impact will be more interesting in any sport event overall. 

[Casdinyard]

Live audience is a great factor to boost up the confidence and hype of the players residing on that court but there might be times playing alone can still feel better because if you deduct the existence of live audience, the pressure on the players that they must win because it is their home court and all their supporters are there would be lessen.

Home court advantage would still be an advantage because players are more familiarize into their own court since the drills and practice games are being held on their own territory so when live game comes on, they are already familiar and can move freely around the court. It is just a matter of support when live audience are there but the advantage of playing on your own court will give the best confidence for the player on the court.

In a new normal approach there are countries that put manikins in substitution of live audience to let the players feel they are still having a support so existence of live audience won't be a problem anymore. It will still be relying on the team players on how they will perform during the game using their home court advantage even without the presence of live audience.

[harizen]

1 is travel sucks and traveling too a new city to play always affects players even more usa because its so big

What if the HOME team just came as an AWAY team?

Travel shouldn't be a big deal. Not just because a HOME team will play on their home it means they won't literally come from traveling.

One of the popular game into the world is playing basketball which is a good thing because some of the player and team has a representative on their every country and if we are talking about the Basketball we have the NBA which most of the professional teams and players are representing their places. But now let's talk about the match of every game which we can tell for example is the Golden State versus Miami heat and we have the best of three matches which a team must have a two (2) wins either 2-0 or 2-1 so go up for the upper bracket and meet the other teams.

Just in case you missed, all NBA games staring from the remaining games of the current season > Playoffs > Finals will be done in one stadium.

Maintaining the bracket or spot for the purpose of home-court advantage isn't necessary anymore.

[bearexin]

For some teams hoke advantage is very important whule for others it makes no difference. I would say at the big stage, in top championships it shouldn't make much of a difference except if we are talking about small teams that really care about their fans support. Maybe only in second and third leagues the supporters are much more important when talking about home advantage

If we are to trust the news the NBA is set to resume 30th July and the games will be played at a neutral venue so I think a lot of questions will be answered whether home court advantage was a big factor when some teams were doing good and actually neutral venues is the best possible venue for any sports but because home court/ground brings more viewers which makes it lucrative to host events in certain home advantage.

By the way as you said only small leagues are mainly affected by no-home advantage I would like to tell you that it also affects the best teams and highest level of players as I was watching EPL a few days ago and I never felt the same energy in players that used to be there when grounds were filled with spectators.

[dunfida]

For some teams hoke advantage is very important whule for others it makes no difference. I would say at the big stage, in top championships it shouldn't make much of a difference except if we are talking about small teams that really care about their fans support. Maybe only in second and third leagues the supporters are much more important when talking about home advantage

If we are to trust the news the NBA is set to resume 30th July and the games will be played at a neutral venue so I think a lot of questions will be answered whether home court advantage was a big factor when some teams were doing good and actually neutral venues is the best possible venue for any sports but because home court/ground brings more viewers which makes it lucrative to host events in certain home advantage.

By the way as you said only small leagues are mainly affected by no-home advantage I would like to tell you that it also affects the best teams and highest level of players as I was watching EPL a few days ago and I never felt the same energy in players that used to be there when grounds were filled with spectators.

There would be noticeable changes not only on the venue that they are playing on but also into players performance when they do play out on a neutral venue or in home.
You would able to see the difference when it comes to performance but they would eventually able to overcome that and must be done of course because if they dont play
that much effectively then they do know the risk behind on getting removed out of the time.They would set out things into their mind that the show must go on
in spite on the new surrounding that they are dealing with.

[boyptc]

For some teams hoke advantage is very important whule for others it makes no difference. I would say at the big stage, in top championships it shouldn't make much of a difference except if we are talking about small teams that really care about their fans support. Maybe only in second and third leagues the supporters are much more important when talking about home advantage

Home advantage.

You can say that as speculating that it doesn't really matter to them. As part of professionalism for athletes, they have to consider and stand firm even the crowd is going to be biased against them.

But for the home team, it's a big deal and it makes difference.

Somehow players will have familiarity especially if they always do their practice in the same venue it's still a confidence booster to play at home even if there's no live audiences but the impact is bit different since there's live fans will cheer at them but somehow it adds more excitement but let see if we will be entertained for that set up or we get bored for not having a real audience actions.

We don't have to choose and we have no choice but to be entertained with this setup.

I don't find myself to think if I'll be satisfied or not with this setup, we are in a global situation and don't choose if we will be or will not be entertained.

[freedomgo]

For some teams hoke advantage is very important whule for others it makes no difference. I would say at the big stage, in top championships it shouldn't make much of a difference except if we are talking about small teams that really care about their fans support. Maybe only in second and third leagues the supporters are much more important when talking about home advantage

Home advantage.

You can say that as speculating that it doesn't really matter to them. As part of professionalism for athletes, they have to consider and stand firm even the crowd is going to be biased against them.

But for the home team, it's a big deal and it makes difference.

Somehow players will have familiarity especially if they always do their practice in the same venue it's still a confidence booster to play at home even if there's no live audiences but the impact is bit different since there's live fans will cheer at them but somehow it adds more excitement but let see if we will be entertained for that set up or we get bored for not having a real audience actions.

We don't have to choose and we have no choice but to be entertained with this setup.

I don't find myself to think if I'll be satisfied or not with this setup, we are in a global situation and don't choose if we will be or will not be entertained.

Let's give them a try, as for me, I am sure I would be happy once the games will return even with no home court advantage as personally I have seen a lot of games where not played in their home court but in just different venue, and that is from our local basketball league.

[boyptc]

We don't have to choose and we have no choice but to be entertained with this setup.

I don't find myself to think if I'll be satisfied or not with this setup, we are in a global situation and don't choose if we will be or will not be entertained.

Let's give them a try, as for me, I am sure I would be happy once the games will return even with no home court advantage as personally I have seen a lot of games where not played in their home court but in just different venue, and that is from our local basketball league.

It is what I'm saying. We have to give them a try, actually, we have to accept it that the setup is more like that this time.

We can adopt into this setup easily being an audience, we understand what we have lately.

[Botnake]

We don't have to choose and we have no choice but to be entertained with this setup.

I don't find myself to think if I'll be satisfied or not with this setup, we are in a global situation and don't choose if we will be or will not be entertained.

Let's give them a try, as for me, I am sure I would be happy once the games will return even with no home court advantage as personally I have seen a lot of games where not played in their home court but in just different venue, and that is from our local basketball league.

It is what I'm saying. We have to give them a try, actually, we have to accept it that the setup is more like that this time.

We can adopt into this setup easily being an audience, we understand what we have lately.

If the players can adopt, there's no reason we can't adopt on it, they will enjoy what they are doing, we would also feel the same.

As for me, I am more excited for the games to come back especially NBA as I can start betting again.

I know it's not the usual type of game since we won't be seeing a crowd anymore, but man, as long as there's betting lines in my favorite sportsbook, I think I would not complain, and who am I to complain when they are trying give their best effort to give us an entertainment, and we don't even have to take the risk compared to the players who are having a contact with each other and could possibly get infected in a close space.

[stomachgrowls]

We don't have to choose and we have no choice but to be entertained with this setup.

I don't find myself to think if I'll be satisfied or not with this setup, we are in a global situation and don't choose if we will be or will not be entertained.

Let's give them a try, as for me, I am sure I would be happy once the games will return even with no home court advantage as personally I have seen a lot of games where not played in their home court but in just different venue, and that is from our local basketball league.

It is what I'm saying. We have to give them a try, actually, we have to accept it that the setup is more like that this time.

We can adopt into this setup easily being an audience, we understand what we have lately.

If the players can adopt, there's no reason we can't adopt on it, they will enjoy what they are doing, we would also feel the same.

As for me, I am more excited for the games to come back especially NBA as I can start betting again.

I know it's not the usual type of game since we won't be seeing a crowd anymore, but man, as long as there's betting lines in my favorite sportsbook, I think I would not complain, and who am I to complain when they are trying give their best effort to give us an entertainment, and we don't even have to take the risk compared to the players who are having a contact with each other and could possibly get infected in a close space.

Im having the same feelings towards this and instead of making out complaints then why we cant just appreciate on the things that  they are trying to accomplish on here?

They are indeed risking out themselves to have physical contact with other players just to give out entertainment to their fans and thats the most important thing.

Other factors might have changed but it can be adopted even though it would take for some time but it wont really matter that much as long these events do continue to resume out in spite on
the current condition we are into.

[TitanGEL]

We don't have to choose and we have no choice but to be entertained with this setup.

I don't find myself to think if I'll be satisfied or not with this setup, we are in a global situation and don't choose if we will be or will not be entertained.

Let's give them a try, as for me, I am sure I would be happy once the games will return even with no home court advantage as personally I have seen a lot of games where not played in their home court but in just different venue, and that is from our local basketball league.

It is what I'm saying. We have to give them a try, actually, we have to accept it that the setup is more like that this time.

We can adopt into this setup easily being an audience, we understand what we have lately.

If the players can adopt, there's no reason we can't adopt on it, they will enjoy what they are doing, we would also feel the same.

As for me, I am more excited for the games to come back especially NBA as I can start betting again.

I know it's not the usual type of game since we won't be seeing a crowd anymore, but man, as long as there's betting lines in my favorite sportsbook, I think I would not complain, and who am I to complain when they are trying give their best effort to give us an entertainment, and we don't even have to take the risk compared to the players who are having a contact with each other and could possibly get infected in a close space.

There are a lot of bettors like us who are really excited to see that the NBA will have a comeback but for sure there are a lot of new strict rules in order to prevent the spreading of the virus in the court. It may affect the performance of every team but I will still make a bet because it is my previously hobby after all. During this quarantine, I just playing dice and slots and I'm pretty bored to do it. I think it is the time for me to bet again in live sports because the excitement and the feeling when I do it is really different.

[btc78]

its still some advantgae

two more factors

1 is travel sucks and traveling too a new city to play always affects players even more usa because its so big

2 hoe players can rest and dont really care about being in same city as awlays they can relax and play more normal

1. Travelling is always part of those teams that are visiting the home court of their opponent so I don't think that they feel sucks whenever they travel. Before, first of all, it's their job and they understand the give and take for homecourt for each team.
2. I don't understand this but they won't travel just exact before the game so they have time to rest.

Travelling in some cases are exciting to other team because they will have a chance to prove to other team that they can beat others in thier own home court and now it is becoming more reality because there are no fans that will shout against them and this will give composure to the visiting team.

I remember when i am still playing basketball and visiting  other school for regional competition,the feeling is intense when you saw the crowd that will shout against your team lol.

[Wexnident]

Live audience is a great factor to boost up the confidence and hype of the players residing on that court but there might be times playing alone can still feel better because if you deduct the existence of live audience, the pressure on the players that they must win because it is their home court and all their supporters are there would be lessen.

Home court advantage would still be an advantage because players are more familiarize into their own court since the drills and practice games are being held on their own territory so when live game comes on, they are already familiar and can move freely around the court. It is just a matter of support when live audience are there but the advantage of playing on your own court will give the best confidence for the player on the court.

In a new normal approach there are countries that put manikins in substitution of live audience to let the players feel they are still having a support so existence of live audience won't be a problem anymore. It will still be relying on the team players on how they will perform during the game using their home court advantage even without the presence of live audience.

Well, the home court not only gives audience familiarity but rather the atmosphere. It's kind of a vague thing, but hell, players understand it well enough I suppose. It's basically the fear of going to somewhere unknown for others, while being at home for someone else. We're all afraid of the unknown, and players going to foreign courts to play could prove that they are pressured as such, whether there is an audience or not.

its still some advantgae

two more factors

1 is travel sucks and traveling too a new city to play always affects players even more usa because its so big

2 hoe players can rest and dont really care about being in same city as awlays they can relax and play more normal

Ask any professional player out there. If they think traveling sucks, they should probably quit already tbh. It's not a matter of it being big, players would only hate traveling if they were pushed against a stupid schedule, but if things were planned properly, traveling can even be a form of relaxation. Players are also given the time to adjust their mindset afaik. They give them some time to roam the city to adjust the "unknown city" mindset, making their mentality the same as being in the home court, or at least, making it as close as possible to that type of mindset.