Pirlo was great player but I don't like giving such big functions to people without actual coaching references. Few of them work out well but most of them just crash and burn. Why taking such a risk when there are other options?
Compare what weight Zidane or Klopp have and then Italy picks Pirlo. Doesn't looks like best option for a team that in deep crisis. Looks that they want to miss another World Cup, though I don't believe that Pirlo willstay for whole this 4 year period there.
And @slaman, I don't see Pep working with national teams, at leat now.
Portugal were not the better team in that Nations League final. Spain was the better team. Spain dominated that game just like they dominated France. They just couldn't score their chances and allowed Portugal to always equalise.
OK, that final didn't stuck in my meory, I don't remember how it was exactly, but by saying that Portugal were better I didn't mean that they played much better or something - they were better on penalties.

Imagine what the statistics of attackers will be in the future with such a number of teams, current records will be the starting level.
And by the way, that's why I'm a supporter of the Super League. Football (which is a business) should be run by those who actually do business (the clubs themselves), not by bastard officials. But naturally I would not want the kind of ugliness that the USA is demonstrating.
I remember when I thought about how hard it will be to beat Klose's record, but now it looks so meh after expansion. Group stage and even 1/32 now only is needed for strickers to improve their stats. And all these cringe American moments like
hydration commercial breaks, half time show and etc - it's not same football that I fall in love in my childhood