Do you think COVID19 is a scam?

[Wakajeje01]

I haven't seen people around me yet which contaminate it especially in Nigeria I think the COVID19 of a thing can't exist

[hornetsnest]

Pooling of tests. 5 different people's swabs sent off in one vial. So one positive will contaminate the other 4, giving 5 positives.

[BADecker]

The existence of Covid-19 probably is the truth. What it can do and does do is probably the scam. Covid-19 isn't all that dangerous. The lies about it are the things that are dangerous.

Youtube search on "David Martin, Covid."

[Tash]

Covid-19 pandemic isn't a scam a world wide record show that more than 48.1 million has the cases of Covid-19, 39.1 million has recovered with 1.23 million deaths

A positve test result is not a case.  Get your facts straight and provide scientific prove of "virus" isolation. Dying with is not the same of dying from.
Are you Nigerian?

[Indymoney]

The existence of Covid-19 probably is the truth. What it can do and does do is probably the scam. Covid-19 isn't all that dangerous. The lies about it are the things that are dangerous.

Youtube search on "David Martin, Covid."

Here I agree with you its not scam but isn't all that dangerous because I meet few peoples they feel some problems but with the help of local medicine they recover and now living as they was before this media doing some tricks just because of big profit going to labortries and few other factors also involve.

[BADecker]

The existence of Covid-19 probably is the truth. What it can do and does do is probably the scam. Covid-19 isn't all that dangerous. The lies about it are the things that are dangerous.

Youtube search on "David Martin, Covid."

Here I agree with you its not scam but isn't all that dangerous because I meet few peoples they feel some problems but with the help of local medicine they recover and now living as they was before this media doing some tricks just because of big profit going to labortries and few other factors also involve.

I was thinking more along the lines that Covid simply exists. I didn't mean that it was even affecting or infecting anyone.

We don't have clear scientific isolation of whatever it is that is affecting people. All we get is blab that it is Covid, without real proof... researchers and medical heads SAYING that it is Covid without showing the real lab-work. Also, the CDC has in their paperwork that they don't even have a Covid sample, themselves, to compare with anything.

So, Covid exists... check out what David Martin says. But that it is infecting anybody - or even that it has gone around the world - is really unknown, and might be a complete lie.

[Tash]

The existence of Covid-19 probably is the truth. What it can do and does do is probably the scam. Covid-19 isn't all that dangerous. The lies about it are the things that are dangerous.

Youtube search on "David Martin, Covid."

Here I agree with you its not scam but isn't all that dangerous because I meet few peoples they feel some problems but with the help of local medicine they recover and now living as they was before this media doing some tricks just because of big profit going to labortries and few other factors also involve.

I was thinking more along the lines that Covid simply exists. I didn't mean that it was even affecting or infecting anyone.

We don't have clear scientific isolation of whatever it is that is affecting people. All we get is blab that it is Covid, without real proof... researchers and medical heads SAYING that it is Covid without showing the real lab-work. Also, the CDC has in their paperwork that they don't even have a Covid sample, themselves, to compare with anything.

So, Covid exists... check out what David Martin says. But that it is infecting anybody - or even that it has gone around the world - is really unknown, and might be a complete lie.

It exist if injected with vaccine or other medication (synthetic). Pure phantasy for it to jump about or float in mid air. No "virus" has ever lived or will ever live its not a bakteria.

[hornetsnest]

Achtung! I am here to test you peeples ..schnell schnell !!

The New York State Bar Association on Saturday passed a resolution urging the state to consider making it mandatory for all New Yorkers to undergo COVID-19 vaccination when a vaccine becomes available, even if people object to it for “religious, philosophical or personal reasons.

State Bar Passes Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Recommendation
Mary Beth Morrissey, chair of the bar association’s Health Law Section’s Task Force on COVID-19, said in a statement after the vote on Saturday, “The authority of the state to respond to a public health crisis is well-established in constitutional law.”
By Jason Grant | November 07, 2020 at 05:28 PM

The New York State Bar Association on Saturday passed a resolution urging the state to consider making it mandatory for all New Yorkers to undergo COVID-19 vaccination when a vaccine becomes available, even if people object to it for “religious, philosophical or personal reasons.”

The resolution, which was passed by a majority of the bar association’s 277-member House of Delegates, includes conditions limiting its scope. Those include that the state government should only consider making vaccinations mandatory if voluntary COVID-19 vaccinations fall short of producing needed levels of population immunity; that an assessment of the health threat to various communities be made so that perhaps the mandate can be targeted; and that a mandate only be considered after there is expert consensus about the vaccine’s safety and efficacy.

In a statement Saturday afternoon, Mary Beth Morrissey, chair of the bar association’s Health Law Section’s Task Force on COVID-19, which in May released a controversial report that had first proposed the idea of a vaccine mandate, said, “The authority of the state to respond to a public health crisis is well-established in constitutional law,”

“In balancing the protection of the public’s health and civil liberties, the Public Health Law recognizes that a person’s health can and does affect others,” said Morrisey, a lawyer who also holds a doctorate degree in gerontological social work research.

The Health Law Section’s May report generated an uproar online, over the spring and summer, among anti-vaccine groups and lawyers who represent people injured by vaccines. But the relevant part of the 83-page report proposing a vaccine mandate was broader in scope, and more direct, than the resolution passed by the bar association Saturday. And most of the conditions contained in the resolution had not been contained in the report.

The report had recommended that it should be mandatory for all Americans to undergo COVID-19 vaccination, despite people’s objections, with the one exception being doctor-ordered medical reasons. There had been no language about a mandate being limited to New York state residents, and no language saying a public recommendation made to the state government should only be for it to “consider” a mandate.

Also various conditions in Saturday’s passed resolution were not present in the May report. Those conditions include that before considering a mandate the government should determine if voluntary vaccinations fall short of producing needed levels immunity and the condition that, depending on the health threat in communities, a mandate could be community- or population-targeted.

“Some Americans may push back on the COVID-19 vaccination,” the May report had said in part. “Nonetheless, for the sake of public health, mandatory vaccinations for COVID-19 should be required in the United States as soon as it is available.” It also had said that “the history of unsuccessful attempts to challenge mandatory vaccinations may reduce the extent of opposition” to a mandatory vaccine order.

Still, the vote Saturday by the bar association, which with its 70,000 members is one of the nation’s largest state bar groups, is significant. The association is considered to be influential both with lawmakers in Albany and Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s office.

In addition, the bar association’s vaccine-mandate recommendation, which it made public Saturday in a news release, appears to be unique. Both representatives at the bar association and certain lawyers focused on vaccine law, considered to be a small, specialized field of law, say they aren’t aware of other organizations, in or outside of the legal world, taking a stance — at this early juncture — on the notion of a mandatory COVID-19 vaccine.

The prospect of the resolution being passed on Saturday, during an association online video meeting, brought out an opposition rally in Albany before the vote even took place.

At 8:30 a.m., a group of parents, families and individuals who vigorously oppose mandatory COVID-19 vaccination marched from a central square in Albany to Cuomo’s mansion.

The rally was organized in large part by Patricia Finn, a longtime vaccination-specialized lawyer who, for the last two decades, she has said, has represented thousands of families who have resisted vaccinations for medical and religious reasons. Finn said Friday in a phone interview that the marchers would waive signs and chant on their half hour trek to Cuomo’s mansion.

She added Friday that in her view, and in the view of many of her past clients, Cuomo and New York state have been especially “aggressive” among states in compelling children to take vaccines, and New York’s rules governing that and exemptions are much stricter than New Jersey’s and Pennsylvania’s, for example.

On Saturday afternoon, Finn said in an email to the New York Law Journal, “It seems like NYSBA “New York State Bar Association] retrenched and passed a resolution more in line with existing laws. It is more practical given the laws that exist  Vaccine mandates are a state issue so NYSBA obviously addressed that in the resolution.”

“More important though,” she added, “the parents opposing forced vaccines supported [state] candidates in the [Nov. 3] election that were in favor of.restoring religious exemptions in [the state].  The balance has shifted in the legislature and I believe this issue will be addressed in the legislature again soon.” She also said, “ Not sure why NYSBA saw a need to pass anything today and it is disappointing they are not addressing civil liberty issues and a Covid mandate.”

Bar Association President Scott Karson said in the group’s release Saturday statement, “The magnitude of the COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented over the last 100 years by any measure – the number of lives lost, the survivors who remain seriously ill, the risks faced by health care workers, the disproportionate impact on communities of color, the profound trauma and the disruption to our economy.”

He added that “the United States was unprepared to deal with this pandemic” and that the resolution, and its recommendations, passed Saturday are necessary.

The controversy generated for months among anti-vaccine groups and individuals over the Health Law Section original recommendation made in its May report was loud and unmistakeable. For example, a May 28 New York Law Journal article on the health law task force’s recommendation that American should be mandated to take a COVID-19 vaccine was passed widely across Facebook. In tune, independent-from-government-minded groups, including some on the right of the political spectrum, along with anti-vaccination groups shared the article in droves and group followers commented, sometimes by the hundreds. Comments were often laced with vitriol. Many commentators said they would protest a mandatory vaccination. Others said no government will be able to make them take a coronavirus vaccine that they say isn’t necessary and could be dangerous.

On pages 60-63 of the May report, which focused the “unique” legal and ethical issues brought forward by the coronavirus pandemic, the Health Law Section cited case law to back up its vaccine-taking recommendation. It wrote that “some Americans may push back on the COVID-19 vaccination for religious, philosophical or personal reasons” but “for the sake of public health, mandatory vaccinations for COVID-19 should be required in the United States.”

“Mandatory vaccinations are supported by the authority of the state police power when the vaccinations are necessary to protect the health of the community,” the group wrote in the report, while citing the landmark 1905 U.S. Supreme Court decision Jacobson v. Massachusetts.

Pointing to constitutional law-focused cases, including the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health, the group said that “constitutional challenges under the religious freedom clause under the First Amendment and under the substantive due process clause of the 14th Amendment have failed, when the individual interests are not strong enough to outweigh the public benefit.”

In turn, some attorneys who represent clients injured by vaccines or who’ve refused to take vaccines despite orders to do so, as well as with some law professors, have challenged the bar association group’s interpretation of constitutional-based case law regarding state police powers.

In addition to making arguments during interviews with the Law Journal in June, the attorneys and law professors also distinguished between how certain pertinent case law should be applied to adults versus children, and they laid out some policy-based arguments against the idea of making it mandatory for Americans to take a COVID-19 vaccine.

In taking on the health law section’s arguments stating a range of cases support a vaccine-taking mandate when “individual interests are not strong enough to outweigh the public benefit,” the vaccine-injury lawyer, Finn, wrote, for example, that “while previous constitutional challenges under the religious freedom clause under the First Amendment and under the substantive due process clause of the 14th Amendment have failed, none of the cases cited by [the] NYSBA [health law section's task force] address [the] failed safety and efficacy of the mandated vaccinations, or the requisite necessity and ‘lack of a public emergency’ required by” Jacobson.

The Health Law Section then responded to Finn’s and others’ criticisms. The group’s task force chairwoman said in June that its “report rests on a body of well-established law,” and she underscored that her group’s report only “suggests the need for mandatory vaccination, when a safe and effective vaccine becomes available.”

https://dhna0nwgp8ihl.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/15163415/Ill-record-it-as-Coronavirus-squared-326.jpg






DR CREEP - PANDEMIC FEAT This song from 2013 shows toilet paper at 1min 3sec, then he says 2020 combined with coronavirus bodies stacking. https://youtu.be/5P77bUdE4p4

"Dead Zone" TV show from 2003 mentions corona virus, talks about the Hydroxychloroquine being the cure, and "lockdown." https://youtu.be/jY6-HvE5YdU

Communists are not interested in winning adherents based on its merits. Their god is Satan. Communists are concerned only with obedience/observance. That's why they control information and discourse. Communism is really monopoly capitalism.Extreme socialism and especially Communism are just devices to usurp power and property.
The central banking cabal is the ultimate monopoly. It has an almost global monopoly over government credit. Its object is to translate this into a monopoly over everything - political, cultural, economic and spiritual.Isn't it strange that during revolutions, the mobs never attack the bankers, their mansions or banks?

~prepareforzemutation

[Tash]

Definitely NOT a scam.  Virus is real and destroys your organs.  Source: Girlfriend works in a COVID clinic.

That being said... I'm still not going to be taking the vaccine from Big Pharma & Co.

Also, fk the Chicoms for releasing this on the world.  Hope all you chicom bastards burn in hell.

Tell her to get proper medicine and dont inject poisons like vaccine and all be fine.
Inject a poison and you will get sick, just ask the odd mosquito what she can do to anyone.

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

yes it was done by those executing the color revolution in the usa, and they falsely accuse china.

[tvbcof]

yes it was done by those executing the color revolution in the usa, and they falsely accuse china.

SARS-cov-2' (common cold with a minor tweak to help it spread better) did 'come from China'.

The cornavirus 'gain of function' development work was halted in the U.S. some years ago.  The response (by Fauci's NIAID among others who's project it was) was to simply move the research to Wuhan on contract.  Remember the various staff and 'research' moving back and forth between the certain of the American 'academic institution' and China early on in this thing?  Ya, it's like that.

Why would China play ball?  Hmmm...lets see...


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8648141/China-boasts-Wuhan-water-party-PAYBACK-critics-condemned-just-sour-grapes.html

China didn't win this thing without a lot of help from 'leaders' all over the world.  The thing has been long planned out.

I became extra suspicious when one of the CCP leaders was touring a locked down stack-n-pack apartment complex in Wuhan back in Jan and someone translated the shouts from the windows as 'It's not real' and 'It's a hoax'.

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

The cornavirus 'gain of function' development work was halted in the U.S. some years ago.  The response (by Fauci's NIAID among others who's project it was) was to simply move the research to Wuhan on contract.  

Plausible deniability.

Give it to the chineses, so that when it's first spread in wuhan everyone would say it's the china-flue.

While in reality it's those managing the color revolution / regime change in the us who unleashed it to the world.

Don't forget they rape children on private islands, why would they care about a 0.05% lethality virus (I guess they forgot why militaries are reluctant to use biowarfare with synthetic viruses, they can mutate very fast...).

Trump had the best economy ever.
They knew censorship (big tech) and constant propaganda campaign (MSM) wouldn't change a thing.

So to unleash voter frauds, sink the economy, they unleashed the plandemic with the added bonus of being able to take over our corpses with their vaccine.

I think it's clear for all to see now.

[Tash]

Last Saturday in Leipzig Germany
https://youtu.be/1gj0RzJgCOg

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

Last Saturday in Leipzig Germany
https://youtu.be/1gj0RzJgCOg

wait for it, when the people of the world will get that covid was intentionally released to frame china, steal the election from trump, assure massive bail outs and foster the forced vaccination agendas...

[Tash]

Last Saturday in Leipzig Germany
https://youtu.be/1gj0RzJgCOg

wait for it, when the people of the world will get that covid was intentionally released to frame china, steal the election from trump, assure massive bail outs and foster the forced vaccination agendas...

No election is stolen.
Electoral commission will declare the winner, not the media once compulsory recount is finished and all legal challenges.
Covid is nothing else as at some stage in life some poison injected, the real cases. Fast majority have some ills from bad diet, overdose on acidic food.
Test is nothing but a scam, it has its use but not to find some virus

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

the ballot pool is too contaminated to be counted or relevant anymore. How to know which vote is valid and which isn't now? the coup plotters know how to rig elections, they do it almost everyday worldwide.

[Tash]

the ballot pool is too contaminated to be counted or relevant anymore. How to know which vote is valid and which isn't now? the coup plotters know how to rig elections, they do it almost everyday worldwide.

The DHS (department homeland security) has put a hiden watermark on all valid ballots and blockchain linked.

[tvbcof]

Last Saturday in Leipzig Germany
https://youtu.be/1gj0RzJgCOg

If it's allowed on Jewtube at this point, it's a psyop. Period.

For the next act I'm expect a 'tikkun olam' savior to enter stage right to 'save the people' from the evil big-pharma corporate villains.  They'll all celebrate together after a successful show which enchanted the mouth-breathing simpletons.

[Tash]

Last Saturday in Leipzig Germany
https://youtu.be/1gj0RzJgCOg

If it's allowed on Jewtube at this point, it's a psyop. Period.

For the next act I'm expect a 'tikkun olam' savior to enter stage right to 'save the people' from the evil big-pharma corporate villains.  They'll all celebrate together after a successful show which enchanted the mouth-breathing simpletons.

Channels have been shut down in the middle of live broadcast.

Serbian tells how it was with Milosovic fake election
https://www.bitchute.com/video/sCQL8CtoTcKC/

[BADecker]

Now we learn what Covid was all about in the first place. How deep the evil flows! It boils over throughout the whole world in its attempts to make the people of the world into slaves way more enslaved than the worst slaves in China.


With election rigging via mail-in ballots, the real purpose of the COVID bioweapon now becomes clear

It’s now abundantly clear that the real purpose of the engineered COVID-19 bioweapon was to allow Democrats to steal the election via mail-in ballot fraud.

By deploying the coronavirus weapon in China and allowing it to spread globally (thanks to the WHO and left-wing media calling Trump a “racist” for trying to close flights from China), the globalists were able to engineer long-duration lockdowns across America in defiance of medical or scientific justification.

The real purpose of these lockdowns was three-fold:

    Crush the domestic economy and blame Trump for poor economic performance.
    Cancel in-person voting and justify mail-in ballots, allowing massive election fraud by Democrats.
    Keep children home from school, allowing them to vote by using the mail-in ballots that were sent to them by the Dems. (Yes, children were filling out ballots and voting for Biden.)

The fake news media’s role in all this was to counter the truth at every level with lies and propaganda:

    To falsely claim the Wuhan coronavirus was “natural” and came from bats rather than being engineered as a weapon.
    To push for lockdowns all the way through the election by dishonestly reporting positive coronavirus tests as “cases” in order to claim the pandemic was still a huge threat. (Have you noticed how quickly the pandemic disappeared once the media proclaimed Joe Biden the winner?)
    Run fake polls in favor of Joe Biden to support the election rigging that they knew was about to take place. The fake polls were necessary to align with the rigged results which required Dems to manufacture hundreds of thousands of Joe Biden votes in key swing states.
    Call for Big Tech to censor all pro-Trump channels, voices and news organizations in order to control the narrative and silence any criticism of the Biden crime family.

Big Tech’s role in all this, of course, was to carry out the censorship and do the bidding of communist China, making sure Biden — whose entire family is on China’s payroll — “wins” the election no matter what. Even now, anyone who posts truthful, factual information about voting irregularities is silenced by Twitter and Facebook.

So far 450,000 fraudulent ballots have been identified in swing states, with more to come