Seph213
Member
Offline
Activity: 124
Merit: 13
|
|
March 19, 2021, 03:24:28 AM |
|
You have to remove the heatsink, not only the backplate.
Looks like the next supreme x has got the same problem with the ekwb cooler. All 1mm pads used - temp much higher than expected. Hope its the same spot.
I meant if i wanted to only change the pad on the pcie16 unless u mean we need to remove heatsink and backplate just to swap the pads ? Since with the watercool ur still having same temps then i’m thinking keeping it stock with only changing the pads would reduce the mem temps as much as u did. Just don’t want to void my warranty . Is there no way to remove the backplate without msi finding out ?
|
|
|
|
jcc39
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
March 19, 2021, 03:49:18 AM |
|
MSI Ventus 3x 3080 RaveOS running of 4gb flash drive 240W Core 1425 Mem 10802 MHz Core temp 45C Mem temp unknown (Linux. But no throttling so far) Fan 63% In 4U case with 3 front fans Completely stock card no modifications Outside temp 7C 102.84 MH/s I had it up to 103.5mh running 24hrs straight with no errors, just started to tune for efficiency. I think this card does pretty darn good considering it supposedly has the worst thermals of any 3080 and even has the plastic backplate. https://imgur.com/a/evKf0k6
|
|
|
|
Erpelusas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
March 19, 2021, 08:03:54 AM |
|
I got my EKWB Blocks for the Supreme X yesterday. Just want to inform all that the pads might be too thin. 1. GPU Asus TUF 62 degrees (watercooled) 2. GPU MSI Supreme X 96 degrees (watercooled) and still slowly rising. Just did a second try and it didnt change the temp. But i recognized nearly no imprint of the rams in the pads. I should have 1.5mm here for a 3. try. EKWB sends only 1mm pads. So after mounting of the block, check the ram temp with hwinfo.... Edit: Changing the lonely ram pad at the 16x PCI-E from 1mm to 1.5mm dropped the ram temp by 30 degrees. Sounds unbelievable but is true... Edit: RAM +1149 = 99 MH/s RAM +1200 = 99.4 MH/s RAM +1300 > 100 MH/s Core 1275 MHz ( too lazy to drop it more) VCore 0,731 Power 234 Watt Ram Temp 78 degress Phoenix miner Goal achieved Phoenixminer, inflate the hash. You don't have a real hash.
|
|
|
|
logicalray77
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 4
|
|
March 19, 2021, 10:32:47 AM |
|
EVGA RTX 3080 FTW3
T-rex - Latest PL = 60% Memory = +500 Fan = 65% Watts = 227 Core = -200
Core temp = 53 Memory temp = 89 Ambient temp = 24
AVG Mhs = 92.20
|
|
|
|
Seph213
Member
Offline
Activity: 124
Merit: 13
|
|
March 19, 2021, 05:39:18 PM |
|
I got my EKWB Blocks for the Supreme X yesterday. Just want to inform all that the pads might be too thin. 1. GPU Asus TUF 62 degrees (watercooled) 2. GPU MSI Supreme X 96 degrees (watercooled) and still slowly rising. Just did a second try and it didnt change the temp. But i recognized nearly no imprint of the rams in the pads. I should have 1.5mm here for a 3. try. EKWB sends only 1mm pads. So after mounting of the block, check the ram temp with hwinfo.... Edit: Changing the lonely ram pad at the 16x PCI-E from 1mm to 1.5mm dropped the ram temp by 30 degrees. Sounds unbelievable but is true... Edit: RAM +1149 = 99 MH/s RAM +1200 = 99.4 MH/s RAM +1300 > 100 MH/s Core 1275 MHz ( too lazy to drop it more) VCore 0,731 Power 234 Watt Ram Temp 78 degress Phoenix miner Goal achieved Phoenixminer, inflate the hash. You don't have a real hash. I use phoenixminer and my hash is the same as reported on the pool side . How u explain that if phoenixminer inflates the hashrate .
|
|
|
|
Wotan Wipeout
Member
Offline
Activity: 438
Merit: 27
|
|
March 19, 2021, 07:18:06 PM |
|
Anybody knows that phoenix miner is a trusted miner. Its well done and updated often. Nothing more to say....
|
|
|
|
jgonzi
Member
Offline
Activity: 639
Merit: 19
|
|
March 19, 2021, 09:24:39 PM |
|
I got my EKWB Blocks for the Supreme X yesterday. Just want to inform all that the pads might be too thin. 1. GPU Asus TUF 62 degrees (watercooled) 2. GPU MSI Supreme X 96 degrees (watercooled) and still slowly rising. Just did a second try and it didnt change the temp. But i recognized nearly no imprint of the rams in the pads. I should have 1.5mm here for a 3. try. EKWB sends only 1mm pads. So after mounting of the block, check the ram temp with hwinfo.... Edit: Changing the lonely ram pad at the 16x PCI-E from 1mm to 1.5mm dropped the ram temp by 30 degrees. Sounds unbelievable but is true... Edit: RAM +1149 = 99 MH/s RAM +1200 = 99.4 MH/s RAM +1300 > 100 MH/s Core 1275 MHz ( too lazy to drop it more) VCore 0,731 Power 234 Watt Ram Temp 78 degress Phoenix miner Goal achieved Phoenixminer, inflate the hash. You don't have a real hash. I use phoenixminer and my hash is the same as reported on the pool side . How u explain that if phoenixminer inflates the hashrate . The pool hash must be the same of course but the pool with the hash show it quiite higher around a 3%
|
|
|
|
Seph213
Member
Offline
Activity: 124
Merit: 13
|
|
March 20, 2021, 01:11:17 PM |
|
I got my EKWB Blocks for the Supreme X yesterday. Just want to inform all that the pads might be too thin. 1. GPU Asus TUF 62 degrees (watercooled) 2. GPU MSI Supreme X 96 degrees (watercooled) and still slowly rising. Just did a second try and it didnt change the temp. But i recognized nearly no imprint of the rams in the pads. I should have 1.5mm here for a 3. try. EKWB sends only 1mm pads. So after mounting of the block, check the ram temp with hwinfo.... Edit: Changing the lonely ram pad at the 16x PCI-E from 1mm to 1.5mm dropped the ram temp by 30 degrees. Sounds unbelievable but is true... Edit: RAM +1149 = 99 MH/s RAM +1200 = 99.4 MH/s RAM +1300 > 100 MH/s Core 1275 MHz ( too lazy to drop it more) VCore 0,731 Power 234 Watt Ram Temp 78 degress Phoenix miner Goal achieved Phoenixminer, inflate the hash. You don't have a real hash. I use phoenixminer and my hash is the same as reported on the pool side . How u explain that if phoenixminer inflates the hashrate . The pool hash must be the same of course but the pool with the hash show it quiite higher around a 3% I don’t get what u said
|
|
|
|
BitBlitzer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
March 20, 2021, 02:06:51 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Seph213
Member
Offline
Activity: 124
Merit: 13
|
|
March 21, 2021, 12:17:39 AM |
|
So 3080’s don’t actually do 100mhs ? If pheonix miners inflated the hashrate wouldnt it be reported 3% lower on the pool side ?
|
|
|
|
Erpelusas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
March 25, 2021, 07:31:17 AM |
|
Anybody knows that phoenix miner is a trusted miner. Its well done and updated often. Nothing more to say....
Nobody disputes that it is good and trustworthy. That is why I have been using it for the last 3 years. Its 0.65% fee and its constant updating have been the key to its success. But that's not to say that it doesn't inflate the hash. And that did not matter to us until they have come out miner as good as phoenixminer and but without inflation. That does not mean that it is bad, far from it .. But that it inflates is a fact. It is as simple as using other miners and doing checks. That there is no problem as long as one takes into account that inflation. Many people are interested in paying 0.65% even if they have to see an unreal hash.
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
|
March 25, 2021, 09:26:03 AM |
|
So 3080’s don’t actually do 100mhs ? If pheonix miners inflated the hashrate wouldnt it be reported 3% lower on the pool side ? 3080s can still do 100mh/s+ without using Phoenix, it's a bit of a silicon lottery. I use Trex miner. 5 x 3080s. 2 do 102.8mh/s, 1 x 100.9mh/s, 1 x 98.8mh/s, 1 x 96mh/s In fact, I had to stop using Phoenix miner for my 3080 rig as I got way too many stale shares.
|
|
|
|
dragonmike
|
|
March 26, 2021, 05:18:25 PM |
|
So 3080’s don’t actually do 100mhs ? If pheonix miners inflated the hashrate wouldnt it be reported 3% lower on the pool side ? 3080s can still do 100mh/s+ without using Phoenix, it's a bit of a silicon lottery. I use Trex miner. 5 x 3080s. 2 do 102.8mh/s, 1 x 100.9mh/s, 1 x 98.8mh/s, 1 x 96mh/s In fact, I had to stop using Phoenix miner for my 3080 rig as I got way too many stale shares. All these figures are a bit pointless without mentioning power level/draw etc. I'm sure even my Shitabyte Gaming OC can do these figures if I increase power.
|
|
|
|
P00P135
|
|
March 26, 2021, 07:55:20 PM |
|
Zotac Trinity
HiveOS N460.32.03 drivers 215w PL -200 Core +2400 Mem 65c 70% Fanspeed 99.38 Mh/s
|
|
|
|
sakmsb
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 2
|
|
March 27, 2021, 08:22:48 PM |
|
Zotac Trinity
HiveOS N460.32.03 drivers 215w PL -200 Core +2400 Mem 65c 70% Fanspeed 99.38 Mh/s
NO thermal throttling on trinity?
|
|
|
|
P00P135
|
|
March 27, 2021, 08:40:01 PM |
|
Zotac Trinity
HiveOS N460.32.03 drivers 215w PL -200 Core +2400 Mem 65c 70% Fanspeed 99.38 Mh/s
NO thermal throttling on trinity? It throttled when it reached 70c core temps. I can't monitor mem temps on hiveOS. Also it can reach 101Mh/s @230w but didn't seem worth.
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
|
March 28, 2021, 10:27:44 AM |
|
So 3080’s don’t actually do 100mhs ? If pheonix miners inflated the hashrate wouldnt it be reported 3% lower on the pool side ? 3080s can still do 100mh/s+ without using Phoenix, it's a bit of a silicon lottery. I use Trex miner. 5 x 3080s. 2 do 102.8mh/s, 1 x 100.9mh/s, 1 x 98.8mh/s, 1 x 96mh/s In fact, I had to stop using Phoenix miner for my 3080 rig as I got way too many stale shares. All these figures are a bit pointless without mentioning power level/draw etc. I'm sure even my Shitabyte Gaming OC can do these figures if I increase power. Hopefully this suits your needs. Included the memory temps for the Shitabyte Gaming OC cards The "hot" one is the MSI Suprim. https://imgur.com/a/Bjua0cL
|
|
|
|
agente (OP)
|
|
March 28, 2021, 05:02:39 PM |
|
So 3080’s don’t actually do 100mhs ? If pheonix miners inflated the hashrate wouldnt it be reported 3% lower on the pool side ? 3080s can still do 100mh/s+ without using Phoenix, it's a bit of a silicon lottery. I use Trex miner. 5 x 3080s. 2 do 102.8mh/s, 1 x 100.9mh/s, 1 x 98.8mh/s, 1 x 96mh/s In fact, I had to stop using Phoenix miner for my 3080 rig as I got way too many stale shares. All these figures are a bit pointless without mentioning power level/draw etc. I'm sure even my Shitabyte Gaming OC can do these figures if I increase power. Hopefully this suits your needs. Included the memory temps for the Shitabyte Gaming OC cards The "hot" one is the MSI Suprim. https://imgur.com/a/Bjua0cLCan you share your settings? 73/76c junction temp is really impressive. environment temp? Gigabyte version?
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
|
March 28, 2021, 05:49:18 PM |
|
So 3080’s don’t actually do 100mhs ? If pheonix miners inflated the hashrate wouldnt it be reported 3% lower on the pool side ? 3080s can still do 100mh/s+ without using Phoenix, it's a bit of a silicon lottery. I use Trex miner. 5 x 3080s. 2 do 102.8mh/s, 1 x 100.9mh/s, 1 x 98.8mh/s, 1 x 96mh/s In fact, I had to stop using Phoenix miner for my 3080 rig as I got way too many stale shares. All these figures are a bit pointless without mentioning power level/draw etc. I'm sure even my Shitabyte Gaming OC can do these figures if I increase power. Hopefully this suits your needs. Included the memory temps for the Shitabyte Gaming OC cards The "hot" one is the MSI Suprim. https://imgur.com/a/Bjua0cLCan you share your settings? 73/76c junction temp is really impressive. environment temp? Gigabyte version? Ambient temp is 22c. All the Gigabyte cards are modified with new thermal pads front and rear(between the PCB and backplate). Three of the Gigabyte cards are Gaming OC, One is a Vision. No power limit set, all have vcore locked at 725mv and using the stock core frequency "curve" for the card. I.E. there is no core frequency offset. They all vary on core clock due to silicon lottery. The Gaming OC cards, 1 does +1175mhz memory offset(One of the 222w cards in the image), 1 does +800(226w, this card lost silicon lottery, it's really inefficient compared to the other cards I have), the last does +550 on the memory, 209w card, seems it has a power efficient core but the memory sucks. The Vision card also does +1175(222w card) The Suprim is the most energy efficient card. I haven't modified it like the Gigabyte cards, so the memory temps are much higher and therefore I think what is holding back my memory overclock of +1000mhz.
|
|
|
|
agente (OP)
|
|
March 28, 2021, 06:03:16 PM |
|
Ambient temp is 22c. All the Gigabyte cards are modified with new thermal pads front and rear(between the PCB and backplate).
Brand used? 2mm, 3mm or a mix?
|
|
|
|
|