🏆⚽ Adkinsbet.com | Sports | In-Play | ESports | Racebook | Virtual Sports | ⚽🏆

[radex90]

No, I am not

[nikica99]

Hi folks, Ray here.

Previous representative apparently messed it up on the forum here, my sincere apologies. Matters related to users Realscout and Oz.Kashi have been misrepresented.
I'm going to work on it right now. As for Oz Kashi: His last bets have been canceled out of goodwill and I hope to update his account soon.
He did not violate the terms on the way that was explained on the forum.
My advice remains to contact directly via Email to avoid misunderstandings.

Our terms and conditions state that an account can be closed if our company is put in a bad light, but of course that does not apply here as these users are experiencing serious problems and have not just started an accusation topic. Hope to be able to provide more information in the short term. The accusation topic is there to write problems. We would only close accounts if people are writing false accusations.
If you have any concerns, please write in the relevant topic or write our support an Email.

Thanks,
Ray

 

The last desperate attempt to get more sheep to pay the money?



Why didn't you mention my case?
Until you sort out each case, don't expect anything to change.
Fraudsters, thieves.

[nikica99]

I am here to point out to normal guys that there are 4 open scam accusations against adkins
normal guys would know what that means

you bots just keep being bots

You start on your own case of nikica99, you make accusations towards Adkinsbet but you are unable to provide any form of evidence. Then where's your proof? I think you are mostly interested in your own cases, in which you decided to put everything on James Ward and you lost that bet. and now you are crying in this topic. your story was really a lot of bullshit to be honest. you were so hard trying to make us believe your story but the story was somehow so bad that it was not even 1% possible to be true 

There is a 1% chance that you are not retarded.

[codegnome]

You write that James Warden is out, and that you put all your money on the over market, since that would already win? can you explain how you can place a  bet on the over market if a player is to be announced not to play?
I mean out is out. Then it would not make any sense to place a bet on the Over market?

[Adzivu]

He placed a bet on another player (John Wall) to score more points because the absence of James Harden means that player will play more minutes and will take more shots because Harden takes 24 shots per game. So those 24 shots will be distributed among other players, but since some players have more "shooting privileges" than other that means that player will take bigger % of those 24 shots.

Let's take for example game between Houston and Sacramento that was played on December 31st.
Harden played 38:18 minutes and scored 33 points from 24 field goal attempts and 11 free throw attempts.
John Wall played 36:34 minutes and scored 22 points from 20 field goal attempts and 4 FTA (free throw attempts).

Houston and Sacramento then played on January 2nd (the game in which Harden did not play)
and John Wall played 37:14 minutes and scored 28 points from 22 field goal attempts and 6 FTA (free throw attempts).

[Vaskiy]

It is very bad to see a new gambling site to get into scam. Just few months from its existence such a list of negative trust for scamming is really bad, and it makes people fear of using the truly good sites. Because, everything is money involved. Even a small fund can make people worried much. Reading a post got to understand what adkinsbet is really doing with its players. They need to understand it is hard to retain back the reputation.

[codegnome]

He placed a bet on another player (John Wall) to score more points because the absence of James Harden means that player will play more minutes and will take more shots because Harden takes 24 shots per game. So those 24 shots will be distributed among other players, but since some players have more "shooting privileges" than other that means that player will take bigger % of those 24 shots.

Let's take for example game between Houston and Sacramento that was played on December 31st.
Harden played 38:18 minutes and scored 33 points from 24 field goal attempts and 11 free throw attempts.
John Wall played 36:34 minutes and scored 22 points from 20 field goal attempts and 4 FTA (free throw attempts).

Houston and Sacramento then played on January 2nd (the game in which Harden did not play)
and John Wall played 37:14 minutes and scored 28 points from 22 field goal attempts and 6 FTA (free throw attempts).

Thanks for the explanation. At first sight I get it wrong, I thought we were talking about 1 player but now it appears the case is about 2 players.
So in summary nikica99 thought he could steal some money from Adkinsbet because he read a rival of John Wall was not going to play and tried to take advantage about it?
I believe this is the exact arbitrage betting that bookmakers are suffering from. Why do I have the feeling that Adzivu is somehow related to nikica99 

[deadthings]

He placed a bet on another player (John Wall) to score more points because the absence of James Harden means that player will play more minutes and will take more shots because Harden takes 24 shots per game. So those 24 shots will be distributed among other players, but since some players have more "shooting privileges" than other that means that player will take bigger % of those 24 shots.

Let's take for example game between Houston and Sacramento that was played on December 31st.
Harden played 38:18 minutes and scored 33 points from 24 field goal attempts and 11 free throw attempts.
John Wall played 36:34 minutes and scored 22 points from 20 field goal attempts and 4 FTA (free throw attempts).

Houston and Sacramento then played on January 2nd (the game in which Harden did not play)
and John Wall played 37:14 minutes and scored 28 points from 22 field goal attempts and 6 FTA (free throw attempts).

Thanks for the explanation. At first sight I get it wrong, I thought we were talking about 1 player but now it appears the case is about 2 players.
So in summary nikica99 thought he could steal some money from Adkinsbet because he read a rival of John Wall was not going to play and tried to take advantage about it?
I believe this is the exact arbitrage betting that bookmakers are suffering from. Why do I have the feeling that Adzivu is somehow related to nikica99 

I remember the odds of this game, as it was announced on a forum somewhere. Odds for this player were changing every minute of the day since there were rumours about who was playing.
I read that Nikica tried to place a genius bet, but it looks like he made the wrong bet! and lost it! 
If the bookmakers do not punish you for arbitrage betting, then justice will do it seems 

[coin.princess]

It is very bad to see a new gambling site to get into scam. Just few months from its existence such a list of negative trust for scamming is really bad, and it makes people fear of using the truly good sites. Because, everything is money involved. Even a small fund can make people worried much. Reading a post got to understand what adkinsbet is really doing with its players. They need to understand it is hard to retain back the reputation.

You should better read the whole cases. There are people who are trying to exploit their API because they offer many matches worldwide. They took action and voided the bets.
Which is the only way to get rid of these gambler. Actually this kind of gamblers are destroying the whole industry, not the bookmakers.
Since you are wearing a signature from Stake.com, do you know that there is an open accusation against them? Mister perfect.

[radex90]

Bookies are constantly on guard for every gossip, every injury or subside news and they offer their odds accordingly...

Bettors choose whether to accept or to refuse their odds

Then come shitheads and take away your winnings, deposits, mess up with bets, and hire few bots to write nonsense

So, act like gentlemen while in this business (ofc, do your best to act so every time) and resolve/pay whatever you owe

[nikica99]

He placed a bet on another player (John Wall) to score more points because the absence of James Harden means that player will play more minutes and will take more shots because Harden takes 24 shots per game. So those 24 shots will be distributed among other players, but since some players have more "shooting privileges" than other that means that player will take bigger % of those 24 shots.

Let's take for example game between Houston and Sacramento that was played on December 31st.
Harden played 38:18 minutes and scored 33 points from 24 field goal attempts and 11 free throw attempts.
John Wall played 36:34 minutes and scored 22 points from 20 field goal attempts and 4 FTA (free throw attempts).

Houston and Sacramento then played on January 2nd (the game in which Harden did not play)
and John Wall played 37:14 minutes and scored 28 points from 22 field goal attempts and 6 FTA (free throw attempts).

Finally someone normal who understand my case and why I bet like I bet.
 

He placed a bet on another player (John Wall) to score more points because the absence of James Harden means that player will play more minutes and will take more shots because Harden takes 24 shots per game. So those 24 shots will be distributed among other players, but since some players have more "shooting privileges" than other that means that player will take bigger % of those 24 shots.

Let's take for example game between Houston and Sacramento that was played on December 31st.
Harden played 38:18 minutes and scored 33 points from 24 field goal attempts and 11 free throw attempts.
John Wall played 36:34 minutes and scored 22 points from 20 field goal attempts and 4 FTA (free throw attempts).

Houston and Sacramento then played on January 2nd (the game in which Harden did not play)
and John Wall played 37:14 minutes and scored 28 points from 22 field goal attempts and 6 FTA (free throw attempts).

Thanks for the explanation. At first sight I get it wrong, I thought we were talking about 1 player but now it appears the case is about 2 players.
So in summary nikica99 thought he could steal some money from Adkinsbet because he read a rival of John Wall was not going to play and tried to take advantage about it?
I believe this is the exact arbitrage betting that bookmakers are suffering from. Why do I have the feeling that Adzivu is somehow related to nikica99 

To steal money? Are you retarded idiot? Were my chances of winning that bet 100% because Harden was out? Of course no, but when doing some math it seems to be profitable in the long run.
Anyway bookie had that bet in offer like almost all other bookies and they accepted my bet. If my bet would be lost they will take my money. ( They anyway took my money )

-Let me ask you something:


Is offering low odds not a steal? It's steal of course but they must live from something. Mind about that. On every bet they "steal from us offering lower odds than real odds" . Add voiding, not paying , changing bets on that and we can call them criminals. Players are not protected enough. They can do almost what they want with us with their stupid scamming rules.

One more thing:

There is a big difference between arbitrage bettor and smart bettor. If I am smart bettor I don't have to be an arbitrage bettor. But you are so stupid to understand this matter or you are paid from Adkins not to understand this.
Enjoy.



[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[BitcoinAccepted]

I thought that smart gamblers usually suppose to win. Apparently not you, as your bet lost. And now you're also trying to blame Adkinsbet for placing the wrong bet.  

A serious bettor who places a bigger bet will always take a screenshot of their bet. Where is yours? Yes, you are really a very smart gambler that you did not took a screenshot from that bet.

You call your own a smart gambler, why can't you hand over proof and only have aimless talk?

Not a really good example of being a smart gambler. Everybody can see that that other account is yours as well, already the 3rd account you are using to post in this topic.

The negative trust in your account is there for a reason.

[janggernaut]

It is very bad to see a new gambling site to get into scam. Just few months from its existence such a list of negative trust for scamming is really bad, and it makes people fear of using the truly good sites. Because, everything is money involved. Even a small fund can make people worried much. Reading a post got to understand what adkinsbet is really doing with its players. They need to understand it is hard to retain back the reputation.

It's not bad. This always happens to almost all new gambling sites. Most of them turned to scam site after few weeks or months after it launched. I'm not surprised this happened, that's why i always avoiding gamble on new gambling site and just go to old one, like stake, if i want to bet on sports betting or yolodice, bitsler, primedice, cryptogames, or wolfbet if i want to bet on dice game

A serious bettor who places a bigger bet will always take a screenshot of their bet. Where is yours? Yes, you are really a very smart gambler that you did not took a screenshot from that bet.

He has posted all evidence on here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5308729.0

[ronaldo40]

hahaha like stake? they scam people how much did they pay you to make that post what a joke  you are just google on scam stake you have dozens of stories and i also read that somebody writes that stake scammed somebody over 100 bitcoins and what also funny is is that their license is/was not valid anymore now that is what i call fraud

[safari88]

that's what i notice too, the site was faster than other sports betting website but maybe because they keep it simple or maybe they don't have casino that may lower down the website's performance? i'm curious if the casino or having a lot of feature or animation would affect the website's performance.

Not really I've seen some gambling website with casino and sports betting but works faster in my opinion, though I think you were referring to loading times? It's true that the Adkinsbet has a good loading times and you don't need to wait for a bit time. Let's hope they would add some casinos on their website.

I think they should focus more on adding more features on their website their deposit bonus was a good start but I think if they would add more that could be much better. There's a lot of things that they can add that could benefit players such as money return after one month maybe like 20% of their total losses or something like free bets.

Good idea and provably gamblers love that but for casino owners it's not ideal thing to do with them since it's a profit already for them so it's not totally ideal to lose a profit for just giving it back although it's good promotion but still it will not justify the expenses to run a casino. Maybe they should focus on doing such good promotion instead of doing that.

Managing a casino is a nice option for casino gamblers. there are also other sites that only run a casino and do not have a sportsbook. and there are sites that have both you also have sites that divide it into branches, so you get different sites. 1 to gamble on sports, one to play in the casino and 1 to play poker for example.

[janggernaut]

hahaha like stake? they scam people how much did they pay you to make that post what a joke  you are just google on scam stake you have dozens of stories and i also read that somebody writes that stake scammed somebody over 100 bitcoins and what also funny is is that their license is/was not valid anymore now that is what i call fraud

Those stories were from those who lose their money on stake. They were angry and just blame the site without any valid proofs.
This is adkinsbet thread, please stay on topic on here and just disscuss about current scam from adkinsbet. Have you checked how many scam accusation threads about adkinsbet?

[cutesgirl]

hahaha like stake? they scam people how much did they pay you to make that post what a joke  you are just google on scam stake you have dozens of stories and i also read that somebody writes that stake scammed somebody over 100 bitcoins and what also funny is is that their license is/was not valid anymore now that is what i call fraud

Those stories were from those who lose their money on stake. They were angry and just blame the site without any valid proofs.
This is adkinsbet thread, please stay on topic on here and just disscuss about current scam from adkinsbet. Have you checked how many scam accusation threads about adkinsbet?

Without any reason? That must be a joke. Someone made a video that he was scammed by stake.com
And that license from stake.com has been revoked by the license committee.

[deadthings]

that's what i notice too, the site was faster than other sports betting website but maybe because they keep it simple or maybe they don't have casino that may lower down the website's performance? i'm curious if the casino or having a lot of feature or animation would affect the website's performance.

Not really I've seen some gambling website with casino and sports betting but works faster in my opinion, though I think you were referring to loading times? It's true that the Adkinsbet has a good loading times and you don't need to wait for a bit time. Let's hope they would add some casinos on their website.

I think they should focus more on adding more features on their website their deposit bonus was a good start but I think if they would add more that could be much better. There's a lot of things that they can add that could benefit players such as money return after one month maybe like 20% of their total losses or something like free bets.

Good idea and provably gamblers love that but for casino owners it's not ideal thing to do with them since it's a profit already for them so it's not totally ideal to lose a profit for just giving it back although it's good promotion but still it will not justify the expenses to run a casino. Maybe they should focus on doing such good promotion instead of doing that.

Managing a casino is a nice option for casino gamblers. there are also other sites that only run a casino and do not have a sportsbook. and there are sites that have both you also have sites that divide it into branches, so you get different sites. 1 to gamble on sports, one to play in the casino and 1 to play poker for example.

Poker .. Then the question still arises to what extent that has to do with being lucky or good skills.
That will always remain a question what is going on.

[janggernaut]

Without any reason? That must be a joke. Someone made a video that he was scammed by stake.com
And that license from stake.com has been revoked by the license committee.

Show me the link of video and post on stake's ANN thread, will you?

[sempak]

that's what i notice too, the site was faster than other sports betting website but maybe because they keep it simple or maybe they don't have casino that may lower down the website's performance? i'm curious if the casino or having a lot of feature or animation would affect the website's performance.

Not really I've seen some gambling website with casino and sports betting but works faster in my opinion, though I think you were referring to loading times? It's true that the Adkinsbet has a good loading times and you don't need to wait for a bit time. Let's hope they would add some casinos on their website.

I think they should focus more on adding more features on their website their deposit bonus was a good start but I think if they would add more that could be much better. There's a lot of things that they can add that could benefit players such as money return after one month maybe like 20% of their total losses or something like free bets.

Good idea and provably gamblers love that but for casino owners it's not ideal thing to do with them since it's a profit already for them so it's not totally ideal to lose a profit for just giving it back although it's good promotion but still it will not justify the expenses to run a casino. Maybe they should focus on doing such good promotion instead of doing that.

Managing a casino is a nice option for casino gamblers. there are also other sites that only run a casino and do not have a sportsbook. and there are sites that have both you also have sites that divide it into branches, so you get different sites. 1 to gamble on sports, one to play in the casino and 1 to play poker for example.

Poker .. Then the question still arises to what extent that has to do with being lucky or good skills.
That will always remain a question what is going on.

In principle you can associate poker with gambling and both have luck. I just think that the factor of agility has a greater influence here than the term luck. and then you can also distinguish between live games on location or games that you play on the PC.