[POLL] Do vaccines kill people?

[Tash]

Inspired by our dear P&S celebrity BADecker:

The vaccines kill, and the deaths are being hidden.

I must say I have some doubts about this statement. Let's have a quick vote and set the record straight. Obviously only vaccinated people can vote because we can trust only first-hand experiences. So if you have been vaccinated please let us know if you're still alive or not.

I don't think vaccines kill but there could be a possibility that it could lead to some symptoms that could lead to death if it is not compatible with one's body. There is no harm in taking vaccine but sometimes we don't know what those that had taken it are facing so it is important to ask questions about how they felt. Vaccine will not kill you if you take it but always know that you area one step of becoming symptomized.

Have you considered doing so one day?

Oh chee tell them:
https://nomoresilence.world/
or this people
https://www.vaxtestimonies.org/en/                                                                                                         
another thousand
https://1000covidstories.com/   

[1714938217]

1714938217

[1714938217]

1714938217

[1714938217]

1714938217

[1714938217]

1714938217

[1714938217]

1714938217

[1714938217]

1714938217

[suchmoon]

debunked numerous times

Once is enough. Stop spamming your garbage on every page.

~

Same goes for you, sparky.

[BADecker]

debunked numerous times

Once is enough. Stop spamming your garbage on every page.

~

Same goes for you, sparky.

Sorry. Can't help you, there. I don't even know where the "Ignore" button is to tell you; I never use it, myself.

[Natsuu]

researchgate.net

Cool. Now give me a researchgate link which says the vaccine is gene therapy or any of your other bullshit.
...

All you need for that is the wayback machine at archive.org; the companies were proud as hell of their gene therapy until marketing research indicated that it wasn't a good sales pitch for the plandemic.  Best to go with the string 'vaccine' and nothing more because they already had legal indemnity for maiming people with that.

I just re-activated the thread with the speech from Moderna honcho Tal Zaks crowing about 'hacking the software of life'.  Feel free to try to argue that it wasn't the same technology that they are now calling a 'vaccine' if you are a real glutton for punishment.

In other words, all you have is words coming from yourself without support from your own source? Show your publicly available research sources, and maybe you can have a credibility  

P.S. I clearly stated RESEARCH so please don't show your favorite chute or any articles that doesn't even have valid data's

[tvbcof]

researchgate.net

Cool. Now give me a researchgate link which says the vaccine is gene therapy or any of your other bullshit.
...

All you need for that is the wayback machine at archive.org; the companies were proud as hell of their gene therapy until marketing research indicated that it wasn't a good sales pitch for the plandemic.  Best to go with the string 'vaccine' and nothing more because they already had legal indemnity for maiming people with that.

I just re-activated the thread with the speech from Moderna honcho Tal Zaks crowing about 'hacking the software of life'.  Feel free to try to argue that it wasn't the same technology that they are now calling a 'vaccine' if you are a real glutton for punishment.

In other words, all you have is words coming from yourself without support from your own source? Show your publicly available research sources, and maybe you can have a credibility  

P.S. I clearly stated RESEARCH so please don't show your favorite chute or any articles that doesn't even have valid data's

Jesus Christ but you are one lazy and stupid motherfucker!  There is an entire thread on this very board which is up near the top lately:

  Moderna's Top Scientist: 'We Are Actually Hacking the Software of Life'

You can watch a presentation by the guy himself which is linked in the very first post.

[o_e_l_e_o]

Jewtube is good enough for cat vids and all manners of pro-jab propaganda from the celebrity doctors that you like so much, but for real information it is useless.

You can watch a presentation by the guy himself which is linked in the very first post.

Lol.

[Tash]

CONFIRMED: The Jab is a classified weapon
https://truth11.com/2021/09/25/confirmed-the-jab-is-a-classified-weapon/
The pfizer shot really is a “classified state of the art U.S. weapons system.”

[o_e_l_e_o]

CONFIRMED: The Jab is a classified weapon
https://truth11.com/2021/09/25/confirmed-the-jab-is-a-classified-weapon/
The pfizer shot really is a “classified state of the art U.S. weapons system.”

Or maybe, rather than the FDA for some reason using redaction codes from the US military, they use their own redaction codes?

(b)(4) simply means the information is confidential commercial information.

To protect “confidential corporate information,” the FDA routinely redacts information in warning letters, using (b)(4) to indicate where information has been blacked out.

Exemption (b)(4) of FOIA permits agencies, as a matter of discretion, to withhold trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person which is privileged or confidential.

Unless you think that "jerky pet treats" are also a secret classified US weapons system? https://www.fda.gov/media/84973/download

Lol, you anti-vaxxers really will believe any old shit without a second thought or a single piece of critical thinking.

Edit:

Good research.

Double lol. This is what passes for "research" in the eyes of an anti-vaxxer. I guess BiG pHaRmA really are hiding secret 5G controlled death lasers in dog treats now. Hahahaha.

[tvbcof]

CONFIRMED: The Jab is a classified weapon
https://truth11.com/2021/09/25/confirmed-the-jab-is-a-classified-weapon/
The pfizer shot really is a “classified state of the art U.S. weapons system.”

Good research.  Likely a fairly accurate view of what is going on.  I myself figured that the only thing powerful enough to allow Pfizer to hide the ingredients of a supposedly 'approved' injection would be 'national security', so research purported to unravel to this stage is not a surprise.

As I am prone to do, I try to do the propagandists job for them and cook up an excuse which will fly with the tards.  Not only fly, but be 'obvious' to them and further cement their confidence in the loving embrace of Big Brother (corp/gov).  So...


...of course, in the spirit of 'defense', the military industrial complex loaned helpful technology which will save the world to Pfizer (and the others as well.)  But it's top secret stuff and only a 'un-patriotic conspiracy theorist anti-vaxxer' would desire to know what it actually is.  We can prove our patriotism by rolling up our sleeves without asking any questions.


Now 'patriotism' only goes so far, and by definition not beyond national borders (even if mostly vestigial ones.)  Many third-world countries who are owned by the IMF and World Bank and live off 'special drawing rights' already outsource their 'science' to the U.S. FDA and friends.  Whatever these organizations say about local healthcare practices is gospel and it's not healthy (economically or on some cases physically) for local politicos to question it.  Patriotism-by-proxy.  Never mind that it is national security policy of mothership to 'manage' population levels in said subservient nation.

[_Miracle]

https://sketchplanations.com/

this site will help :-)

I felt alive, then came to P&S and lost hope for humanity (just for a sec though)

[tvbcof]

https://sketchplanations.com/

this site will help :-)

I felt alive, then came to P&S and lost hope for humanity (just for a sec though)

I felt that people might be breaking free of their pseudo-intellectual jail cells, then a hoard of people like you showed up on the Bitcointalk forum.

Oh well.  The herd is getting stronger in number, more synchronized, and moving faster as it is guided toward the cliff.  Better plans can be made by having a more accurate understanding of the landscape.  So; 'thanks'.

[BADecker]

Probably all vaccines kill a few people at least. Many people are harmed by all vaxxes. Vaxxes might actually work for some people, but good nutrition and hygiene work better.

Note that the mRNA gene adjustment serum that is call the Covid vaxx, is not really a vaccine at all.

[Tash]

Timeframe is right in the 5 to 6 month mark.
I say chances are higher then 50% we never hear from him again.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5307207.msg57843607#msg57843607
The Covid "vaccine" is russian roulette.

[mindrust]

Asking if vaccines are killing people is like asking if oxygen is killing people.

There are good medical products and there are bad products.

https://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/prescription-drugs/gardasil-lawsuit/

This one (Gardasil) killed tens of thousands of people. If you think all vaccines are good, go find one and stab yourself with it.

[tvbcof]

Leana Wen (born Wen Linyan, Rhodes Scholar, CFR member, CNN go-to for a talking head):

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/JWlOjt2FpeHc/

What she seems to be saying is that she, as a vaxed/marked, will be a super-spreader when _she_ gets the covaids infection, and then put her unvaxxed family at risk.

Ergo, the unvaxxed are a danger to her and other vaxxed people because if she catches the coviads from them she is more of a risk to others due to her vaxxed status.

Left unsaid is why, since the vaxxed are super-spreaders, would she not be more likely to catch it from one of them?  But most people cannot really think about such complexities.

Anyway, I hope people can follow the logic here.  Seems pretty clear that the expectation is that, for a normie, their minds will shut down and go into 'reject further input' mode at first stages of any indication of a need for logical reasoning.  Thus, she and her fellow mainstream normie-land media talking heads can spout off anything they like...and be assumed by the sheeple to be brilliant beacons of light and hope for humanity.  Sadly, it works very well.

[suchmoon]

Timeframe is right in the 5 to 6 month mark.
I say chances are higher then 50% we never hear from him again.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5307207.msg57843607#msg57843607
The Covid "vaccine" is russian roulette.

If you think that everyone who stops posting on this forum is dead then this is a very deadly forum. Survival rate is less than 10% of users who register here and that predates COVID-19 by many years.

I think my poll is more accurate than your estimate.

[Cnut237]

Probably all vaccines kill a few people at least.

No-one has ever suggested that vaccines are 100% effective and confer immortality. No-one has ever suggested that everyone is a suitable candidate for receiving a vaccine, which is why there is screening of candidates.
Vaccination is not an all-or-nothing question, though. Does taking a tested, approved Covid vaccine on average, in general, confer better protection than doing nothing? Indisputably, yes. Look at the data.

Many people are harmed by all vaxxes.

Please quantify.

Vaxxes might actually work for some people, but good nutrition and hygiene work better.

Being fit and healthy obviously confers an advantage, just not as much as the vaccine. But, the two aren't mutually exclusive. Why not do both? It's not an either/or situation.

Note that the mRNA gene adjustment serum that is call the Covid vaxx, is not really a vaccine at all.

Not sure where you've plucked this one from. Citation needed. Proper citation, not youtube wacko.

[Tash]

 
Not entirely agree with the lengthy Spartacus COVID Letter, if anyone interrested here it is:
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/damn-you-hell-you-will-not-destroy-america-here-spartacus-covid-letter-thats-gone-viral

[Gyfts]

Leana Wen (born Wen Linyan, Rhodes Scholar, CFR member, CNN go-to for a talking head):

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/JWlOjt2FpeHc/

What she seems to be saying is that she, as a vaxed/marked, will be a super-spreader when _she_ gets the covaids infection, and then put her unvaxxed family at risk.

Ergo, the unvaxxed are a danger to her and other vaxxed people because if she catches the coviads from them she is more of a risk to others due to her vaxxed status.

Left unsaid is why, since the vaxxed are super-spreaders, would she not be more likely to catch it from one of them?  But most people cannot really think about such complexities.

Anyway, I hope people can follow the logic here.  Seems pretty clear that the expectation is that, for a normie, their minds will shut down and go into 'reject further input' mode at first stages of any indication of a need for logical reasoning.  Thus, she and her fellow mainstream normie-land media talking heads can spout off anything they like...and be assumed by the sheeple to be brilliant beacons of light and hope for humanity.  Sadly, it works very well.

Leana Wen is a propagandist who deserves to have whatever phony license she holds revoked. I've never seen someone plastered on TV screens at such a high rate to spread blatant falsehoods.

Per CDC published data, <200 5-11 year olds have died of Covid in 1.5 years, yet this deranged "professional" claims that muzzling of children through usage of surgical face masks should continue unless every child has gotten vaccinated, in addition to low community case load, in addition to *daily* testing.

I always love to point to her when folks say "listen to the experts."

Because this expert not once has cited any data when considering any guidelines related to children, yet she is providing commentary that is meant to be taken seriously. Fear mongering for headlines is her call to fame.

According to the CDC, the flu is deadlier to children than Covid during some aggressive flu seasons. Not my words, the CDC. Wonder if Leana Wen was calling for masking of children during these flu seasons, or daily flu testing. I doubt it.

[BADecker]

Probably all vaccines kill a few people at least.

No-one has ever suggested that vaccines are 100% effective and confer immortality. No-one has ever suggested that everyone is a suitable candidate for receiving a vaccine, which is why there is screening of candidates.
Vaccination is not an all-or-nothing question, though. Does taking a tested, approved Covid vaccine on average, in general, confer better protection than doing nothing? Indisputably, yes. Look at the data.

Many people are harmed by all vaxxes.

Please quantify.

Vaxxes might actually work for some people, but good nutrition and hygiene work better.

Being fit and healthy obviously confers an advantage, just not as much as the vaccine. But, the two aren't mutually exclusive. Why not do both? It's not an either/or situation.

Note that the mRNA gene adjustment serum that is call the Covid vaxx, is not really a vaccine at all.

Not sure where you've plucked this one from. Citation needed. Proper citation, not youtube wacko.

The vaxxes might look good until you look at the other side of what the CDC says... https://openvaers.com/covid-data and https://openvaers.com/images/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-20116.pdf.

But you know all this already.