REQUEST FOR ATTENTION OF: All 1xbit Signature Campaign Participants

[JollyGood]

LAST UPDATED 5th DECEMBER 2022

1xbit ARE MAJOR SCAMMERS

1xbit ARE MAJOR SCAMMERS







1xbit ARE MAJOR SCAMMERS

1xbit ARE MAJOR SCAMMERS


=====
In this thread I am using a similar format to the one I employed when I created the following thread regarding the Yobit scammers: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220208.0

It was successful therefore parts of it are duplicated here in the hope of reducing the number of victims being created by the 1xbit scammers
=====

Here is the 1xbit signature campaign threads:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339884.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5384913.0

Here is their thread where they claim to be solving issues:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266815.0

Here is their censored and self-moderated review thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339885.0

The forum is full of posts from victims and alleged victims of the 1xbit scammers where winnings have not been paid and/or withdrawals have been blocked and accounts locked... therefore in an attempt to counter the valid negativity they have started a signature campaign to try to create a division between forum members.

The 1xbit scammers have also started a thread where they will pay users for effectively writing good things about them.


In simple terms, all signature campaign participants for the 1xbit scammers are kindly requested to withdraw from the campaign because they are in most cases knowingly supporting and promoting a well known scam organisation.

All members posting selective and dubious reviews or out and out lies in their 1xbit.com honest review campaign thread in order to pocket some BTC are advised to refrain from doing so. Please do not support either directly or indirectly any scam organisation.


All new 1xbit signature campaign participants or applicants will receive a PM asking them to refrain from displaying the 1xbit signature or their account will be most probably receive negative feedback after 48 hours of them promoting the 1xbit scammers.

I am not the only forum member who has left negative trust for those promoting the 1xbit scammers. Once negative trust is given, it will not be removed unless there is a compelling case.

Please stop promoting a known scam and do not not apply to join their promotions for the sake of pocketing some Bitcoin that was effectively stolen by the 1xbit scammers from innocent victims and then passed on to their signature participants and their honest reviews campaign. Thank you.

From my investigations, studies and experience about the 1xbit campaign applicants and participants, it seems many of them can be broken down in to a few groups what are operated by a single puppeteer who controls the sock-puppets of that particular group. It seems 1xbit are inadvertently paying most of their campaign funds in to the hands of a few puppeteers that have fooled them. A fully deserved yet strange situation that the 1xbit scammers themselves have been scammed by their campaign participating puppeteers.

After the campaign applicants and participants that are part of farming groups, the next largest group seem to be alt-accounts. After that, the remaining seem to be applying in order to try their luck but they are in the tiniest of minority.

At the moment ~136 names have been added
Here is a list of those who have either applied to join or participated in their signature campaign which effectively means these forum members knowingly want to promote a scam (which will make the number of victims increase) just because they will receive payment from the 1xbit scammers. The list will be updated as and when time permits. You all are requested to add the following to your trust list with a tilde therefore effectively excluding and distrusting them:

Code:

~||bit
~1xbit_official
~1xManager
~1xbitpatnar
~ajochems
~Alanaz
~aleandromagno
~Alisha-k
~alpamar99
~altcointalk14
~apaben
~Bagaji
~barota
~bekti3
~bharal07
~bilal_jan321
~BintangBuleun
~bleedrulez
~BIN-BIN
~BitcoinAccepted
~bitjoin
~bitgov
~blackfor3st
~blackviruse
~BOAEDAN
~Btcvilla
~cafucafucafu
~CDC AP
~celot
~coinism
~crunck
~Cryptock
~CryptoCraze11
~CryptoGoonie
~Desmong
~diyetisman
~D-law
~dodgrad
~Ebede
~EdenHazard
~Emy leklap
~Erdogan
~eXtremal
~FlightyPouch
~Fritwakky
~gadado
~galambo
~goku19
~Gosgosking
~haidil
~hello_good_sir
~herurist
~HUSTLER
~ilovealtcoins
~ipanks
~izsara
~jinxing
~john_nautica
~Jsmbugu
~junmisakiro
~KarpovE4
~keyscore44
~kingangel
~klidex
~kotwica666
~Kyraishi
~LimLims
~lulumiya
~maju69
~Mamun74
~mardaed
~Markinzo
~Masplanc
~mm2543363580
~momoamzad
~MonsterV 
~mostcrack
~MrcMrc
~muratsink
~Naficopa
~nakata121
~nebiki
~Newlifebtc
~og kush420
~perla
~pieppiep
~pipshunter
~PonzyManCrazyLiar
~prince malik
~protech77
~qory
~Qunenin
~preikaler
~Rabi3
~raiblock
~RankerCan
~Ratash
~rijaljun
~RILWAN
~rokokgudanggaram
~ropyu1978
~roslinpl 
~rudolfaxl
~safari88
~S A KHAIR
~samputin
~sempak
~Shagnasty
~sikke
~Sirait
~SmokerFace
~sovie
~StLucifer
~supto005
~Sweminer777
~tazmantasik
~terrorJR
~tessnik
~TheEconomists
~Theones
~timerland
~toast
~Trojane
~tulusikhlas
~Tumanggor
~Uzairjutt275
~VanityWallets2015
~vvikkass
~watergold
~wildan88
~yayayo
~YinShuiSiYuan
~Zackgeno96

[AB de Royse777]

I would say let's give the participants a week time. Let them decide if they want to remove the sig code. If they don't then how about tagging them since we have a warning post now that clearly shows that they can not have an excuse for it anymore.

Maybe on can mention all the participants in this thread or send PM (it could be riskly considering they will report it as unsolicited PM).

[sujonali1819]

According to this spreadsheet All the participants has atleast one negative trust what I can see by default trust view. And as I guess There is a big chance that many of them are enrolling the campaign with their alts.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jd9RqLTK10kQJ20CjT0xQfLbYFyQxPW0VYUJ2CFtg4Y/edit#gid=279361360


And the funny things is The 1xbit manager looking for some user/members who has not any red trust. 

if not met required post you post wrong part or post was bad so not count it. can send to me pm for review!

yes we have open position but looking too people with good and neutral trust not negative!

[Yogee]

A request to ignore all users wearing their signature is also an alternative if they don't take this post seriously.

[Little Mouse]

If they don't then how about tagging them since we have a warning post now that clearly shows that they can not have an excuse for it anymore.

On yobit campaign, some participants were tagged by suchmoon and if I'm correct, all of these were neutral. I think that's the best approach here too. Both yobit and 1xbit are same. They are selectively scamming people and/or scamming through so called blockchain less project.

[YOSHIE]

The only reason the admins, have to take action against the 1xbit site and maintainers, looks like they / 1xbit campaign participants don't care if they are flagged by DT, this is because 1xbit maintainers accept participants who have earned red trust from the start.

In the case of 1xbit only the admin can take action at this time, it's a shame for newcomers who are not aware of the 1xbit scam site, the victims of fraud are increasing every day, because they offer a fairly high bonus, many are tempted and fall victim to 1xbit, they don't realize after the money is deposited and play wins, 1xbit team, closes the account.

Every effort has been made by DT and other members of this forum, to warn against new members, but that doesn't seem to stop them from advertising, I beg the admin, take one action against the 1xbit site, so that victims of fraud do not increase every day.


I know scams are not moderated here and the forum doesn't want to be involved in that, but this is a step that must be taken by the Bitcointalk forum to still give the best impression for the Bitcoin/crypto community in the future, not the impression of being scammed by certain sites.

[zanezane]

I don't know why some of the people who joined their campaign are defending it as if that's going to help them get paid more. There's one that I saw earlier that says that they did pay so the claim that they're a scam isn't going to be true. This participants would probably sell their mothers for a dollar for how desperate they are.

[The Cryptovator]

Do you believe 1xbit signature campaign participants will leave the campaign? I don't think so, because all participants are tagged from the beginning of the start campaign and they were aware of the 1xbit scam. So all the participants of 1xbit do not care about the forum trust system. They don't have fear of getting the red tag. So how they will leave campaigns? Rather than they are creating a reputation thread upon getting a red tag from DT members. I can't see any way how we can prevent them from promoting the 1xbit signature.

I beg the admin, take one action against the 1xbit site, so that victims of fraud do not increase every day.

It doesn't going happen you know unless they spam like Yobit.

[Igebotz]

Such a shame we live in a society where people especially the youths are ready to trade their reputation for a penny that won't last or contribute anything to their lives, the same youths who help in promoting a scam site would become victims one way or another and start blaming the government for not providing adequate cybersecurity. How do you sleep knowing that what you are being paid is from a scammed victim.

[ScamViruS]

It is now important to take action against those who are participating in 1xbit's signature campaign. They are wearing the signature of 1xbit, and if somewhere a user says something against 1xbit then they are arguing with those members which means they are willing to do anything to promote this scam in big way.

It's really a shame that they are promoting a scam to earn a little money by participating in the signature campaign. Which is giving that website a chance to scam on a larger scale. They don't just limit themselves to participating in signature, they try their best to defend that website. Most of the members who have participated in this signature campaign have had their accounts tagged by DT members due to their involvement in various scam campaigns. So their illegal activities already exist.

[Charles-Tim]

Here is their censored and self-moderated review thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339885.0

Ahh!!! This alone make 1xbit to deserve negative trust, that means anyone that created his own opinion content (post) which is against theirs (1xbit) will be deleted by 1xbit. I have noticed this site even before I joined Bitcointalk, no good reputation about them at the time even till now. I will advice people to stay away from this gambling site (1xbit) because of the bad reputation it has on this forum, until it is changed to good reputation by experienced member of this forum.

[acroman08]

The 1xbit scammers have also started a thread where they will pay users for effectively writing good things about them.

the thread was supposed to be an "honest review" although I am not sure how honest they are. I've seen negative reviews in the thread too and those were paid also(at least according to what the OP of that thread has posted). although I agree with what NotATether said in that thread. (quoted it below for reference)

And here lies the problem with paying people for review campaigns _{(1xbit scam accusations put aside for a moment)}, is that people are just going to point their browser at the site and write about the first 10 things they see!

Guys that's not how reviews work. You are also supposed to play with all features on the site, try to deposit, try to withdraw, play some games and see what happens, talk to their live support, and rate their reactions/helpfulness. These 1-paragraph spaghetti posts for sats aren't going to help anyone who is trying to independently read 1xbit reviews.

According to this spreadsheet All the participants has atleast one negative trust what I can see by default trust view. And as I guess There is a big chance that many of them are enrolling the campaign with their alts.

seeing that the accounts bought by adkinsbet have simultaneously become active and applied to the campaign there's no doubt that others are applying their alts too.

[JollyGood]

I would say let's give the participants a week time. Let them decide if they want to remove the sig code. If they don't then how about tagging them since we have a warning post now that clearly shows that they can not have an excuse for it anymore.

Maybe on can mention all the participants in this thread or send PM (it could be riskly considering they will report it as unsolicited PM).

I think giving them a week is being too generous. Maybe 48 hours in enough even though from another aspect they probably do not even deserve to be given time but still I requested in a kind and courteous manner from them to stop colluding with the 1xbit scammers.

When the Yobit scammers were running a signature campaign here I created a thread asking all signature campaign participants displaying Yobit banners to kindly stop promoting their scam otherwise they would be tagged within 48hrs (I believe), I even listed their user names and sent PMs to those before tagging but I had time and patience in that period. Right now it will not be possible to send PMs and go through every account to copy and paste their details but they will end up getting tagged.

Last month I was not on DT1, maybe this will change this month so my tagging might have more of an impact on those signature participants that are willing to entice gullible people in to losing their money at the hands of the 1xbit scammers.

And the funny things is The 1xbit manager looking for some user/members who has not any red trust.  

if not met required post you post wrong part or post was bad so not count it. can send to me pm for review!

yes we have open position but looking too people with good and neutral trust not negative!

I am not surprised by this because 1xbit are scammers after all and they have no hesitation in wanting to scam people but all the while are seeking to employ only those with clean trust history to promote their scam. The only reason they have negative trust participants in their signature campaign is because those that are not using alt-accounts and those that are trying to protect their hard earned trust and reputation would never even think about participating.

A request to ignore all users wearing their signature is also an alternative if they don't take this post seriously.

Yes this is an option which can be applied even after tagging them.

If they don't then how about tagging them since we have a warning post now that clearly shows that they can not have an excuse for it anymore.

On yobit campaign, some participants were tagged by suchmoon and if I'm correct, all of these were neutral. I think that's the best approach here too. Both yobit and 1xbit are same. They are selectively scamming people and/or scamming through so called blockchain less project.

Here is how I took action against the Yobit scammers and I received a lot of support from the forum, thankfully they made a decision to leave the forum but maybe that was not associated with the thread but it certainly got a lot of attention: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220208.0

[The Sceptical Chymist]

A request to ignore all users wearing their signature is also an alternative if they don't take this post seriously.

A request to whom?  Anybody reading this thread can ignore all the signatures they want, but the problem is obviously that most members don't have signatures on ignore and will therefore be exposed to the posts made by all the members of the 1xbit.com campaign--and some of them might click on one of those signatures and potentially get scammed.

Personally, I don't care if JollyGood or anyone else tags every single participant, though I wouldn't feel the need to do so myself.  There was a similar situation with the last Yobit campaign, and I'm of mixed feelings about punishing the campaigners rather than going after Yobit or 1xbit.com or whoever else is accused of scamming.  The reason for that (which many of you probably won't agree with) is that just because you rent out your signature space, it doesn't mean you endorse the service that's being advertised. 

It's tantamount to boycotting a TV station for allowing [pick your controversial company] to buy an advert slot when that company has done something shady.  It happens all the time and to me I'm fine with it.  Everyone should do their own due diligence before buying a product or using a service that's advertised on a website/TV station/wherever.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

Everyone should do their own due diligence before buying a product or using a service that's advertised on a website/TV station/wherever.

That's true but what is the forum said to be again to the industry at large, it's supposed to be a hangout platform for fellow enthusiast but now it's more like a building ground for newbie to start their journey in the industry. Already there's enough scams out there that they have to protect themselves from, it doesn't make sense for them to start seeing the community give room for scammers to have their way by advertising freely on the forum.

Already Theymos did denied them an advert slots on the forum, that alone should send a very strong signal that scammers aren't welcomed here even though the forum doesn't moderate scams. The community always look out for her members and this isn't the first time they'll be tackling similar issue. I remember yobit controversial and how the community won, same with Best_change and how we may them clear up their accusations, that's how a company having the best interest of her reputation should react.

I believe if this steps on stopping them from advertising and clearing up their reputation isn't taken, we might just be sending the wrong signal to other scammy company out their to come pollute the forum. Let call black Black when we see them and not be the others, the media house careless about the welfare of their customers instead focused on enriching themselves, we can do better than them. I believe 1xbit will be welcomed if they work towards resolving the issue raised against them but until then, I stand with the OP and I'll be willing to participate in the tagging.

[shasan]

According to this spreadsheet All the participants has atleast one negative trust what I can see by default trust view.

I have reviewed all the accepted participants and noticed all the participant have at least2 negative trust from default trusted users. Anyway, the users who had joined on this campaign knew they will get negative trust and even they may get banned for promoting 1xbit like promoting yobit.

[Igebotz]

I have reviewed all the accepted participants and noticed all the participant have at least2 negative trust from default trusted users. Anyway, the users who had joined on this campaign knew they will get negative trust and even they may get banned for promoting 1xbit like promoting yobit.

Most of the participants had a negative trust before now from Godknows where and when they saw that the manager was accepting scammer promoters they jumped in it knowing that they have nothing to lose besides scam is not moderated on the forum, there are few accounts still promoting Adkinsbet without getting any restrictions or ban. Maybe restrict negative trust accounts from participating in bounties and sig campaigns.

[pilosopotasyo]

According to this spreadsheet All the participants has atleast one negative trust what I can see by default trust view.

I have reviewed all the accepted participants and noticed all the participant have at least2 negative trust from default trusted users. Anyway, the users who had joined on this campaign knew they will get negative trust and even they may get banned for promoting 1xbit like promoting yobit.

Those who do not have prior negative feedbacks before joining this campaign is making a huge gamble because of the high payout and they are hoping that the campaign will last a long time, probably 4 to 5 months unless the forum restricts the campaign, I don't think they will heed the advice here.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Most of the participants had a negative trust before now from Godknows where and when they saw that the manager was accepting scammer promoters they jumped in it knowing that they have nothing to lose besides scam is not moderated on the forum, there are few accounts still promoting Adkinsbet without getting any restrictions or ban. Maybe restrict negative trust accounts from participating in bounties and sig campaigns.

This is a good question. Where did all the previously colored accounts know about the beginning of this subscription campaign? There are only a few people who sincerely resented the received tag, the rest do not care. It has already been proven that awakened accounts are someone else's alternatives.
Would you believe that they read the forum without logging in? It is more logical to think that they belong to someone who is among us but pretends to be honest, and all of his altos are signed to this scam.
Therefore, whether you remove negative tags or not, does not matter for these profiles. These are scam accounts that will promote anything for money without worrying about their reputation.

[JollyGood]

The only reason the admins, have to take action against the 1xbit site and maintainers, looks like they / 1xbit campaign participants don't care if they are flagged by DT, this is because 1xbit maintainers accept participants who have earned red trust from the start.

In the case of 1xbit only the admin can take action at this time, it's a shame for newcomers who are not aware of the 1xbit scam site, the victims of fraud are increasing every day, because they offer a fairly high bonus, many are tempted and fall victim to 1xbit, they don't realize after the money is deposited and play wins, 1xbit team, closes the account.

Every effort has been made by DT and other members of this forum, to warn against new members, but that doesn't seem to stop them from advertising, I beg the admin, take one action against the 1xbit site, so that victims of fraud do not increase every day.


I know scams are not moderated here and the forum doesn't want to be involved in that, but this is a step that must be taken by the Bitcointalk forum to still give the best impression for the Bitcoin/crypto community in the future, not the impression of being scammed by certain sites.

Sadly we are all too familiar with the fact that scams are not moderated by the admins here in the forum, it is really about us all taking individual or collective action against those that are trying to scam forum members and destroying the reputation of crypto on an international scale.

I don't know why some of the people who joined their campaign are defending it as if that's going to help them get paid more. There's one that I saw earlier that says that they did pay so the claim that they're a scam isn't going to be true. This participants would probably sell their mothers for a dollar for how desperate they are.

Those that are defending 1xbit by posting propaganda in their "honest reviews" thread and also in their signature campaign thread, they do it simply because they are either the Adkinsbet associated bunch of alt-accounts and are on the 1xbit payroll or they hope to be on the 1xbit payroll by trying to endear themselves.

These sorts of signature campaign participants are of they type that would gladly sell the soul of their grandmother to the devil for the sake of a few pennies therefore they would feel zero remorse for promoting a known scam such as 1xbit.

Such a shame we live in a society where people especially the youths are ready to trade their reputation for a penny that won't last or contribute anything to their lives, the same youths who help in promoting a scam site would become victims one way or another and start blaming the government for not providing adequate cybersecurity. How do you sleep knowing that what you are being paid is from a scammed victim.

Yes it is a shame but sadly when it comes to some forum members, they would easily trade their reputation and dignity for a penny or two. They do not care about promoting scams because they simply do not care.

It is now important to take action against those who are participating in 1xbit's signature campaign. They are wearing the signature of 1xbit, and if somewhere a user says something against 1xbit then they are arguing with those members which means they are willing to do anything to promote this scam in big way.

It's really a shame that they are promoting a scam to earn a little money by participating in the signature campaign. Which is giving that website a chance to scam on a larger scale. They don't just limit themselves to participating in signature, they try their best to defend that website. Most of the members who have participated in this signature campaign have had their accounts tagged by DT members due to their involvement in various scam campaigns. So their illegal activities already exist.

Thankfully several members have already tagged many of those promoting the 1xbit scammers. I also started tagging all accounts either displaying their signature or those that have applied to join (including those that are probably alt-accounts but have been vocal supporters).

Here is their censored and self-moderated review thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339885.0

Ahh!!! This alone make 1xbit to deserve negative trust, that means anyone that created his own opinion content (post) which is against theirs (1xbit) will be deleted by 1xbit. I have noticed this site even before I joined Bitcointalk, no good reputation about them at the time even till now. I will advice people to stay away from this gambling site (1xbit) because of the bad reputation it has on this forum, until it is changed to good reputation by experienced member of this forum.

Their self-moderated/censored thread was designed to stifle any opposition to the narrative they wanted to spew but in the end they will never be able to stop voices of opposition. If 1xbit were serious about being a genuine business they would make it clear who owns and operates them in their ToS and also list and explain their real association with the Kawbet scammers but before all of that they would apologise to all their victims and pay them owed funds as well as compensation.

Put quite simply, the 1xbit scammers cannot be trusted.

seeing that the accounts bought by adkinsbet have simultaneously become active and applied to the campaign there's no doubt that others are applying their alts too.

It would be interesting to know what binds those sets of Adkinsbet shills and their real relationship to the Kawbet/1xbit scammers.