Gambling on friendly matches

[Oshosondy]

The most common friendly matches are both the international  country and club friendlies, long time ago I have seen these type of matches as a way to bet and have fun, many of my betting result are positive most especially if I bet on a single match. The country or club that will win is not certain but I noticed staking on over 1.5 or over 2.5 is always most of the time results to a good outcome.

I am not saying this is a risk free bet, no bet is risk free, but I noticed this type of match most of the time results to many goals scored which makes better for taking over 1.5 or over 2.5 and the games are won.

Some people still like to accumulate, the accumulation can also be positive and won but the more the accumulation the more the high chances of losing. But I do not still see any wrong in accumulating 3 matches, though the chances to lose will increase because as one match lost result to the nullification of the bet, I prefer just a single game in a week.

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

[1715442850]

1715442850

[Cnut237]

Personally, I don't like betting on friendly matches, I find them too unpredictable. There are also often a lot of player changes, so one thing to avoid is probably betting on a certain player to score - chances are they will play less of the match than would normally be the case. But you're right that teams are generally less cautious in friendlies, which we might expect would lead to more goals in total.

[Cherylstar86]

Betting on friendly matches without any pressure is a bit risky in my opinion. With odds of above 2.5 I would consider betting on the underdog. The stronger team will likely never bring their A team and usually let's the substitute players play. The purpose of these friendly matches is to be entertaining and not about winning. I would expect the underdog to win more of these games, or it will be a draw at least.

Many expected good gambling outcome, but I can't be confident with underdog to become more potential of winning. I always rely on odds but I'll stick on strong team that would probably give us bigger hints to decide which will be the best pick for winning streak. Friendly match might end up with draw decision, and only pure entertainment.

[hahay]

I personally prefer to avoid betting on friendly matches because usually the players being played are second or even third tier players, so we will predict more wrongly. For example, a famous team plays a friendly match, then we predict the match will run normally with the main players being played but after the match starts we will be surprised to see the composition of players we don't know. That way, the predictions we make will be of no use at all and also, as far as I'm aware there won't be many goals in the friendly. Regarding which betting option is better, I think it depends because I will always adjust to the team that will bet and what kind of tournament they are in, it doesn't always have to be about the number of goals 1.5 and 2.5 because there are many other options that are also good.

[boyptc]

I thought that this is the other type of betting friendly match.

But as much as you want to bet with these matches, it's hard to determine who would be the winner of such games. Because, as it's declared as a friendly match.

You'll never know what they've talked about before the game on their lockers.

[YOSHIE]

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

In general, in gambling matches, clubs are often considered very annoying, not a few are involved in betting their friendship to fight for the country that is director, In fact, what is often encountered is player injury, this factor can endanger the club in the league that we bet on.

Unexpected things often happen in friendly match gambling, often seen this match often triggers aggressive and controversial nature.

The bottom line: there are the biggest consequences in a friendly match, Although the assessment that leads to the game is more underdog, in fact this match is very difficult to predict.

[Oshosondy]

The bottom line: there are the biggest consequences in a friendly match, Although the assessment that leads to the game is more underdog, in fact this match is very difficult to predict.

Yes friendly matches is very difficult to predict, I have also noticed that, that is why I did not mention wining but just over 1.5 or over 2.5, which means both team or one of the teams scoring 2 or 3 goals will make the bettor to win the match. I have been noticing friendlies over a long time ago, most opponents score or one opponent will score more than one or two goals. Try to check this out about friendlies. If to consider the ratio of this type of goals to no goal or under 1.5 goals, the ration will be 70% matches played to be over 1.5 while 30% for under 1.5. I too do not go for straight win because I noticed the winner is not certain because the players used are not the first 11, may not even be part of the A team.

[Zilon]

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

It depends, because performances at country friendlies are quite different from club friendlies. If I was to bet on a country friendly game I would go for a straight win with over 1.5 while for club friendlies which aren't taken serious by most manager would be a draw for me. But I would go for 1 game at a time other than accumulating odds that might end-up with lots of disappointing outcome.

Sincerely predicting this games is a bit difficult atimes so I spend good time selecting my teams both for the country and club teams but from my personal observation countries tend to perform better in friendlies compared to clubs.

[Oshosondy]

Sincerely predicting this games is a bit difficult atimes so I spend good time selecting my teams both for the country and club teams but from my personal observation countries tend to perform better in friendlies compared to clubs.

In what way in performance? Do you mean in straight win? Or choosing total goal scored?

In straight win, I do not bet on straight win in friendlies, but likely countries can be performing better but I do not know, but there are many unknown clubs in club friendlies if you noticed, even if the clubs are unknown and uncommon, how will the match be determined when the players also are not known. But what about going for total goals? I mean the total goals scored by both teams after the match ended. I used 1.5 as the min and 2.5 to be the max.

[Wexnident]

Don't really want to ngl. In most Esports matches, even if players do perform skillfully, they don't really pick the meta or move or do actions that they would normally do, which is a BIG factor imo. Yes, both teams don't do it, but the skill levels of both teams are quite close to each other so even the smallest factor is enough to influence the match.  I just enjoy the games together with the team tbh. It's fun, especially if you get in the mood together with how the casters do their jobs. We do bet on what teams win though, just that it has no money involved.

[Peanutswar]

Having a friendly match is one of the most riskier things can do in a match because they can even troll and they can even throw the game as much as they want because it's a friendly game no matter what the outcome is still its the entertainment to them unless its an in a professional match like in a league, tournament, majors and another event which can benefit to them to have a point. Well I'm a fan of dota so most of the time I see the match of good teams like Liquid (Kuroky) vs OG (Notail) this game is risky because its a friendly match too but still they don't consider it because it a match to enter the title of T.I Champions.

[iv4n]

Betting on friendly games is risky! You can't make an objective analysis, coaches like to experiment with new names, tactics, there are up to 12 substitutions... unlike in big games where motivation is high, in friendly games, there can be a lack of motivation! Underdogs often win because they play against some big name and they give their best, just to be seen!...

When I bet on friendly games, like OP, I bet on goals... usually over 2.5, but sometimes I like to test over 3.5 and over 4.5 goals with some games...
After all, without big pressure, which is common for official games, there's less tension... players are more relaxed, mistakes are being made, and I expect to see more goals!

[Alisha-k]

I would keep my games straight both for country and club international friendlies and would very selective in choosing my games I would rather take up good matches and predict both as draw because going for a straight win might be heartbreaking atimes most especially for club friendlies with poor management.

[palle11]

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

Nah friendly matches both clubs and countries are not good for draws or straight win but going for goals are better and more likely and guarantee for success. The reason to go for goals more than draw is that as the name comes, it is friendly meaning no seriousness because there are no cups or stakes involved for the players, team or clubs so they will just play it out as friends. Such matches are just meant to test players fitness and readiness of team for future competition. Therefore, coaches relax some important players or those who are already fit and most times the rules of the game are relaxed and you can see numerous changes of players which is actually the purpose; to test the fitness of the players and physhe of the team. At times you see players not showing seriousness on the pitch, some even laugh on the pitch rather than chasing lost possession on the ball. So those are reasons to bet for goals in friendlies and many turn out to be matches with goals.

[madnessteat]

I never bet on friendly matches because of their increased unpredictability. I don't like increased risk, which is why I choose a tournament match, where I can make a more thorough analysis of the teams and thus predict the outcome of the match.

[bittraffic]

How do you determine a friendly match?

Wouldn't you interpret friendly match as an exhibition fight like Mike Tyson vs Jones or Floyd vs Logan? We didn't see any listing of it on crypto book though but if it was we likely are betting on a draw as expected because it looks like they are just up there for the audience to see how they're after years being retired.

[Fesatmas]

The most common friendly matches are both the international  country and club friendlies, long time ago I have seen these type of matches as a way to bet and have fun, many of my betting result are positive most especially if I bet on a single match. The country or club that will win is not certain but I noticed staking on over 1.5 or over 2.5 is always most of the time results to a good outcome.

I am not saying this is a risk free bet, no bet is risk free, but I noticed this type of match most of the time results to many goals scored which makes better for taking over 1.5 or over 2.5 and the games are won.

It's not balanced when we have to bet between the two forces who have a level of quality in terms of play. Simply put, between countries against clubs, it is clear that it does not benefit both parties. Friendly matches are not too serious to bet on. because winning and losing are the main points of it all testing how strong they are in dealing with high-class players from various countries who gather in one football club. While the accumulation of country players only rests on players within the country itself.

[ralle14]

Going for 1x2 markets seems risky as teams have less pressure to win so total goals is indeed the best way to approach friendly matches but it still depends on the offered odds and your personal projected odds. Even if over 2.5 or 1.5 is likely to hit I wouldn't say it's that easy because friendly matches can be very random you'd never know if these teams suddenly change their playstyle like going for a defensive type of play and next thing you know the match ends with a 1-0 or 0-0 scoreline.

[worle1bm]

I don't prefer to bet on these types of friendly matches because the outcome cannot be predicted on them and you can't place a bet if you don't know any of the possible outcome even with such odds.You can't do any analysis as both the team specialties are not much known and they can make any moment change in between the match so don't prefer bets on them.

[acroman08]

How do you determine a friendly match?

Wouldn't you interpret friendly match as an exhibition fight like Mike Tyson vs Jones or Floyd vs Logan? We didn't see any listing of it on crypto book though but if it was we likely are betting on a draw as expected because it looks like they are just up there for the audience to see how they're after years being retired.

not a crypto sportsbook but I remember seeing BetOnline posting betting options on where logan paul will bleed from. the post was too funny so I am not really sure if the post were legitimate or just a troll post from BetOnline.

https://twitter.com/betonline_ag/status/1401381306768965640/photo/1

[Fredomago]

I don't prefer to bet on these types of friendly matches because the outcome cannot be predicted on them and you can't place a bet if you don't know any of the possible outcome even with such odds.You can't do any analysis as both the team specialties are not much known and they can make any moment change in between the match so don't prefer bets on them.

Yeah right, with friendly games the odds is really hard to predict especially with ML, but for OP's strategy just my two cents since it's friendly match both opposing teams are not putting that much pressures.

Just my personal opinion though still unpredictable in anyhow. Maybe if that works for OP as he mentioned most of the time, if I were him I'll stick on that strategy and enjoy.

Luck still the best companion in each gambling bets that you'll going to take.

[Rruchi man]

From OP, i believe that the context of this discussion has been limited to soccer alone, so i speak in that accord.It is a real gamble to bet on friendly matches because unlike playing in a competitive space, players sometimes lack motivation to give their 100%, coaches take it as a time to try out new strategies and also test the players they have on reserve.
The situation is even worse when there are very little or no spectators in the pitch to cheer. It is also easier for there to be the case of match fixing.

If you must bet on friendly matches, a tip from me to you which is not a must for you to take is that you do not bet on the whole game at a go, break your bets into two and bet on the first half first, then follow to place your bet in the second half after watching and analysing the first.

[geegaw]

I don't prefer to bet on these types of friendly matches because the outcome cannot be predicted on them and you can't place a bet if you don't know any of the possible outcome even with such odds.You can't do any analysis as both the team specialties are not much known and they can make any moment change in between the match so don't prefer bets on them.

The friendly match is relatively focused on interesting points, the expertise and professionalism of both sides will not be high even if one side is far superior, sometimes the score will be sorted and even the match will last longer than desired to serve the purpose of charity donation or attracting funding. The goal has not mattered in terms of winning, our betting has also become a donation activity, most of the odds on friendly matches are just to provide more environment for gambling addicts to satisfy their mind

[South Park]

Betting on friendly matches without any pressure is a bit risky in my opinion. With odds of above 2.5 I would consider betting on the underdog. The stronger team will likely never bring their A team and usually let's the substitute players play. The purpose of these friendly matches is to be entertaining and not about winning. I would expect the underdog to win more of these games, or it will be a draw at least.

It depends on the nature of these friendly matches, if those matches are part of the preparation for an international tournament then you know that both teams are going to take this seriously so you can still bet on it as if it was a serious match, because it is, but if this is not the case then I am like you and I will be very afraid of betting in any of those matches as teams are more relaxed and even if their starters play they are not going to bring their best game and the result will become unpredictable.

[KTChampions]

This is a completely random event since neither the coach nor the players care about the end result, they just try different strategies. Therefore, the best way is to avoid bets on such matches or to bet small amounts on underdogs, since their motivation is higher (it is always pleasant to defeat a strong opponent) and in a friendly match they can win.

[YuginKadoya]

Friendly matches are often fun to watch you can get a happy vibe were players are just enjoying taking the opportunity to play without fear of losing, and that is why I hate most so I will not bet in some events like these, I think it is just an exhibition match between two teams and it is always hard to predict who's going to win because teams on the friendly match like these don't really use their starting member mostly they will just use their substitute players so their main player will not get injured in a more crucial game where they will be needed, but matches like these are very ideal to players for them to see their potential in a game.

[Dread Pirate Roberts]

If you already have a strong prediction and analysis, why not? and you have also mentioned for fun and quite interesting odds for match you belive will have strong result you will win . im currenly not really update in sportsbook but if it's in e-sports, if I know about a team and see good odds, I'll go along. sometimes the game like this, friendly match or minor match just for filling free time and for fun purpose no serious money involved.

[dimonstration]

If you already have a strong prediction and analysis, why not? and you have also mentioned for fun and quite interesting odds for match you belive will have strong result you will win . im currenly not really update in sportsbook but if it's in e-sports, if I know about a team and see good odds, I'll go along. sometimes the game like this, friendly match or minor match just for filling free time and for fun purpose no serious money involved.

There's no harm and too much pressure in betting with friendly matches, though it should only be a minimal amount involved since it's hard to predict who will gonna win. It is just like merely supporting who we think will win unlike if it's not friendly matches we can see the pressure and each team will strive harder who will win we can base it on their past performances.

[Kakmakr]

No, I say ... no betting should be allowed on friendly matches. I have seen some Rugby matches in the past where the opposing teams left tackles for fun and laughter in friendly matches or they will ask a non kicker to kick for poles.

We should only bet on matches where there are true competition and a strong will to win... Yes, some players play hard in friendly matches too, but there are nothing in these matches for them. (No tournament points or League points or ranking) 

[ReiMomo]

I don't prefer to bet on these types of friendly matches because the outcome cannot be predicted on them and you can't place a bet if you don't know any of the possible outcome even with such odds.You can't do any analysis as both the team specialties are not much known and they can make any moment change in between the match so don't prefer bets on them.

We might still end up loosing even after choosing the right team with best players. I have lost around $1000 on IPL cricket match. But really gained some in the beginning which really pushed me to go further with huge amount.  Its really at times hard to predict. We might have predicted something but what happened might have been at times surprising. At times its based on the luck I would say.

[Oilacris]

The most common friendly matches are both the international  country and club friendlies, long time ago I have seen these type of matches as a way to bet and have fun, many of my betting result are positive most especially if I bet on a single match. The country or club that will win is not certain but I noticed staking on over 1.5 or over 2.5 is always most of the time results to a good outcome.

I am not saying this is a risk free bet, no bet is risk free, but I noticed this type of match most of the time results to many goals scored which makes better for taking over 1.5 or over 2.5 and the games are won.

It's not balanced when we have to bet between the two forces who have a level of quality in terms of play. Simply put, between countries against clubs, it is clear that it does not benefit both parties. Friendly matches are not too serious to bet on. because winning and losing are the main points of it all testing how strong they are in dealing with high-class players from various countries who gather in one football club. While the accumulation of country players only rests on players within the country itself.

Not really that much interested on betting with friendly matches yet i cant really feel up the thrill at least and also you can really say that showing off their true potential or skills
wont really be that possible but who knows about showing off on whose better.

For me i wont really be seeing this to be interesting but if odds would be considerable then i might really put up some try but if not then i do just simply ignore it.

We can compare the thrill between friendly matches and real tourney ones.

[jostorres]

I don't prefer to bet on these types of friendly matches because the outcome cannot be predicted on them and you can't place a bet if you don't know any of the possible outcome even with such odds.You can't do any analysis as both the team specialties are not much known and they can make any moment change in between the match so don't prefer bets on them.

Not sure how friendly matches in soccer do for gamblers but for boxing and such events, these friendly or non-official games are terrible. Recently a fight happened between Mayweather and Logan Paul where I felt Logan won but because there were no judges to score the fight, there was technically no winner and I wonder what happened to the bets that were placed on the fight.

This is a completely random event since neither the coach nor the players care about the end result, they just try different strategies. Therefore, the best way is to avoid bets on such matches or to bet small amounts on underdogs, since their motivation is higher (it is always pleasant to defeat a strong opponent) and in a friendly match they can win.

Yeah, and they might sub some players to give them some game time and nearly all the game is random because there is no eagerness to win from both teams. I remember watching some friendly matches and they don't even take overtime seriously like the ref will blow the whistle as soon as the time is nearly over.

[Eureka_07]

In my opinion, it is not a good idea if you'll choose to bet on friendly matches games other than those serious like tournaments/season leagues. Most of these friendly games aren't predictable, and most of the time players are just enjoying the game. They're not serious so the risk is very high compared to serious games.

[Fortify]

The most common friendly matches are both the international  country and club friendlies, long time ago I have seen these type of matches as a way to bet and have fun, many of my betting result are positive most especially if I bet on a single match. The country or club that will win is not certain but I noticed staking on over 1.5 or over 2.5 is always most of the time results to a good outcome.

I am not saying this is a risk free bet, no bet is risk free, but I noticed this type of match most of the time results to many goals scored which makes better for taking over 1.5 or over 2.5 and the games are won.

Some people still like to accumulate, the accumulation can also be positive and won but the more the accumulation the more the high chances of losing. But I do not still see any wrong in accumulating 3 matches, though the chances to lose will increase because as one match lost result to the nullification of the bet, I prefer just a single game in a week.

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

In theory friendly matches should be as competitive as any other game, you might even find newer players trialing for the team to see whether they can stand up to the pressure - in which case they are likely to fight harder to impress. However it is a bit of a catch-22 because friendlies might actually seem more acceptable to "rig" if such activity was going on. I remember watching blatant cheating by two basketball teams in the Philippines who were both trying to lose, so at the lower levels of football this certainly seems like a possibility and friendly matches is exactly where cheaters might try to target if they want to ease their conscious a little. To be honest, any decent bookmaker is well aware of all the odds and make even limit the over/under possibilities automatically if they see such trends.

[panjul07]

In my opinion, it is not a good idea if you'll choose to bet on friendly matches games other than those serious like tournaments/season leagues. Most of these friendly games aren't predictable, and most of the time players are just enjoying the game. They're not serious so the risk is very high compared to serious games.

Good or not will always based on our own preferences, if we know what to bet and how to analyze the match then it will be a good chance to make some money.
Friendly matches is matches where most team do not really care about the result as most of them uses friendly match to try different strategies and players.
Of course it is more unpredictable than regular tournament/competition but if we are familiar with it then there is nothing wrong to bet on friendly matches.

[Woodie]

Good observation and I think the reason for this is most teams don't usually field their top guys to play some of these friendlies because they know players can pick up injuries which could cost them a title chase and no one wants to take that kind of a risk with friendlies. So intelligent coaches simply put in reserve teams and tell them to just have fun and end result is plenty of goals and pundits are cashing in with the results

[crzy]

Betting on friendly matches without any pressure is a bit risky in my opinion. With odds of above 2.5 I would consider betting on the underdog. The stronger team will likely never bring their A team and usually let's the substitute players play. The purpose of these friendly matches is to be entertaining and not about winning. I would expect the underdog to win more of these games, or it will be a draw at least.

The risk is always in gambling no matter what kind of matches you’re betting with. I don’t place any bet on friendly matches because I find it boring and usually the players are not that serious which I think is just a waste of money.

I’d rather both on the real games where I can cheer for my team though the pressure is already on but that’s gambling and that’s where the fun is. There’s no assurance that the underdog will win on the friendly matched, that’s the risk you should understand first before you bet.

[Saidasun]

Friendly's of big teams vs small teams is especially good right now because its still early in the season and the bigger team will be fielding the youngsters to play also remember that if the are a big team they might have players in the African cup of nations and that will weaken their team. Arsenal slipped up the other day and Manchester United nearly did today. 

[Desmong]

Friendly's of big teams vs small teams is especially good right now because its still early in the season and the bigger team will be fielding the youngsters to play also remember that if the are a big team they might have players in the African cup of nations and that will weaken their team. Arsenal slipped up the other day and Manchester United nearly did today. 

Betting on friendly matches is not that bad although it depends on the teams playing for one to decide whether betting will be necessary or not. Football matches are unpredictable are times things always go the contrary to what we might think would be the outcome of a match. Risk taking precautions should be the Paramount when betting on football matches. Although I don't like betting on friendly matches whether country or club cause the match might not be taken seriously.

[Ratash]

Friendly games are a bit special compared to official competitions so gambling on them is a bit tricky because as you know most of the coachs want to try the new players and that can reflect on the team performance and we can see many surprises so checking all the statistics before placing a bet is crutial.

[dunfida]

In my opinion, it is not a good idea if you'll choose to bet on friendly matches games other than those serious like tournaments/season leagues. Most of these friendly games aren't predictable, and most of the time players are just enjoying the game. They're not serious so the risk is very high compared to serious games.

Good or not will always based on our own preferences, if we know what to bet and how to analyze the match then it will be a good chance to make some money.
Friendly matches is matches where most team do not really care about the result as most of them uses friendly match to try different strategies and players.
Of course it is more unpredictable than regular tournament/competition but if we are familiar with it then there is nothing wrong to bet on friendly matches.

It would really be unpredictable and since players wont really be that serious or really not doing their 100% play then expect that there might be some unexpected things to happen
and its indeed up to someone if they would really be tending to make some bets on friendly matches because this doesnt only talks about on earning money with those bets
but also you could really enjoy these kind of matches specially on low-tier vs on high tier or something like that.
Betting on things will be always on self preference.

[Wexnident]

In theory friendly matches should be as competitive as any other game, you might even find newer players trialing for the team to see whether they can stand up to the pressure - in which case they are likely to fight harder to impress. However it is a bit of a catch-22 because friendlies might actually seem more acceptable to "rig" if such activity was going on. I remember watching blatant cheating by two basketball teams in the Philippines who were both trying to lose, so at the lower levels of football this certainly seems like a possibility and friendly matches is exactly where cheaters might try to target if they want to ease their conscious a little. To be honest, any decent bookmaker is well aware of all the odds and make even limit the over/under possibilities automatically if they see such trends.

Well, that's only in theory. Friendly matches, or maybe so-called all-star matches, are mostly just events that are used to hype up the event. Yes the basic skill of the pro player is there, but that's it, the basic. They don't bother much with thinking and/or mechanics and just go in for trying to actively make the match hyped up by doing a LOT of stuff. As for trial players, I don't think most of them could even get to tournament friendly matches against the team they want, it's mostly the event organizers and the teams that decide no? So I don't think they can go in even if they want to.

Friendly matches are also a way to see teamups you'd never actually see most of the time. Brings a sense of novelty to the game.

[Saint-loup]

The most common friendly matches are both the international  country and club friendlies, long time ago I have seen these type of matches as a way to bet and have fun, many of my betting result are positive most especially if I bet on a single match. The country or club that will win is not certain but I noticed staking on over 1.5 or over 2.5 is always most of the time results to a good outcome.

I am not saying this is a risk free bet, no bet is risk free, but I noticed this type of match most of the time results to many goals scored which makes better for taking over 1.5 or over 2.5 and the games are won.

Some people still like to accumulate, the accumulation can also be positive and won but the more the accumulation the more the high chances of losing. But I do not still see any wrong in accumulating 3 matches, though the chances to lose will increase because as one match lost result to the nullification of the bet, I prefer just a single game in a week.

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

I've never observed that before, it would be interesting to get some statistics on that matter or to create them. Does anyone know which will be the next friendly match? Users should post them here.

[Vaskiy]

Not only with these kind of friendly matches, this kind of odds can be seen with the matches in which one team is strong and the opponent is an average team. Mostly we can see this happen with the cricket matches and on tennis matches. During my early days of gambling I just look for the odds and used to place bets. In that manner I've won more matches.

[Rabi3]

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

i think the total goals market is best choice, friendlies are hard to predict, even when you see a big club playing against another one from a different country, which you can call a small club, you can't predict what could happen, they can start with good players on the first half then change the whole squad on the 2nd half, you don't know when the team is going to make substitutes and if it could affect the match, i think over can be safer, for me, i had a bad experience with friendly matches so i avoid them.

[Saint-loup]

Not only with these kind of friendly matches, this kind of odds can be seen with the matches in which one team is strong and the opponent is an average team. Mostly we can see this happen with the cricket matches and on tennis matches. During my early days of gambling I just look for the odds and used to place bets. In that manner I've won more matches.

LOL you would be really a big noob at that time because if you just looked at the odds and chose the favorite, you've certainly won more matches than if you had bet on the underdogs but you've certainly lost more money at the end. 

[Fundamentals Of]

It depends on friendly matches. There are friendly matches among two teams or players. But what about friendly matches between a boxer or a vlogger for example? If there is a friendly match between two soccer or basketball teams, I might not gamble at all. You cannot make a very strict analysis on it because you can hardly take into consideration their statistics and performances. The match is friendly so there is not much at stake. But if it's a boxing match between a professional boxer and a social media influencer I might be attracted to bet on the boxer.

[swogerino]

The friendly matches are only made to check a team performance and the teams are not results oriented here,a lot of times during this games teams with odds 1.10 against very weak teams have even lost the game and many times drawn to those teams.It is not recommended to bet on friendly games because the teams main focus here is to try as many players and as many strategies as possible and these games usually happen now,in a pre season time.You can bet on these games but the chance that you will lose money by betting on these games is really high.

[Oshosondy]

Does anyone know which will be the next friendly match? Users should post them here.

That should not be a problem, there are sites for checking scores, some of them would have included all the game that will be played during the day on their site in the early morning hour, the games are also defined with titles which indicates the type of league, cup, also maybe it is international country or club friendlies, that is how I do check. The problem is that there are some friendly matches that may not be on sportbooks unlike leagues and cups, but there are also still many on sportbooks.

[dezoel]

I haven't compared the friendly games as compared to the competitive ones but you may be right about more goals theory because when games are friendly, both the teams will take it lightly and the defense would be loose while the players who attack will always have the same shots and skills because no one wants to miss goals, even during a friendly game.

I don't analyze teams and their defense in soccer but there are bettors who check everything and bet over/under. For me, it's seriously just random when making over or under bets and I just place my bets and stick to the TV and pray for it lol.

[Lorence.xD]

It depends on friendly matches. There are friendly matches among two teams or players. But what about friendly matches between a boxer or a vlogger for example? If there is a friendly match between two soccer or basketball teams, I might not gamble at all. You cannot make a very strict analysis on it because you can hardly take into consideration their statistics and performances. The match is friendly so there is not much at stake. But if it's a boxing match between a professional boxer and a social media influencer I might be attracted to bet on the boxer.

Friendly matches comprising of teams is much easier because you can easily see which one is going to win because you know whose side has the best player and who doesn't have one meaning that you can easily distinguish which one is the best one to choose.

[Strongkored]

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

I've never bet on friendly matches because I don't pay much attention to matches like that, for football I have positive results on bets choose over 1.5 or BTTS compared 1 X 2.
But often bettors will also take into the odds of the available options.

[iv4n]

...

I've never observed that before, it would be interesting to get some statistics on that matter or to create them. Does anyone know which will be the next friendly match? Users should post them here.

Betting for friendly matches is a dangerous gamble. The main problem is that it is almost impossible to make an objective analysis of statistics since it does not exist, and even if it is, it is not so important. Most often the result is unpredictable.

Taken from a nice article about betting on friendly matches, definitely worth reading: https://alvin-almazov.com/theory/how-to-bet-on-friendly-matches-in-football/

When it comes to football I guess we will have to wait for some friendly games... Euro ended a week ago, and qualifications for Champions league already started, tomorrow we have some games. Most leagues start in August (some countries already started)... Qualifications for the World cup are ongoing too, the next games are on 1 and 2 September...

It's a busy schedule, and I guess we will not see some friendly matches before winter and some longer break!

[bittraffic]

How do you determine a friendly match?

Wouldn't you interpret friendly match as an exhibition fight like Mike Tyson vs Jones or Floyd vs Logan? We didn't see any listing of it on crypto book though but if it was we likely are betting on a draw as expected because it looks like they are just up there for the audience to see how they're after years being retired.

not a crypto sportsbook but I remember seeing BetOnline posting betting options on where logan paul will bleed from. the post was too funny so I am not really sure if the post were legitimate or just a troll post from BetOnline.

https://twitter.com/betonline_ag/status/1401381306768965640/photo/1

Is there really betting for this?  I remember there was a betting which round a boxer will fall but I don't know how legit that is. By what the users above are saying it is not going to be listed on sportsbook where we can bet on it even on soccer or football.

...

I've never observed that before, it would be interesting to get some statistics on that matter or to create them. Does anyone know which will be the next friendly match? Users should post them here.

Betting for friendly matches is a dangerous gamble. The main problem is that it is almost impossible to make an objective analysis of statistics since it does not exist, and even if it is, it is not so important. Most often the result is unpredictable.

Taken from a nice article about betting on friendly matches, definitely worth reading: https://alvin-almazov.com/theory/how-to-bet-on-friendly-matches-in-football/

When it comes to football I guess we will have to wait for some friendly games... Euro ended a week ago, and qualifications for Champions league already started, tomorrow we have some games. Most leagues start in August (some countries already started)... Qualifications for the World cup are ongoing too, the next games are on 1 and 2 September...

It's a busy schedule, and I guess we will not see some friendly matches before winter and some longer break!

Base on the article it does sound like it's still not friendly at all. It even says a friendly match is a dangerous gamble whatever the writer says I'm going to consider it not risk free. You still have to be a religious fan of a sport to recognize which will win the match.

[Oshosondy]

Base on the article it does sound like it's still not friendly at all. It even says a friendly match is a dangerous gamble whatever the writer says I'm going to consider it not risk free.

No match is risk free, professional matches are even better than friendly matches because expected players will play in professional matches unlike friendlies. The outcome of friendlies are unpredictable, many people have commented how the underdogs have more chance of winning if compared to professional matches. It is not even a good suggestion for someone to stake straight win in a friendly match.

[Kittygalore]

No match is risk free, professional matches are even better than friendly matches because expected players will play in professional matches unlike friendlies. The outcome of friendlies are unpredictable, many people have commented how the underdogs have more chance of winning if compared to professional matches. It is not even a good suggestion for someone to stake straight win in a friendly match.

That could be true but I don't think that an All Star line up in NBA is going to lose to the Rookies because the skill and power gap of both sides are just too big, not to mention that the All Star has more experience. I think these kind of thing depends which sports is going to be playing a friendly match.

[KTChampions]

By the way, it would be interesting to check the average performance of friendly matches compared to regular games. Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that more goals are scored in friendlies. But it still does not have any practical value, because if it is, then this is taken into account by the bookmakers when setting the odds.

[Viscore]

I don't usually bet on friendly games for the reason that the better team might not play on full potential so the underdog could win, it's nice if it will be like that all the time as you can easily predict the winner, but sometimes the better team also plays hard so it's hard to guess using the statistics and past games results.

[Fredomago]

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

I've never bet on friendly matches because I don't pay much attention to matches like that, for football I have positive results on bets choose over 1.5 or BTTS compared 1 X 2.
But often bettors will also take into the odds of the available options.

If you know what types of teams are playing against each other, better to this kind of odds is much better.
Just like how OP describe his point, he's making good amount of profits by placing his bet over 1.5 or 2.5

It's tough to predict what the outcome of certain games that we will going to bet, either friendly or regular games the fact that you
need to have good knowledge is very important.

You'll have to assess and go with how you understand and how your instinct and observation guided you to place your bet.

[xSkylarx]

I don't usually bet on friendly games for the reason that the better team might not play on full potential so the underdog could win, it's nice if it will be like that all the time as you can easily predict the winner, but sometimes the better team also plays hard so it's hard to guess using the statistics and past games results.

Agree sort of you will really know who will win somewhat it is not very competitive to watch. Friendly matches is good to watch but not to be because you cant see the effort of the players out of it. Those competitions on getting at the top is really the best to bet, we have our own analysis about the team and it is unpredictable . I think i mostly see this friendly game about pros vs the celebrities or something like that and i think fans is only enjoying it but imagine pros vs celeb? what kind of game is that.

[Fesatmas]

Not really that much interested on betting with friendly matches yet i cant really feel up the thrill at least and also you can really say that showing off their true potential or skills
wont really be that possible but who knows about showing off on whose better.

For me i wont really be seeing this to be interesting but if odds would be considerable then i might really put up some try but if not then i do just simply ignore it.

We can compare the thrill between friendly matches and real tourney ones.

In other words, we can still watch this as a form of representation to review the strengths of both parties. Betting too seriously does not provide great satisfaction for friendly matches. We definitely want to have a more intense adrenaline rush where betting on star players is the key if you want to bet on friendly games. Again not a good idea. Let's visit a gambling site that is more challenging for you to bet bigger.

[Oasisman]

I don't usually bet on friendly games for the reason that the better team might not play on full potential so the underdog could win, it's nice if it will be like that all the time as you can easily predict the winner, but sometimes the better team also plays hard so it's hard to guess using the statistics and past games results.

Exactly, aside from being unpredictable, it is prone to match fixing and betting manipulations, Especially when there's a good amount of bettors to a specific club.
Key players are always allowed not to play even without anything valid for a reason because the game is unofficial, so the officials could mess around with the bet. 
Though suspicious friendly matches may occur not very often, but I guess it's safe to bet to an official game, at least you're a bit comfortable betting to your favourite club.

[Ziskinberg]

Exhibition matches and friendly games, I think they are the same, and honestly, I don't bet on this kind of game as it's hard to predict who will win, if I have to bet, I would go with the underdog as the favorites will not put everything they have because they'll want to avoid injuries.

I'm a fan of basketball, NBA All-Star is one of my favorites to watch but I don't consistently bet on this game as this event is just for fun.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Nor do I usually bet on friendly matches, because in most cases the starting players do not go, the substitutes go, and obviously the substitutes do not give the same performance as the starter.

In the soccer matches of the South American teams they usually play with the same intensity, some if all the starting players are taken, but there are times that the players who are in the teams of International Clubs such as those of the Spanish or Italian League, do not they give permission for not being a decisive match for their nation and that detracts from emotion and sometimes importance, despite the fact that many of the friendlies help them connect as a team.

[Fundamentals Of]

It depends on friendly matches. There are friendly matches among two teams or players. But what about friendly matches between a boxer or a vlogger for example? If there is a friendly match between two soccer or basketball teams, I might not gamble at all. You cannot make a very strict analysis on it because you can hardly take into consideration their statistics and performances. The match is friendly so there is not much at stake. But if it's a boxing match between a professional boxer and a social media influencer I might be attracted to bet on the boxer.

Friendly matches comprising of teams is much easier because you can easily see which one is going to win because you know whose side has the best player and who doesn't have one meaning that you can easily distinguish which one is the best one to choose.

Again, it depends on the match. In a friendly match, I would assume that there is not much competition. There is no rank to chase, no championship to reach, etc. Moreover, losing does not mean one gets eliminated or losing the chance to reach the finals, or losing the belt, etc. This means that you could hardly expect players to give their all as if there is a lot at stake. A friendly match is one in which players would just play and enjoy. There is no sense of urgency to win.

There is a higher chance for a stronger team to lose to a weaker team in a friendly match than in a regular one.

[freedomgo]

There is a higher chance for a stronger team to lose to a weaker team in a friendly match than in a regular one.

That's the thing I always consider when betting on a friendly match, even if the other team is a heavy underdog, there's still a chance that they can upset the heavy favorites and that is good for us underdog bettors as we can get a good odds which means big wins. If we look at some posts on the exhibition matches of the USA where they lose the game, you can think that the opposing team has very attractive odds since the USA is always the top favorite to win in any game.

[Cling18]

Gambling on friendly matches is one of the hardest to gamble on,haVing tried on several occasions as well very risky,you could bet on over 1.5 as the total goals in a game and you'll end up getting a single goal at the match...they try to turn out well at times,but 80% of friendlies have gambled didn't turn out well.

It also has a bigger risk since it's too unpredictable but I still find it entertaining since they do not put too much pressure despite having the eagerness to win the match. There's still a competition but I usually have better hopes for the underdog to win. I have watched this type of match several times already and there isn't too much tension for both parties while playing.

[leea-1334]

Not only with these kind of friendly matches, this kind of odds can be seen with the matches in which one team is strong and the opponent is an average team. Mostly we can see this happen with the cricket matches and on tennis matches. During my early days of gambling I just look for the odds and used to place bets. In that manner I've won more matches.

Duh! Anyone can do this any games, friendly or not, cricket or not. Friendlies for me are quite difficult except for the team you actually follow properly and also for big teams that the news is forthcoming,,, like with Spurs you can even follow social media and find out the team setup and formation. Most important to know is whether or not the team is playing to win or playing to experiment.

[ReiMomo]

It depends on friendly matches. There are friendly matches among two teams or players. But what about friendly matches between a boxer or a vlogger for example? If there is a friendly match between two soccer or basketball teams, I might not gamble at all. You cannot make a very strict analysis on it because you can hardly take into consideration their statistics and performances. The match is friendly so there is not much at stake. But if it's a boxing match between a professional boxer and a social media influencer I might be attracted to bet on the boxer.

Friendly matches comprising of teams is much easier because you can easily see which one is going to win because you know whose side has the best player and who doesn't have one meaning that you can easily distinguish which one is the best one to choose.

Again, it depends on the match. In a friendly match, I would assume that there is not much competition. There is no rank to chase, no championship to reach, etc. Moreover, losing does not mean one gets eliminated or losing the chance to reach the finals, or losing the belt, etc. This means that you could hardly expect players to give their all as if there is a lot at stake. A friendly match is one in which players would just play and enjoy. There is no sense of urgency to win.

There is a higher chance for a stronger team to lose to a weaker team in a friendly match than in a regular one.

I even remember a strong player who supposed to contribute towards his team's win, has intentionally played lethargically and lost. Later he was given penalty for assisting the gambler who bet on his team loose the match. Money is the ultimate addiction here for players and gamblers. Both at times work together on a large scale behind the scene.

[Fundamentals Of]

There is a higher chance for a stronger team to lose to a weaker team in a friendly match than in a regular one.

That's the thing I always consider when betting on a friendly match, even if the other team is a heavy underdog, there's still a chance that they can upset the heavy favorites and that is good for us underdog bettors as we can get a good odds which means big wins. If we look at some posts on the exhibition matches of the USA where they lose the game, you can think that the opposing team has very attractive odds since the USA is always the top favorite to win in any game.

That's really the thing that I consider in friendly matches. That is why I tend to avoid betting on them. But if you are thinking of the high odds not so risky as it may seem because it is just a friendly game, it might turn out profitable.

The USA vs Nigeria basketball game for example gives us a result which was unexpected. But if it were not a friendly game or just an exhibition match, I guess USA would have played much much better and definitely won.

[magneto]

Probably just luck, imo.

You have to realise that the methods that bookies use to price risk as well as all other players in the market is probably a lot more sophisticated than you. Even if your matches are indeed more likely to go over on the over/under, it's going to be futile if the odds that you get are atrocious.

It's very hard to find true market inefficiencies, and they disappear very quickly.

[KTChampions]

Probably just luck, imo.

You have to realise that the methods that bookies use to price risk as well as all other players in the market is probably a lot more sophisticated than you. Even if your matches are indeed more likely to go over on the over/under, it's going to be futile if the odds that you get are atrocious.

It's very hard to find true market inefficiencies, and they disappear very quickly.

In fact, not everything is so easy for bookmakers. Due to the fact that they start accepting bets long before the event, an imbalance between the odds and real odds occurs quite often, but bookmakers change odds very rarely and by a very insignificant amount, because if they change them greatly, then for many players there will be an opportunity to make a counter bet and thus guaranteed be in the black.

[Obito]

Probably just luck, imo.

You have to realise that the methods that bookies use to price risk as well as all other players in the market is probably a lot more sophisticated than you. Even if your matches are indeed more likely to go over on the over/under, it's going to be futile if the odds that you get are atrocious.

It's very hard to find true market inefficiencies, and they disappear very quickly.

More like coincidence if you ask me because there's no such thing as luck, it's all just a big chain of events that we were just in the right time and place and all of it can be explained by statistics and numbers.

[imstillthebest]

Gambling on friendly matches is one of the hardest to gamble on,haVing tried on several occasions as well very risky,you could bet on over 1.5 as the total goals in a game and you'll end up getting a single goal at the match...they try to turn out well at times,but 80% of friendlies have gambled didn't turn out well.

It also has a bigger risk since it's too unpredictable but I still find it entertaining since they do not put too much pressure despite having the eagerness to win the match. There's still a competition but I usually have better hopes for the underdog to win. I have watched this type of match several times already and there isn't too much tension for both parties while playing.

this is the most important thing in gambling and that is to get entertained .
we can treat the bets that we placed as a talent fee for the players because they made us entertained  . never tried to bet on this kind of gameplay but if i do i think i will also do the same like you , i will also bet on underdogs .
 underdogs will always have that passion to win and they may not show it but their opponent is too confident enough that they play carelessly.

[zanezane]

I even remember a strong player who supposed to contribute towards his team's win, has intentionally played lethargically and lost. Later he was given penalty for assisting the gambler who bet on his team loose the match. Money is the ultimate addiction here for players and gamblers. Both at times work together on a large scale behind the scene.

That's throwing the game and that player was handsomely paid a large amount of money to throw the game and I think that it's not a common thing to happen so there's an unlikely thing that all friendly matches have this kind of fiasco.

[Fesatmas]

Probably just luck, imo.

You have to realise that the methods that bookies use to price risk as well as all other players in the market is probably a lot more sophisticated than you. Even if your matches are indeed more likely to go over on the over/under, it's going to be futile if the odds that you get are atrocious.

It's very hard to find true market inefficiencies, and they disappear very quickly.

More like coincidence if you ask me because there's no such thing as luck, it's all just a big chain of events that we were just in the right time and place and all of it can be explained by statistics and numbers.

Do quantitative statistics show the accuracy of factual data circulating in the field?
Not really !! could lead to data manipulation. Then how to find the accuracy? well the qualitative method will show a much more tangible risk, it's just that it's difficult to do and as you said we prefer to look at the data that is already presented.
Bookies often use this method and cheat small bettors. Betting money on friendly games, just a less stressful bet.

[Karartma1]

Guys what's the point on betting real money of friendly matches that have nothing at stake? If you gamble away your money on those games you better go buy some scratch cards...
Or you probably have better chances if you buy a lottery ticket. Don't waste your money that way, there are plenty of games and sports to fulfill your betting desire!

[ralle14]

Guys what's the point on betting real money of friendly matches that have nothing at stake? If you gamble away your money on those games you better go buy some scratch cards...
Or you probably have better chances if you buy a lottery ticket. Don't waste your money that way, there are plenty of games and sports to fulfill your betting desire!

From my view friendly matches are like fillers since there are days without any interesting matches so you turn to these matches if you become desperate, in a way they're somewhat similar to simulated reality matches. I get your point though it's definitely not worth taking but it's hard to stop people from betting on these matches since they can't help themselves and at the same time i've seen others earn some decent profit just by parlaying these matches.

[Fredomago]

this is the most important thing in gambling and that is to get entertained .
we can treat the bets that we placed as a talent fee for the players because they made us entertained  . never tried to bet on this kind of gameplay but if i do i think i will also do the same like you , i will also bet on underdogs .
 underdogs will always have that passion to win and they may not show it but their opponent is too confident enough that they play carelessly.

Well if you think that way it's easier for you to leave the house without any regret once you lose your pick, I like the idea of picking the under dog when betting to this type of gambling, same with how you see it those underdog are eager to prove something and since the game is just  a friendly game the chance that heavy favorite may not look at it as a threat.

Though not always the case, since there's pride that being stake inside. Winning is always the aimed of each teams who played inside this friendly matches.

[madnessteat]

In my opinion, it all depends on how important this or that and friendly match. If the match is very important for the reputation of both teams and their coaches and the upcoming game promises to be exciting, then you can bet on such a match bet. If the upcoming match is not important for the teams and the coach can release players from the reserves on the field or test new tactics, it is better to bypass this match.

[3meek]

I very often lose when I bet on friendlies... I usually bet on a win, but often the result is not in my favour... Many clubs or national teams do not make an effort in such matches, do not attach importance to them, treat them like a training session... That's why I try to avoid such bets!

[KTChampions]

Guys what's the point on betting real money of friendly matches that have nothing at stake? If you gamble away your money on those games you better go buy some scratch cards...
Or you probably have better chances if you buy a lottery ticket. Don't waste your money that way, there are plenty of games and sports to fulfill your betting desire!

As you can see from the topic, a very rare bettor is interested in such matches. The reasons are quite obvious - low motivation in the end result of the game (scoring is not a priority). But if someone likes exotic bets like the number of substitutions or corners, then friendlies are quite suitable for that.

[acener]

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

I prefer to go for straight win or draw I don't like to gamble with friendly matches I think they are for entertainment purpose only and not really a serious match.
For me it is better to bet on official match than those friendly matches since we know that the teams or player are more serious because their records are at stake.

[agustina2]

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

Sometimes I will simply skip at those matches because no analyzation was needed there. I can wait for another competitive match.

If there will be a case that I really need to bet at these friendly matches, I'd rather choose the around @1.5 odds because since it's a friendly match, I doubt the underdogs will push a win against the favorites even the former will not give their all.

Simple as that.

[stomachgrowls]

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

Sometimes I will simply skip at those matches because no analyzation was needed there. I can wait for another competitive match.

If there will be a case that I really need to bet at these friendly matches, I'd rather choose the around @1.5 odds because since it's a friendly match, I doubt the underdogs will push a win against the favorites even the former will not give their all.

Simple as that.

Most likely these would be the odds of these matches and those superior teams do mostly turn out to loss and since this doesnt really involve any analysis then it turns out that this is less

interesting compared into those official match where you can really enjoy and make out some presumptions and basis towards your bet and this is one of  the factors on making

the game more enjoyable compared into these friendly matches where i dont really see any interest on putting up bets but  well this is self preference though.

[dustboy]

Guys what's the point on betting real money of friendly matches that have nothing at stake? If you gamble away your money on those games you better go buy some scratch cards...
Or you probably have better chances if you buy a lottery ticket. Don't waste your money that way, there are plenty of games and sports to fulfill your betting desire!

[/quote]

There is no other points except making money from sports betting even if it is just friendly match. It is not something bad if we are familiar with the match or we used to analyze such matches. It is even better than buying lottery ticket or scratch cards where your chance is purely based on luck with so low odds to win.

I have to say the opposite here, buying lottery ticket is wasting more money than sports betting regardless the type of the match. All in all, it is about preferences.

[imstillthebest]

this is the most important thing in gambling and that is to get entertained .
we can treat the bets that we placed as a talent fee for the players because they made us entertained  . never tried to bet on this kind of gameplay but if i do i think i will also do the same like you , i will also bet on underdogs .
 underdogs will always have that passion to win and they may not show it but their opponent is too confident enough that they play carelessly.

Well if you think that way it's easier for you to leave the house without any regret once you lose your pick, I like the idea of picking the under dog when betting to this type of gambling, same with how you see it those underdog are eager to prove something and since the game is just  a friendly game the chance that heavy favorite may not look at it as a threat.

Though not always the case, since there's pride that being stake inside. Winning is always the aimed of each teams who played inside this friendly matches.

yeah i change my mindset to this but before i was like the typical gambler that bet to win but the effect of loosing hits different on me.  
i notice that i cant easily move on.
your could be right tho that results can varry because not all players think the same but others will put thier best in every match they are playing whether its friendly or not and its going to be an easy win for the bettors if the results were always the same.

[Karartma1]

Guys what's the point on betting real money of friendly matches that have nothing at stake? If you gamble away your money on those games you better go buy some scratch cards...
Or you probably have better chances if you buy a lottery ticket. Don't waste your money that way, there are plenty of games and sports to fulfill your betting desire!

There is no other points except making money from sports betting even if it is just friendly match. It is not something bad if we are familiar with the match or we used to analyze such matches. It is even better than buying lottery ticket or scratch cards where your chance is purely based on luck with so low odds to win.

I have to say the opposite here, buying lottery ticket is wasting more money than sports betting regardless the type of the match. All in all, it is about preferences.

Opinions, man, these are just our own opinions. Statistically speaking you may be right and actually you could win big money on friendlies without even knowing what are you betting on! That's the advantage of ignorance, which tends to be working a lot these days.
On a different note, the same could have been buying Dogecoin 12 months ago at its low, hoping for an idiot to pump it via twitter.
Am I right?

[Dread Pirate Roberts]

Friendly games are a bit special compared to official competitions so gambling on them is a bit tricky because as you know most of the coachs want to try the new players and that can reflect on the team performance and we can see many surprises so checking all the statistics before placing a bet is crutial.

There are also many friendly matches that are competitive because they compete for the name of the country, club or personal history, the point is that not all friendly matches are just regular matches. even better if know the team is more exciting not completely choose random team. for some people that are a big fan of that team even for friendly match people would bet for them.

[Maus0728]

Isn't it possible that these friendly matches might become "fixed matches," with the winner determined before the game begins? This indicates that there is a great deal of corruption going on behind the scenes in these matches, with no competitive or strategic play.

Some may also argue that matches like this are merely for the purpose of putting their training into practice which means that the result does not matter.

[rodskee]

Guys what's the point on betting real money of friendly matches that have nothing at stake? If you gamble away your money on those games you better go buy some scratch cards...
Or you probably have better chances if you buy a lottery ticket. Don't waste your money that way, there are plenty of games and sports to fulfill your betting desire!

There is no other points except making money from sports betting even if it is just friendly match. It is not something bad if we are familiar with the match or we used to analyze such matches. It is even better than buying lottery ticket or scratch cards where your chance is purely based on luck with so low odds to win.

I have to say the opposite here, buying lottery ticket is wasting more money than sports betting regardless the type of the match. All in all, it is about preferences.

We are betting and playing in gambling because of two things , To win of course and to enjoy the game.
we tend to play friendly but let us not be Hypocrite , that we are aiming to win against others.
and i don't think that Buying lottery tickets is wasting money , it is depend on how much we value the gambling we are involving and there are even people that enjoys waiting than funny gambling.

[Jackl87]

The most common friendly matches are both the international  country and club friendlies, long time ago I have seen these type of matches as a way to bet and have fun, many of my betting result are positive most especially if I bet on a single match. The country or club that will win is not certain but I noticed staking on over 1.5 or over 2.5 is always most of the time results to a good outcome.

Betting on the outcome of friendly matches seems extremely risky to me. I realise that betting always involves a certain amount of risk, but in friendly matches there are simply more factors that make the outcome of a match very difficult to predict, especially during that period of a season (or pre-season). Take for example the friendly match of FC Bayern vs FC Cologne. Cologne won this match with 3-2. In retrospect, this may seem quite logical, as most Bayern players were active at the EURO and therefore had not yet started training, but would you really have bet on a win for FC Cologne because of this? Bayern still had players like Upamecano and Choupo-Moting in the starting line-up.

[mindrust]

Betting on friendly matches without any pressure is a bit risky in my opinion. With odds of above 2.5 I would consider betting on the underdog. The stronger team will likely never bring their A team and usually let's the substitute players play. The purpose of these friendly matches is to be entertaining and not about winning. I would expect the underdog to win more of these games, or it will be a draw at least.

Risky how? Either one of the teams will win or it will be a draw. Same as always. However, I agree that both of the teams won't do their best in these games so it is hard to pick a favorite. But then, when there is a favorite, the odds for the win of the favorite team are very low.

I agree with you your 2.5 odds limit. If the bookie pays good money for your pick, then it is worth the risk you take, otherwise skip these games.

[KTChampions]

Betting on the outcome of friendly matches seems extremely risky to me. I realise that betting always involves a certain amount of risk, but in friendly matches there are simply more factors that make the outcome of a match very difficult to predict, especially during that period of a season (or pre-season). Take for example the friendly match of FC Bayern vs FC Cologne. Cologne won this match with 3-2. In retrospect, this may seem quite logical, as most Bayern players were active at the EURO and therefore had not yet started training, but would you really have bet on a win for FC Cologne because of this? Bayern still had players like Upamecano and Choupo-Moting in the starting line-up.

Where there is risk, there is an opportunity to win. I myself do not like random matches and rarely bet on them, but it seems to me that the strategy of betting on an explicit underdog can be profitable due to the randomness of the result. Perhaps, in order to get a particularly profitable odds, it is worth waiting for the underdog to start losing and at that moment place a bet.

[Fesatmas]

I very often lose when I bet on friendlies... I usually bet on a win, but often the result is not in my favour... Many clubs or national teams do not make an effort in such matches, do not attach importance to them, treat them like a training session... That's why I try to avoid such bets!

The bet loses three times and you keep repeating it until you lose the answer from the friendly match. You have wasted time and money that you should not have risked in the first place. It's nice to realize that betting on friendly matches is not a good option. You will not get the sensation of a real gambling game.

If there will be a case that I really need to bet at these friendly matches, I'd rather choose the around @1.5 odds because since it's a friendly match, I doubt the underdogs will push a win against the favorites even the former will not give their all..

or it could be that friendly matches are planned so that local players feel the best when faced with high-class players, so that they are given the opportunity to score several goals in the early minutes, then end up slaughtered with crazy scores. LOL

[hahay]

Betting on the outcome of friendly matches seems extremely risky to me. I realise that betting always involves a certain amount of risk, but in friendly matches there are simply more factors that make the outcome of a match very difficult to predict, especially during that period of a season (or pre-season). Take for example the friendly match of FC Bayern vs FC Cologne. Cologne won this match with 3-2. In retrospect, this may seem quite logical, as most Bayern players were active at the EURO and therefore had not yet started training, but would you really have bet on a win for FC Cologne because of this? Bayern still had players like Upamecano and Choupo-Moting in the starting line-up.

Where there is risk, there is an opportunity to win. I myself do not like random matches and rarely bet on them, but it seems to me that the strategy of betting on an explicit underdog can be profitable due to the randomness of the result. Perhaps, in order to get a particularly profitable odds, it is worth waiting for the underdog to start losing and at that moment place a bet.

Live betting still won't give me a good advantage I think, because this is about a friendly match I think also when the favorite team loses temporarily, then when I bet directly on a mediocre team I will only get low odds too. For me personally betting on friendly matches will really require skill, because here we will not easily bet on the line but if you want to get off the track at least it requires high confidence too, and this is very different from matches throughout the league and I prefer to avoid it.

[gabbie2010]

Betting on friendly matches without any pressure is a bit risky in my opinion. With odds of above 2.5 I would consider betting on the underdog. The stronger team will likely never bring their A team and usually let's the substitute players play. The purpose of these friendly matches is to be entertaining and not about winning. I would expect the underdog to win more of these games, or it will be a draw at least.

Many expected good gambling outcome, but I can't be confident with underdog to become more potential of winning. I always rely on odds but I'll stick on strong team that would probably give us bigger hints to decide which will be the best pick for winning streak. Friendly match might end up with draw decision, and only pure entertainment.

The OP lay emphasis on too many goals is usually scored in friendly matches thus the best bet is play on over 1.5 or 2.5 there are many instances where a strong team will field weak team to test or access their youth team thus enabling the underdog who must have fielded a stronger team a chance to win or play a draw unarguable a friendly match will mostly ended in a draw however the numbers of goals scored by both team is likely to  be many due to probably both team in some instances not fielding their No 1 goalkeepers. personally I won't bet on friendly matches because of it higher risk.

[KTChampions]

Where there is risk, there is an opportunity to win. I myself do not like random matches and rarely bet on them, but it seems to me that the strategy of betting on an explicit underdog can be profitable due to the randomness of the result. Perhaps, in order to get a particularly profitable odds, it is worth waiting for the underdog to start losing and at that moment place a bet.

Live betting still won't give me a good advantage I think, because this is about a friendly match I think also when the favorite team loses temporarily, then when I bet directly on a mediocre team I will only get low odds too. For me personally betting on friendly matches will really require skill, because here we will not easily bet on the line but if you want to get off the track at least it requires high confidence too, and this is very different from matches throughout the league and I prefer to avoid it.

I meant a different bet in the described situation! When the favorite starts winning, the odds for the underdog skyrocket and it is necessary to bet on it. The randomness does not disappear anywhere and the underdog may well win, and even if you lose most of the bets, you can be in the black, since rare wins will give a large profit.

[bitzizzix]

Depends on the friendly team in the match, if the mediocre team plays better I don't bet and if the favorite team plays I will bet what else the two big teams play it will be more interesting.
even though it's a friendly match if the big teams play they will still play seriously because it will protect the team's good name, and friendly matches are broadcast because to entertain us for another reason because all the matches are over.

[uneng]

Isn't it possible that these friendly matches might become "fixed matches," with the winner determined before the game begins? This indicates that there is a great deal of corruption going on behind the scenes in these matches, with no competitive or strategic play.

Some may also argue that matches like this are merely for the purpose of putting their training into practice which means that the result does not matter.

Yes, it's possible, but keep in mind even competitive matches can be fixed. Probably what happens with friendly matches is that it's easier to fix the results without causing too much suspicion from people around since there will be always the excuse nothing was being disputed (reward, title, prize, trophy, etc), so the players didn't put any effort on it.

This uncertainty makes logical analyzes inaccurate and bets on this category much more risky than in normal games.
If it worths the risk or not I think it will depend on the size of the gambler's bankroll and on how much he is willing to lose.

[dunfida]

Depends on the friendly team in the match, if the mediocre team plays better I don't bet and if the favorite team plays I will bet what else the two big teams play it will be more interesting.
even though it's a friendly match if the big teams play they will still play seriously because it will protect the team's good name, and friendly matches are broadcast because to entertain us for another reason because all the matches are over.

We can  really make out some comparison directly and would always stick out on the team which had some better stats compared to other one but if both teams are top tiers
then its really hard to determine which one who would win up.

The problem on betting with friendly matches is that both teams arent giving their best into their plays which it turns out to be unpredictable since top tier or better teams
could be possibly beaten up by lower ones.

[goaldigger]

Isn't it possible that these friendly matches might become "fixed matches," with the winner determined before the game begins? This indicates that there is a great deal of corruption going on behind the scenes in these matches, with no competitive or strategic play.

Some may also argue that matches like this are merely for the purpose of putting their training into practice which means that the result does not matter.

There’s a high possibility that the match is fixed since this is just a friendly matches where the result is not a big deal to both parties so if you do place your bet, you should understand the risk of it and expect that the result might be different.

Friendly matches serves as a training of course especially if you have an incoming fights, your team will look into someone and ask for a friendly match, whatever the result is the purpose is not to win or lose but to be train and gain a good experience.

[fullhdpixel]

Depends on the friendly team in the match, if the mediocre team plays better I don't bet and if the favorite team plays I will bet what else the two big teams play it will be more interesting.
even though it's a friendly match if the big teams play they will still play seriously because it will protect the team's good name, and friendly matches are broadcast because to entertain us for another reason because all the matches are over.

That is veracious because if the teams playing in a friendly game aren't competitive, it is not worth taking the risk, especially in a friendly game. If the teams playing have high caliber players they will always look to score and defend equally well.

I don't care much whether a game is competitive or just friendly but as long as I recognize the players and know their skills, I make my bets based on that without thinking too much and because I bet on winner more than over and over goals, I don't really care too much about how many goals each team do as long as my team comes out victorious.

[Smartvirus]

Betting on friendly games often seem like the worst sort of event to place a bet on to me. Reason been that, its often a test or perhaps some sort of exercise to the players. Having no sense of focus on the game andost times, you don't see the first team playing the games. They just pick a few players and mix them with the some upcoming guys. It's often bet of a top team against a much lesser team who wants to test how good they are but then, not having the first team kind of levels the platform though, you can see every bit of seriousness in the small team. So it's risky to place a bet on a win or lose market.

[Kelvinid]

Betting on friendly games often seem like the worst sort of event to place a bet on to me. Reason been that, its often a test or perhaps some sort of exercise to the players. Having no sense of focus on the game andost times, you don't see the first team playing the games. They just pick a few players and mix them with the some upcoming guys. It's often bet of a top team against a much lesser team who wants to test how good they are but then, not having the first team kind of levels the platform though, you can see every bit of seriousness in the small team. So it's risky to place a bet on a win or lose market.

If you know what would possibly be the outcome of the game, then you should have a good strategy on how to win. As a bettor, we don't actually complain whether the game is just a friendly match or not, as long as we see the value, then we put a bet as we believe we can win.

[DoublerHunter]

Depends on the friendly team in the match, if the mediocre team plays better I don't bet and if the favorite team plays I will bet what else the two big teams play it will be more interesting.
even though it's a friendly match if the big teams play they will still play seriously because it will protect the team's good name, and friendly matches are broadcast because to entertain us for another reason because all the matches are over.

^ Probably it is pure entertainment if you will stake on the on friendly matches because that is not a competition that is an exhibition game that supposedly a friendly fight between the team or the players who played this. Most likely this kind of game does not have a prize to compete, sometimes it is just a donation to any organization that needs help not just by the players. Either it will win or lose does not matter, as long as it will give entertainment to those who have watched.

[BuNga_cute]

Depends on the friendly team in the match, if the mediocre team plays better I don't bet and if the favorite team plays I will bet what else the two big teams play it will be more interesting.
even though it's a friendly match if the big teams play they will still play seriously because it will protect the team's good name, and friendly matches are broadcast because to entertain us for another reason because all the matches are over.

That is veracious because if the teams playing in a friendly game aren't competitive, it is not worth taking the risk, especially in a friendly game. If the teams playing have high caliber players they will always look to score and defend equally well.

I don't care much whether a game is competitive or just friendly but as long as I recognize the players and know their skills, I make my bets based on that without thinking too much and because I bet on winner more than over and over goals, I don't really care too much about how many goals each team do as long as my team comes out victorious.

Actually as long as the team that plays is a team that I know, I have no problem betting, even if it's only a friendly match. Especially those who
play my favorite team, it's the same with you, I won't think too much. I will immediately place a bet and am ready to accept the risk. Because
if the team I know plays, I can predict how the game will go. Although maybe the team did not field all of its star players and was only dominated
by young players, but the strategy used usually remains the same. And big teams usually have quite high self-esteem, even if it's just a friendly
match they don't accept if they have to lose.

[barota]

Betting on friendly games often seem like the worst sort of event to place a bet on to me. Reason been that, its often a test or perhaps some sort of exercise to the players. Having no sense of focus on the game andost times, you don't see the first team playing the games. They just pick a few players and mix them with the some upcoming guys. It's often bet of a top team against a much lesser team who wants to test how good they are but then, not having the first team kind of levels the platform though, you can see every bit of seriousness in the small team. So it's risky to place a bet on a win or lose market.

If you know what would possibly be the outcome of the game, then you should have a good strategy on how to win. As a bettor, we don't actually complain whether the game is just a friendly match or not, as long as we see the value, then we put a bet as we believe we can win.

in my opinion betting on friendly match is not good , but betting on professional match like LaLiga , italy championship , germany championship, euro 2021 , is good because there is lot of option of betting corner , match minute , and for match frindly the two team for ecample can play with litlle serious  , but in general betting have lot of risk whatever the type of the match because in the gambling it is not easy for making  profit

[sunsilk]

Depends on the friendly team in the match, if the mediocre team plays better I don't bet and if the favorite team plays I will bet what else the two big teams play it will be more interesting.

You won't know if the other team plays better because you have to bet first until the game starts.

even though it's a friendly match if the big teams play they will still play seriously because it will protect the team's good name, and friendly matches are broadcast because to entertain us for another reason because all the matches are over.

Not all of the matches they play serious. We all knew it, even if they show how serious look they are. You'll see that it's somehow like an exhibition match if that's a known friendly match.

[Oshosondy]

Depends on the friendly team in the match, if the mediocre team plays better I don't bet and if the favorite team plays I will bet what else the two big teams play it will be more interesting.
even though it's a friendly match if the big teams play they will still play seriously because it will protect the team's good name, and friendly matches are broadcast because to entertain us for another reason because all the matches are over.

Well, if the good teams play, it does not still guarantee that the match can be won, players do not take friendly serious like league and cup matches, they are very sensitive not to even have injuring, even from seeing them playing you will noticed they did not put in much efforts unlike in tournament matches. But this can still indicate that the strong team have more possible chance to win the underdog. Only what I just like to go for on friendly matches are over 1.5 and 2.5 goals and nothing more.

[jaberwock]

Live betting still won't give me a good advantage I think, because this is about a friendly match I think also when the favorite team loses temporarily, then when I bet directly on a mediocre team I will only get low odds too. For me personally betting on friendly matches will really require skill, because here we will not easily bet on the line but if you want to get off the track at least it requires high confidence too, and this is very different from matches throughout the league and I prefer to avoid it.

I meant a different bet in the described situation! When the favorite starts winning, the odds for the underdog skyrocket and it is necessary to bet on it. The randomness does not disappear anywhere and the underdog may well win, and even if you lose most of the bets, you can be in the black, since rare wins will give a large profit.

Such a true analysis of the games and I am sure you have made some really big wins. When underdogs are down a goal or score in any sport, the favorites will start to slow down since it's a friendly game and might make some player substitutions which doesn't change the odds too much but gives a really good chance of the underdog to equal the score and for the bettors to cash their bet slips or just take the risk and ride your luck for the win.

So much talk about rigging in friendly games but I think the limit for betting on such games is low because these games are meant more for fun than anything else and people rigging matches prefer to place big bets and hence more important games where a large sum of bets are accepted by the bookies.

[mv1986]

Depends on the friendly team in the match, if the mediocre team plays better I don't bet and if the favorite team plays I will bet what else the two big teams play it will be more interesting.
even though it's a friendly match if the big teams play they will still play seriously because it will protect the team's good name, and friendly matches are broadcast because to entertain us for another reason because all the matches are over.

We can  really make out some comparison directly and would always stick out on the team which had some better stats compared to other one but if both teams are top tiers
then its really hard to determine which one who would win up.

The problem on betting with friendly matches is that both teams arent giving their best into their plays which it turns out to be unpredictable since top tier or better teams
could be possibly beaten up by lower ones.

Right and also in soccer for example, you don't know what kind of substitutions both teams or even only one team is planning. You bet on the team with the better stats and out of the sudden the coach decides in halftime to bring six players from the second team to give them a chance to prove themselves. That's tough to assess before the game and even what is going to happen during the game.

[TheGreatPython]

Isn't it possible that these friendly matches might become "fixed matches," with the winner determined before the game begins? This indicates that there is a great deal of corruption going on behind the scenes in these matches, with no competitive or strategic play.

Some may also argue that matches like this are merely for the purpose of putting their training into practice which means that the result does not matter.

Yes, it's possible, but keep in mind even competitive matches can be fixed. Probably what happens with friendly matches is that it's easier to fix the results without causing too much suspicion from people around since there will be always the excuse nothing was being disputed (reward, title, prize, trophy, etc), so the players didn't put any effort on it.

This uncertainty makes logical analyzes inaccurate and bets on this category much more risky than in normal games.
If it worths the risk or not I think it will depend on the size of the gambler's bankroll and on how much he is willing to lose.

Friendly matches might be easier to fix in other ways than tanking the game actually. I mean both the teams can agree to a fixer playing a slow-paced game and avoiding taking shots or taking too many shots as per the demand of the fixer. Personally, I am not too fazed by match-fixing because I am a small gambler and I don't care if teams are fixing games because a fixing might even happen in my favor too.

Mind you, I hate match-fixing no doubt but there is no way to detect it and a few players getting caught and penalized a few thousand backs doesn't mean too much either and the truth is that some of the officials are also corrupted.

[alegotardo]

I've bet a few times on friendly games, always from teams I knew reasonably well (at least), and never had good financial results.

In friendlies neither team has an obligation to win, so no matter how good the odds are for a given team, it isn't hard to see them losing a match. The final result is always very unpredictable, especially if you are betting on details such as who will score the goal or what the exact score will be.

[semobo]

Friendly matches may look like easy to predict but its not going to be too easy, infact it wil be very confusing when we make bets based on the anaysis against both the teams and their players because the players will take this match as just a match where nothing to lose on the other side some players want to shine in those matches if they get chances.

[johhnyUA]

I am not saying this is a risk free bet, no bet is risk free, but I noticed this type of match most of the time results to many goals scored which makes better for taking over 1.5 or over 2.5 and the games are won.

Good point, dude! But another problem that in such matches you never know who win. So to bet on the team is very bad idea (i'm not sure, maybe someone had told that before in this topic) because you can't predict how even strong players will play: with motivation to win or not.

But about bet on "over 1.5" is a good point, again.  

Friendly matches may look like easy to predict but its not going to be too easy, infact it wil be very confusing when we make bets based on the anaysis against both the teams and their players because the players will take this match as just a match where nothing to lose on the other side some players want to shine in those matches if they get chances.

Yep, the same point as me!

[South Park]

I very often lose when I bet on friendlies... I usually bet on a win, but often the result is not in my favour... Many clubs or national teams do not make an effort in such matches, do not attach importance to them, treat them like a training session... That's why I try to avoid such bets!

It depends on the friendly match itself, there are many teams that hold those friendly matches just to raise money so in that case their best payers are not going to take the field and predicting the result will be almost impossible, also it is unlikely that even the backups are going to give it their all as they know there is nothing at stake, but if the match is being held to prepare themselves so they can compete in an international tournament and the best players are on the field then it makes sense to bet on those matches.

[suzanne5223]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

[palle11]

No, I say ... no betting should be allowed on friendly matches. I have seen some Rugby matches in the past where the opposing teams left tackles for fun and laughter in friendly matches or they will ask a non kicker to kick for poles.

You can actually make a bet but don't put your hope on it as you should do unserious bet with little money. Like in football, friendly games usually seen lots of goals because of the nature of the game and that works more than betting on draws. One better thing about such bet is that it is on few games that are played mostly Wednesday and Thursday, do you can concentrate to pick out your favourable games.

[Lanatsa]

No, I say ... no betting should be allowed on friendly matches. I have seen some Rugby matches in the past where the opposing teams left tackles for fun and laughter in friendly matches or they will ask a non kicker to kick for poles.

You can actually make a bet but don't put your hope on it as you should do unserious bet with little money. Like in football, friendly games usually seen lots of goals because of the nature of the game and that works more than betting on draws. One better thing about such bet is that it is on few games that are played mostly Wednesday and Thursday, do you can concentrate to pick out your favourable games.

There are some sites that offers a bet for a friendly matches, so it’s about the risk that you’ll take on this if you bet for the friendly match because the result can be more different and I’m sure players will not take this seriously and that’s why we’ve seen unbelievable scores.

You can bet at your own risk, little money is fine but if you’re planning to put big money I’d rather not to. Do place your bet on real matches at least the risk is lesser compare to that, and it’s more fun because that’s a real one.

Results could really be different because most likely you would really be seeing underdogs would mostly beat up those better ones which it isn't a surprising thing but it isn't bad to place up some bets if you are really that interested.

For my part, I don't really put it in mind about betting with these friendly matches because I cant really just feel the thrill compared when you do bet on games which are really aiming for the championship or simply means that each team is putting up their best on the game.

Well, this is a personal choice and preference and this is why we do see different opinions on here.

[dothebeats]

Straight win is far safer and friendlier to your money compared to staking or doing accumulators. While players of such matches are still giving their best to win, you can tell that they are in it for the fans’ enjoyment. More goals are expected on these types of events to hype up the fans and support the clubs that are in the game, or to have them anticipate for the next matches that these guys will play on.

[Rengga Jati]

Betting on a friendly match may be as risky as others. However, how we can ensure that they play well is sometimes little bit different and difficult. We all know that a friendly match sometimes becomes surprising, moreover if one side club is not really serious at all. Although this may be a small chance to find this.

snip

I do think so.
Even this bet may be also one of the favorites, this is sometimes very surprising.
It may also be also caused by the "friendly macth" itself where the players may not play hard at that time.

[DarkDays]

Isn't it possible that these friendly matches might become "fixed matches," with the winner determined before the game begins? This indicates that there is a great deal of corruption going on behind the scenes in these matches, with no competitive or strategic play.

Some may also argue that matches like this are merely for the purpose of putting their training into practice which means that the result does not matter.

Friendly matches serves as a training of course especially if you have an incoming fights, your team will look into someone and ask for a friendly match, whatever the result is the purpose is not to win or lose but to be train and gain a good experience.

I agree. Friendly matches are there to get experience, test the team and improve which is why I don't see the point in betting on those matches.

Yes, there might be the ego that a winner is a winner but in the scheme of things it is not the main event so interest will be lower than a normal match and so will the reward. The way I see it, if the reward doesn't match the risk or time spent on it then I won't pursue.

[Oshosondy]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

That is true, no bet is risk-free, even if the chance of the club to win that someone think is 99%, it is still very possible the 1% chance to lose will be the outcome of the match, that is just how gambling is. But specifically speaking of friendly matches, it is better not to go for a particular team because the underdog can be the winner because of some reasons some of us have discussed above like a strong team not using their best players and also the players playing in a way not to have injury. Going for straight win will not be good than going for total goals that will be scores but with over 1.5 or over 2.5 goals while someone suggested going for over 1.5 total goals.

[harizen]

Isn't it possible that these friendly matches might become "fixed matches," with the winner determined before the game begins? This indicates that there is a great deal of corruption going on behind the scenes in these matches, with no competitive or strategic play.

I don't see the benefits of turning these friendly-matched into rigged. There is no big thing at stake as the purpose is just a simple "friendly game". You can't also expect a competitive or serious game at these types of matches.

For let's say, that a friendly match game is rigged, bettors won't know it so still, the risks are there just like how they placed who will win on a certain match. Might be a disadvantage but that's how gambling works.

[suzanne5223]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

That is true, no bet is risk-free, even if the chance of the club to win that someone think is 99%, it is still very possible the 1% chance to lose will be the outcome of the match, that is just how gambling is. But specifically speaking of friendly matches, it is better not to go for a particular team because the underdog can be the winner because of some reasons some of us have discussed above like a strong team not using their best players and also the players playing in a way not to have injury. Going for straight win will not be good than going for total goals that will be scores but with over 1.5 or over 2.5 goals while someone suggested going for over 1.5 total goals.

I agree with what you said about the best team not to use their players to avoid injury while they test their bench players performance ahead of the upcoming tournaments and some teams don't always put much effort when playing friend matches, it is good to know this type team but as you said straight to win it good in this condition.

[just_Alice]

I don't care much whether a game is competitive or just friendly but as long as I recognize the players and know their skills, I make my bets based on that without thinking too much and because I bet on winner more than over and over goals, I don't really care too much about how many goals each team do as long as my team comes out victorious.

But that’s the problem with this kind of matches, even if you know the team and the skills well - nothing is guaranteed, because there’s nothing at stake for the teams, so they might not play to the best of their abilities and allow themselves something they wouldn’t have allowed in a tournament.

Do you trust your teams enough to be willing to take that risk?

[Ryker1]

I don't care much whether a game is competitive or just friendly but as long as I recognize the players and know their skills, I make my bets based on that without thinking too much and because I bet on winner more than over and over goals, I don't really care too much about how many goals each team do as long as my team comes out victorious.

But that’s the problem with this kind of matches, even if you know the team and the skills well - nothing is guaranteed, because there’s nothing at stake for the teams, so they might not play to the best of their abilities and allow themselves something they wouldn’t have allowed in a tournament.

Do you trust your teams enough to be willing to take that risk?

Well, this is just an exhibition game, right? This is very risky to gamble because you don't know how serious they are because this is not a competition --this is just an event whose prize money and impact on the team's rankings are either zero too. But we still gamble on this since we don't know who will win the game but don't expect that they give their best, this is just entertainment or just to provide professional entertainment and players aiming at the prize. However, this game was so having fun to watch.

[johhnyUA]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

Can't agree. Friendly matches is high risk activity. Because you never know how much any team is motivated for winning. In ordinary match you know that both teams are highly motivated to win and you can't ignore this question and concentrate on players stats, team history and so on. But in friendly matches you need to depend on very abstract term of "motivation" which you can't measure in any way.
More things to pay attention - harder to predict.

[Joca97]

The most common friendly matches are both the international  country and club friendlies, long time ago I have seen these type of matches as a way to bet and have fun, many of my betting result are positive most especially if I bet on a single match. The country or club that will win is not certain but I noticed staking on over 1.5 or over 2.5 is always most of the time results to a good outcome.

I am not saying this is a risk free bet, no bet is risk free, but I noticed this type of match most of the time results to many goals scored which makes better for taking over 1.5 or over 2.5 and the games are won.

Some people still like to accumulate, the accumulation can also be positive and won but the more the accumulation the more the high chances of losing. But I do not still see any wrong in accumulating 3 matches, though the chances to lose will increase because as one match lost result to the nullification of the bet, I prefer just a single game in a week.

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

A lot of people are always going for goals in this matches. Because most of the teams dont go with their first squad. The side effect is that some teams arent serious about this kind of matches and are trying out some things. Also 90% of the times there isnt additional time so that lowers the chances for goals as well

[Slow death]

honestly I prefer to bet on premier league games, series A, la Liga, Portuguese league, French league, German league focus on betting on games that I have control over, friendly games there will be little pressure, there will be little effort to win while in league games teams are more focused on fighting to become champions and also due to the great importance that some leagues have, one can easily obtain a lot of relevant data to analyze the game and have a good idea of which team can win

[pinggoki]

Friendly matches like this where there is no real prize at stake for the ones at play are the ones I try to avoid the most. Not because of anything ritualistic, just that I find it hard to win when gambling in matches like this probably because there is little to no pressure involved between two teams, so they can play as relaxed or as aggressive as they want without worries. I also notice that a good percentage of these friendly matches side with the underdogs probably because the top contenders don't have anything to put in line anyway.

honestly I prefer to bet on premier league games, series A, la Liga, Portuguese league, French league, German league focus on betting on games that I have control over, friendly games there will be little pressure, there will be little effort to win while in league games teams are more focused on fighting to become champions and also due to the great importance that some leagues have, one can easily obtain a lot of relevant data to analyze the game and have a good idea of which team can win

Exactly my reason. I am happy that at least someone notices this trend. Then again if I were to be betting in friendly matches I will put my money on the underdog if they are at play because of the reasons I have stated above. They can play as relaxed as they want while I will get my free win at the end of it.

[harizen]

Then again if I were to be betting in friendly matches I will put my money on the underdog if they are at play because of the reasons I have stated above. They can play as relaxed as they want while I will get my free win at the end of it.

No such thing as a free win even stats will tell you that underdogs are far better on winning rates compare to favorites in a friendly match. As you said, both teams are relaxed, which means the possibility of those players on the underdog team might also not spend time playing much.

That's the reason I don't bet on friendly matches as there's no bearing and honestly more risky to bet compared to a regular and actual match. I can compare it to my approach towards NBA Pre-Season games wherein some teams are playing and test their rosters prior to the actual start of the season. I'm only betting here with some considerations.

[hahay]

honestly I prefer to bet on premier league games, series A, la Liga, Portuguese league, French league, German league focus on betting on games that I have control over, friendly games there will be little pressure, there will be little effort to win while in league games teams are more focused on fighting to become champions and also due to the great importance that some leagues have, one can easily obtain a lot of relevant data to analyze the game and have a good idea of which team can win

I don't think friendly matches are about trying to win, because as far as I know friendly matches are just to test some strategies and also, the players being played are not the main players. This is what makes me avoid betting on friendly matches, indeed sometimes the matches are interesting but most of them don't try to win because this is only a friendly match which of course will have no prestige in the match, so the result of losing will not be a problem for the team.

[mv1986]

Then again if I were to be betting in friendly matches I will put my money on the underdog if they are at play because of the reasons I have stated above. They can play as relaxed as they want while I will get my free win at the end of it.

No such thing as a free win even stats will tell you that underdogs are far better on winning rates compare to favorites in a friendly match. As you said, both teams are relaxed, which means the possibility of those players on the underdog team might also not spend time playing much.

That's the reason I don't bet on friendly matches as there's no bearing and honestly more risky to bet compared to a regular and actual match. I can compare it to my approach towards NBA Pre-Season games wherein some teams are playing and test their rosters prior to the actual start of the season. I'm only betting here with some considerations.

There is one exception to your rule: I once bet on a team from the second English league against Manchester United in a friendly match. The odds for winning both halfs were insanely high on the second league team and I just gave it a gamble because I was quite sure Manchester United will try a lot of things, young players and so on. That's exactly what happened and while this is like ten years ago or so, Manchester did lose 4 to 1 or something. The odds were double digits close to 20 if I remember correctly.

So betting on the absolute underdog might be worth a gamble from time to time in friendly matches

[KTChampions]

Isn't it possible that these friendly matches might become "fixed matches," with the winner determined before the game begins? This indicates that there is a great deal of corruption going on behind the scenes in these matches, with no competitive or strategic play.

I don't see the benefits of turning these friendly-matched into rigged. There is no big thing at stake as the purpose is just a simple "friendly game". You can't also expect a competitive or serious game at these types of matches.

For let's say, that a friendly match game is rigged, bettors won't know it so still, the risks are there just like how they placed who will win on a certain match. Might be a disadvantage but that's how gambling works.

If by a rigged match we mean that the players will strive to make some kind of result on purpose, then this makes a lot of sense - they can place bets in bookmakers on that result through dummies and win money. The main problem is that bookmakers keep track of this moment: if too many bets are received on some result, they immediately understand that something is not clean here.

[palle11]

honestly I prefer to bet on premier league games, series A, la Liga, Portuguese league, French league, German league , friendly games there will be little pressure, there will be little effort to win while in league games teams are more focused on fighting to become champions and also due to the great importance that some leagues have, one can easily obtain a lot of relevant data to analyze the game and have a good idea of which team can win

Let me give you some better tips on some of these popular leagues you have mentioned. I realize that the lower leagues there, the divisions, league 1,2 championship and infact unknown leagues there are easier to get your bets in green and they come with bigger odds rather than betting on popular leagues like premiership that has lots of offsets.

focus on betting on games that I have control over

Lol. Is there any game we have control over? It is called football game and anything can happen with any game. Underdogs are turning tables and causing heartbreaks. To my view, I don't think there games we have control over but we can say greater percentage favourable to a team.

[suzanne5223]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

Can't agree. Friendly matches is high risk activity. Because you never know how much any team is motivated for winning. In ordinary match you know that both teams are highly motivated to win and you can't ignore this question and concentrate on players stats, team history and so on. But in friendly matches you need to depend on very abstract term of "motivation" which you can't measure in any way.
More things to pay attention - harder to predict.

I agree with what you point out about not knowing the team motivate for winning the friendly game but sports betting is not for all gamblers but people who are consistent about the situation that revolves in the game of sport and it is not reasonable to bet on the game you don't understand the motivate or previous history of the team in winning friendly matches.
I don't consider a friendly match to be hard to predict.

[Fatunad]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

Can't agree. Friendly matches is high risk activity. Because you never know how much any team is motivated for winning. In ordinary match you know that both teams are highly motivated to win and you can't ignore this question and concentrate on players stats, team history and so on. But in friendly matches you need to depend on very abstract term of "motivation" which you can't measure in any way.
More things to pay attention - harder to predict.

I agree with what you point out about not knowing the team motivate for winning the friendly game but sports betting is not for all gamblers but people who are consistent about the situation that revolves in the game of sport and it is not reasonable to bet on the game you don't understand the motivate or previous history of the team in winning friendly matches.
I don't consider a friendly match to be hard to predict.

Friendly match arent really hard to predict but somehow it is really somewhat giving off that random result since underdogs could mostly beat up the favorite or higher or better teams
since not all of them would really be giving out their best into the game.Motivation to win is something lacking into this kind of game since its not recorded nor official
then you would really be expecting those kind of performances.Its just normal that you would really be considering out on betting on games which you do know
or included into your interest because betting into something which is out of that line would turn out on not to be entertaining.

[mv1986]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

Can't agree. Friendly matches is high risk activity. Because you never know how much any team is motivated for winning. In ordinary match you know that both teams are highly motivated to win and you can't ignore this question and concentrate on players stats, team history and so on. But in friendly matches you need to depend on very abstract term of "motivation" which you can't measure in any way.
More things to pay attention - harder to predict.

I agree with what you point out about not knowing the team motivate for winning the friendly game but sports betting is not for all gamblers but people who are consistent about the situation that revolves in the game of sport and it is not reasonable to bet on the game you don't understand the motivate or previous history of the team in winning friendly matches.
I don't consider a friendly match to be hard to predict.

Friendly match arent really hard to predict but somehow it is really somewhat giving off that random result since underdogs could mostly beat up the favorite or higher or better teams
since not all of them would really be giving out their best into the game.Motivation to win is something lacking into this kind of game since its not recorded nor official
then you would really be expecting those kind of performances.Its just normal that you would really be considering out on betting on games which you do know
or included into your interest because betting into something which is out of that line would turn out on not to be entertaining.

You say they are not really hard to predict? What do you base your argument on? I find them very hard to predict as you never really know what the coaches are going to do in half-time, whether they send a completely different squad out on the pitch. There are so many variables in friendly matches that they are harder to predict than serious games in my opinion.

[goinmerry]

Friendly match arent really hard to predict but somehow it is really somewhat giving off that random result since underdogs could mostly beat up the favorite or higher or better teams since not all of them would really be giving out their best into the game.Motivation to win is something lacking into this kind of game since its not recorded nor official then you would really be expecting those kind of performances.

Your follow-up statement doesn't match your view about friendly matches are not hard to predict.

Since you have pointed out that there's no motivation to win, it's like you are just betting on random here without any analysis or support. You just need to trust that luck will come to you, isn't it?

In the end, what will be your verdict? To bet on favorites or underdogs? Since it's not hard for you to pick who will win.

[Oshosondy]

Your follow-up statement doesn't match your view about friendly matches are not hard to predict.

Since you have pointed out that there's no motivation to win, it's like you are just betting on random here without any analysis or support. You just need to trust that luck will come to you, isn't it?

In the end, what will be your verdict? To bet on favorites or underdogs? Since it's not hard for you to pick who will win.

Betting on friendly matches is truly very risky, the underdog may win and have more chances to win if compared to cups and leagues. I still think there are many spammers here posting without even gambling. I only gamble on total overs to be over 1.5 or 2.5 goals which is common in friendly matches while commenting also on how straight win can be dangerous, I am just very surprised some people are taking to here that friendly matches are not risky, which the underdog have more chance to win if compared to cups and leagues.

[finaleshot2016]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

Can't agree. Friendly matches is high risk activity. Because you never know how much any team is motivated for winning. In ordinary match you know that both teams are highly motivated to win and you can't ignore this question and concentrate on players stats, team history and so on. But in friendly matches you need to depend on very abstract term of "motivation" which you can't measure in any way.
More things to pay attention - harder to predict.

I agree with what you point out about not knowing the team motivate for winning the friendly game but sports betting is not for all gamblers but people who are consistent about the situation that revolves in the game of sport and it is not reasonable to bet on the game you don't understand the motivate or previous history of the team in winning friendly matches.
I don't consider a friendly match to be hard to predict.

Friendly match arent really hard to predict but somehow it is really somewhat giving off that random result since underdogs could mostly beat up the favorite or higher or better teams
since not all of them would really be giving out their best into the game.Motivation to win is something lacking into this kind of game since its not recorded nor official
then you would really be expecting those kind of performances.Its just normal that you would really be considering out on betting on games which you do know
or included into your interest because betting into something which is out of that line would turn out on not to be entertaining.

You say they are not really hard to predict? What do you base your argument on? I find them very hard to predict as you never really know what the coaches are going to do in half-time, whether they send a completely different squad out on the pitch. There are so many variables in friendly matches that they are harder to predict than serious games in my opinion.

Agree with you, scrims or friendly matches are the matches where we can see or discover a lot of extreme or amazing moves and strategies because players are comfortable to show-off than the actual match. So for me, friendly matches or scrims are also tournaments that is also hard to predict because players will still do their best but less pressure, amazing moves are being discovered there. Serious games or actual games are very predictable especially if the match that aren't really balanced and sometimes you'll know from the start of the game if someone's not performing well.

[skarais]

Betting on friendly matches is truly very risky, the underdog may win and have more chances to win if compared to cups and leagues.

Is it because you see that a friendly is a match that is not played with a high focus for win?
I think it's a real risk of a friendly match because the favorite team usually doesn't play more of its star players which make the match very boring in my opinion.

I still think there are many spammers here posting without even gambling.

Don't you think that in other thread they are have an habits the same too?

[Viscore]

Betting on friendly matches is truly very risky, the underdog may win and have more chances to win if compared to cups and leagues.

Is it because you see that a friendly is a match that is not played with a high focus for win?
I think it's a real risk of a friendly match because the favorite team usually doesn't play more of its star players which make the match very boring in my opinion.

If you are putting a bet you'll never feel bored especially if you are seeing that your team is wining.
believing that the favorite will not perform their best, you should put your bet on the underdog, better odds, and a better chance of winning.
Lost of games in the past that an underdog won in an exhibition or friendly match, so people are attracted to gamble.

[Fredomago]

Betting on friendly matches is truly very risky, the underdog may win and have more chances to win if compared to cups and leagues.

Is it because you see that a friendly is a match that is not played with a high focus for win?
I think it's a real risk of a friendly match because the favorite team usually doesn't play more of its star players which make the match very boring in my opinion.

If you are putting a bet you'll never feel bored especially if you are seeing that your team is wining.
believing that the favorite will not perform their best, you should put your bet on the underdog, better odds, and a better chance of winning.
Lost of games in the past that an underdog won in an exhibition or friendly match, so people are attracted to gamble.

Bookies though knows how to play smarty against the gamblers, they might offer attracting odds for the favorite or vice versa knowing that in anyhow there are risky gamblers that will take the call and bet.

Friendly games are not as easy as it is still need some efforts to understand the tempo of the game, just like you said it's not boring you f you see that your bets are winning, while you are monitoring the game.

different types of gamblers have different ways of betting strategies,some might bet with over and under while other loves to take the big risk and bet for the underdog in hope that the value of their bets will give them more enjoyable profits.

[Joca97]

Your follow-up statement doesn't match your view about friendly matches are not hard to predict.

Since you have pointed out that there's no motivation to win, it's like you are just betting on random here without any analysis or support. You just need to trust that luck will come to you, isn't it?

In the end, what will be your verdict? To bet on favorites or underdogs? Since it's not hard for you to pick who will win.

Betting on friendly matches is truly very risky, the underdog may win and have more chances to win if compared to cups and leagues. I still think there are many spammers here posting without even gambling. I only gamble on total overs to be over 1.5 or 2.5 goals which is common in friendly matches while commenting also on how straight win can be dangerous, I am just very surprised some people are taking to here that friendly matches are not risky, which the underdog have more chance to win if compared to cups and leagues.

Friendly games are very risky because most of the times you cannot even see the lineup or even the reserves the underdog always o most goes with their strongest squad while the stronger team mostly goes with the weaker one. Mostly this matches should be played over a certain amount of goals but still very risky

[mv1986]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

Can't agree. Friendly matches is high risk activity. Because you never know how much any team is motivated for winning. In ordinary match you know that both teams are highly motivated to win and you can't ignore this question and concentrate on players stats, team history and so on. But in friendly matches you need to depend on very abstract term of "motivation" which you can't measure in any way.
More things to pay attention - harder to predict.

I agree with what you point out about not knowing the team motivate for winning the friendly game but sports betting is not for all gamblers but people who are consistent about the situation that revolves in the game of sport and it is not reasonable to bet on the game you don't understand the motivate or previous history of the team in winning friendly matches.
I don't consider a friendly match to be hard to predict.

Friendly match arent really hard to predict but somehow it is really somewhat giving off that random result since underdogs could mostly beat up the favorite or higher or better teams
since not all of them would really be giving out their best into the game.Motivation to win is something lacking into this kind of game since its not recorded nor official
then you would really be expecting those kind of performances.Its just normal that you would really be considering out on betting on games which you do know
or included into your interest because betting into something which is out of that line would turn out on not to be entertaining.

You say they are not really hard to predict? What do you base your argument on? I find them very hard to predict as you never really know what the coaches are going to do in half-time, whether they send a completely different squad out on the pitch. There are so many variables in friendly matches that they are harder to predict than serious games in my opinion.

Agree with you, scrims or friendly matches are the matches where we can see or discover a lot of extreme or amazing moves and strategies because players are comfortable to show-off than the actual match. So for me, friendly matches or scrims are also tournaments that is also hard to predict because players will still do their best but less pressure, amazing moves are being discovered there. Serious games or actual games are very predictable especially if the match that aren't really balanced and sometimes you'll know from the start of the game if someone's not performing well.

Well, I wouldn't say serious games are "very" predictable. They are also difficult to predict in many instances, but when Manchester City plays against Rubin Kazan in the Champions League, you know what is most likely going to happen. When they meet in a friendly match up, City could easily lose because Guardiola might send five guys at age 17 onto the pitch. Also, any game that is very easy to predict also gives you the worst odds. Hence, it wouldn't even be worse putting bets on those games.

[suzanne5223]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

Can't agree. Friendly matches is high risk activity. Because you never know how much any team is motivated for winning. In ordinary match you know that both teams are highly motivated to win and you can't ignore this question and concentrate on players stats, team history and so on. But in friendly matches you need to depend on very abstract term of "motivation" which you can't measure in any way.
More things to pay attention - harder to predict.

I agree with what you point out about not knowing the team motivate for winning the friendly game but sports betting is not for all gamblers but people who are consistent about the situation that revolves in the game of sport and it is not reasonable to bet on the game you don't understand the motivate or previous history of the team in winning friendly matches.
I don't consider a friendly match to be hard to predict.

Friendly match arent really hard to predict but somehow it is really somewhat giving off that random result since underdogs could mostly beat up the favorite or higher or better teams
since not all of them would really be giving out their best into the game.Motivation to win is something lacking into this kind of game since its not recorded nor official
then you would really be expecting those kind of performances.Its just normal that you would really be considering out on betting on games which you do know
or included into your interest because betting into something which is out of that line would turn out on not to be entertaining.

You say they are not really hard to predict? What do you base your argument on? I find them very hard to predict as you never really know what the coaches are going to do in half-time, whether they send a completely different squad out on the pitch. There are so many variables in friendly matches that they are harder to predict than serious games in my opinion.

Agree with you, scrims or friendly matches are the matches where we can see or discover a lot of extreme or amazing moves and strategies because players are comfortable to show-off than the actual match. So for me, friendly matches or scrims are also tournaments that is also hard to predict because players will still do their best but less pressure, amazing moves are being discovered there. Serious games or actual games are very predictable especially if the match that aren't really balanced and sometimes you'll know from the start of the game if someone's not performing well.

Well, I wouldn't say serious games are "very" predictable. They are also difficult to predict in many instances, but when Manchester City plays against Rubin Kazan in the Champions League, you know what is most likely going to happen. When they meet in a friendly match up, City could easily lose because Guardiola might send five guys at age 17 onto the pitch. Also, any game that is very easy to predict also gives you the worst odds. Hence, it wouldn't even be worse putting bets on those games.

We don't need to argue about this issue because everything depends on gambler knowledge about sports in particular but my stance is that friendly matches are not difficult to predict and about some teams not using their best players or putting their best in the match, bettors need to understand the stance of each team about the friendly game before putting in money.

[passwordnow]

Lol. Is there any game we have control over? It is called football game and anything can happen with any game. Underdogs are turning tables and causing heartbreaks. To my view, I don't think there games we have control over but we can say greater percentage favourable to a team.

We don't have control over the games that we bet on. Friendly match or not, we do not control them. And for these friendly matches, the only one that has control over them are the higher management which seems going to be possible for them to manipulate the results at their will. In some sporting events, this is really happening and we don't know when that's going to happen but some athletes have voiced out that this is really an insider and happens as it's against their will.

[Hamphser]

Lol. Is there any game we have control over? It is called football game and anything can happen with any game. Underdogs are turning tables and causing heartbreaks. To my view, I don't think there games we have control over but we can say greater percentage favourable to a team.

We don't have control over the games that we bet on. Friendly match or not, we do not control them. And for these friendly matches, the only one that has control over them are the higher management which seems going to be possible for them to manipulate the results at their will. In some sporting events, this is really happening and we don't know when that's going to happen but some athletes have voiced out that this is really an insider and happens as it's against their will.

Manipulating or not then we wont even know because most of the time the performance of these friendly matches arent really that interesting to watch.I do have that kind of impression this is why i dont really make out some bets on friendly matches.

When it comes to odds then i dont even see it for it to be considerable.Better to go with official matches where you can really feel up the thrill on the game since you know
that they are aiming to win not like with friendly matches which they dont care at all if they do win or lose.

[South Park]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

You are not wrong on what you are mentioning however the fact that both teams are not giving their all when they are facing each other is a problem, after all if a team is not committed at all to win the game while the other tries harder then that gives the second team a great advantage over the first one just by the desire and the effort they are wiling to put to get the win even if the quality of their players was lower, this makes it almost impossible to tell if the odds the casino is giving are good or not.

[Shasha80]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

You are not wrong on what you are mentioning however the fact that both teams are not giving their all when they are facing each other is a problem, after all if a team is not committed at all to win the game while the other tries harder then that gives the second team a great advantage over the first one just by the desire and the effort they are wiling to put to get the win even if the quality of their players was lower, this makes it almost impossible to tell if the odds the casino is giving are good or not.

In friendly matches, teams usually do not use all their core players, because friendly matches do not have a target to win. This is what makes
the final outcome of the game even more difficult to predict, like you said the two teams playing a friendly match will not give everything.
Because they play without a burden, and that makes it quite risky in my opinion betting on friendly matches. My advice to avoid gambling on
friendly matches.

[mv1986]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

You are not wrong on what you are mentioning however the fact that both teams are not giving their all when they are facing each other is a problem, after all if a team is not committed at all to win the game while the other tries harder then that gives the second team a great advantage over the first one just by the desire and the effort they are wiling to put to get the win even if the quality of their players was lower, this makes it almost impossible to tell if the odds the casino is giving are good or not.

In friendly matches, teams usually do not use all their core players, because friendly matches do not have a target to win. This is what makes
the final outcome of the game even more difficult to predict, like you said the two teams playing a friendly match will not give everything.
Because they play without a burden, and that makes it quite risky in my opinion betting on friendly matches. My advice to avoid gambling on
friendly matches.

That is not entirely true because again taking up my example from before, if Manchester City plays against a team from the second or third league in England, even that friendly match is a huge highlight for the massive underdog and they might play as intensive as if it was an FA cup game. Everybody of the underdog team wants to present himself in the best shape possible. Perhaps City pays attention and gets interested. The top teams don't play to their full abilities because it is really just a test for them and nothing more.

[KTChampions]

We don't have control over the games that we bet on. Friendly match or not, we do not control them. And for these friendly matches, the only one that has control over them are the higher management which seems going to be possible for them to manipulate the results at their will. In some sporting events, this is really happening and we don't know when that's going to happen but some athletes have voiced out that this is really an insider and happens as it's against their will.

I think this state of affairs is relevant for backward countries where business is not developed, but corruption is developed. In any developed country, top management will keep away from such affairs as far as possible, since even a suspicion of this can have serious consequences for a career, and if there is evidence, this will mean a criminal sentence.

[hahay]

We don't have control over the games that we bet on. Friendly match or not, we do not control them. And for these friendly matches, the only one that has control over them are the higher management which seems going to be possible for them to manipulate the results at their will. In some sporting events, this is really happening and we don't know when that's going to happen but some athletes have voiced out that this is really an insider and happens as it's against their will.

I think this state of affairs is relevant for backward countries where business is not developed, but corruption is developed. In any developed country, top management will keep away from such affairs as far as possible, since even a suspicion of this can have serious consequences for a career, and if there is evidence, this will mean a criminal sentence.

However, sometimes big clubs just try a few strategies before the start of the league. When the strategy works well then of course, big wins will be unstoppable. But on the other hand, when the coach applies an experimental strategy with second-tier or even third-tier players being played, then it has a chance of getting defeated by the team that is underestimated. I have often found this case in the past few years, for that reason it is also better for me to avoid betting in friendly matches because for me, surprise scores are not only about manipulation because they can occur due to errors in strategy implementation due to experiments carried out in friendly matches.

[madnessteat]

Lol. Is there any game we have control over? It is called football game and anything can happen with any game. Underdogs are turning tables and causing heartbreaks. To my view, I don't think there games we have control over but we can say greater percentage favourable to a team.

We don't have control over the games that we bet on. Friendly match or not, we do not control them. And for these friendly matches, the only one that has control over them are the higher management which seems going to be possible for them to manipulate the results at their will. In some sporting events, this is really happening and we don't know when that's going to happen but some athletes have voiced out that this is really an insider and happens as it's against their will.

In friendly matches is much harder to predict the outcome of the match compared to the championship or the game for the cup as the coach can create more unpredictable situations and guess the team composition or strategy used in the upcoming game is almost unreal. 

[Obito]

~snip

Do quantitative statistics show the accuracy of factual data circulating in the field?
Not really !! could lead to data manipulation. Then how to find the accuracy? well the qualitative method will show a much more tangible risk, it's just that it's difficult to do and as you said we prefer to look at the data that is already presented.
Bookies often use this method and cheat small bettors. Betting money on friendly games, just a less stressful bet.

That only depends though I mean if it's and independent study by different people, there's a low chance of the statistics being manipulated, I don't think that math can be faked, it's an absolute thing and even if it's faked, there will be people that will be eager to point out the mistake.

[Fredomago]

In friendly matches is much harder to predict the outcome of the match compared to the championship or the game for the cup as the coach can create more unpredictable situations and guess the team composition or strategy used in the upcoming game is almost unreal.  

Since it's just a friendly match and there's no bearing with the game, coach can rotate players which is uncommon to how we predict the
line up inside the field.

It's tough to know as there's always reserves that we don't expect to happen but  possible to see during the game, from that case
if you are more on the gambling side, taking the over / under might be  better to consider.

Also, if you have that risky type instinct ML for underdog might gather your interest too.

[SquallLeonhart]

I always say the same thing for the all-star games on NBA as well, it is just mute point and nobody really cares about winning so when you are betting on it, you are not betting on who is better or who is worse, you are betting on who will have more fun basically. I seriously do not think that we should be betting on friendlies neither, sportsbooks could be offering that as an option to you but you do not have to take it, you could just wait.

I understand that during the off-season it becomes harder to not gamble on anything and waiting for the regular season to start, and yes that is a bit hard but at the same time we are talking about something that is very risky to wager instead of no wager, if you are not addicted to gambling then maybe you should try to stay away from those games. Any team could beat any team in friendlies and that is a risk I rather not take.

[passwordnow]

Lol. Is there any game we have control over? It is called football game and anything can happen with any game. Underdogs are turning tables and causing heartbreaks. To my view, I don't think there games we have control over but we can say greater percentage favourable to a team.

We don't have control over the games that we bet on. Friendly match or not, we do not control them. And for these friendly matches, the only one that has control over them are the higher management which seems going to be possible for them to manipulate the results at their will. In some sporting events, this is really happening and we don't know when that's going to happen but some athletes have voiced out that this is really an insider and happens as it's against their will.

In friendly matches is much harder to predict the outcome of the match compared to the championship or the game for the cup as the coach can create more unpredictable situations and guess the team composition or strategy used in the upcoming game is almost unreal. 

I think it varies but we can say that both are unpredictable but with what I've observed for some sports that I've watched with friendly matches, they're likely just having fun.
There's a bit of seriousness into their games but it's still different from the usual counted games and seasons that we watch for the particular sports that we watch.

[KTChampions]

I think this state of affairs is relevant for backward countries where business is not developed, but corruption is developed. In any developed country, top management will keep away from such affairs as far as possible, since even a suspicion of this can have serious consequences for a career, and if there is evidence, this will mean a criminal sentence.

However, sometimes big clubs just try a few strategies before the start of the league. When the strategy works well then of course, big wins will be unstoppable. But on the other hand, when the coach applies an experimental strategy with second-tier or even third-tier players being played, then it has a chance of getting defeated by the team that is underestimated. I have often found this case in the past few years, for that reason it is also better for me to avoid betting in friendly matches because for me, surprise scores are not only about manipulation because they can occur due to errors in strategy implementation due to experiments carried out in friendly matches.

Yes, unpleasant surprises are very likely here. For example, I know that some people like to bet on the number of goals in friendly matches (it is assumed that it should be higher than the average for the teams), but if a coach in a particular fight tries to hone a closed game aimed at keeping the score, then such bets usually fail.

[LUCKMCFLY]

I always say the same thing for the all-star games on NBA as well, it is just mute point and nobody really cares about winning so when you are betting on it, you are not betting on who is better or who is worse, you are betting on who will have more fun basically. I seriously do not think that we should be betting on friendlies neither, sportsbooks could be offering that as an option to you but you do not have to take it, you could just wait.

I understand that during the off-season it becomes harder to not gamble on anything and waiting for the regular season to start, and yes that is a bit hard but at the same time we are talking about something that is very risky to wager instead of no wager, if you are not addicted to gambling then maybe you should try to stay away from those games. Any team could beat any team in friendlies and that is a risk I rather not take.

I do not have a lot of experience with basketball, honestly it is one of the sports that I know very little, but I thought that when they were friendly games, they were almost like a football style, since in football they do not care much the word "friendly" and Many times fights occur, and serve the coaches to give an idea of how the style of the game is and the strategies applied by the opposing team.

Although I like the fact that NBA's basketball friendly games are to have fun, it means that they do not care about the result, and I think it is what is sought in a game friendly.

[suzanne5223]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

You are not wrong on what you are mentioning however the fact that both teams are not giving their all when they are facing each other is a problem, after all if a team is not committed at all to win the game while the other tries harder then that gives the second team a great advantage over the first one just by the desire and the effort they are wiling to put to get the win even if the quality of their players was lower, this makes it almost impossible to tell if the odds the casino is giving are good or not.

In friendly matches, teams usually do not use all their core players, because friendly matches do not have a target to win. This is what makes
the final outcome of the game even more difficult to predict, like you said the two teams playing a friendly match will not give everything.
Because they play without a burden, and that makes it quite risky in my opinion betting on friendly matches. My advice to avoid gambling on
friendly matches.

That is not entirely true because again taking up my example from before, if Manchester City plays against a team from the second or third league in England, even that friendly match is a huge highlight for the massive underdog and they might play as intensive as if it was an FA cup game. Everybody of the underdog team wants to present himself in the best shape possible. Perhaps City pays attention and gets interested. The top teams don't play to their full abilities because it is really just a test for them and nothing more.

I support what you said about the underdog putting their full ability in a friendly match game cause they need to convince their manager they are capable of playing in an upcoming match and like I said earlier, it all depends on the two teams involved motivate because we have a situation where the top teams also up in their best because the top eleven is yet to be selected just like we see during some country prepare for the World Cup.

[paxmao]

In friendly matches it may be more difficult to really ascertain the teams strength because in many sports, particularly in soccer, motivation sometimes weights more than raw quality of the players. In a friendly game, it is much more difficult to figure out who is going to put more effort into winning. Also, some teams tend to play harder than other, and during friendly matches that may be much less and would result in a completely different strategy and possibly a different performance. Overall, I think is more difficult to predict.

[FlamingFingers]

Gambling on friendly match is a high risk gamble, you tend to loose it all as its comprises of fixed matches, a team that you expect to win will just pull a suprise by losing despite being given a very low odds, it's better to play either goal goal or over 2.5 goals in such match, because they don't put in much effort

[johhnyUA]

I always say the same thing for the all-star games on NBA as well, it is just mute point and nobody really cares about winning so when you are betting on it, you are not betting on who is better or who is worse, you are betting on who will have more fun basically. I seriously do not think that we should be betting on friendlies neither, sportsbooks could be offering that as an option to you but you do not have to take it, you could just wait.

Lol, didn't know about all-stars NBA matches that they're are so close to football FM. But i can tell that your point is very correct (if i get it right): When sportsmen get paid BEFORE match or at least they know that they will get a lot of money and bonuses they're don't have any incentive to win, so it's hard to bet on them. The same thing in box (last Mayweather fights) and many other sport events

[mv1986]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

You are not wrong on what you are mentioning however the fact that both teams are not giving their all when they are facing each other is a problem, after all if a team is not committed at all to win the game while the other tries harder then that gives the second team a great advantage over the first one just by the desire and the effort they are wiling to put to get the win even if the quality of their players was lower, this makes it almost impossible to tell if the odds the casino is giving are good or not.

In friendly matches, teams usually do not use all their core players, because friendly matches do not have a target to win. This is what makes
the final outcome of the game even more difficult to predict, like you said the two teams playing a friendly match will not give everything.
Because they play without a burden, and that makes it quite risky in my opinion betting on friendly matches. My advice to avoid gambling on
friendly matches.

That is not entirely true because again taking up my example from before, if Manchester City plays against a team from the second or third league in England, even that friendly match is a huge highlight for the massive underdog and they might play as intensive as if it was an FA cup game. Everybody of the underdog team wants to present himself in the best shape possible. Perhaps City pays attention and gets interested. The top teams don't play to their full abilities because it is really just a test for them and nothing more.

I support what you said about the underdog putting their full ability in a friendly match game cause they need to convince their manager they are capable of playing in an upcoming match and like I said earlier, it all depends on the two teams involved motivate because we have a situation where the top teams also up in their best because the top eleven is yet to be selected just like we see during some country prepare for the World Cup.

Friendly matches right before a World Cup are very often of poor quality. The difference I pointed out is referring to something else in friendly matches between teams of different league levels. When a team from a lower league plays against a team of the top national league, it is not just a friendly match for the underdog. It could even be a once in a lifetime game. Imagine you are third league in England and play a friendly match against Manchester city. That game means a lot to you, there is a lot of intrinsic motivation involved. While the players of Manchester City, even if they have to prove themselves, won't consider that game as important because there is only so much you can prove against a third league team as a first league player.

[South Park]

You are not wrong on what you are mentioning however the fact that both teams are not giving their all when they are facing each other is a problem, after all if a team is not committed at all to win the game while the other tries harder then that gives the second team a great advantage over the first one just by the desire and the effort they are wiling to put to get the win even if the quality of their players was lower, this makes it almost impossible to tell if the odds the casino is giving are good or not.

In friendly matches, teams usually do not use all their core players, because friendly matches do not have a target to win. This is what makes
the final outcome of the game even more difficult to predict, like you said the two teams playing a friendly match will not give everything.
Because they play without a burden, and that makes it quite risky in my opinion betting on friendly matches. My advice to avoid gambling on
friendly matches.

That is not entirely true because again taking up my example from before, if Manchester City plays against a team from the second or third league in England, even that friendly match is a huge highlight for the massive underdog and they might play as intensive as if it was an FA cup game. Everybody of the underdog team wants to present himself in the best shape possible. Perhaps City pays attention and gets interested. The top teams don't play to their full abilities because it is really just a test for them and nothing more.

Which highlights once again the point that I brought with my previous post, even if a team is not as good as the other if the team that on paper is superior takes a relaxed approach to the game while the other team is doing their best to win then it is not as easy to predict who is going to come up with a victory, obviously the better team should still remain the favorite, but for how much? That's the question and this is why when we see this kind of matches we see a lot of surprises as the team that on paper is not as good is giving their all in order to win.

[suzanne5223]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

You are not wrong on what you are mentioning however the fact that both teams are not giving their all when they are facing each other is a problem, after all if a team is not committed at all to win the game while the other tries harder then that gives the second team a great advantage over the first one just by the desire and the effort they are wiling to put to get the win even if the quality of their players was lower, this makes it almost impossible to tell if the odds the casino is giving are good or not.

In friendly matches, teams usually do not use all their core players, because friendly matches do not have a target to win. This is what makes
the final outcome of the game even more difficult to predict, like you said the two teams playing a friendly match will not give everything.
Because they play without a burden, and that makes it quite risky in my opinion betting on friendly matches. My advice to avoid gambling on
friendly matches.

That is not entirely true because again taking up my example from before, if Manchester City plays against a team from the second or third league in England, even that friendly match is a huge highlight for the massive underdog and they might play as intensive as if it was an FA cup game. Everybody of the underdog team wants to present himself in the best shape possible. Perhaps City pays attention and gets interested. The top teams don't play to their full abilities because it is really just a test for them and nothing more.

I support what you said about the underdog putting their full ability in a friendly match game cause they need to convince their manager they are capable of playing in an upcoming match and like I said earlier, it all depends on the two teams involved motivate because we have a situation where the top teams also up in their best because the top eleven is yet to be selected just like we see during some country prepare for the World Cup.

Friendly matches right before a World Cup are very often of poor quality. The difference I pointed out is referring to something else in friendly matches between teams of different league levels. When a team from a lower league plays against a team of the top national league, it is not just a friendly match for the underdog. It could even be a once in a lifetime game. Imagine you are third league in England and play a friendly match against Manchester city. That game means a lot to you, there is a lot of intrinsic motivation involved. While the players of Manchester City, even if they have to prove themselves, won't consider that game as important because there is only so much you can prove against a third league team as a first league player.

Maybe your expectation are high about the friendly matches played before the World Cup or it is because you watch the game between countries with poor football experience because the World Cup friendly I know is not of poor quality.

Regarding a lower class team playing a friendly match against the upper class, the match won't be much important for the upper class but that doesn't mean they won't put in their best because they have a reputation to protect and it is not always about the money.

[Oilacris]

Gambling on friendly match is a high risk gamble, you tend to loose it all as its comprises of fixed matches, a team that you expect to win will just pull a suprise by losing despite being given a very low odds, it's better to play either goal goal or over 2.5 goals in such match, because they don't put in much effort

Not really that believing about on being fixed because most of this friendly matches are really not serious when it comes to players performance since they do know that it isnt really official

or not really be counted into their statistics and i do barely see that there are odds that been offered with friendly matches or does depend if its really popular or not.

For me its not really that appealing or interesting on betting out on these friendly matches due to those various reasons that had been mentioned.

[boyptc]

Gambling on friendly match is a high risk gamble, you tend to loose it all as its comprises of fixed matches, a team that you expect to win will just pull a suprise by losing despite being given a very low odds, it's better to play either goal goal or over 2.5 goals in such match, because they don't put in much effort

They're prone to fix matches but you'll never know if the match is fixed or not.

There are still those teams that won't allow such match-fixing to happen because the penalty and punishment are big for these teams if they've been caught.

[3meek]

Gambling on friendly match is a high risk gamble, you tend to loose it all as its comprises of fixed matches, a team that you expect to win will just pull a suprise by losing despite being given a very low odds, it's better to play either goal goal or over 2.5 goals in such match, because they don't put in much effort

They're prone to fix matches but you'll never know if the match is fixed or not.

There are still those teams that won't allow such match-fixing to happen because the penalty and punishment are big for these teams if they've been caught.

It's not about match-fixing... A team can lose not because someone arranged it... Sometimes it is not profitable to play the main squad because of upcoming matches and the team does not play the main squad... In fact there may be many possible outcomes that are not in your favour!

[Peanutswar]

Gambling on friendly match is a high risk gamble, you tend to loose it all as its comprises of fixed matches, a team that you expect to win will just pull a suprise by losing despite being given a very low odds, it's better to play either goal goal or over 2.5 goals in such match, because they don't put in much effort

They're prone to fix matches but you'll never know if the match is fixed or not.

There are still those teams that won't allow such match-fixing to happen because the penalty and punishment are big for these teams if they've been caught.

It's not about match-fixing... A team can lose not because someone arranged it... Sometimes it is not profitable to play the main squad because of upcoming matches and the team does not play the main squad... In fact there may be many possible outcomes that are not in your favour!

Its too hard to play or to bet against a friendly match again there's a possible happen in this kind of game both organizations can talk about the possible chance of winning to win or to throw but if you are a bettor and you know its a friendly match its a higher risk to win, but if this kind of match is the same with the high-rank tournament they could possibly not to throw the game but if just a normal game like a low-class tournament it could possible.

[freedomgo]

Gambling on friendly match is a high risk gamble, you tend to loose it all as its comprises of fixed matches, a team that you expect to win will just pull a suprise by losing despite being given a very low odds, it's better to play either goal goal or over 2.5 goals in such match, because they don't put in much effort

They're prone to fix matches but you'll never know if the match is fixed or not.

There are still those teams that won't allow such match-fixing to happen because the penalty and punishment are big for these teams if they've been caught.

It's not about match-fixing... A team can lose not because someone arranged it... Sometimes it is not profitable to play the main squad because of upcoming matches and the team does not play the main squad... In fact there may be many possible outcomes that are not in your favour!

Its too hard to play or to bet against a friendly match again there's a possible happen in this kind of game both organizations can talk about the possible chance of winning to win or to throw but if you are a bettor and you know its a friendly match its a higher risk to win, but if this kind of match is the same with the high-rank tournament they could possibly not to throw the game but if just a normal game like a low-class tournament it could possible.

I'm okay with betting in this kind of game, it's not a problem for me as I only put a little bet, I will treat it like entertainment only and not too serious about it. In friendly games, stats won't work so even if your analysis is well-research, you still can't assure which team will win as one team could not exert an effort especially the favorites.

[virasog]

The most common friendly matches are both the international  country and club friendlies, long time ago I have seen these type of matches as a way to bet and have fun, many of my betting result are positive most especially if I bet on a single match. The country or club that will win is not certain but I noticed staking on over 1.5 or over 2.5 is always most of the time results to a good outcome.

I am not saying this is a risk free bet, no bet is risk free, but I noticed this type of match most of the time results to many goals scored which makes better for taking over 1.5 or over 2.5 and the games are won.

Some people still like to accumulate, the accumulation can also be positive and won but the more the accumulation the more the high chances of losing. But I do not still see any wrong in accumulating 3 matches, though the chances to lose will increase because as one match lost result to the nullification of the bet, I prefer just a single game in a week.

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

Aren't the friendly matches fixed and player don't play at their full potential. Due to this i personally do not like to bet on these matches. I think in friendly matches, often the weak team is made to win or the match is played in such a style so it remains interesting till the end. For me, its risky to bet on these matches.

[Oshosondy]

Aren't the friendly matches fixed and player don't play at their full potential. Due to this i personally do not like to bet on these matches. I think in friendly matches, often the weak team is made to win or the match is played in such a style so it remains interesting till the end. For me, its risky to bet on these matches.

I did not believe on fixed matches before until I noticed it is actually true, but normal all league matches can be fixed too even more than friendly matches, that is the reason I do not like to place bet on small matches again, also many of the friendly matches are not common, there is possibility of fixing the uncommon ones, but that does not still stop me from trying to choose over 1.5. I understand you very well, going for wining on friendly matches will mostly result to loss because even the underdog can win, but I do not go for straight win in friendly matches.

[KTChampions]

I always say the same thing for the all-star games on NBA as well, it is just mute point and nobody really cares about winning so when you are betting on it, you are not betting on who is better or who is worse, you are betting on who will have more fun basically. I seriously do not think that we should be betting on friendlies neither, sportsbooks could be offering that as an option to you but you do not have to take it, you could just wait.

I understand that during the off-season it becomes harder to not gamble on anything and waiting for the regular season to start, and yes that is a bit hard but at the same time we are talking about something that is very risky to wager instead of no wager, if you are not addicted to gambling then maybe you should try to stay away from those games. Any team could beat any team in friendlies and that is a risk I rather not take.

All-star matches have nothing to do with friendlies - they are pure show, while friendlies have at least some kind of sporting overtones. I avoid betting on friendly matches, but still the fact that any team can beat any team can be assessed not only as a disadvantage, but also as an advantage, when the underdog wins the odds are usually high.

[CryptocurencyKing]

I avoid betting on friendly matches, but still the fact that any team can beat any team can be assessed not only as a disadvantage, but also as an advantage, when the underdog wins the odds are usually high.

Exactly! I become so skeptical when it comes tonplacing a bet on friendlies that actual league games or competitions. They both come with a completely different vibe and energy. You can't exactly tell which team is bound to emerge victorious even with a pairing of an unequal strength as per quality of players and the league from which the team hails from.
I rarely bet on frienndlies too, especially when it comes to the win market. The goal market has been to some extent more favourable to me. One way that i actually use to make my predictions is, by looking at the teams line ups. Seeing many of the first team players on the bench especially those handling key roles simply means, there isn't anything serious in the fixture and vice versa.

[Fredomago]

I avoid betting on friendly matches, but still the fact that any team can beat any team can be assessed not only as a disadvantage, but also as an advantage, when the underdog wins the odds are usually high.

Exactly! I become so skeptical when it comes tonplacing a bet on friendlies that actual league games or competitions. They both come with a completely different vibe and energy. You can't exactly tell which team is bound to emerge victorious even with a pairing of an unequal strength as per quality of players and the league from which the team hails from.
I rarely bet on frienndlies too, especially when it comes to the win market. The goal market has been to some extent more favourable to me. One way that i actually use to make my predictions is, by looking at the teams line ups. Seeing many of the first team players on the bench especially those handling key roles simply means, there isn't anything serious in the fixture and vice versa.

Hard to predict unlike with real games where all the stats are important, with friendly games those good players even they are in the game can just run and enjoy without any pressures.

They are just competing with time and not really with the opponents that they are playing with, and same logic applies when betting.

Make sure to bet for fun and not to chased whoever be the winner it will lessen the stress if you lose your pick.

[Yamifoud]

I avoid betting on friendly matches, but still the fact that any team can beat any team can be assessed not only as a disadvantage, but also as an advantage, when the underdog wins the odds are usually high.

Exactly! I become so skeptical when it comes tonplacing a bet on friendlies that actual league games or competitions. They both come with a completely different vibe and energy. You can't exactly tell which team is bound to emerge victorious even with a pairing of an unequal strength as per quality of players and the league from which the team hails from.
I rarely bet on frienndlies too, especially when it comes to the win market. The goal market has been to some extent more favourable to me. One way that i actually use to make my predictions is, by looking at the teams line ups. Seeing many of the first team players on the bench especially those handling key roles simply means, there isn't anything serious in the fixture and vice versa.

Hard to predict unlike with real games where all the stats are important, with friendly games those good players even they are in the game can just run and enjoy without any pressures.

They are just competing with time and not really with the opponents that they are playing with, and same logic applies when betting.

Make sure to bet for fun and not to chased whoever be the winner it will lessen the stress if you lose your pick.

Most of you are concern about the favorite team not playing their best, if that's what you see then it's not hard to predict the winner of the game. What really happened here is that we are a sure bettor on the favorites, so we think they will win and we are disappointed if they will not play their best. In gambling, betting with your heart would never result to profit, always look for an opportunity or the value to win in every bet.

[7788bitcoin]

Most of you are concern about the favorite team not playing their best, if that's what you see then it's not hard to predict the winner of the game. What really happened here is that we are a sure bettor on the favorites, so we think they will win and we are disappointed if they will not play their best. In gambling, betting with your heart would never result to profit, always look for an opportunity or the value to win in every bet.

This is not a concern but a fact that you cannot trust and wage a bet on friendly matches, just take a look at all the friendly matches that are played this year and look at the scorecard and i can bet that you will find many upsets that you will not imagine if they are playing with the best team possible and i lost a lot of money in the past wagging for friendly matches and now i will never make that mistake.

[Saint-loup]

Most of you are concern about the favorite team not playing their best, if that's what you see then it's not hard to predict the winner of the game. What really happened here is that we are a sure bettor on the favorites, so we think they will win and we are disappointed if they will not play their best. In gambling, betting with your heart would never result to profit, always look for an opportunity or the value to win in every bet.

This is not a concern but a fact that you cannot trust and wage a bet on friendly matches, just take a look at all the friendly matches that are played this year and look at the scorecard and i can bet that you will find many upsets that you will not imagine if they are playing with the best team possible and i lost a lot of money in the past wagging for friendly matches and now i will never make that mistake.

If you have lost a lot of money it means you had a bad bankroll management. Because if you know there is a big uncertainty in the outcome of the event, you shouldn't bet on small odds. Thus in those situations you should only bet on the underdogs, if you want to bet something. Because if you bet on the favorites with odds smaller than their real chances of winning you will wipe out your bankroll in the long run and even in the medium term.

[Oshosondy]

If you have lost a lot of money it means you had a bad bankroll management. Because if you know there is a big uncertainty in the outcome of the event, you shouldn't bet on small odds. Thus in those situations you should only bet on the underdogs, if you want to bet something. Because if you bet on the favorites with odds smaller than their real chances of winning you will wipe out your bankroll in the long run and even in the medium term.

Even if their is a big certainty, I do not bet on small odds, this happened to me when Spain Under19 was playing one small European country at the qualifying stage which I was expecting Spain to win, the odd for Spain was 1.06 and I remembered very well, I took Spain to win, the match later was draw, I lost the match. Taking small odds makes many people to think it is the best way until they become addicted because small odds makes gamblers to gamble more as they want to turn it big, resulting to loss. On friendly matches, I do not go for straight win, because if you choose the underdog, that does not still mean the big team might not win too.

[Saint-loup]

If you have lost a lot of money it means you had a bad bankroll management. Because if you know there is a big uncertainty in the outcome of the event, you shouldn't bet on small odds. Thus in those situations you should only bet on the underdogs, if you want to bet something. Because if you bet on the favorites with odds smaller than their real chances of winning you will wipe out your bankroll in the long run and even in the medium term.

Even if their is a big certainty, I do not bet on small odds, this happened to me when Spain Under19 was playing one small European country at the qualifying stage which I was expecting Spain to win, the odd for Spain was 1.06 and I remembered very well, I took Spain to win, the match later was draw, I lost the match. Taking small odds makes many people to think it is the best way until they become addicted because small odds makes gamblers to gamble more as they want to turn it big, resulting to loss. On friendly matches, I do not go for straight win, because if you choose the underdog, that does not still mean the big team might not win too.

That is not what I said, I didn't say it is not a good thing to bet on small odds when there is not a big uncertainty, I just said it is not a good thing to bet on small odds when the uncertainty is big... If you don't bet on small odds when there is a big certainty you're wrong too. Because your chances to win the bet are big too, thus you can earn money if only a small proportion of those matches loses. Moreover I don't understand what you mean at the end : If you are not betting on the favorite or the underdog, which one are you betting on?

[Oshosondy]

That is not what I said, I didn't say it is not a good thing to bet on small odds when there is not a big uncertainty, I just said it is not a good thing to bet on small odds when the uncertainty is big... If you don't bet on small odds when there is a big certainty you're wrong too. Because your chances to win the bet are big too, thus you can earn money if only a small proportion of those matches loses. Moreover I don't understand what you mean at the end : If you are not betting on the favorite or the underdog, which one are you betting on?

I created the thread because I noticed there are much goals in friendly matches, though also want to hear people's opinion about friendlies but most people prefer my suggestion which is going for over 1.5 or over 2.5 of total goals. Betting for either the big team or underdog in such match is risky, anyone team can win, that is why I prefer to go for total goals to be scored, though we can choice what we like, if it is working for us.

[Saint-loup]

That is not what I said, I didn't say it is not a good thing to bet on small odds when there is not a big uncertainty, I just said it is not a good thing to bet on small odds when the uncertainty is big... If you don't bet on small odds when there is a big certainty you're wrong too. Because your chances to win the bet are big too, thus you can earn money if only a small proportion of those matches loses. Moreover I don't understand what you mean at the end : If you are not betting on the favorite or the underdog, which one are you betting on?

I created the thread because I noticed there are much goals in friendly matches, though also want to hear people's opinion about friendlies but most people prefer my suggestion which is going for over 1.5 or over 2.5 of total goals. Betting for either the big team or underdog in such match is risky, anyone team can win, that is why I prefer to go for total goals to be scored, though we can choice what we like, if it is working for us.

Most of people are not real gamblers here and have not any clue about how to earn money in betting, then I wouldn't take the majority opinion for a reliable advice. If odds of the favorites are overvalued then it means odds of the underdogs are undervalued... Thus you will maybe lose 3 times but you will earn 5 times your stake the fourth time for example.

[Altryist]

I created the thread because I noticed there are much goals in friendly matches, though also want to hear people's opinion about friendlies but most people prefer my suggestion which is going for over 1.5 or over 2.5 of total goals. Betting for either the big team or underdog in such match is risky, anyone team can win, that is why I prefer to go for total goals to be scored, though we can choice what we like, if it is working for us.

Betting on total in such matches is perhaps even smarter, because there are only two outcomes, or more than 2.5, or less. And if you bet on the winner, then there can be a victory, a defeat, or a draw. So two versus three possible outcomes also matter. But personally, I always avoid betting on friendlies because these are very unpredictable matches, maybe even without a lot of motivation.

[Kong Hey Pakboy]

I think there's nothing wrong with betting on friendly match expect that there's no upset happening because the teams that are playing won't be playing at their best because there's no stake for them in the game. So when you bet on this kind of game, go for the favorites because they're likely to win.

[3meek]

[
I'm okay with betting in this kind of game, it's not a problem for me as I only put a little bet, I will treat it like entertainment only and not too serious about it. In friendly games, stats won't work so even if your analysis is well-research, you still can't assure which team will win as one team could not exert an effort especially the favorites.

I've always treated betting as entertainment, meaning it's not a way for me to make money on a regular basis... Still, I avoid betting on friendly matches... Losing even a small bet in such games is for me a meaningless loss of money... So I'd rather bet it on another event!

[Ziskinberg]

[
I'm okay with betting in this kind of game, it's not a problem for me as I only put a little bet, I will treat it like entertainment only and not too serious about it. In friendly games, stats won't work so even if your analysis is well-research, you still can't assure which team will win as one team could not exert an effort especially the favorites.

I've always treated betting as entertainment, meaning it's not a way for me to make money on a regular basis... Still, I avoid betting on friendly matches... Losing even a small bet in such games is for me a meaningless loss of money... So I'd rather bet it on another event!

That's definitely the right thing to do, we gamble to enjoy more the game we are watching, so if it will turn out like a non-effort game by both teams, then there's no fun in watching the game unless you are really a gambler who gambles in any game regardless on they will play hard or not.

Most gamblers gamble on their favorite sports because they know it and they love their team to win, but if you will not follow your heart in betting, you will surely not gonna enjoy what you are watching as all you want to know is the outcome of the game to confirm if you lose or win.

[Beparanf]

I think there's nothing wrong with betting on friendly match expect that there's no upset happening because the teams that are playing won't be playing at their best because there's no stake for them in the game. So when you bet on this kind of game, go for the favorites because they're likely to win.

Yeah, we always do that with friend to determine who's opinion was right on basketball game. This gives more excitement on watching the match and save both you on an argument that has no ending. At the end of the day, we are still friends no matter what is the result and use the winning money to buy some drinks for us so everyone still a winner although there might be some teasing until the end but still fun.

[Fredomago]

I think there's nothing wrong with betting on friendly match expect that there's no upset happening because the teams that are playing won't be playing at their best because there's no stake for them in the game. So when you bet on this kind of game, go for the favorites because they're likely to win.

Yeah, we always do that with friend to determine who's opinion was right on basketball game. This gives more excitement on watching the match and save both you on an argument that has no ending. At the end of the day, we are still friends no matter what is the result and use the winning money to buy some drinks for us so everyone still a winner although there might be some teasing until the end but still fun.

What a classic gambling partnership  at the end of the day both wins as all the money have been used for treating each other, no need to argue since the outcome of the game dictates who wins between you and your friend.

But moving back to the topic, in assessing the game there's always a good alternative ways to bet if you are unsure who's going to win and like how OP give his opinion here,

Depends from how you understand both teams that will compete, just keep in mind that shit might happened so also bring back up bet behind you. 

[boyptc]

Gambling on friendly match is a high risk gamble, you tend to loose it all as its comprises of fixed matches, a team that you expect to win will just pull a suprise by losing despite being given a very low odds, it's better to play either goal goal or over 2.5 goals in such match, because they don't put in much effort

They're prone to fix matches but you'll never know if the match is fixed or not.

There are still those teams that won't allow such match-fixing to happen because the penalty and punishment are big for these teams if they've been caught.

It's not about match-fixing... A team can lose not because someone arranged it... Sometimes it is not profitable to play the main squad because of upcoming matches and the team does not play the main squad... In fact there may be many possible outcomes that are not in your favour!

They're prone though.

Yes, there are too many things that might not be according to what you're thinking when you bet with friendly matches. But if you really want to bet with those matches.

Do whatever you think is favorable to you.

[shield132]

Usually, when it comes to friendly matches (in this case, imagine soccer), I prefer to stay away. In friendly matches, you can't predict a lot of things: you can't fairly judge who will try their best to win the match and who will try to preserve energies for another match or for whatever the reason they have.
When it comes to goals, yeah, I agree with you, there is the high probability that there will be more goals because friendly matches mean nothing and teams shouldn't be focusing on their defense line but at the same time it means that attackers won't be intensive/forceful.

[Saint-loup]

Usually, when it comes to friendly matches (in this case, imagine soccer), I prefer to stay away. In friendly matches, you can't predict a lot of things: you can't fairly judge who will try their best to win the match and who will try to preserve energies for another match or for whatever the reason they have.
When it comes to goals, yeah, I agree with you, there is the high probability that there will be more goals because friendly matches mean nothing and teams shouldn't be focusing on their defense line but at the same time it means that attackers won't be intensive/forceful.

And if it's right that there are more goals in this kind of meeting do you really think bookmakers are not aware of that and don't adjust their odds to get less profits on higher number of goals? It's the job of the bookmakers to evaluate odds of a outcome to happen, they won't give extra gains just for fun.

[KTChampions]

I think there's nothing wrong with betting on friendly match expect that there's no upset happening because the teams that are playing won't be playing at their best because there's no stake for them in the game. So when you bet on this kind of game, go for the favorites because they're likely to win.

Do you have experience with similar beats? I strongly doubt it, otherwise you would already know that this is a losing strategy, since the coefficients for winning are very small. At such bets, it will take a very long time to wait for the doubling of the deposit, and several unsuccessful results (in friendly matches, the underdogs wins often) will nullify your deposit.

[LUCKMCFLY]

I think there's nothing wrong with betting on friendly match expect that there's no upset happening because the teams that are playing won't be playing at their best because there's no stake for them in the game. So when you bet on this kind of game, go for the favorites because they're likely to win.

Well, this is what the logic indicates, but when it comes to favorite teams, for example, in football matches, many times the players who are starters, the most famous and who play the most, their clubs do not give them permission. to go to play, because they do not want to risk them to possible injuries, then the teams have to play with the substitutes and it is not the same level, of course this does not apply for teams like Brazil, Argentina, whose bench players tend to have a high level , much like the one that the starting players show, but sometimes it can be like a double-edged sword, where you can risk more than the bet.

[Fredomago]

I think there's nothing wrong with betting on friendly match expect that there's no upset happening because the teams that are playing won't be playing at their best because there's no stake for them in the game. So when you bet on this kind of game, go for the favorites because they're likely to win.

Well, this is what the logic indicates, but when it comes to favorite teams, for example, in football matches, many times the players who are starters, the most famous and who play the most, their clubs do not give them permission. to go to play, because they do not want to risk them to possible injuries, then the teams have to play with the substitutes and it is not the same level, of course this does not apply for teams like Brazil, Argentina, whose bench players tend to have a high level , much like the one that the starting players show, but sometimes it can be like a double-edged sword, where you can risk more than the bet.

Well said, the management will not risk those players that they've invested millions of dollars just to accidentally injured during this kind of friendly games, it's not easy to predict as friendly games may turn to the other side of outcome, not every time heavy favorites will win sometimes it's best to take the underdog since the value of odd really sweet if you able to win the game.

Otherwise, best to find other alternative type of betting, there are lots of options chance to win may give you better opportunities.

[Sanitough]

Usually, when it comes to friendly matches (in this case, imagine soccer), I prefer to stay away. In friendly matches, you can't predict a lot of things: you can't fairly judge who will try their best to win the match and who will try to preserve energies for another match or for whatever the reason they have.
When it comes to goals, yeah, I agree with you, there is the high probability that there will be more goals because friendly matches mean nothing and teams shouldn't be focusing on their defense line but at the same time it means that attackers won't be intensive/forceful.

And if it's right that there are more goals in this kind of meeting do you really think bookmakers are not aware of that and don't adjust their odds to get less profits on higher number of goals? It's the job of the bookmakers to evaluate odds of a outcome to happen, they won't give extra gains just for fun.

They'll make sure the betters would be interested on betting both sides, if most bettors are betting on the other side, the odds will move as it's the job of the bookmakers to balance the betting so the site will not suffer and they'll continue to accept bets.

[South Park]

I did not believe on fixed matches before until I noticed it is actually true, but normal all league matches can be fixed too even more than friendly matches, that is the reason I do not like to place bet on small matches again, also many of the friendly matches are not common, there is possibility of fixing the uncommon ones, but that does not still stop me from trying to choose over 1.5. I understand you very well, going for wining on friendly matches will mostly result to loss because even the underdog can win, but I do not go for straight win in friendly matches.

Fixed matches are a great problem within the industry, many people like you used to believe that things like this do not really happen, but they do, and there have been huge scandals because it has happened on some of the most popular leagues around the world and some of the most important games, so it is to be expected that fixing a friendly match is way easier than in any other match because nothing is at stake, and if a team underperforms then no one is going to care about it because there is a justification for it as the players are not giving their 100%.

[Oshosondy]

Fixed matches are a great problem within the industry, many people like you used to believe that things like this do not really happen, but they do, and there have been huge scandals because it has happened on some of the most popular leagues around the world and some of the most important games, so it is to be expected that fixing a friendly match is way easier than in any other match because nothing is at stake, and if a team underperforms then no one is going to care about it because there is a justification for it as the players are not giving their 100%.

Yes, fixing matches is true and happening in foot ball, but also some people have taken the chance to scam people that like easy things, scammers will just predict one or two matches with big odds like 4 or 5 odds or more, they will sell it to their victims saying the matches are fixed but not fixed and the victim will lose the bets. But back to the main point, both friendly and small matches can be fixed, that is why I prefer going for big matches like leagues, cups and campaigns league which I know they are not fixed.

[tyz]

Usually, when it comes to friendly matches (in this case, imagine soccer), I prefer to stay away. In friendly matches, you can't predict a lot of things: you can't fairly judge who will try their best to win the match and who will try to preserve energies for another match or for whatever the reason they have.
When it comes to goals, yeah, I agree with you, there is the high probability that there will be more goals because friendly matches mean nothing and teams shouldn't be focusing on their defense line but at the same time it means that attackers won't be intensive/forceful.

And if it's right that there are more goals in this kind of meeting do you really think bookmakers are not aware of that and don't adjust their odds to get less profits on higher number of goals? It's the job of the bookmakers to evaluate odds of a outcome to happen, they won't give extra gains just for fun.

They'll make sure the betters would be interested on betting both sides, if most bettors are betting on the other side, the odds will move as it's the job of the bookmakers to balance the betting so the site will not suffer and they'll continue to accept bets.

The odds are always adjusted according to how bets are placed. If many bettors bet on many goals, then the odds for few goals are increased and those for many goals are decreased. In principle, the betting provider only thinks about the initial odds, but as soon as the first bets are placed, the further setting of the odds happens purely on algorithms.

[CryptocurencyKing]

Yes, fixing matches is true and happening in foot ball, but also some people have taken the chance to scam people that like easy things, scammers will just predict one or two matches with big odds like 4 or 5 odds or more, they will sell it to their victims saying the matches are fixed but not fixed and the victim will lose the bets. But back to the main point, both friendly and small matches can be fixed, that is why I prefer going for big matches like leagues, cups and campaigns league which I know they are not fixed.

About match fixing and people actually digging in to buy these predicted odds, I wonder why these things happens. Is it greed on the part of the the ones actually making and selling the predictions. Let me explain;
There is every possibility that, should a supposed match be fixed and you are aware and sure of it, you could break the rule of investing and stake more than you can afford to loose just to maximise profit but then, some persons end up selling these predictions with hopes of getting some additional income off the predictions. Is that greed at play or some safe move aimed at getting some funds.
I see these guys making the predictions to be really safe because, it could turn out that, the matches weren't fixed at all but then, a prediction born out of there prediction but then, they let you take all the risk for them and should it turn to play out, you pay otherwise you take the lose alone.

[Reatim]

Fixed matches are a great problem within the industry, many people like you used to believe that things like this do not really happen, but they do, and there have been huge scandals because it has happened on some of the most popular leagues around the world and some of the most important games, so it is to be expected that fixing a friendly match is way easier than in any other match because nothing is at stake, and if a team underperforms then no one is going to care about it because there is a justification for it as the players are not giving their 100%.

Yes, fixing matches is true and happening in foot ball, but also some people have taken the chance to scam people that like easy things, scammers will just predict one or two matches with big odds like 4 or 5 odds or more, they will sell it to their victims saying the matches are fixed but not fixed and the victim will lose the bets. But back to the main point, both friendly and small matches can be fixed, that is why I prefer going for big matches like leagues, cups and campaigns league which I know they are not fixed.

actually those victims of this kind of scam are deserving to their situation because they are also cheaters , imagine wanna buy a  fixed match just to win instantly ? so these scammers are making money against their own buddies in which cheaters.

sports betting is one of the most colorful and worth a bet in gambling and if you add this kind of behavior then you are just letting the system becomes corrupt and you are worth to become being scammed.

[Natalim]

Fixed matches are a great problem within the industry, many people like you used to believe that things like this do not really happen, but they do, and there have been huge scandals because it has happened on some of the most popular leagues around the world and some of the most important games, so it is to be expected that fixing a friendly match is way easier than in any other match because nothing is at stake, and if a team underperforms then no one is going to care about it because there is a justification for it as the players are not giving their 100%.

Yes, fixing matches is true and happening in foot ball, but also some people have taken the chance to scam people that like easy things, scammers will just predict one or two matches with big odds like 4 or 5 odds or more, they will sell it to their victims saying the matches are fixed but not fixed and the victim will lose the bets. But back to the main point, both friendly and small matches can be fixed, that is why I prefer going for big matches like leagues, cups and campaigns league which I know they are not fixed.

actually those victims of this kind of scam are deserving to their situation because they are also cheaters , imagine wanna buy a  fixed match just to win instantly ? so these scammers are making money against their own buddies in which cheaters.

sports betting is one of the most colorful and worth a bet in gambling and if you add this kind of behavior then you are just letting the system becomes corrupt and you are worth to become being scammed.

Well said, and there's no fun in sports betting if you know the outcome, yes, you can make easy money but you are corrupt just like those players who are rigging games for their personal interest. I wish the authorities will be more strict with their policies, those who are caught doing this should be sanction with the maximum penalty.

I always hear the words "sports rigging", but there are only few who are sanctioned for this corrupt practice.

[mv1986]

As said by the OP, no betting is risk-free but I still consider gambling on friendly matches to be less risky because there won't be much pressure in terms of having game fever, overbetting the amount you can't afford to lose, and there is usually ease of mind in throughout the game result. However, people still need to be sure about the possible winning team before betting on a friendly match.

You are not wrong on what you are mentioning however the fact that both teams are not giving their all when they are facing each other is a problem, after all if a team is not committed at all to win the game while the other tries harder then that gives the second team a great advantage over the first one just by the desire and the effort they are wiling to put to get the win even if the quality of their players was lower, this makes it almost impossible to tell if the odds the casino is giving are good or not.

In friendly matches, teams usually do not use all their core players, because friendly matches do not have a target to win. This is what makes
the final outcome of the game even more difficult to predict, like you said the two teams playing a friendly match will not give everything.
Because they play without a burden, and that makes it quite risky in my opinion betting on friendly matches. My advice to avoid gambling on
friendly matches.

That is not entirely true because again taking up my example from before, if Manchester City plays against a team from the second or third league in England, even that friendly match is a huge highlight for the massive underdog and they might play as intensive as if it was an FA cup game. Everybody of the underdog team wants to present himself in the best shape possible. Perhaps City pays attention and gets interested. The top teams don't play to their full abilities because it is really just a test for them and nothing more.

I support what you said about the underdog putting their full ability in a friendly match game cause they need to convince their manager they are capable of playing in an upcoming match and like I said earlier, it all depends on the two teams involved motivate because we have a situation where the top teams also up in their best because the top eleven is yet to be selected just like we see during some country prepare for the World Cup.

Friendly matches right before a World Cup are very often of poor quality. The difference I pointed out is referring to something else in friendly matches between teams of different league levels. When a team from a lower league plays against a team of the top national league, it is not just a friendly match for the underdog. It could even be a once in a lifetime game. Imagine you are third league in England and play a friendly match against Manchester city. That game means a lot to you, there is a lot of intrinsic motivation involved. While the players of Manchester City, even if they have to prove themselves, won't consider that game as important because there is only so much you can prove against a third league team as a first league player.

Maybe your expectation are high about the friendly matches played before the World Cup or it is because you watch the game between countries with poor football experience because the World Cup friendly I know is not of poor quality.

Regarding a lower class team playing a friendly match against the upper class, the match won't be much important for the upper class but that doesn't mean they won't put in their best because they have a reputation to protect and it is not always about the money.

Take Germany as an example. Apart from the last EURO and the last World Cup, all the tournaments before they finished well. What about during the friendly matches they played right in advance of those tournaments? They were so bad that everyone was afraid they would lose at the group stage at those tournaments already. Most friendly matches are indeed bad quality.

Bayern Munich has lost three first friendly matches now, what does that tell us?

[LUCKMCFLY]

Take Germany as an example. Apart from the last EURO and the last World Cup, all the tournaments before they finished well. What about during the friendly matches they played right in advance of those tournaments? They were so bad that everyone was afraid they would lose at the group stage at those tournaments already. Most friendly matches are indeed bad quality.

Bayern Munich has lost three first friendly matches now, what does that tell us?

Here you are absolutely right, it reminds me of a day when Venezuela beat Brazil in a friendly match, because Brazil was not with its star players, but according to the coaches of Venezuela it helped them to determine the level that Brazil had for that At the moment, and in the qualifying rounds for the World Cup it was useless, because obviously Brazil beat Venezuela by a great advantage, impossible to achieve, so friendly football matches do not represent the real football level in themselves, despite the fact that the rivalry continues to be the same, but taking care since they do not want the players to get injured either.

[mv1986]

Take Germany as an example. Apart from the last EURO and the last World Cup, all the tournaments before they finished well. What about during the friendly matches they played right in advance of those tournaments? They were so bad that everyone was afraid they would lose at the group stage at those tournaments already. Most friendly matches are indeed bad quality.

Bayern Munich has lost three first friendly matches now, what does that tell us?

Here you are absolutely right, it reminds me of a day when Venezuela beat Brazil in a friendly match, because Brazil was not with its star players, but according to the coaches of Venezuela it helped them to determine the level that Brazil had for that At the moment, and in the qualifying rounds for the World Cup it was useless, because obviously Brazil beat Venezuela by a great advantage, impossible to achieve, so friendly football matches do not represent the real football level in themselves, despite the fact that the rivalry continues to be the same, but taking care since they do not want the players to get injured either.

I think that even though every player strives to give their best even in friendly matches to make sure they will be considered for those big tournaments, they all know that an injury would mean an instant end to their dreams. I was a soccer player myself and you are more careful if there is a game where there is pretty much nothing at stake and a week later you have an extremely important game. Sure, you don't play like the last loser on purpose, but you are more careful definitely. That takes away a lot of the dynamics we are usually used to see when full pros play against each other. At the same time you may see some beautiful goals here and there in the friendly matches because players are willing to try stuff and take more risk from outside the box and stuff.

[suzanne5223]

Maybe your expectation are high about the friendly matches played before the World Cup or it is because you watch the game between countries with poor football experience because the World Cup friendly I know is not of poor quality.

Regarding a lower class team playing a friendly match against the upper class, the match won't be much important for the upper class but that doesn't mean they won't put in their best because they have a reputation to protect and it is not always about the money.

Take Germany as an example. Apart from the last EURO and the last World Cup, all the tournaments before they finished well. What about during the friendly matches they played right in advance of those tournaments? They were so bad that everyone was afraid they would lose at the group stage at those tournaments already. Most friendly matches are indeed bad quality.

Bayern Munich has lost three first friendly matches now, what does that tell us?

I remember the game you use as an example and as I said before, it is your duty as a gambler to understand the motivating sides and also check their historical data just like we do in crypto trading. This is what I used to predict the winning of the ongoing Olympic boxing game final where I predicted Galal Yafai as the winner when others thought Carlo Paalam will win, guess what? Galal won.

[Xinarae*]

To be honest friendship is full of expectations but it makes things worse. I take him as a friend and keep thinking of him as a business partner our friendship has always been good I hoped that this relationship would benefit not only me but also zimbabwean cricket that's why I was so interested she even gave him information by accepting a lot of benefits because of the friendly relationship. But later friendly matches make gambling worse everything fails before the end.

[hahay]

To be honest friendship is full of expectations but it makes things worse. I take him as a friend and keep thinking of him as a business partner our friendship has always been good I hoped that this relationship would benefit not only me but also zimbabwean cricket that's why I was so interested she even gave him information by accepting a lot of benefits because of the friendly relationship. But later friendly matches make gambling worse everything fails before the end.

I don't understand about you considering a club or team as friends? Also, the friendly match is not about you fighting him. But if you consider a club or team as a business partner, then I think you become part of the staff that is within the club, maybe. I guess you think the friendly match is your match with him or something, or how can you think of a club or team as a business partner?

[Fredomago]

I remember the game you use as an example and as I said before, it is your duty as a gambler to understand the motivating sides and also check their historical data just like we do in crypto trading. This is what I used to predict the winning of the ongoing Olympic boxing game final where I predicted Galal Yafai as the winner when others thought Carlo Paalam will win, guess what? Galal won.

off topic: Paalam beats the defending gold medalist and the homegrown fighter, both are very crucial for him but he made it to the final fight though he loss it's  a great pride.

Back to the topic, it's you as gamblers who really needs to take time assessing what are the possibilities, the outcome is mostly different from any regular matches, but if you look into previous stats you'll get some good information that can lead you to the right path in choosing your bets in a particular friendly matches.

[KTChampions]

~
Back to the topic, it's you as gamblers who really needs to take time assessing what are the possibilities, the outcome is mostly different from any regular matches, but if you look into previous stats you'll get some good information that can lead you to the right path in choosing your bets in a particular friendly matches.

Still, friendlies are a "thing in themselves" and have little to do with serious competition.
A small example of how weakly friendly matches have to the real strength of a team: Spartak Moscow.
Before the season, Spartak had an impressive series of victories in friendly matches which he won with a total score of 21-1. After the season began, Spartak has a 0-2 defeat at home in the Champions League. One victory in the national championship and two defeats.
I was very lucky that, being inspired by the pre-season successes of Spartak, I refrained from betting on matches with its participation  

[suzanne5223]

I remember the game you use as an example and as I said before, it is your duty as a gambler to understand the motivating sides and also check their historical data just like we do in crypto trading. This is what I used to predict the winning of the ongoing Olympic boxing game final where I predicted Galal Yafai as the winner when others thought Carlo Paalam will win, guess what? Galal won.

off topic: Paalam beats the defending gold medalist and the homegrown fighter, both are very crucial for him but he made it to the final fight though he loss it's  a great pride.

Yes, it is a great pride for Paalam and I can see a lot of Phillippines that's on the forum been optimistic about him been raise from nothing fame through this Olympic game.
 

Back to the topic, it's you as gamblers who really needs to take time assessing what are the possibilities, the outcome is mostly different from any regular matches, but if you look into previous stats you'll get some good information that can lead you to the right path in choosing your bets in a particular friendly matches.

Thats correct and that's the reason why I like sports betting but the current stats can also provide misinformation though and this is the reason the motive and the preparation of the fighters need to use to make the prediction.

[South Park]

Fixed matches are a great problem within the industry, many people like you used to believe that things like this do not really happen, but they do, and there have been huge scandals because it has happened on some of the most popular leagues around the world and some of the most important games, so it is to be expected that fixing a friendly match is way easier than in any other match because nothing is at stake, and if a team underperforms then no one is going to care about it because there is a justification for it as the players are not giving their 100%.

Yes, fixing matches is true and happening in foot ball, but also some people have taken the chance to scam people that like easy things, scammers will just predict one or two matches with big odds like 4 or 5 odds or more, they will sell it to their victims saying the matches are fixed but not fixed and the victim will lose the bets. But back to the main point, both friendly and small matches can be fixed, that is why I prefer going for big matches like leagues, cups and campaigns league which I know they are not fixed.

What you are speaking of is very common in the world of boxing, before the pandemic I really liked to go and see the potential new stars on the world boxing when they are just starting their careers, and it is very common that you are going to receive a tip from someone that you do not know that a certain fight is fixed and that you should bet on it, but obviously this doesn't make sense, someone that knows that a fight is fixed will never share that information with anyone so they are trying to scam you.

[DU18]

The most common friendly matches are both the international  country and club friendlies, long time ago I have seen these type of matches as a way to bet and have fun, many of my betting result are positive most especially if I bet on a single match. The country or club that will win is not certain but I noticed staking on over 1.5 or over 2.5 is always most of the time results to a good outcome.

I am not saying this is a risk free bet, no bet is risk free, but I noticed this type of match most of the time results to many goals scored which makes better for taking over 1.5 or over 2.5 and the games are won.

Some people still like to accumulate, the accumulation can also be positive and won but the more the accumulation the more the high chances of losing. But I do not still see any wrong in accumulating 3 matches, though the chances to lose will increase because as one match lost result to the nullification of the bet, I prefer just a single game in a week.

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

Honestly, i wouldn't spend my money betting on friendly matches, i don't think friendly matches have high intensity and chances are in that game the players will not play the match well, and both teams usually only field their reserve squad or young players in friendly matches to test their performance before the league takes place, after all both teams will play quite carefully and don't want to risk their players getting injured and that's why so far I have never bet on friendly matches, because in my opinion those matches are just entertainment and without there is a high fighting power for a team to win the match.

[ReiMomo]

The most common friendly matches are both the international  country and club friendlies, long time ago I have seen these type of matches as a way to bet and have fun, many of my betting result are positive most especially if I bet on a single match. The country or club that will win is not certain but I noticed staking on over 1.5 or over 2.5 is always most of the time results to a good outcome.

I am not saying this is a risk free bet, no bet is risk free, but I noticed this type of match most of the time results to many goals scored which makes better for taking over 1.5 or over 2.5 and the games are won.

Some people still like to accumulate, the accumulation can also be positive and won but the more the accumulation the more the high chances of losing. But I do not still see any wrong in accumulating 3 matches, though the chances to lose will increase because as one match lost result to the nullification of the bet, I prefer just a single game in a week.

What do you think about staking on over 1.5 and over 2.5 on international friendlies (both country and club friendlies)? Or do you prefer to go for straight win or draw?

Honestly, i wouldn't spend my money betting on friendly matches, i don't think friendly matches have high intensity and chances are in that game the players will not play the match well, and both teams usually only field their reserve squad or young players in friendly matches to test their performance before the league takes place, after all both teams will play quite carefully and don't want to risk their players getting injured and that's why so far I have never bet on friendly matches, because in my opinion those matches are just entertainment and without there is a high fighting power for a team to win the match.

I have even seen many betting on even friendly matches. When there were tournaments, yes, many used to bet on which team will win. Many have been much happier with what they won betting on the correct team. Even teams which were not up to the mark, have won and made people trust on them to bet more on upcoming tournaments. Its everywhere man. Those who have opportunity to gamble, they do gamble and those who are just exposed to betting on matches where they can, they do bet so.  As long as its entertaining and thrilling yes, nothing wrong in it so.

[Fredomago]

I have even seen many betting on even friendly matches. When there were tournaments, yes, many used to bet on which team will win. Many have been much happier with what they won betting on the correct team. Even teams which were not up to the mark, have won and made people trust on them to bet more on upcoming tournaments. Its everywhere man. Those who have opportunity to gamble, they do gamble and those who are just exposed to betting on matches where they can, they do bet so.  As long as its entertaining and thrilling yes, nothing wrong in it so.

That's how gamblers be like, in every opportunity to place their bets, they will come and bet on it, even friendly matches. They will take part in it and try to win.

Not just by predicting which team will win but also those available odds that they knew, they will take advantage in hope to win decently.

No wrong with that, as there are many exposed gamblers on whatever sides of sport betting who will continue to support and find
their luck within this industry.

[Pmalek]

I think there is a big different between betting on club friendly matches and national team friendlies.

Club friendlies are mostly played during the off-season, like the summer friendlies that just passed and were played throughout July and August. Those matches are played while the teams are in preparation mode and the players aren't in their competitive rhythm yet. New players arrive at clubs, and club friendlies are the time when their abilities and strengths are put to the test. The players usually don't have the strength for a 90 minutes match, so you often see the entire team being substituted at half time or around the one hour mark. Wagering  a lot of money on the favorites in such matches could be dangerous. The pre-season friendlies are also the time to test youth players to figure out which of them will stay at the club, who will be sold, or send out on loan.

International friendlies are different. They are played during the on-going football season. The players are already in good physical shape and their club competitions are in progress. There aren't that many international friendlies due to limited availability of players, so the national teams can't experiment a lot, and they tend to bring out a strong squad. The favorites will usually play to win, and it makes much more sense to wager money on this type of games.   

[Ziskinberg]

I have even seen many betting on even friendly matches. When there were tournaments, yes, many used to bet on which team will win. Many have been much happier with what they won betting on the correct team. Even teams which were not up to the mark, have won and made people trust on them to bet more on upcoming tournaments. Its everywhere man. Those who have opportunity to gamble, they do gamble and those who are just exposed to betting on matches where they can, they do bet so.  As long as its entertaining and thrilling yes, nothing wrong in it so.

That's how gamblers be like, in every opportunity to place their bets, they will come and bet on it, even friendly matches. They will take part in it and try to win.

Not just by predicting which team will win but also those available odds that they knew, they will take advantage in hope to win decently.

No wrong with that, as there are many exposed gamblers on whatever sides of sport betting who will continue to support and find
their luck within this industry.

The fact that they are betting on friendly matches, they should know that it's different from real competition, so their approach is going to be different so in the end, they will not complain that the outcome is different from their expectation. With gambling, nothing is certain and nothing is easy for sure.

[tabas]

The fact that they are betting on friendly matches, they should know that it's different from real competition, so their approach is going to be different so in the end, they will not complain that the outcome is different from their expectation. With gambling, nothing is certain and nothing is easy for sure.

Expected outcome from betting with these friendly matches is really different from the usual matches that we bet. No complains with these matches.
You bet for it so win or lose, you've been aware of the possible outcome and heck, it's gambling, results vary even with your best analysis.

[mv1986]

The only time I really consider betting on friendly matches actually is when there is no serious stuff to bet on. During the long breaks. What I thought do bet on during the breaks is the Esports Fifa games, but not the simulated ones. For the simulated ones I am never sure if it's like playing roulette an the house wins. I don't know if there is any way to find a prove by the gambling site whether the simulated games are really simulated. I wonder how they even do that.

[Dread Pirate Roberts]

That's how gamblers be like, in every opportunity to place their bets, they will come and bet on it, even friendly matches. They will take part in it and try to win.

In addition, for the favorite team, even though it is a friendly match, people will still bet on their favorite team. for those who really like gambling. because usually it's no longer about money but the fun and hype you get when you see your favorite team playing. this depends on how much he is a fan of the team. but if it's a completely random friendly match that he doesn't know, maybe those people really likes gambling in the sportsbook section even though he doesn't really know the match.

[ethereumhunter]

I have even seen many betting on even friendly matches. When there were tournaments, yes, many used to bet on which team will win. Many have been much happier with what they won betting on the correct team. Even teams which were not up to the mark, have won and made people trust on them to bet more on upcoming tournaments. Its everywhere man. Those who have opportunity to gamble, they do gamble and those who are just exposed to betting on matches where they can, they do bet so.  As long as its entertaining and thrilling yes, nothing wrong in it so.

That's how gamblers be like, in every opportunity to place their bets, they will come and bet on it, even friendly matches. They will take part in it and try to win.

Not just by predicting which team will win but also those available odds that they knew, they will take advantage in hope to win decently.

No wrong with that, as there are many exposed gamblers on whatever sides of sport betting who will continue to support and find
their luck within this industry.

It is no surprise if people always want to bet on many things, not just in gambling games or sports betting, even if that is just for playing for fun and not seriously. As long as they can see the chance to make money, they will use it for their benefit and try to place the bet with their friends if the bookmakers are not available. We can sometimes place a bet for friendly matches or qualifications for the team that will enter the list and sometimes, we are only making a bet with our community or friends.

[bakasabo]

I think that friendly matches are not the best game to gamble on. Not all players in both team show their best and dont give themselves for 100% on the field. Some use friendly games just to test their new tactics. Some teams play with their reserve, youth or second squad in such games, because they save team starts for a more serious match. For example, that is why we can see FC Barcelona loosing 1:0 to a local Antarctica football team (that is just an example). It is hard to predict the result in such matches.

[cafucafucafu]

What's the point of even chasing these?

Real inefficiencies in the market are super hard to come by, and generally trends that we observe in sports gambling come about due to sheer luck as opposed to any real substance.

It's the harsh reality, but it's true. Given sufficient events, there is bound to be one pattern that seemingly repeats itself - for instance you winning on over/unders on friend matches. This is going to work until it doesn't - because there is simply no sound basis or reason for why this bet should have a positive EV in the long run.

[KTChampions]

I think that friendly matches are not the best game to gamble on. Not all players in both team show their best and dont give themselves for 100% on the field. Some use friendly games just to test their new tactics. Some teams play with their reserve, youth or second squad in such games, because they save team starts for a more serious match. For example, that is why we can see FC Barcelona loosing 1:0 to a local Antarctica football team (that is just an example). It is hard to predict the result in such matches.

If you like to bet on favorites, then this is really a problem, but if not, then imagine what opportunities appear in friendly matches - you can bet on the underdog (the odds will be large) and the probability of winning is high, because in friendly matches the result is very random.

[crzy]

I think that friendly matches are not the best game to gamble on. Not all players in both team show their best and dont give themselves for 100% on the field. Some use friendly games just to test their new tactics. Some teams play with their reserve, youth or second squad in such games, because they save team starts for a more serious match. For example, that is why we can see FC Barcelona loosing 1:0 to a local Antarctica football team (that is just an example). It is hard to predict the result in such matches.

If you like to bet on favorites, then this is really a problem, but if not, then imagine what opportunities appear in friendly matches - you can bet on the underdog (the odds will be large) and the probability of winning is high, because in friendly matches the result is very random.

This is still gambling after all so there’s no assurance on which team are going to win, so this is more risky compare to the real matches and friendly matches can also be a fixe match so better to be more careful and wise. I’ve seen this one on the Basketball with the team USA on the recent Olympic, they’ve loss 2 friendly matches very surprising and yet they claim the gold on the real matches, for me friend matches are not worth to bet and its no that exciting to watch.

[Fredomago]

That's how gamblers be like, in every opportunity to place their bets, they will come and bet on it, even friendly matches. They will take part in it and try to win.

In addition, for the favorite team, even though it is a friendly match, people will still bet on their favorite team. for those who really like gambling. because usually it's no longer about money but the fun and hype you get when you see your favorite team playing. this depends on how much he is a fan of the team. but if it's a completely random friendly match that he doesn't know, maybe those people really likes gambling in the sportsbook section even though he doesn't really know the match.

They always support their teams. If they've got spare money, favorite still have some edge mostly in fans' eyes.

If they bet on them, they've added additional entertainment with their bets. Friendly matches are also games that fans watch, so expect those who are avid fans, they will be there to support the team.

That fact that they also engaged with gambling, they will take it as opportunities not only to enjoy but also to win.

[DU18]

I think that friendly matches are not the best game to gamble on. Not all players in both team show their best and dont give themselves for 100% on the field. Some use friendly games just to test their new tactics. Some teams play with their reserve, youth or second squad in such games, because they save team starts for a more serious match. For example, that is why we can see FC Barcelona loosing 1:0 to a local Antarctica football team (that is just an example). It is hard to predict the result in such matches.

If you like to bet on favorites, then this is really a problem, but if not, then imagine what opportunities appear in friendly matches - you can bet on the underdog (the odds will be large) and the probability of winning is high, because in friendly matches the result is very random.

But basically the team that plays in friendly matches will not play in total, because surely they consider the injury and fatigue factors that can be obtained by the players, so if that happens it will certainly be detrimental to the team when the competition starts, so I think victory can belong to the team the smaller team in the match, because usually if a small team fights a big team in a trial  match of course the small team will mobilize their core team to be able to see how big the team strength will be.

[KTChampions]

If you like to bet on favorites, then this is really a problem, but if not, then imagine what opportunities appear in friendly matches - you can bet on the underdog (the odds will be large) and the probability of winning is high, because in friendly matches the result is very random.

This is still gambling after all so there’s no assurance on which team are going to win, so this is more risky compare to the real matches and friendly matches can also be a fixe match so better to be more careful and wise. I’ve seen this one on the Basketball with the team USA on the recent Olympic, they’ve loss 2 friendly matches very surprising and yet they claim the gold on the real matches, for me friend matches are not worth to bet and its no that exciting to watch.

Of course, this is gambling and it is associated with risk. Or did you think there is some way to place a bet and get money without risking it? Betting for friendlies has both pros and cons, that's what I wanted to say. If you are a professional bettor or want to be, then you should see these opportunities and use them.

[Vaskiy]

If you like to bet on favorites, then this is really a problem, but if not, then imagine what opportunities appear in friendly matches - you can bet on the underdog (the odds will be large) and the probability of winning is high, because in friendly matches the result is very random.

This is still gambling after all so there’s no assurance on which team are going to win, so this is more risky compare to the real matches and friendly matches can also be a fixe match so better to be more careful and wise. I’ve seen this one on the Basketball with the team USA on the recent Olympic, they’ve loss 2 friendly matches very surprising and yet they claim the gold on the real matches, for me friend matches are not worth to bet and its no that exciting to watch.

Of course, this is gambling and it is associated with risk. Or did you think there is some way to place a bet and get money without risking it? Betting for friendlies has both pros and cons, that's what I wanted to say. If you are a professional bettor or want to be, then you should see these opportunities and use them.

When something is involved with money, automatically it'll have risk associated with it. Difference between the risk associated with gambling and investment is the chance of getting washed off. With investment the chance of complete wash off is low whereas with gambling it can happen in a single bet. When we talk of friendly matches, it is same as other matches. Only few gambling sites give access to these matches. It is good to go with fixed matches, those information won't be got that easy.

[ShowOff]

OP, are you sure that this thread is still decent enough to keep it open? I'm sure this thread was pretty good during preseason, but now a new season has started and I don't think this thread is still relevant enough to be left open. 12 pages seems like enough to see or hear the opinion of the gamblers and now consider locking it. -Just a suggestion.

[coupable]

I think that friendly matches are not the best game to gamble on. Not all players in both team show their best and dont give themselves for 100% on the field. Some use friendly games just to test their new tactics. Some teams play with their reserve, youth or second squad in such games, because they save team starts for a more serious match. For example, that is why we can see FC Barcelona loosing 1:0 to a local Antarctica football team (that is just an example). It is hard to predict the result in such matches.

If you are the one who used to bet on favorites when it's for a good coeffecient, then you are betting on a friendly game. This is one of the principles for the friendly games ; there are no standars and coach can make up to 12 substitutions during one match and the players motivation isn't the same when the match is official.
Friendly matches are mainly to test the performance of the players and new tactics, this is why It's almost impossible to get a reliable analysis of statistics. This is so dangerous, practice it just for fun and not for big money bets .

[Hamphser]

OP, are you sure that this thread is still decent enough to keep it open? I'm sure this thread was pretty good during preseason, but now a new season has started and I don't think this thread is still relevant enough to be left open. 12 pages seems like enough to see or hear the opinion of the gamblers and now consider locking it. -Just a suggestion.

It do still counts as long it would be open just like those other gambling topics which had lots of pages but still not consider on locking but for sure this thread would be locked by Mods anytime soon just like on what happened on other threads as well.

On topic reply if i would be gambling on friendly matches? Depends but most of the time i wont re ally be considering on putting up some bets.Why? most of the time on where underdog teams
could beat up the better one. They arent playing on their full potential or all seriousness.