[MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 built in 2013 with the future in mind

[Onebounce]

Hello everyone, remember that MOON is a currency that has embraced the philosophy of decentralisation and, for this reason, has no company behind it but is run exclusively by the community that has carried this spirit forward since its inception. We are an “open source” technology and open to everyone in the world. This group that created the Sol token intends to revitalise our currency using our brand. At the same time, they agree that among the millions of tokens that are generated out of thin air, associating with the original could be a successful choice. In this testing phase, we have had the opportunity in just a few weeks to obtain fees that will allow us to continue with innovation. One of their developers has already deposited the client update to the latest core version 0.21.4 in GitHub (only an independent developer audit is needed to proceed with consensus and activate all features). This group has also committed to supporting us in listing on good exchanges. All the innovation we want to pursue (merger mining security, privacy, burning stolen coins) can be supported by the success of this token. This proposal does not allow us to have fees directly, but ultimately it leaves us free. Someone suggested that we generate a 100% controlled token, but we risk becoming mere pumpers. Today, we hold 11M MOON SOL of fully diluted 966,216,856.005254, equal to 1.138%. I express my confidence and have personally purchased 1M MOON SOL. We can use it, there are several dexes, and we hope that our MOON OG will also be fungible and usable. “Use creates value”, as I have always said from the beginning.
I agree

all the answers and the right path forward are entirely contained within this post.

Despite being the original OG coin, MOON has been stuck in the corner of the market for far too long—lacking the strength and visibility it deserves in the current crypto landscape. This initiative is exactly what we need.

Just to confirm, the main goal is to establish a bridge that makes SOL MOON and OG MOON mutually fungible and swappable, correct? If so, this is a brilliant approach.

I am fully behind this proposal.

[RoniArci]

Hello everyone, remember that MOON is a currency that has embraced the philosophy of decentralisation and, for this reason, has no company behind it but is run exclusively by the community that has carried this spirit forward since its inception. We are an “open source” technology and open to everyone in the world. This group that created the Sol token intends to revitalise our currency using our brand. At the same time, they agree that among the millions of tokens that are generated out of thin air, associating with the original could be a successful choice. In this testing phase, we have had the opportunity in just a few weeks to obtain fees that will allow us to continue with innovation. One of their developers has already deposited the client update to the latest core version 0.21.4 in GitHub (only an independent developer audit is needed to proceed with consensus and activate all features). This group has also committed to supporting us in listing on good exchanges. All the innovation we want to pursue (merger mining security, privacy, burning stolen coins) can be supported by the success of this token. This proposal does not allow us to have fees directly, but ultimately it leaves us free. Someone suggested that we generate a 100% controlled token, but we risk becoming mere pumpers. Today, we hold 11M MOON SOL of fully diluted 966,216,856.005254, equal to 1.138%. I express my confidence and have personally purchased 1M MOON SOL. We can use it, there are several dexes, and we hope that our MOON OG will also be fungible and usable. “Use creates value”, as I have always said from the beginning.
I agree

I agree to,
Is there any forecast for a new Mooncoin listing? Making Mooncoin available on a multi-wallet is also a good option to help popularize Mooncoin.

[ZeFork]

Hi all Moon Bros, please send a feedback about the proposal to update the Mooncoin Solana partnership with Original Mooncoin since 2013


the proposal:

"🌙 Mooncoin Ecosystem – Public Statement & Direction (2026)

Mooncoin holders, community members, builders,

Over the past days there has been discussion around treasury structure, governance, and operational direction.

We want to provide clarity.

1️⃣ Mooncoin Is Decentralized
The 2013 Proof-of-Work Mooncoin has no CEO, no central authority, and no single governing body.

That is a strength. It also means initiative is allowed. Different groups can build. Different contributors can execute. Momentum does not require permission.

2️⃣ The Current Reality

Right now:
• The Solana layer is the only active capital engine
• It is generating attention, trading activity, and fee revenue
• It operates in a fast, competitive environment

Without that engine, there is no treasury growth.

No treasury → no listings
No listings → no growth

That is simply the market structure we are operating in.

3️⃣ Operational Direction Going Forward

Effective immediately:
100% of Solana-generated fees will remain in the Solana Growth Treasury.
70% → Growth Treasury (strategic execution)
30% → Automated buybacks via Juice (unchanged)

This ensures:
• Speed of execution
• Clear capital allocation
• Professional negotiation capability
• Accountability

This is not a rejection of OG Mooncoin. It is sequencing. We grow the engine first. We expand the treasury.

Then we deploy from strength.

4️⃣ The Role of 2013 Mooncoin
The 2013 chain remains:
• The legacy
• The origin
• The historical backbone

It is alive. It matters. It is part of the identity. The Solana layer is not competition. It is a capital amplification layer.

The long-term strategy remains:
Scale Solana revenue
Increase treasury depth
Deploy capital toward liquidity & listings for og mooncoin
Strengthen and amplify the 2013 chain

5️⃣ On Existing OG Funds
The previously accumulated OG listing and fee wallets should remain untouched. And are in 100% control of @c3p0_deluxe currently.

Those funds were gathered for OG purposes. They should only be deployed for OG-related initiatives with clarity and agreement.

Protection of community-intended capital is respected.

6️⃣ On Cooperation
We remain open to:
• Coordinated listing efforts
• Professional exchange negotiations
• Structured collaboration
• Transparent reporting

Disagreement on structure is not hostility. But stagnation is not an option.

7️⃣ Final Position

Mooncoin is decentralized. That means: No single gatekeeper. No single veto. No forced dependency. Parallel execution is better than stalled coordination.

We move forward.
Momentum matters.
Execution matters.
Structure matters.

2026 is a build year. Let's make Mooncoin the next big thing in crypto.

🌙 — Dub"

Proposal presented in the Mooncoin Fellowship group on Telegram (https://web.telegram.org/k/#@MooncoinBro)

Good evening to all participants of the Mooncoin Fellowship community. I check all the points that were proposed and came to the conclusion that it will be a good partnership in the short and medium term. My question is about the long term of this union, new markets, expansion of the Mooncoin name, recognition of the great 2013 Pow, and from what I'm seeing here on the forum there is strong speculation that Mooncoin will return to being worth at least 1 satoshi.
I will vote as yes, I agree.

[Levi621]

Hi all Moon Bros, please send a feedback about the proposal to update the Mooncoin Solana partnership with Original Mooncoin since 2013


the proposal:

"🌙 Mooncoin Ecosystem – Public Statement & Direction (2026)

Mooncoin holders, community members, builders,

Over the past days there has been discussion around treasury structure, governance, and operational direction.

We want to provide clarity.

1️⃣ Mooncoin Is Decentralized
The 2013 Proof-of-Work Mooncoin has no CEO, no central authority, and no single governing body.

That is a strength. It also means initiative is allowed. Different groups can build. Different contributors can execute. Momentum does not require permission.

2️⃣ The Current Reality

Right now:
• The Solana layer is the only active capital engine
• It is generating attention, trading activity, and fee revenue
• It operates in a fast, competitive environment

Without that engine, there is no treasury growth.

No treasury → no listings
No listings → no growth

That is simply the market structure we are operating in.

3️⃣ Operational Direction Going Forward

Effective immediately:
100% of Solana-generated fees will remain in the Solana Growth Treasury.
70% → Growth Treasury (strategic execution)
30% → Automated buybacks via Juice (unchanged)

This ensures:
• Speed of execution
• Clear capital allocation
• Professional negotiation capability
• Accountability

This is not a rejection of OG Mooncoin. It is sequencing. We grow the engine first. We expand the treasury.

Then we deploy from strength.

4️⃣ The Role of 2013 Mooncoin
The 2013 chain remains:
• The legacy
• The origin
• The historical backbone

It is alive. It matters. It is part of the identity. The Solana layer is not competition. It is a capital amplification layer.

The long-term strategy remains:
Scale Solana revenue
Increase treasury depth
Deploy capital toward liquidity & listings for og mooncoin
Strengthen and amplify the 2013 chain

5️⃣ On Existing OG Funds
The previously accumulated OG listing and fee wallets should remain untouched. And are in 100% control of @c3p0_deluxe currently.

Those funds were gathered for OG purposes. They should only be deployed for OG-related initiatives with clarity and agreement.

Protection of community-intended capital is respected.

6️⃣ On Cooperation
We remain open to:
• Coordinated listing efforts
• Professional exchange negotiations
• Structured collaboration
• Transparent reporting

Disagreement on structure is not hostility. But stagnation is not an option.

7️⃣ Final Position

Mooncoin is decentralized. That means: No single gatekeeper. No single veto. No forced dependency. Parallel execution is better than stalled coordination.

We move forward.
Momentum matters.
Execution matters.
Structure matters.

2026 is a build year. Let's make Mooncoin the next big thing in crypto.

🌙 — Dub"

Proposal presented in the Mooncoin Fellowship group on Telegram (https://web.telegram.org/k/#@MooncoinBro)

I'm very happy to see this topic active again; the present has shown good improvement in several essential factors for Mooncoin. We, as a community, must seize this opportunity to scale Mooncoin's growth, which has been minimal for many years. Without Mooncoin Fellowship, Mooncoin would have already died.

I accept the offer made.

[HeitorMessias]

Thank you so much for all the feedback from the Mooncoin Fellowship community. Since everyone is in favor of this partnership, I will announce news about Mooncoin soon.

[MrAble]

Clarifying the Mooncoin Fellowship Narrative – Questions About Transparency

Hello Mooncoin community,

I want to address some serious concerns regarding recent interactions with the account operating under Mooncoin Fellowship in the Telegram groups. This post is meant to document events and ask for clarification, not to attack anyone personally.

During the discussion, I raised questions about community fund handling, promotions, and how certain decisions benefit the Mooncoin community. Instead of providing clear answers, several patterns emerged:

Shifting the narrative: When questions were raised about transparency and fund handling, the conversation was repeatedly redirected to personal contributions, historical work, or accusations against me. For example:

I was labeled as a member of external groups (.eco team, Solana Token), which I do not belong to.

Focus was shifted from questions about community processes to my personal involvement or “contributions” over the past years.

Contradictory statements about donations and community approval: A donation of 10 SOL was claimed to have been given to the community, yet the same account stated it could be returned to their own wallet, raising questions about control and transparency.

Additionally, it was repeatedly stated that fund distributions were made based on a community vote, but no evidence of such a vote or the outcome was provided when requested.

Refusal to provide evidence: Accusations of false statements were made against me, yet no concrete examples or proof were provided when requested.

These points indicate a clear pattern of twisting the narrative: instead of addressing questions about community governance and transparency, the conversation was redirected to deflect responsibility, highlight personal contributions, and claim unverified community approval.

For clarity, I would like to ask the community and the Mooncoin Fellowship account:

Was there an actual vote approving the distribution of community or development funds? If so, where can the results be verified?

Who controls the wallets associated with community funds and promotions?

How are distribution decisions made, and by whom?

Is there a public record or documentation for community fund allocation?

How do these processes support Mooncoin’s long-term growth?

I want to stress that this is not an attack on contributions or historical work, which I acknowledge and appreciate. The purpose of this post is to highlight narrative misdirection and to ask for transparency, which is crucial for any healthy cryptocurrency community.

I hope the Mooncoin Fellowship account or community members can provide clear answers to these questions so that the community can continue to operate with trust and accountability.

Thank you.

**Mooncoin Community Concern – Questions About SOL Distribution and Community Governance**

Hello Mooncoin community,

I want to clarify a situation that recently happened in the Mooncoin Telegram groups and raise a few questions that I believe are important for the transparency and future of the project.

First, I want to make clear that I have been part of the Mooncoin community for many years and have always tried to support the project where possible by participating in discussions, helping community members, and assisting when asked.

Recently there was a discussion regarding the distribution of **84 SOL** connected to the CoinToPay promotion and the Solana-related activity around Mooncoin.

During the discussion I raised a few questions about how these funds were handled and how the distribution benefits the Mooncoin community. My concern was simply about transparency and structure. Development funds or community gifts are normally expected to be used for development, infrastructure, or other long-term benefits for the project.

The answers I received suggested that the funds had already been distributed according to participation rules. However, several things remain unclear to me and possibly to others in the community.

Questions that I believe deserve clarification:

1. What wallet originally held the **84 SOL** used for the promotion?
2. Who had access or control over that wallet?
3. Were the distribution rules decided collectively by the community or by a single organizer?
4. Is there a public transaction list showing the distribution?
5. How does the distribution structure benefit Mooncoin development long term?

Another point raised during the discussion was the statement that **10 SOL was donated to the community**, but that it could also be returned to the person who donated it. This raised additional questions about whether the funds were actually transferred to a community-controlled wallet or remained under personal control.

To be clear, this post is **not an accusation**. Many people have contributed to Mooncoin over the years and hosting infrastructure, explorers, and domains have required real effort and personal expense. Those contributions are appreciated.

However, transparency is important for any cryptocurrency project. Questions about community funds or promotions should not be seen as attacks but as part of healthy community governance.

I am not affiliated with any external groups, teams, or organizations mentioned during the discussion. My goal is simply to understand the structure behind these decisions and to ensure Mooncoin continues to grow in a transparent and community-driven way.

If anyone involved can provide clarification about the SOL distribution or the structure behind the promotion, it would help the entire community.

Thank you.


https://imgvb.com/image/visual-v1-update-march.WTVjFQ
Mooncoin Fellowship – Narrative Twisting and Community Control Concerns

Hello Mooncoin community,

I want to document recent interactions with the account operating under Mooncoin Fellowship in the Telegram groups and raise concerns about community governance and transparency. This post is intended to inform and request clarification, not to attack any individual personally.

During the discussion, I raised questions about fund handling, promotions, and decisions affecting the Mooncoin community. Instead of addressing these questions, the following patterns were observed:

Twisting the narrative: When asked straightforward questions, the conversation was redirected to personal contributions, historical work, or unverified accusations.

For example, I was accused of being a member of external groups (.eco team or Solana Token), which I am not.

Focus shifted away from community fund transparency toward personal attacks or unverifiable claims.

Community control and “Moongod” behavior: It became clear that the account positions itself as the central authority in the community. Any questions or concerns are often deflected, conversations derailed, and participants labeled as saboteurs or worse. Statements like:

“Good, I’ll return the 10 SOL to my pocket and let’s see how much you’ll cry.”
“Without saboteurs, it becomes much easier to build the future of Mooncoin.”

…demonstrate this concentration of control and the attempt to intimidate community members from questioning decisions.

Contradictory statements about donations and community approval: Claims were made that fund distributions were based on a “community vote,” yet no evidence or public record of such a vote was provided. Donations claimed as “community funds” were also said to be retrievable by a single individual, raising questions about control and transparency.

These behaviors indicate a pattern of narrative twisting and deflection, rather than open and transparent governance. Speaking up about community funds or decision-making triggers derailed conversations and personal attacks, rather than answers.

For clarity, I ask the Mooncoin Fellowship account and the community:

Was there an actual community vote approving fund distributions? Can results be verified publicly?

Who controls the wallets for community and development funds?

How are distribution decisions made, and by whom?

Is there a transparent record of transactions or fund allocations?

How do these processes support Mooncoin’s long-term development and community growth?

This post is not meant to diminish past contributions, which are acknowledged. The goal is to highlight behavior that centralizes control, twists narratives, and derails discussion, and to request transparent processes that the entire community can trust.

Thank you.

[MrAble]

Final Thoughts – The Mooncoin Fellowship and Community Governance

Hello Mooncoin community,

I want to leave a documented reflection regarding recent events with Mooncoin Fellowship in the Telegram groups. This is not an attack, but a summary for thought and clarification for the community.

Recently, the opportunity for community-driven initiatives with Mooncoin appears to have come to an end. The SolMoon team chose to step away, and many members left after sharing final exit messages. This reflects both the frustration of contributors and the difficulties of participating in a space where communication and decision-making are centralized.

During discussions, several patterns became apparent:

Narrative twisting and deflection: When questions were raised about fund handling or community initiatives, the conversation was repeatedly redirected to personal contributions or accusations, rather than providing transparent answers.

Centralized control (“Moongod” behavior): The Mooncoin Fellowship account positioned itself as the ultimate authority. Any questions from community members were met with derailed conversations, deflection, or personal attacks — including labeling participants as saboteurs — rather than constructive discussion. Statements such as:

“Without saboteurs, it becomes much easier to build the future of Moon[Suspicious link removed]d, I’ll return the 10 SOL to my pocket and let’s see how much you’ll cry.”

…show this centralized approach and the attempt to control narrative and actions.

Contradictions and transparency concerns: Donations and community funds were described as both community-controlled and personally retrievable, and claims of “community votes” on distributions were made without evidence.

This post is meant as a final reflection for the community:

The opportunity for a cooperative path has ended.

Decisions are being made by centralized authority rather than community consensus.

Transparency around community funds and governance remains unclear.

I leave this here for thought. Healthy communities thrive on transparency, shared decision-making, and respect for contributors — qualities that should guide Mooncoin forward, even if certain opportunities have passed.

Thank you.

[MrAble]

Mooncoin – A Practical Way Forward 06-03-2026

Hello Mooncoin community,

Recent events made it clear that the previous opportunity did not work out. The collaboration discussions ended, the SolMoon team has stepped away, and there has been a lot of friction in the community. There is no point repeating the past — the focus now should be what we can realistically do going forward.

At this moment we need to acknowledge the current situation:

Coin2Pay is currently the only functioning exchange route for Mooncoin

Liquidity is extremely low

There is no real utility at the moment

If Mooncoin is going to move forward, we need to start with basic structure and realistic goals.

1. Restore Market Activity

The first step is simple but necessary:
We need buyers and sellers.

Without activity on Coin2Pay there is no visible market and no incentive for new participants. Even small trading activity helps build a price chart and signals that the project is still alive.

2. Chart Improvements

A second step would be chart and visibility improvements.

If possible, the community could vote or coordinate improvements around:

better chart visibility

tracking tools

clearer market data

This helps new users understand what Mooncoin is doing and whether it has momentum.

3. Utility and Incentives

Right now Mooncoin has no active utility, which makes it difficult to attract interest.

We should start discussing simple incentives that can create activity again. This could include:

reward mechanisms

community-driven initiatives

small service integrations

experiments that generate transaction activity

Nothing overly complex — just something practical that creates movement.

4. Fee Generation Ideas

Some community members suggested exploring mechanisms similar to what other ecosystems do to generate small fees that support development or community initiatives.

However, this needs to be approached carefully and respectfully. The SolMoon team has chosen not to continue working with the community after what happened, and we should not attempt to replicate or interfere with their work in a way that could create conflict.

If fee generation models are explored, they should be independent ideas that respect other teams and ecosystems.

5. Community Structure

Finally, the community itself needs a clearer structure:

open discussions

transparent decisions

realistic goals

respectful collaboration

Mooncoin has existed for many years because of people who believed in the project and kept it alive. If we want it to continue, the focus should be building again step by step, not repeating the conflicts that slowed us down.

If anyone has practical ideas for restoring activity, improving visibility, or creating simple utility, this would be the right moment to start discussing them.

Mooncoin still has a community — now we need to see if we can turn that into traction again.

[MrAble]

Community Participation Model (Tier Based)

If Mooncoin wants to rebuild traction, participation needs structure. One idea worth discussing is a tier-based participation model for governance, rewards, and community work.

This would encourage people to contribute consistently instead of only appearing during events or disputes.

Possible structure:

Tier 1 – Community Participants

Anyone holding Mooncoin or participating in discussions

Can vote in basic community polls

Can participate in small bounties or community tasks

Tier 2 – Active Contributors

Members who actively help the ecosystem

Examples: moderation, guides, promotion, documentation, development assistance

Eligible for larger bounty rewards

Higher voting weight in improvement proposals

Tier 3 – Core Contributors

People maintaining infrastructure or major contributions

Examples: explorers, hosting, development, integrations

Responsible for reviewing proposals and coordinating work

Participate in higher-level governance decisions

Polls and Voting

Important decisions should not be made informally in small groups. Instead:

Community polls can be held for proposals

Tier participation could determine voting weight

Results should be transparent and documented

Bounty Programs

To encourage activity we could introduce structured bounties for things like:

documentation

marketing and outreach

technical support

tools or integrations

community growth

Rewards do not need to be large — the goal is consistent engagement and visible progress.

Why This Matters

Mooncoin survived many years because of community effort. A tier-based structure could help organize contributions, reduce chaos in discussions, and give people clear ways to help the project move forward.

If the community agrees, this model could be refined together and tested gradually.

[MrAble]

Mooncoin Recovery Roadmap

Instead of large promises, the goal should be small measurable progress over the next 90 days.

Phase 1 – Stabilization (0–30 days)
Focus on basic activity and organization.

Establish community structure (tier participation model)

Start regular community polls

Increase activity on Coin2Pay (buyers & sellers)

Identify active contributors

Create a small bounty list for simple tasks

Goal: restore visible activity and engagement.

Phase 2 – Visibility (30–60 days)
Improve presence and transparency.

Improve chart tracking and visibility tools

Launch small community bounties

Publish progress updates

Attract old community members back into discussion

Goal: show that Mooncoin is active again.

Phase 3 – Utility Exploration (60–90 days)
Begin experimenting with basic utility.

Possible directions:

small service integrations

community reward systems

transaction incentives

fee generation ideas

Any model should be independent and respectful of other teams, including the SolMoon developers who have decided not to continue collaboration.

Goal: create the first signs of real utility again.

8. Transparent Community Treasury (Optional)

If Mooncoin begins to generate activity again, a transparent treasury model could be useful.

Principles could include:

community visibility of funds

poll-based decisions for spending

small allocations for development, infrastructure, and bounties

Transparency avoids misunderstandings and builds trust inside the community.

9. Final Thought

Mooncoin has survived for many years because people kept it alive even during quiet periods.

The opportunity that recently existed may have ended, but that does not mean the project itself has to stop. What matters now is whether the community is willing to rebuild step by step with structure, transparency, and cooperation.

Small progress is better than endless arguments.

If people are willing to participate constructively, Mooncoin can still move forward.

[agswinner]

Mooncoin Recovery Roadmap

Instead of large promises, the goal should be small measurable progress over the next 90 days.

Phase 1 – Stabilization (0–30 days)
Focus on basic activity and organization.

Establish community structure (tier participation model)

Start regular community polls

Increase activity on Coin2Pay (buyers & sellers)

Identify active contributors

Create a small bounty list for simple tasks

Goal: restore visible activity and engagement.

Phase 2 – Visibility (30–60 days)
Improve presence and transparency.

Improve chart tracking and visibility tools

Launch small community bounties

Publish progress updates

Attract old community members back into discussion

Goal: show that Mooncoin is active again.

Phase 3 – Utility Exploration (60–90 days)
Begin experimenting with basic utility.

Possible directions:

small service integrations

community reward systems

transaction incentives

fee generation ideas

Any model should be independent and respectful of other teams, including the SolMoon developers who have decided not to continue collaboration.

Goal: create the first signs of real utility again.

8. Transparent Community Treasury (Optional)

If Mooncoin begins to generate activity again, a transparent treasury model could be useful.

Principles could include:

community visibility of funds

poll-based decisions for spending

small allocations for development, infrastructure, and bounties

Transparency avoids misunderstandings and builds trust inside the community.

9. Final Thought

Mooncoin has survived for many years because people kept it alive even during quiet periods.

The opportunity that recently existed may have ended, but that does not mean the project itself has to stop. What matters now is whether the community is willing to rebuild step by step with structure, transparency, and cooperation.

Small progress is better than endless arguments.

If people are willing to participate constructively, Mooncoin can still move forward.

The final agreement was approved here precisely to avoid the errors that led to a lack of transparency in the so-called testing phase. However, I see some blockheads  still asking how to distribute the fees intended for our community.
I'd like to point out that there's no reason to question the person elected by the community to represent us. This person has been our voice, our website, and the leader of the ANN for many years. Therefore, if further attacks and criticisms arise regarding how fees were managed and distributed, or anything else
we may consider terminating or reviewing the agreements made. There's some confusion; many questions are answered above. I invite you to read more carefully. Perhaps the initial excitement is lacking due to misunderstandings, but the partnership is in place. Or perhaps I'm just confused now. Your roadmap can be discussed, but now the focus is on Moon Sol to ensure the energy for Moon's listing on a good exchange (>millions of users). So, points 1-2 would already be

[MrAble]

I want to clarify something here, because the discussion keeps drifting into the wrong direction.

Nobody is attacking the community or the work that has been done over the years. Many of us appreciate the effort that went into maintaining the website, the ANN thread and other infrastructure. That work helped Mooncoin survive for a long time.

However, asking questions about transparency or how decisions are made should not automatically be framed as an attack. A healthy community should be able to ask questions and discuss things openly.

The earlier “test phase” clearly showed that some things created confusion inside the community. That is not necessarily about blaming individuals — it simply means the structure around decisions and communication could have been clearer.

My intention with the roadmap ideas was not to disrupt anything or create conflict. The idea was simply to introduce a structured way for the community to move forward, especially considering the current situation:

• Mooncoin currently has very limited exchange presence
• Coin2Pay is effectively the only active route for trading
• There is currently no clear utility or incentive structure
• Community participation has become fragmented

Because of this, suggesting things like community polls, small bounties, voting structures or participation incentives is meant to rebuild activity from the ground up.

This is not about replacing leadership or questioning who has contributed in the past. It is about making sure the project can move forward in a transparent and collaborative way.

If the focus right now is on supporting Moon Sol and potential exchange exposure, that is fine. But at the same time the Mooncoin community itself should also work on rebuilding activity, governance and engagement.

At the end of the day, everyone here wants the same thing:
to see Mooncoin grow again.

Constructive discussion will get us there. Division will not.

[agswinner]

Based on the historical discussions within the Mooncoin (MOON) thread on Bitcointalk, here are the key considerations shared by agswinner regarding exchange listings and their strategic importance:
1. Quality and Reputation Over Quantity
Agswinner consistently argued that being listed on dozens of obscure, low-tier exchanges was counterproductive. He believed that:
 * Tier 1 Exchanges are the goal because they provide legitimate liquidity and attract serious investors.
 * Listing on "shady" exchanges with fake volumes (wash trading) damages the coin's credibility and makes it look like a "pump and dump" scheme.
2. The "Seal of Approval" (Technical Legitimacy)
For agswinner, an exchange listing was more than just a place to trade; it was a technical validation of the project.
 * Major exchanges perform due diligence. If a reputable platform keeps MOON listed, it proves to the world that the blockchain is stable and the wallet code is secure.
 * He often warned that a delisting was a red flag, signaling that the development team wasn't keeping up with necessary technical updates.
3. Resistance to High Listing Fees
A recurring theme in his posts was the refusal to pay "extortionate" fees to be listed. His philosophy was:
 * Organic Growth: If the community is active and the volume is real, exchanges will eventually list the coin for free because they want the trading commission revenue.
 * Utility over Hype: Funds are better spent on developing the ecosystem (like the MoonWord project or mobile wallets) rather than "buying" a spot on an exchange.
4. Market Stability and Price Discovery
He viewed exchanges as the only venue for true price discovery.
 * Agswinner emphasized that for MOON to be used as a real currency (for payments or micro-transactions), it needed a stable price determined by real supply and demand on transparent platforms.
 * He discouraged the community from begging for listings out of desperation, as it invited predatory traders who would crash the price after a brief spike.
5. Accessibility for Newcomers
Agswinner recognized that the primary importance of a good exchange was the Fiat-to-Crypto bridge.
 * The ultimate goal was to make MOON easily accessible to the average person who doesn't want to jump through hoops (like buying BTC first).
 * He saw high-quality exchanges as the "on-ramp" necessary for mass adoption.
Summary of agswinner's Philosophy
In short, agswinner viewed exchanges as a tool for growth, not the goal itself. He believed that the value of Mooncoin must be built through development and community utility; the exchange merely acts as a mirror reflecting that value to the world.

[HeitorMessias]

Reply to MrAble:

Yes, your goal in the Telegram groups was to make personal attacks, then you backed down because you saw that your discourse was not accepted by the community. As these texts now on Bitcointalk are indeed to offend and attack in a polite and discreet way. It doesn't matter if at the beginning you wrote "the intention is not to attack," yes, you are attacking when you distort the facts and ignore a good part of your negative actions towards the community. You called a long-time member a "piece of shit." In addition to accusing me of using Mooncoin for "enrichment," and I can't forget that for days you used an automated AI to interact in the group, thus disrespecting everyone in the group. I have many obligations outside this digital crypto world, so much so that it took me two days to respond to you here. However, you are online all day, meaning you could contribute much more than the little you do. Mooncoin in recent years has caused "impoverishment" not only for me but for other long-time members.

Everyone was excited to receive Sol in the promotion with all the criteria and parameters well defined. Why didn't you participate in the promotion and use your acquired SOL for the benefit of the community? The objective was clear: to encourage existing Mooncoin markets, and unfortunately, it didn't work as expected. I don't remember seeing any questions, only people excited about the distribution of SOL. You were the only one to question it, but why should I care about your opinion if the majority goes the opposite way? I am a community leader, not your personal employee. Besides, there are things I personally don't support, but as a community leader, I do. That's called professionalism. I apologize if I didn't hold a community poll to confirm the obvious: your opinion was unique, and the community really liked it. Don't talk about a group of 10 people as if they were chosen; the promotion was publicized with clear rules. How many active people in the community do you think have more than 50 million Mooncoins? Don't repeat the lie you told in the group that there are more than 300 people with more than 50 million Mooncoins. Everyone knows that a wallet can have as many addresses as necessary; claiming that each address on the Mooncoin Blockchain richlist is a different person is bordering on the absurd.

You, on the other hand, have a close relationship with the "Mooncoin" team, Solana. If you want, I can leave the proof here, along with your insults to various members, including the community as a whole.

It's curious that you didn't recognize the irony when it was said that I would return my donation. Perhaps the mistake was mine in speaking that way to a person full of malice who only caused confusion in the group in recent weeks, to the point that I had to temporarily expel you to see if you would start paying attention to things. Do you remember the reason for our last discussion? You posted a 'roadmap' in the group and I asked you what your role would be within the roadmap. You responded completely inadequately and ignored me. Really, if you want to post an "action plan" without specifying which part you will execute? This serves to give a terrible image to the community and scares away potential volunteer members. If I post a roadmap or expansion plan, I have an obligation to include the part I am willing to do to attract more people to volunteer. Who will volunteer for the plan of someone who doesn't specify their own volunteer role within the plan? Who will give credibility to someone who distorts facts and ignores positive actions to discredit historical members?

You want to hold me accountable for actions that belong to other people. The blockchain doesn't lie. The donation addresses I've created so far have only received donations; nothing has been withdrawn. And if I use any resources from these addresses, it will be declared here, as everything I've done for Mooncoin in recent years. If any resources are removed from these addresses, I will inform the community. If there is a good opportunity for Mooncoin, I will open a vote to find out people's opinions.

If you want to contribute constructively, feel free to write whatever you want without offending members. I am not obligated to watch you offend people based on your personal opinions and applaud. I will no longer respond to your attempts to create intrigue in the community disguised as concern for the community.

I hope the focus now is on innovations involving Mooncoin, and I will consider all the constructive aspects of your criticism. I will make a plan on how to increase the already existing transparency of the community and further increase community interaction in future decision-making.

[HeitorMessias]

Hi all Moon Bros, I'm opening a 48-hour poll to find out from the community what the best way to manage Mooncoin Fellowship funds for Mooncoin development is.

To validate the vote, I will consider users who have posted here at least once before. Copy and paste the option that is most appropriate for you, and if you think it's valid, leave your justification.
Voting ends in 48 hours; I will announce the start and end times on the community's Twitter and Telegram channels.

Option 1

Focus on the long term, using the funds for basic costs such as hosting, domains, and other possible expenses for basic development. Focus on accumulating resources for a listing on a large, reputable exchange with more than 1 million daily active users.

Option 2

Use for listing on 2 small exchanges similar to Finexbox.

Option 3

Distribution to holders with more than 50M, as was done in the first fee round.

Option 4

Listing on a 1 small exchange similar to Finexbox + basic costs such as hosting, domains, and other potential expenses for basic development.



Solana and Mooncoin Donation Addresses for donations to support the development, progress, and maintenance of Mooncoin.

https://solscan.io/account/6jyktL9Pw8z2LajCKSZjRqNB9yDx19pLRfdBLqCfUArz

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/moon/address.dws?MQgzH38QDBJ1CjZtSdMBXQbUQsuY9s9XvA.htm

[Onebounce]

Supporting Option 4. It provides the best balance between securing a trading platform for credibility and maintaining the necessary infrastructure for long-term development. This is the most realistic path for our current growth.

[agswinner]

Hi all Moon Bros, I'm opening a 48-hour poll to find out from the community what the best way to manage Mooncoin Fellowship funds for Mooncoin development is.

To validate the vote, I will consider users who have posted here at least once before. Copy and paste the option that is most appropriate for you, and if you think it's valid, leave your justification.
Voting ends in 48 hours; I will announce the start and end times on the community's Twitter and Telegram channels.

Option 1

Focus on the long term, using the funds for basic costs such as hosting, domains, and other possible expenses for basic development. Focus on accumulating resources for a listing on a large, reputable exchange with more than 1 million daily active users.

Option 2

Use for listing on 2 small exchanges similar to Finexbox.

Option 3

Distribution to holders with more than 50M, as was done in the first fee round.

Option 4

Listing on a 1 small exchange similar to Finexbox + basic costs such as hosting, domains, and other potential expenses for basic development.



Solana and Mooncoin Donation Addresses for donations to support the development, progress, and maintenance of Mooncoin.

https://solscan.io/account/6jyktL9Pw8z2LajCKSZjRqNB9yDx19pLRfdBLqCfUArz

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/moon/address.dws?MQgzH38QDBJ1CjZtSdMBXQbUQsuY9s9XvA.htm

Option 1

Focus on the long term, using the funds for basic costs such as hosting, domains, and other possible expenses for basic development. Focus on accumulating resources for a listing on a large, reputable exchange with more than 1 million daily active users.

[JoaoPauloHMetal]

Hi all Moon Bros, I'm opening a 48-hour poll to find out from the community what the best way to manage Mooncoin Fellowship funds for Mooncoin development is.

To validate the vote, I will consider users who have posted here at least once before. Copy and paste the option that is most appropriate for you, and if you think it's valid, leave your justification.
Voting ends in 48 hours; I will announce the start and end times on the community's Twitter and Telegram channels.

Option 1

Focus on the long term, using the funds for basic costs such as hosting, domains, and other possible expenses for basic development. Focus on accumulating resources for a listing on a large, reputable exchange with more than 1 million daily active users.

Option 2

Use for listing on 2 small exchanges similar to Finexbox.

Option 3

Distribution to holders with more than 50M, as was done in the first fee round.

Option 4

Listing on a 1 small exchange similar to Finexbox + basic costs such as hosting, domains, and other potential expenses for basic development.



Solana and Mooncoin Donation Addresses for donations to support the development, progress, and maintenance of Mooncoin.

https://solscan.io/account/6jyktL9Pw8z2LajCKSZjRqNB9yDx19pLRfdBLqCfUArz

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/moon/address.dws?MQgzH38QDBJ1CjZtSdMBXQbUQsuY9s9XvA.htm

Option 1

Focus on the long term, using the funds for basic costs such as hosting, domains, and other possible expenses for basic development. Focus on accumulating resources for a listing on a large, reputable exchange with more than 1 million daily active users.


I believe this is the best option; we've had only small exchanges for many years and nothing has changed. It's not difficult to wait a little longer and get Mooncoin on a major exchange. Full support for proposal number 1 for the use of Mooncoin Fellowship funds.

[RicardoSauro]

Hi all Moon Bros, I'm opening a 48-hour poll to find out from the community what the best way to manage Mooncoin Fellowship funds for Mooncoin development is.

To validate the vote, I will consider users who have posted here at least once before. Copy and paste the option that is most appropriate for you, and if you think it's valid, leave your justification.
Voting ends in 48 hours; I will announce the start and end times on the community's Twitter and Telegram channels.

Option 1

Focus on the long term, using the funds for basic costs such as hosting, domains, and other possible expenses for basic development. Focus on accumulating resources for a listing on a large, reputable exchange with more than 1 million daily active users.

Option 2

Use for listing on 2 small exchanges similar to Finexbox.

Option 3

Distribution to holders with more than 50M, as was done in the first fee round.

Option 4

Listing on a 1 small exchange similar to Finexbox + basic costs such as hosting, domains, and other potential expenses for basic development.



Solana and Mooncoin Donation Addresses for donations to support the development, progress, and maintenance of Mooncoin.

https://solscan.io/account/6jyktL9Pw8z2LajCKSZjRqNB9yDx19pLRfdBLqCfUArz

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/moon/address.dws?MQgzH38QDBJ1CjZtSdMBXQbUQsuY9s9XvA.htm

We've already proven that Mooncoin Holders are the kings of patience and diamond hands, option 1 is the best option!

Option 1

Focus on the long term, using the funds for basic costs such as hosting, domains, and other possible expenses for basic development. Focus on accumulating resources for a listing on a large, reputable exchange with more than 1 million daily active users.

[MrAble]

After some recent discussions, I have decided to step back from participating in this thread for the time being.

My intention in joining the conversation was to contribute ideas and perspectives that could help the development and visibility of Mooncoin. However, I feel that the current direction of the discussion is not productive for me to continue participating constructively.

I respect that different community members may have different approaches regarding governance, moderation, and development priorities.

For now, I will step back and focus my time elsewhere.

I sincerely wish the Mooncoin community success moving forward and hope the project continues to develop in a positive direction.