⛏Team Black Miner (ETHB3 ETHW ETC VTC KAWPOW FIROPOW ZIL +dual +tripple mining )

[Ramsete2]

After several tests, comparing TBMiner with GMiner/T-rex/lolminer I found out that the total shares number submitted to the pool was more or less the same, despite the hashrates difference.

Why don't you mine on 2miners.com, miningpoolhub.com, nanopool.org or other recommended pools. Mine on high intensity and get a poolside profit of +5% or more.

https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/blob/main/FAQ.md

Because on Crazypool I'm getting about 10% more in profits, compared to the pools you mentioned, consuming less power.

https://www.miningpoolsprofits.com/

[1714687853]

1714687853

[1714687853]

1714687853

[1714687853]

1714687853

[sp_]

Because on Crazypool I'm getting about 10% more in profits, compared to the pools you mentioned.

Crazyypool: 1.64 TH
Total network: 727 TH


Crazypool has only 0.22% of the total ethereum network hashrate. If it's 10% more profitable than other pools, why don't everybody switch?


nanopool.org, 2miners.com and miningpoolhub.com has 90THASH (12.3% of the network)


v1.22
1. Uptime error in day is corrected.
2. Added --dagintensity support for AMD cards.
3. Fixed a print bug for cuda showing 0gb memory for cards.
4. Fixed --cl-devices [] for multicard rigs AMD/NVIDIA
5. Fixed index bug in stats when using --cu-devices
6. Added more pools.

https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/releases

TeamBlackMiner_1_22_cuda_11_5.7z
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/cd362cc284613bf970698d16b2859b0aa9f23043faed2304338700887ab2dfdd?nocache=1

TeamBlackMiner_1_22_cuda_11_4.7z
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/d53a27670eb625d68465b076b6fb52b7936822050ba9d29bd7e5b69a9a44d69f?nocache=1

TeamBlackMiner_1_22_cuda_11_2.7z
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/aaa18d5422cc944e66c14ba1e7e201b67959a0b0b3176ac8ac76c058e650f36d?nocache=1

TeamBlackMiner_1_22_Ubuntu_18_04_Cuda_11_4.tar.gz
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/30e3c9a8609558b24c8db1692dac9a3cc2e3a16bb12749a3acb96f41d83fdff2?nocache=1


[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[cost82el]

v1.22
1. Uptime error in day is corrected.
2. Added --dagintensity support for AMD cards.
3. Fixed a print bug for cuda showing 0gb memory for cards.
4. Fixed --cl-devices [] for multicard rigs AMD/NVIDIA
5. Fixed index bug in stats when using --cu-devices
6. Added more pools.

https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/releases

TeamBlackMiner_1_22_cuda_11_5.7z
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/cd362cc284613bf970698d16b2859b0aa9f23043faed2304338700887ab2dfdd?nocache=1

TeamBlackMiner_1_22_cuda_11_4.7z
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/d53a27670eb625d68465b076b6fb52b7936822050ba9d29bd7e5b69a9a44d69f?nocache=1

TeamBlackMiner_1_22_cuda_11_2.7z
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/aaa18d5422cc944e66c14ba1e7e201b67959a0b0b3176ac8ac76c058e650f36d?nocache=1

no LHR unlock?

[sp_]

We are close to do LHR 1 90% unlock on linux/windows..

We added the --lhr-unlock [1,1,0,0,0,0] in v1.22 but it's not working 100% yet. But you can test if it works. (This is an early beta, so expect unstable mining. With debug output and not ready for production. Check if the hashrate increases after "reset" in the console)

Limitations

1. Needs 8gb memory in the rig.
2. Faster speed with Cards on X16 riser.
3. Unlock a minimum of 2 LHR cards in the rig. So 1 standalone card doesn't work.

[Ramsete2]

Because on Crazypool I'm getting about 10% more in profits, compared to the pools you mentioned.

Crazyypool: 1.64 TH
Total network: 727 TH


Crazypool has only 0.22% of the total ethereum network hashrate. If it's 10% more profitable than other pools, why don't everybody switch?


nanopool.org, 2miners.com and miningpoolhub.com has 90THASH (12.3% of the network)

You don't see things on proportion:

- Nanopool has 37.89 TH/s with 47829 miners
- 2miners has 26,33 TH/s with 56957 miners
- Miningpoolhub has 17,85 TH/s with 140284 miners
- Crazypool has 1,65 TH/s with 2869 miners

Yesterday I made 0,06 ETH with 2,15 GH/s on Crazypool

[sp_]

Hi ! I have a probleme to configure TBM on HiveOS. I have a rig witch mix Nvidia and AMD cards. Actually, your disable GPUs doesn't work, I can't put any card here, the miner doesn't start. I have to use the command --cuda-devices to select manually which Nvidia card I want to use. I want to do the same thing witch my AMD cards, so I used --cl-devices to select witch card to mine with. But it doesn't work. So how to select only some Nvidia cards and some AMD cards ?

use
tbminer --list-devices
to find the correct id of the amd card

That’s what I did, it didn’t work either.

Choose Nvidia card ok no problem, choose only AMD card no problem, but choose couple of nvidia and all amd card impossible...

Can you try v1.22?. Should work now.

- 2miners has 26,33 TH/s with 56957 miners
Yesterday I made 0,06 ETH with 2,15 GH/s on Crazypool

- 2miners has 8 TH/s on the solopool as well.

Crazypool is a good pool, but to use it with TBM we/you need to find the optimal defaults. Perhaps a codechange in our program is needed. We could optimize for pools that don't pay for stales, but right now, we prefer pools which pay for stale shares. It's by design. Perhaps later.
--xintensity 160 or 144 is probobly best on this pool.

--xintensity 60 works good on the 580

I tried again and it Failed. Key points:
- after the threads exited, the system freezes and I've to maually reboot

3 of your gpus crashed when creating the dag and didn't start. Try v1.22 with --dagintensity 1

     0m [2021-10-27 21:57:52.649] GPU0  0GB added to miner as Cuda device
     0m [2021-10-27 21:57:52.696] Trying eth.pool.zet-tech.eu:8005 (ethash)
     0m [2021-10-27 21:57:52.743] Pool responded successfully to subscribe
     0m [2021-10-27 21:57:52.837] GPU0 Started Cuda work thread

In v1.22 we have fixed the 0GB bug. 1080ti/1080 with pill (memtweak) is most stable with the cuda_11_5 build. Perhaps 1.22 will work on the P104.
use --dagintensity 1

[ayiphelmy]

waiting for 1070ti speed upgrade.... with any high xintensity only hold 3minute bump hashrate and back to normal again 33.xx mhs, comparing other software can do 34.xx
thanks...

[Chaf]

Hi ! I have a probleme to configure TBM on HiveOS. I have a rig witch mix Nvidia and AMD cards. Actually, your disable GPUs doesn't work, I can't put any card here, the miner doesn't start. I have to use the command --cuda-devices to select manually which Nvidia card I want to use. I want to do the same thing witch my AMD cards, so I used --cl-devices to select witch card to mine with. But it doesn't work. So how to select only some Nvidia cards and some AMD cards ?

use
tbminer --list-devices
to find the correct id of the amd card

That’s what I did, it didn’t work either.

Choose Nvidia card ok no problem, choose only AMD card no problem, but choose couple of nvidia and all amd card impossible...

Can you try v1.22?. Should work now.

I will try it when it will be added to HiveOS (:

[KillrBee]

I think there's a bug in the solution submission time display for 1.22.  I'm running at around 136 MH/s and submitting a valid share about every 56 seconds, but the time on the client says (Submit every 1.61 seconds) and is increasing.  Are you taking the time off of an average instead of the submit to submit timer?

[ZerodayTrader]

Try --kernel 0

Looking better, great hashrate, but still tiny bit too unstable. With "normal" usage of this desktop.

You can lower the --xintensity to f.ex 144

Giving it a try now. But whats going on with this Hashrate spikes?

https://i.imgur.com/u7jKCEr.png
https://i.imgur.com/FfIu0qa.png

Not that i dont like them, would love to have around 27mh/s with <115 to 125~ Watts.

[sp_]

I think there's a bug in the solution submission time display for 1.22.  Are you taking the time off of an average instead of the submit to submit timer?

yes. Sorry about that we will fix it in 1.23

Not that i dont like them, would love to have around 27mh/s with <115 to 125~ Watts.

Perhaps you compiled the big c++ project of yours. High cpu usage or backround tasks can hurt the performance.
 I see that you aren't on the latest version. You should upgrade.

[xhorhex]

hi, your miner is the only miner mixing order of GPUs in raveOS, first example: first two images, 2 crads in a rig, 6700 is GPU0, 5700 is GPU1, TBM reports 5700 as GPU0 and 6700 as GPU1, this leads to incorrect hashrates in raveOS UI, 6700 shows hashrate of 5700 and opposite

https://imagize[Suspicious link removed]ageshack.com/img923/8097/BWrjQg.png
https://imagize[Suspicious link removed]ageshack.com/img923/9501/bmmsTx.png


second example: rig of 8 cards, GPU0 is GPU7, GPU7 is GPU0, GPU1 is GPU6, GPU6 is GPU1 etc, also wrong reporting in UI for hashrate and power, on images you can see 1 card which is not working currently, TBM reports it as GPU6 while it is GPU1

https://imagize[Suspicious link removed]ageshack.com/img923/4953/yH8hRr.png
https://imagize[Suspicious link removed]ageshack.com/img924/1268/vMMJjP.png

hmm, looks like my links to images being removed by the system, maybe because of new account, anyway you got the idea, miner reports cards as 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 order while it is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

[sp_]

try to add --cl-devices [7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0] and remove --auto-detect

[ZerodayTrader]

Not that i dont like them, would love to have around 27mh/s with <115 to 125~ Watts.

Perhaps you compiled the big c++ project of yours. High cpu usage or backround tasks can hurt the performance.
 I see that you aren't on the latest version. You should upgrade.

Last crash was just browsing on some website. But testing with xintensity 144 still, maybe it was just unlucky.


Just noticed now that TeamBlackMiner_1_21_cuda_11_4 for some reason did not get shown up on unminable.com, and wasted lots of hours for nothing - thought its maybe their Problem, but with 1.15 directly shown under worker, hashrate increases....

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[sp_]

Double check that you are mining to the right adress and not the default adress. and check the bat file

[ZerodayTrader]

Thats what i tripple checked ofc. Thats just very weird.

Set ETH_WALLET=0x8Ef413F6D64A376FA46BF689d2f6c809d60C8e63.1070#wmfi-psn9

:loop
   TBMiner --algo ethash --hostname ethash.unmineable.com --port 3333 --wallet ETH:%ETH_WALLET% --worker-name 1070#wmfi-psn9 --no-cpu --log --kernel 0 --xintensity 144
   timeout 3
goto :loop

Just same as always.

[sp_]

You specify the workername twice
replace
Set ETH_WALLET=0x8Ef413F6D64A376FA46BF689d2f6c809d60C8e63.1070#wmfi-psn9

with

Set ETH_WALLET=0x8Ef413F6D64A376FA46BF689d2f6c809d60C8e63

[wasarianta]

In v1.22 we have fixed the 0GB bug. 1080ti/1080 with pill (memtweak) is most stable with the cuda_11_5 build. Perhaps 1.22 will work on the P104.
use --dagintensity 1

Any suggest setting 1080 for windows using TBM 1.22 cuda 11.5 besides --dagintensity 1 and pill ?
--kernel ?
--power-limit ?
--xintensity ? (2miners.com)
MSI AB coreclock and memclock ??

[sp_]

Any suggest setting 1080 for windows using TBM 1.22 cuda 11.5 besides --dagintensity 1 and pill ?
--kernel ?
--power-limit ?
--xintensity ? (2miners.com)
MSI AB coreclock and memclock ??

To get good speed in epoch 450 you need a really high coreclock. To avoid trottleing you need high power and templimit. --kernel 0 can run on higher clocks, so might be the best. --xintensity 1500? you need to experiment and find a value that doesn't give you stale shares on the pool, and high value in the console.

[wasarianta]

To get good speed in epoch 450 you need a really high coreclock. To avoid trottleing you need high power. --kernel 0 can run on higher clocks, so might be the best. --xintensity 1500? you need to experiment and find a value that doesn't give you stale shares on the pool, and high value in the console.

ok sp_ ...i will try to find out and thank you