⛏Team Black Miner (ETHB3 ETHW ETC VTC KAWPOW FIROPOW ZIL +dual +tripple mining )

[UniJo]

Is there any ETA on getting listed in the Hiveos miner list? I know you can add the miner by creating a custom miner profile but it would be much easier if it's listed.

[1714792485]

1714792485

[1714792485]

1714792485

[1714792485]

1714792485

[1714792485]

1714792485

[1714792485]

1714792485

[sp_]

Is there any ETA on getting listed in the Hiveos miner list? I know you can add the miner by creating a custom miner profile but it would be much easier if it's listed.

Task for integration already in progress by the hiveos team. You can ask in the hiveos thread

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2350786.0

v1.11 has already been added in Awesome Miner 8.7.7 beta  with relatime statistics on hashrate and stats

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=676942.0

Greetings,
I went back to version 1.09 because version 1.11 got me down the RX6800 at 61 Mh / s. and the RX580 at 32 Mh / s.

yes. v1.09 is performing better than 1.11 on amd cards. In the next v1.12 we will restore the performance. (default xintensity)

We are working on a new and improved opencl code that will improve performance further on newer AMD cards. ETA around 2 more weeks.

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[ep690d01]

Hi,

very nice works devs, this is my stats

  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] eu1.ethermine.org (ethash)    PING: 39ms    DIFFICULTY: 1.00     EPOCH: 445
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] ID    BOARD   TYPE    TEMP    FAN     CORE    MEM     WATT    kW/h    COST/h
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] GPU0  5500    OpenCL  0/0     0       0       0       0       0.00    0.00USD
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]                                                       0       0.00    0.00USD
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] ID    BOARD   HASHRATE/W      HASHRATE        AVERAGE         SHARES
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] GPU0  5500    0.00 H/W        27.78 MH/s      27.77 MH/s      891/0/13 (100.00)
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]               0.00 H/W        27.78 MH/s      27.77 MH/s      891/0/13 (100.00)
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]

very good performance (-xintensity 24) with nanominer or phoenix just 25.00 MH/s

and 99 MH/s with RTX3080

Thank you!

[sukidesu]

I'm joining the previous request not to stop the miner if the internet connection goes off. No other miner does that. And since TBM doesn't run from OC'ed cards (I have to start the miner before OC'ing), this brings some problems to write a script to handle that (not impossible, but just not stopping if the connection is lost would resolve it).

[sp_]

you can add more retries and longer timeout:

-t --timeout (Set timeout in seconds. Used for connecting and socket timeout)
-r --retries (Set number of retry attempts for connecting to pool)

It's recomended to run the miner in a loop like in the example bat files.

[sukidesu]

you can add more retries and longer timeout:

-t --timeout (Set timeout in seconds. Used for connecting and socket timeout)
-r --retries (Set number of retry attempts for connecting to pool)

It's recomended to run the miner in a loop like in the example bat files.

Yeah but I can't use the .sh files. Again, the miner fails if I overclock my GPUs. I'm forced to OC after starting the miner. Which doesn't make the .sh file easy to write.

[sp_]

Yeah but I can't use the .sh files. Again, the miner fails if I overclock my GPUs. I'm forced to OC after starting the miner. Which doesn't make the .sh file easy to write.

You can add (short options) when you launch the miner f.ex -t 360 -r 20. Or add them into the .conf file

timeout 3 minutes, 20 retries.

https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/blob/main/README.md#example-configuration-file

[sukidesu]

Some days ago I got a PM on reddit from a farmowner who earned more money now With the Team Black Miner than he did before the London hard fork. But you need to tune, and perhaps change the pool.

Any chance you know what pool it is?

[HashingTower]

I have two questions for this miner

1. Is this mining software available on hive OS already?
2. How is the performance with HBM2 memory graphic cards like Radeon VII and Rx Vega 56?

[sp_]

Radeon VII and Rx Vega 56 needs memtweak to run good.
 
https://github.com/Eliovp/amdmemorytweak

NVIDIA gtx 1080ti, 1080, titanx need "The pill hashrate enlarger"

1. Is this mining software available on hive OS already?

You can install it as a custom miner. Or wait a few more days for the devs to integrate it.

Some days ago I got a PM on reddit from a farmowner who earned more money now With the Team Black Miner than he did before the London hard fork. But you need to tune, and perhaps change the pool.

Any chance you know what pool it is?

High difficulty pools that pay for stale shares seems to be the best for this miner. But ppl report good returns by playing with the --xintensity on other pools as well.

  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] ID    BOARD   HASHRATE/W      HASHRATE        AVERAGE         SHARES
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002] GPU0  5500    0.00 H/W        27.78 MH/s      27.77 MH/s      891/0/13 (100.00)
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]                        0.00 H/W        27.78 MH/s      27.77 MH/s      891/0/13 (100.00)
  2349m [2021-10-06 13:26:42.002]

very good performance (-xintensity 24) with nanominer or phoenix just 25.00 MH/s

and 99 MH/s with RTX3080

Thank you!

Thanks, we are working on improving the speed even further on the lastest AMD models. ETA 1-2 weeks.

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[dle378]

Been running TBM v1.11 with xintensity 256 on Ethermine and I am getting great results so far.

868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] us1.ethermine.org (ethash)    PING: 50ms    DIFFICULTY: 1.00     EPOCH: 445
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] ID   BOARD  TYPE TEMP  FAN   CORE  MEM   WATT   kW/h COST/h
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU0   3060       Cuda  61/0  70   1320     8117  143   0.14    0.01USD
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU1   3060       Cuda. 61/0  79   1633     8117  172   0.17    0.01USD
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU2   3060       Cuda. 65/0  70   1354     8117  143   0.14    0.01USD
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU3   3060       Cuda. 53/0  79   1651     8117  172   0.17    0.01USD
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU4   3060       Cuda. 63/0  70   1420     8117  143   0.14    0.01USD
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU5   3060       Cuda. 59/0  70   1358     8117  143   0.14    0.01USD
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381]                                          916   0.92    0.07USD
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381]
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] ID       BOARD  HASHRATE/W         HASHRATE        AVERAGE          SHARES
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU0   3060     455.28 kH/W            65.11 MH/s   65.10 MH/s   802/2/0 (99.75)
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU1   3060       378.53 kH/W            65.11 MH/s   65.11 MH/s   738/1/0 (99.86)
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU2   3060       454.90 kH/W            65.05 MH/s   65.05 MH/s   769/5/0 (99.35)
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU3   3060       378.20 kH/W            65.05 MH/s   65.11 MH/s   737/0/0 (100.00)
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU4   3060       455.06 kH/W            65.07 MH/s   65.06 MH/s   743/0/0 (100.00)
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381] GPU5   3060       455.36 kH/W            65.12 MH/s   65.11 MH/s   754/0/0 (100.00)
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381]                   2577.33 kH/W    390.50 MH/s   390.54 MH/s   4543/8/0 (99.82)

Please keep up the great work!

[sukidesu]

Tested it on Ethermine for 12 hours each with default intensity (256), rig of NV 30** series.

TRex : 563 mh/s
TBM : 555 mh/s (reported : 601 mh/s)

That's really a huge gap between the reported hashrate and the pool average effective hashrate. Even though they pay for the stales (2%) and there's no invalid block.

At this point, just provide the right xintensity and the chosen pool to actually see good results. Because I tested 4 different pools and many different xintensity values, and I still didn't find any way to improve my rentability. Actually quite the opposite.

Been running TBM v1.11 with xintensity 256 on Ethermine and I am getting great results so far.
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381]                   2577.33 kH/W    390.50 MH/s   390.54 MH/s   4543/8/0 (99.82)

Please keep up the great work!

Is 390 mh/s actually your average effective hashrate on ethermine? Just looking at it on your side doesn't mean it's "great results".

[dle378]

Tested it on Ethermine for 12 hours each with default intensity (256), rig of NV 30** series.

TRex : 563 mh/s
TBM : 555 mh/s (reported : 601 mh/s)

That's really a huge gap between the reported hashrate and the pool average effective hashrate. Even though they pay for the stales (2%) and there's no invalid block.

At this point, just provide the right xintensity and the chosen pool to actually see good results. Because I tested 4 different pools and many different xintensity values, and I still didn't find any way to improve my rentability. Actually quite the opposite.

Been running TBM v1.11 with xintensity 256 on Ethermine and I am getting great results so far.
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381]                   2577.33 kH/W    390.50 MH/s   390.54 MH/s   4543/8/0 (99.82)

Please keep up the great work!

Is 390 mh/s actually your average effective hashrate on ethermine? Just looking at it on your side doesn't mean it's "great results".

Thanks for that insight.

Based on your reply, it looks like it may not be "great results" based on the average hashrate reporting on Ethermine?

Current: 351.8 MH/s
Average: 362.7 MH/s
Reported: 390.5 MH/s

How close should they be?

[sp_]

PING: 50ms    DIFFICULTY: 1.00     EPOCH: 445

Too low difficulty for --xintensity 256. (default) try --xintensity 224

Even though they pay for the stales (2%).

You need a pool that pay 100% for the stales / uncle blocks.

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[sukidesu]

Even though they pay for the stales (2%).

You need a pool that pay 100% for the stales / uncle blocks.

ethermine pays it all. 2% is just my current stales ratio.

[sp_]

Etheremine doesn't seem to pay for stales.. 2miners, nanopool, miningpoolhub and alot of other pools does

[dedizonesv2]

Tested it on Ethermine for 12 hours each with default intensity (256), rig of NV 30** series.

TRex : 563 mh/s
TBM : 555 mh/s (reported : 601 mh/s)

That's really a huge gap between the reported hashrate and the pool average effective hashrate. Even though they pay for the stales (2%) and there's no invalid block.

At this point, just provide the right xintensity and the chosen pool to actually see good results. Because I tested 4 different pools and many different xintensity values, and I still didn't find any way to improve my rentability. Actually quite the opposite.

Been running TBM v1.11 with xintensity 256 on Ethermine and I am getting great results so far.
   868m [2021-10-07 09:35:05.381]                   2577.33 kH/W    390.50 MH/s   390.54 MH/s   4543/8/0 (99.82)

Please keep up the great work!

Is 390 mh/s actually your average effective hashrate on ethermine? Just looking at it on your side doesn't mean it's "great results".

how many share pls

for me it's very important share / min !

[dle378]

PING: 50ms    DIFFICULTY: 1.00     EPOCH: 445

Too low difficulty for --xintensity 256. (default) try --xintensity 224

Just changed xintensity to 224.

Should I wait a few hours for the Current/Average Hashrate to adjust properly on Ethermine?

[sp_]

Ethermine seems to be making -9.29% ethereum than the best paying pool. (last 7 days) (-7.02% the last 56 days)

07-october-2021:

[dle378]

Ethermine seems to be making -9.29% ethereum than the best paying pool. (last 7 days) (-7.02% the last 56 days)

07-october-2021:

Are you able to provide a link on how that data is generated?